[Transparent operative training in visceral surgery : Analysis at a German university medical center]

[Fridays for future! - All days for surgery! : Thoughts of young surgeons on a modern promotion of the next generation]

In order to be able to exploit the increasing complexity of modern surgery as best as possible in the future, the focus of young surgeons is on horizontal networking in addition to vertical networking: More interdisciplinary cooperation, more diversity, more perspectives. Future effective project work thrives on the exchange of young specialist society forums, junior resident spokespersons and junior student representation. However, the increasing establishment of mentoring programs and the experiences from daily practice show that this does not work without the experience and the readiness of the "greats" to impart knowledge. This article sketches the current challenges for the next generation of surgeons in the three fields of surgical training, life and surgery as well as promotion of excellence in academic surgery.

See (n)One, Do (n)One, Teach (n)One: Reality of Surgical Resident Training in Germany

Introduction

Due to technological changes, working time restrictions and the creation of specialized centers, surgical training has changed. A competence-based learning technique of surgical skills is the sub-step practice approach, which has been proven important in nationwide opinion surveys. The aim of this prospective multi-center trial was to determine the status quo of the sub-step concept in Germany.

Methods

Over 6 months, the voluntarily participating centers evaluated the following index procedures: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCHE), laparoscopic and open sigmoid resection, minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair, thyroid resection and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). Patients with private insurance were excluded. The detailed sub-steps were documented as well as the reason why these were not performed. In addition, an online survey regarding the sub-step concept was performed before and after the study.

Results

In total, 21 centers included 2969 surgical procedures in 2018 for final analyses. While 24.4% of the procedures were performed by residents, sub-steps were performed in 22.2%. LCHE was most often performed completely by residents (43.3%), and PPPD revealed the highest rate of performed sub-steps (43.3%). Reasons for not assisting sub-steps to residents were often organizational and other reasons. After an initial increase, the number of performed sub-steps decreased significantly during the second half of the survey. The opinion survey revealed a high importance of the sub-step concept. The number of resident procedures was overestimated, and the number of performed sub-steps was underestimated. After the study, these estimations were more realistic.

Conclusion

Even though the sub-step practice concept is considered highly important for surgical education, it needs to be put into practice more consequently. The current data suggest a low participation of surgical residents in the operating room, although the participating hospitals are most likely highly interested in surgical education, hence their voluntary participation. Conceptual changes and a control of surgical education are needed.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-020-05539-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Work-life balance : Thoughts of the Young Surgeon representatives of the German Surgical Society]

Work-life balance is a commonly used term that appears in different contexts and has a different meaning for many colleagues. Unfortunately, however, it is often used as a negative, simplified term to describe the assumed attitude of young surgeons towards work and a medical career, even though this is not universally applicable. As the representatives for Young Surgeons of the German Society of Surgery the aim of this article is to present our thoughts on the issue and associated problems and provide a differentiated outline for discussion.

Evidence in surgical training - a review

The first residency programs for surgical training were introduced in Germany in the late 1880s and adopted in 1889 by William Halsted in the United States [Cameron JL. William Stewart Halsted. Our surgical heritage. Ann Surg 1997;225:445-58.]. Since then, surgical education has evolved from a sheer volume of exposure to structured curricula, and at the moment, due to work time restrictions, surgical education is discussed on an international level. The reported effect of limited working hours on operative case volume has been variable [McKendy KM, Watanabe Y, Lee L, Bilgic E, Enani G, Feldman LS, et al. Perioperative feedback in surgical training: a systematic review. Am J Surg 2017;214:117-26.]. Experienced surgeons fear that residents do not have sufficient exposure to standard procedures. This may reduce the residents' responsibility for the treatment of the patient and even lead to a reduced autonomy at the end of the residency. Surgical education does not only require learning the technical skills but also human factors as well as interdisciplinary and interprofessional handling. When analyzing international surgical curricula, major differences even between countries of the European Union with more or less strict curricula can be found. Thus far, there is no study that analyzes the educational program of different countries, so there is no evidence which educational system is superior. There is also little evidence to distinguish the good from the average surgeon or the junior surgeons' progress during his residency training. Although some evaluation tools are already available, the lack of resources of most teaching hospitals often results in not using these tools as long it is not mandatory by a governmental program. Because of decreased working hours, increasing hospital costs, and increasing jurisdictional restrictions, teaching hospitals and teachers will have to change their sentiments and focus on their way of surgical education before governmental regulations will emerge leading to more regulation in surgical education. Some learning tools such as simulation, electronic learning, augmented reality, or virtual reality for a timely, sufficient and up to date surgical education. However, research and evidence for existing and novel learning tools will have to increase in the next years to allow surgical education for the future generation of surgeons around the world.

[Work and training conditions of residents in urology in Germany : Results of a 2015 nationwide survey by the German Society of Residents in Urology]

BACKGROUND

High-quality urologic residency training programs are crucial to secure both the future of our specialty and patient care. However, little is known about the current training and working conditions among German urology residents.

OBJECTIVES

To comprehensively assess the training- and working conditions among urologic residents in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The GeSRU invited all German urologic residents to complete an online survey on training- and work conditions. Furthermore, the model of effort-reward imbalance (ERI) was applied to measure psychosocial strain at work.

RESULTS

A total of 476 urologic residents participated in the survey. Workdays are characterized by high pace and workload and economic considerations. This comes at the cost of professional training, research and family time. Due to these circumstances, a relevant part of residents draws or at least considers consequences. Psychosocial strain among participants is high and conveys a risk for physicians' health and patients' quality of care.

CONCLUSION

Our findings call for an adjustment of urologic working and training conditions to preserve high-quality medical treatment and to ensure an attractive working environment.