["High pouch output" syndrome. Role of mineralocorticoid diagnosis after restorative proctocolectomy]

Predisposing Factors for High Output Stoma in Patients With a Diverting Loop Ileostomy After Colorectal Surgeries

Purpose

One of the most common ileostomy-related complications is high output stoma (HOS) which causes significant fluids and electrolytes disturbances. We aimed to analyze the incidence, severity, and risk factors for readmission for HOS.

Methods

We reviewed all patients who underwent loop ileostomy closure in a single institution between 2010 and 2020. Patients that were readmitted for dehydration due to HOS during the time interval between the creation and the closure of the stoma were identified and divided into a study (HOS) group. The remaining patients constructed the control group.

Results

A total of 307 patients were included in this study, out of which, 41 patients were readmitted 73 times (23.7% readmission rate) for the HOS group, and the remaining 266 patients constructed the control group. Multivariate analysis identified; advanced American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) classification, elevated baseline creatinine, and open surgery as risk factors for HOS. Renal function worsened among the entire cohort between the construction of the stoma to its closure (mean creatinine of 0.82 vs. 0.96, P<0.0001).

Conclusion

Loop ileostomy formation is associated with a substantial readmission rate for dehydration as a result of HOS, and increasing the risk for renal impairment during the duration of the diversion. We identified advanced ASA PS classification, open surgery, and elevated baseline creatinine as predictors for HOS.

Use of an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker is a major risk factor for dehydration requiring readmission in the setting of a new ileostomy

PURPOSE

Diverting ileostomies help prevent major complications related to anastomoses after colorectal resection but can cause metabolic derangement and hypovolemia, leading to readmission. This paper aims to determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use increased the risk of readmission, or readmission specifically for dehydration after new ileostomy creation.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing diverting ileostomy at a tertiary-care hospital, 2009-2015. Primary outcome was 60-day readmission for dehydration; secondary outcomes included 60-day readmission for any cause, or for infection obstruction.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients underwent diverting ileostomy creation, 59% with a primary diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The 60-day readmission rate was 36% (n = 36). Of readmitted patients, 39% (n = 14) were admitted for dehydration. Other readmission reasons were infection (33%) and obstruction (3%). The majority (64%, n = 9) of patients readmitted for dehydration were taking either an ACEi or an ARB. Compared to patients not readmitted for dehydration, those who were readmitted for dehydration were more likely to be on an ACEi or an ARB (11/85, 13% vs. 9/14, 64%). After controlling for covariates, ACEi or ARB use was significantly associated with risk of readmission (p < 0.0001, odds ratio = 13.56, 95% confidence interval 3.54-51.92,). No other diuretic agent was statistically associated with readmission for dehydration.

CONCLUSIONS

ACEi and ARB use is a significant risk factor for readmission for dehydration following diverting ileostomy creation. Consideration should be given to withholding these medications after ileostomy creation to reduce this risk.

Long-term treatment of high intestinal output syndrome with budesonide in patients with Crohn's disease and ileostomy

PURPOSE

In a previous, controlled study, it was shown that orally administered budesonide increases the absorptive capacity of the intestinal mucosa in patients with ileostomies caused by Crohn's disease. This open, nonrandomized study was designed to analyze this functional, not inflammation-dependent steroid-effect in the long-term course comparing exposure, withdrawal, and reexposure.

METHODS

Phase 1: 23 patients without inflammatory activity of the disease received oral budesonide (3 mg t.i.d.) for at least four weeks (36.7 weeks; standard deviation, 45.3 weeks) because of high intestinal output syndrome. Phase 2: Medication was stopped for four weeks. Phase 3: Medication as in Phase 1. In each phase the weight of the ileostomy bags was measured with a spring balance before emptying and documented in a diary. Mean values per day and per week were calculated and the differences statistically evaluated by the Wilcoxon-(Pratt)-test.

RESULTS

Comparing the last week of Phase 1 to first week of Phase 2, a significant (P < 0.0001) increase of the intestinal output (295 g; standard deviation, 313 g) was observed after omitting budesonide. In contrast, comparing the last week of Phase 2 to Phase 3, a significant (P < 0.0001) decrease of the intestinal output by 323.7 g (standard deviation, 322.2 g) was noticed reaching the same level as in Phase 1.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that the functional, inflammation-independent effect of budesonide on the intestinal mucosa is strongly correlated to the administration of the drug and may be maintained long-term. These results should be confirmed by a larger number of patients.