[Surgical management of liver rupture]

Influences on the amount of intraperitoneal haemorrhage after blunt liver injury: a retrospective autopsy study

OBJECTIVE

The amount of intraperitoneal blood loss due to traumatic liver injury is rarely addressed in correlation with concomitant injuries or pre-existing liver disease.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective review of autopsy reports from 1995 until 2007 at the Institute of Forensic Medicine (Bern, Switzerland), and evaluated 126 cases of blunt liver trauma for the amount of blood in the abdominal cavity, severity of liver injury, pre-existing liver disease and concomitant injuries.

RESULTS

Grades IV and V liver injuries (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification) showed greater blood loss than grades I and II liver injuries. Grade III liver injuries showed no significant difference in the amount of intraperitoneal blood compared with grades IV and V liver injuries and 53 cases of liver injuries (42%) did not bleed at all. The amount of blood found in the abdominal cavity ranged from 0 to 4500 ml. Pre-existing liver steatosis showed no significant difference in injury pattern or bleeding from the liver. Three cases with liver haemangiomas and one with a liver cyst showed no lesion to their focal alteration. Because of the small number of cases, no statistical analysis was made concerning concomitant injuries such as head, thoracic or limb trauma.

CONCLUSION

Higher grades of liver injury severity are associated with higher blood loss into the abdominal cavity. In addition, a patient with pre-existing liver steatosis seems not to be at any greater risk of having a larger rupture or having stronger bleeding from the liver after a blunt impact compared with a patient with a normal liver.

[Surgical treatment of liver trauma: resection--when and how?]

Liver resection as an emergency procedure in patients with liver injury due to abdominal trauma has become a rare procedure. In most cases liver trauma can be managed conservatively. Currently surgery is only indicated in hemodynamically instable patients and in cases of progredient haematoma where the main aim is control of bleeding. Anatomical liver resection should be avoided and may only be performed in cases of total vascular avulsion. Debridement of devascularized tissue can also be carried out in terms of an atypical liver resection. This article elucidates the current indications for liver resection after traumatic liver injury.

[Modern imaging techniques for liver trauma]

Involvement of the liver is one of the most common injuries in addition to those of the pancreas following blunt force abdominal trauma. Due to the even now high mortality radiological imaging must provide a rapid, definitive and exact assessment of the extent of the damage. Despite conflicting study results ultrasound has become established as a rapid and relatively simple method in emergency room treatment and is irreplaceable for initial orientation diagnostics. The use of contrast medium-assisted examinations promises to be an advantage for diagnostics in the secondary phase. Due to the high sensitivity and specificity modern multidetector computed tomography is the most effective examination modality for the detection of liver damage and hepatobiliary complications and plays a central role in non-operative management following abdominal trauma. Shorter and shorter scan times even allow the examination of metastable patients and a rapid assessment even of large body volumes.

[Recombinant activated factor VIIa for treatment of traumatic liver rupture]

Hepatic rupture after blunt abdominal trauma may lead to severe bleeding, depletion and consumption of clotting factors, with the risk of packing to defer the definitive operation. We report two cases of hepatic rupture after blunt trauma with intrahepatic hematoma and severe intraabdominal bleeding. In both cases the bleeding could be stopped by early intervention with recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa). In neither case was surgical intervention necessary and after 3 weeks both patients were released without complications. These cases demonstrate that the early therapy with a single dose of rFVIIa before the development of a hemostatic crisis is a therapeutic option in selected cases where surgical therapy of the bleeding is difficult and risky.

Das Abdominaltrauma

Blunt abdominal trauma is much more frequent than penetrating abdominal trauma in Europe. As a consequence of improved quality of computed tomography, even complex liver injuries are increasingly being treated conservatively. However, missed hollow viscus injuries still remain a problem, as they considerably increase mortality in multiply injured patients. Laparoscopy decreases the rate of unnecessary laparotomies in perforating abdominal trauma and helps to diagnose injuries of solid organs and the diaphragm. However, the sensitivity in detecting hollow viscus injuries is low and the role of laparoscopy in blunt abdominal injury has not been defined. If intra-abdominal bleeding is difficult to control in hemodynamically unstable patients, damage control surgery with packing of the liver, total splenectomy, and provisional closure of hollow viscus injuries is of importance. Definitive surgical treatment follows hemodynamic stabilization and restoration of hemostasis. Injuries of the duodenum and pancreas after blunt abdominal trauma are often associated with other intra-abdominal injuries and the treatment depends on their location and severity.

[Surgical management, prognostic factors, and outcome in hepatic trauma]

Hepatic trauma is a rare surgical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Extensive experience in liver surgery is a prerequisite for the management of these injuries. The medical records of 68 consecutive patients with hepatic trauma were retrospectively reviewed for the severity of liver injury, management, morbidity, mortality, and risk factors. Of the patients, 14 were treated conservatively and 52 surgically (24 suture/fibrin glue, 16 perihepatic packing, 11 resections, 1 liver transplantation). Two patients died just before emergency surgery could be performed. Overall mortality was 21% (14/68), and 13, 14, 6, 27, and 50% for types I, II, III, IV, and V injuries, respectively. Only nine deaths (all type IV and V) were liver related, while four were caused by extrahepatic injuries and one by concomitant liver cirrhosis. With respect to treatment, conservative management, suture, and resection had a low mortality of 0, 4, and 9%, respectively. In contrast, mortality was 47% in patients in whom only packing was performed (in severe injuries). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis proved prothrombin values <40%, ISS scores >30, and transfusion requirements of more than 10 red packed cells to be significant risk factors for post-traumatic death. Type I-III hepatic injuries can safely be treated by conservative or simple surgical means. However, complex hepatic injuries (types IV and V) carry a significant mortality and may require hepatic surgery, including liver resection or even transplantation. Therefore, patients with severe hepatic injuries should be treated in a specialized institution.