[Perioperative fluid management]

The Effect of Colloids versus Crystalloids for Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) contributes to improvements in intraoperative fluid infusion based on objective parameters and has been widely recommended in clinical practice. In addition, increasing evidence reveals that GDFT can improve the prognosis of surgical patients. However, considering the individual characteristics of colloids and crystalloids in clinical use, it is uncertain as to which type of fluids administered is associated with better outcomes in the condition of GDFT.

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of colloids versus crystalloids under GDFT on prognosis in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Data Sources. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, CNKI, Cochrane library, and reference lists of relevant articles.

Methods

Two investigators independently screened and reviewed studies for inclusion and performed data extraction. Our primary outcome was a composite of postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes were (1) mortality at the follow-up duration; (2) postoperative complications of several organ systems, including cardiac, pulmonary, digestive, urinary, nervous system, and postoperative infection events; and (3) hospital and ICU length of stay. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I 2 and chi-square tests. The odds ratio (OR) of the dichotomous data, mean difference (MD) of continuous data, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the pooled data.

Results

Of 332 articles retrieved, 15 RCTs (involving 2,956 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery) were included in the final analysis. When the data were pooled, patients in the colloids and crystalloids group revealed no difference in postoperative composite complications (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.51-1.38, P=0.49) under GDFT. Regarding the secondary outcomes, patients in the colloids group were associated with fewer digestive system complications (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.41-0.98, P=0.04). However, no difference was found in mortality (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.72-2.58, P=0.34), complications of the cardiac system (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 0.66-3.37, P=0.34), pulmonary system (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.62-1.28, P=0.53), urinary system (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.61-1.80, P=0.87), nervous system (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.55-1.98, P=0.90), postoperative infection events (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.75-1.07, P=0.22), length of hospital stay (difference in mean = -0.71, 95% CI = -1.49-0.07, P=0.07), and ICU stay (difference in mean = -0.01, 95% CI = -0.20-0.18, P=0.95) between patients receiving GDFT with colloids or crystalloids.

Conclusion

There is no evidence of a benefit in using colloids over crystalloids under GDFT in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, despite its use resulting in lower digestive system complications.

Value of carotid corrected flow time or changes value of FTc could be more useful in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecologic surgery: a prospective observational study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of point-of-care Doppler ultrasound measurements of carotid corrected flow time and its changes induced by volume expansion to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecological surgery.

Methods

In this prospective study, carotid corrected flow time was measured using Doppler images of the common carotid artery before and after volume expansion. The stroke volume index at each time point was recorded using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring with MostCare. Of the 52 patients enrolled, 26 responded.

Results

The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the carotid corrected flow time and changes in carotid corrected flow time induced by volume expansion were 0.82 and 0.67, respectively. Their optimal cut-off values were 357 and 19.5 ms, respectively.

Conclusion

Carotid corrected flow time was superior to changes in carotid corrected flow time induced by volume expansion for predicting fluid responsiveness in this population.

Positive effects of low-dose S-ketamine on preventing myocardial injury after thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients aged 70 to 85

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of low-dose S-ketamine on marker of myocardial injury (BNP, hs-cTnT and HFABP) after thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients aged 70 to 85.

METHODS

One hundred patients (four cases excluded) aged 70-85 years, with body mass index 18-24 kg·m-2 and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II-III, scheduled for elective lobectomy from April 2022 to April 2023, were selected. The patients were divided into two groups by a random number table method, namely, the low-dose S-ketamine combined with GDFT group (group S) and the control group (group C), with 48 cases in each group. In group S, a low dose of S-ketamine (0.2 mg/kg) was given 1 min before intubation, and the maintenance dose was 0.12 mg·kg-1·h-1. Fluid therapy, guided by cardiac index (CI), changes in stroke volume (△SV), and other dynamic indicators, was used for rehydration during the operation. Group C was given the same amount of normal saline (0.2 mg/kg) 1 min before intubation, and the same rehydration therapy was adopted during the operation. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of the two groups were observed and recorded immediately after entering the operating room (T0), immediately after intubation (T1), immediately after the beginning of one-lung ventilation (OLV) (T2), immediately after the beginning of surgery (T3), immediately after the end of OLV (T4), and at the end of surgery (T5). The intraoperative fluid intake and output and the use of vasoactive drugs were recorded. The plasma levels of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (HFABP), high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were recorded 24 h before operation and 24 and 48 h after operation. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest were recorded at 2 (V1), 6 (V2), 12 (V3), 24 (V4), and 48 h (V5) after operation, and the occurrence of myocardial ischemia during hospitalization was noted.

