[Evidence-based surgery of rectal cancer]

Automatic muscle impedance and nerve analyzer (AMINA) as a novel approach for classifying bioimpedance signals in intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring

Frequent complications arising from low anterior resections include urinary and fecal incontinence, as well as sexual disorders, which are commonly associated with damage to the pelvic autonomic nerves during surgery. To assist the surgeon in preserving pelvic autonomic nerves, a novel approach for intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring was investigated that is based on impedance measurements of the innervated organs. The objective of this work was to develop an algorithm called AMINA to classify the bioimpedance signals, with the goal of facilitating signal interpretation for the surgeon. Thirty patients included in a clinical investigation underwent nerve-preserving robotic rectal surgery using intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring. Contraction of the urinary bladder and/or rectum, triggered by direct stimulation of the innervating nerves, resulted in a change in tissue impedance signal, allowing the nerves to be identified and preserved. Impedance signal characteristics in the time domain and the time-frequency domain were calculated and classified to develop the AMINA. Stimulation-induced positive impedance changes were statistically significantly different from negative stimulation responses by the percent amplitude of impedance change Amax in the time domain. Positive impedance changes and artifacts were distinguished by classifying wavelet scales resulting from peak detection in the continuous wavelet transform scalogram, which allowed implementation of a decision tree underlying the AMINA. The sensitivity of the software-based signal evaluation by the AMINA was 96.3%, whereas its specificity was 91.2%. This approach streamlines and automates the interpretation of impedance signals during intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring.

Technical aspects of a new approach to intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring during robotic rectal surgery

It has been found that rectal surgery still leads to high rates of postoperative urinary, fecal, or sexual dysfunction, which is why nerve-sparing surgery has gained increasing importance. To improve functional outcomes, techniques to preserve pelvic autonomic nerves by identifying anatomic landmarks and implementing intraoperative neuromonitoring methods have been investigated. The objective of this study was to transfer a new approach to intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring based on bioimpedance measurement to a clinical setting. Thirty patients (16 male, 14 female) involved in a prospective clinical investigation (German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00017437, date of first registration 31/03/2020) underwent nerve-sparing rectal surgery using a new approach to intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring based on direct nerve stimulation and impedance measurement on target organs. Clinical feasibility of the method was outlined in 93.3% of the cases. Smooth muscle contraction of the urinary bladder and/ or the rectum in response to direct stimulation of innervating functional nerves correlated with a change in tissue impedance compared with the pre-contraction state. The mean amplitude (Amax) of positive signal responses was Amax = 3.8%, negative signal responses from a control tissue portion with no stimulation-induced impedance change had an amplitude variation of 0.4% on average. The amplitudes of positive and negative signal responses differed significantly (statistical analysis using two-sided t-test), allowing the nerves to be identified and preserved. The results indicate a reliable identification of pelvic autonomic nerves during rectal surgery.

Multimodal Treatment of Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is one of the three most common types of cancer in Germany. Approximately 30% of these cancers are located in the rectum, corresponding to about 18 000 new cases per year.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed database, including current guidelines and recommendations.

RESULTS

Specialized imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, is essential for treatment planning. In very early stages of this disease, tumors without risk factors can be excised locally. Otherwise, radical surgical resection with lymphadenectomy remains the standard treatment, and can be performed either minimally invasive or open. At present, neoadjuvant treatment plans are evolving in the direction of total neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, recent studies investigate whether the improved efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy might now enable patients with a complete clinical remission to be spared from surgical resection (organ-preserving watch-and-wait strategy).

CONCLUSION

The treatment of rectal cancer is a prime example of an interdisciplinary, multimodal approach. In the past, the focus was mainly on improving oncologic outcomes; at present, increasing attention is being devoted to the patients' quality of life as well and the functional aspects of the various modes of treatment.