[Branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm - contra resection]

[Pancreatic cystic neoplasms]

Pancreatic cystic lesions represent a challenging heterogeneous entity with a potential risk of malignant transformation. The diagnostics include in particular medical history taking with collection of relevant clinical information and high-resolution imaging, preferably using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and/or endoscopic ultrasonography. A differentiation between different cystic entities and identification of risk factors are crucial for making appropriate treatment decisions. Only a small proportion of pancreatic cystic neoplasms require surgery. Pancreatic cystic lesions with a relevant risk of malignancy, such as main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN), solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) and general cystic pancreatic lesions with risk factors regardless of the entity, should be resected, whereas an individualized approach is required for branch duct IPMN and serous cystic neoplasms (SCN) and dysontogenetic cysts require no treatment. Parenchyma-sparing and minimally invasive resection techniques should be preferred whenever possible for resecting pancreatic cystic tumors. Approximately 10% of patients develop recurrences over time.

[Indications for the surgical management of pancreatic neoplasms]

Due to its rising incidence, pancreatic neoplasia, which mainly include adenocarcinomas, neuroendocrine and cystic neoplasia of the pancreas, is becoming increasingly relevant in everyday clinical practice.Based on a systematic literature search, a working group of pancreatic experts developed evidence-based recommendations for surgical indications in pancreatic neoplasia to improve the quality.There is a clear surgical indication for primary or secondary resectable pancreatic carcinomas without metastasis, for functionally active, symptomatic and functionally inactive neuroendocrine neoplasia of more than 2 cm in size and for cystic neoplasm with symptoms or signs of malignancy including all intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) of the main duct and mixed type, all mucinous-cystic neoplasia (MCN) > 4 cm and all solid pseudopapillary neoplasia (SPN). Surgery can be indicated for pancreatic carcinomas with isolated arterial vascular infiltration or for long periods of stable oligometastasis, regarding neuroendocrine neoplasias for metastasis or debulking surgery as well as for branch-duct IPMN with risk criteria and MCN <4 cm. There is no primary indication for surgery in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer or asymptomatic serous-cystic neoplasia (SCN).The indication for surgery should always be individualized taking into account age, comorbidities and patient wishes.

[Pancreatic cystic space-occupying lesions-Diagnostics, treatment and follow-up care : Current recommendations taking the current German S3 guidelines on pancreatic cancer into account]

Due to their increased detection pancreatic cystic space-occupying lesions are becoming increasingly relevant in the clinical routine and represent a morphologically and biologically heterogeneous and thus clinically demanding as well as potentially (pre)malignant entity. As a result, recommendations for the diagnostics and treatment of pancreatic cystic tumors have now been incorporated into the current German S3 guidelines on pancreatic cancer. The diagnostics of pancreatic cystic space-occupying lesions are based on the following three elements: collection of relevant clinical information, performance of high-resolution imaging procedures and if diagnostic uncertainty persists, puncture diagnostics. Differentiated diagnostics are of essential importance as these represent the basis for an adequate treatment decision. Pancreatic cystic lesions with a relevant risk of malignant transformation, e.g., main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), followed by mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN), solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) and generally pancreatic cystic lesions with risk factors independent of the entity, should be resected, whereas a differentiated and individualized approach is necessary, especially for branch-duct IPMNs. The serous cystic neoplasms (SCN) have no malignant potential and do not require any treatment if they are asymptomatic. Important principles in surgery of pancreatic cancer, such as adequate surgical resection taking oncological standards into account and standardized appropriate histopathological processing of the specimens as well as intraoperative frozen section analysis also play an important role in pancreatic cystic space-occupying lesions. An annual follow-up seems to be meaningful, especially for IPMNs.

Management and outcomes of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

Background

This study evaluated the outcome and survival of patients with radiologically suspected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs).

Methods

IPMN management was reviewed according to Fukuoka risk factors and IPMN localization, differentiating main‐duct (MD), mixed‐type (MT) and branch‐duct (BD) IPMNs. Perioperative results were compared with those of patients undergoing resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) over the same interval (2010–2014). Overall (OS) and disease‐specific (DSS) survival rates were calculated and subgroups compared.

Results

Of 142 patients with IPMNs, 26 had MD‐IPMN, eight had MT‐IPMN and 108 had BD‐IPMN. Some 74 per cent of patients with MD‐ and MT‐IPMN were managed by primary resection, whereas this was used in only 27·8 per cent of those with BD‐IPMN. The risk of secondary resection and malignant transformation for BD‐IPMNs smaller than 20 mm was 8 and 2 per cent respectively during follow‐up. Pancreatic head resection of IPMNs was associated with an increased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C compared with resection of PDAC (12 of 33 (36 per cent) versus 41 of 221 (18·6 per cent) respectively; P = 0·010), and greater morbidity and mortality (Clavien–Dindo grade III: 15 of 33 (45 per cent) versus 56 of 221 (25·3 per cent) respectively; grade IV: 1 (3 per cent) versus 7 (3·2 per cent); grade V: 2 (6 per cent) versus 2 (0·9 per cent); P = 0·008). Five‐year OS and DSS rates in patients with MD‐IPMN were worse than those for MT‐ and BD‐IPMN (OS: 44, 86 and 97·4 per cent respectively, P < 0·001; DSS: 60, 100 and 98·6 per cent; P < 0·001). Patients with invasive IPMN had worse OS and DSS rates than those with non‐invasive dysplasia (OS: IPMN‐carcinoma (10 patients) 33 per cent, high‐grade dysplasia 100 per cent, intermediate‐grade dysplasia 63 per cent, low grade‐dysplasia 100 per cent, P < 0·001; DSS: IPMN‐carcinoma 43 per cent, all grades of dysplasia 100 per cent, P < 0·001). Patients with high‐risk stigmata had poorer survival than those without risk factors (OS: high‐risk stigmata (35 patients) 55 per cent, worrisome features (31) 95 per cent, no risk factors (76) 100 per cent, P < 0·001; DSS: 71, 100 and 100 per cent respectively, P < 0·001).

Conclusion

The risk of malignant transformation was very low for BD‐IPMNs, but the development of high‐risk stigmata was associated with disease‐specific mortality. Patients with IPMN had greater morbidity after resection than those having resection of PDAC.