RESULTS

Compared with group C, MAP was significantly higher at T1-T5 in group S (P < 0.05), and the plasma concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, BNP, hs-cTnT, and HFABP were significantly lower at 24 and 48 h after operation (P < 0.05). The VAS pain scores at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after operation, the number of effective patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) compressions, and the total number of PCIA compressions within 48 h after operation were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with group C, The hospitalization days, and the incidence of postoperative myocardial ischemia in group S were lower (P < 0.05). There were no significant intergroup differences in urine volume, extubation time, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, bleeding volume, colloid infusion volume, total fluid infusion volume, and the incidence of rescue analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose S-ketamine can reduce the levels of hs-cTnT, HFABP, and BNP in older patients after pulmonary lobectomy, which has a positive effect on preventing myocardial injury.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered on CHICTR (registration No. ChiCTR2300074475). Date of registration: 08/08/2023.

Application of a perioperative nursing strategy in the surgical treatment of elderly patients: a narrative review†

With the steady increase of older people in society, a progressively greater number of patients belonging to the geriatric group need surgical treatment. Since elderly patients with reduced physiological reserve and organ failure often have chronic diseases, geriatric syndrome, and other clinical problems, the perioperative nursing of elderly patients is more complicated. Therefore, we need to comprehensively consider clinical issues, such as patients’ preoperative status, surgical risks, and postoperative quality of life and life expectancy, and conduct comprehensive evaluations and holistic, individualized, and continuous nursing and therapy through the participation of interdisciplinary teams to achieve better curative effects. Here, the perioperative nursing of elderly patients is reviewed, including preoperative evaluation and nursing, intraoperative management, and postoperative nursing.

Therapeutic Effect and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Three Different Nutritional Schemes for Esophageal Cancer Patients in the Early Post-operative Period

Objective: To retrospectively investigate the comparative efficacy, safety and cost-benefits of three nutritional treatment schemes including short peptide jejunal nutrition (SPJN), whole protein jejunal nutrition (WPJN), and partial parenteral nutrition (PPN) in patients underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in our hospital. This study was carried out in accordance with the conceptual framework of nutritional therapy in fast-track rehabilitation surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 305 patients who were assigned to receive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Eligible patients was naturally divided into SPJN group [n = 98 (32.1%)], WPJN group [n = 95 (31.1%)], and PPN group [n = 112 (36.7%)] according to the type of nutritional scheme which was actually prescribed to patients by the attendingphysician in clinical practice. The differences of the serum total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), pre-albumin (PA), hemoglobin (HGB), white blood cells (WBCs), red blood cells (RBCs) and neutrophils were compared among 3 nutritional schemes groups. We also investigated the relationship of the fluid intake, urine output, gastric juice drainage volume and thoracic drainage volume among 3 nutritional groups at 3 days after surgery. Moreover, the differences of cost-benefit indexes, complications, length of hospitalization and hospital expenditure were also compared.

Results: The serum TP, ALB, and PA in the SPJN group were all higher than those in the WPJN and PPN groups (p < 0.05). The gastric juice volume of gastrointestinal decompression drainage and fluid volume of thoracic drainage in the SPJN group were all less than that in the WPJN group (p < 0.05). The overall hospital stay and post-operative hospital stay in the SPJN group were all shorter than that in WPJN group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence of post-operative complications including anastomotic leakage, infection, and gastrointestinal reaction was remarkably lower in the SPJN group compared to the WPJN group (p < 0.05). Interesting, hospital expenditure in the PPN group was less than that in the SPJN and the WPJN groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients may obtain benefits in improving protein level after receiving SPJN scheme at the early stage after esophagectomy. Meanwhile, patients may obtain benefits in improving post-operative complications and hospital stay after receiving SPJN or PPN compared to WPJN protocol. However, the difference between SPJN and PPN requires further study because no difference was detected in terms of clinical outcomes including complications and the length of hospitalization although PPN may achieve a possible decrease of medical expenditure.

[Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): less is more : What must be considered from an anesthesiological perspective?]

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary treatment model with the aim of guaranteeing a reduction of postoperative complications by the maintenance or early restoration of the patient-specific homoeostasis. From the anesthesiologist's perspective in all three areas of the perioperative phases there are important aspects that need to be addressed in the sense of a holistic treatment concept in order to achieve the highest possible benefit for the patient.

OBJECTIVE

In the perioperative period there is a bundle of anesthesiological measures, which make the ERAS concept into what it is now. At this point the focus is on the preoperative preparation and optimization of the patient and on the intraoperative and postoperative fluid management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A selective literature search was carried out in the Medline and Cochrane Library databases including consideration of national and international guidelines.

RESULTS

From an anesthesiological perspective there are relevant aspects in all three pillars of the perioperative phase, the adherence of which will improve the outcome of the patient: a comprehensive risk evaluation in the preoperative period and the avoidance of any sedative drugs; intraoperative individualized fluid management in the sense of a target-oriented optimization; early postoperative enteral nutrition and the avoidance of intravenous fluid administration, whenever justifiable.

CONCLUSION

Implementing the ERAS concept in the daily clinical routine in combination with maintaining a high compliance with the protocols is a demanding interdisciplinary challenge that urgently needs to be continued.