Endoskopische Therapie gastroduodenaler neuroendokriner Neoplasien

Relevant risk factors and the prognostic impact of positive resection margins after endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Introduction

Endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors has a risk of resection margin residues. The related risk factors and prognosis of post-endoscopic resection margin residues have not been fully evaluated.

Aim

To investigate the associated risk factors and prognostic impact of resection margin residues after endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

Material and methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 129 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Sex, age, location, diameter of tumor, depth of invasion, endoscopic treatment methods, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) evaluation, and the work experience of endoscopists were evaluated as potential risk factors. In addition, the prognoses of patients with positive resection margins were analyzed.

Results

A total of 18 (18/129, 14.0%) patients exhibited positive resection margins after endoscopic resection. Among 16 successfully followed-up patients, 1 died due to rupture of pulmonary artery aneurysms, 2 underwent supplementary surgical operations, and 2 underwent additional endoscopic submucosal dissection. The remaining 11 patients were periodically followed up, and no recurrences were found. The results of univariate analysis suggested that endoscopic treatment method, the depth of invasion, and EUS evaluation correlated with positive resection margin. Multivariate regression analysis suggested that the depth of invasion and EUS evaluation were risk factors for resection margin residues.

Conclusions

The depth of invasion and EUS evaluation are independent risk factors for positive resection margins after endoscopic resection. This finding suggests that a greater depth of invasion increases the risk for positive resection margins, while EUS evaluation before resection decreases this risk.

Surgical resection for duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasia: Outcome, prognostic factors and risk of metastases

BACKGROUND

Clinical management of duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNEN) is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of surgical management and to identify risk factors for metastatic disease.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for dNEN were retrospectively analysed. Clinicopathologic features, perioperative outcome and survival were assessed. A literature review with focus on risk factors for metastatic disease was additionally performed.

RESULTS

24 patients were identified. Out of 22 patients presenting with their primary tumour, 20 patients underwent curative resection and 18 patients received curative resection with systematic lymphadenectomy. 17 patients underwent formal oncological resection. Surgical mortality was 1 out of 24 patients. The 5-year overall survival rate was 67% in the entire cohort, 71% in patients undergoing resection for their primary tumour, 72% for patients undergoing curative resection with systematic lymphadenectomy, 75% for pN0 and 70% for pN1 tumours. Lymph node metastases were identified in 15 patients undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy, including 9 of 14 patients with tumours smaller than 2 cm, and 6 of 10 patients with G1 tumours. Literature review confirmed a high risk of metastases in small (58%) or G1 (24%) tumours. Tumour grade and angioinvasion were significantly associated with overall and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Even well differentiated or small dNEN harbour a considerable risk of metastases. These data challenge the concepts of surveillance, local resection and endoscopic management for dNEN based on size and grading. Angioinvasion was identified as a strong negative predictor of overall and disease-free survival in dNEN.