[Relevance of food allergies and intolerance reactions as causes of urticaria]

Diagnosis of urticaria

Acute urticaria do not need extensive diagnostic procedures. Urticaria activity score is a useful tool for evaluation of urticaria. Complete blood count, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein are important investigations for diagnosis of infections in urticaria. Autologous serum skin test is a simple office procedure for diagnosis of auto reactive urticaria. Closed ball point pen tip is a simple test to diagnose dermographism.

Urticaria: its history-based diagnosis and etiologically oriented treatment

INTRODUCTION

The term "urticaria" refers to any of a group of distinct skin conditions that are characterized by itchy, wheal-and-flare skin reactions (hives). In spontaneous urticaria, the most common type, the hives seem to arise without provocation.

METHODS

Selective review of the literature, including current guidelines.

RESULTS

Spontaneous urticaria is divided into acute (lasting less than six weeks) and chronic types. The pathognomonic itching, hives, and angioedema arise by the same mechanism--cutaneous mast cell activation and release of histamine and other mediators of inflammation--in both acute and chronic urticaria, but these two disorders have different etiological profiles. The underlying cause of acute urticaria cannot be identified in about half of all cases. Chronic urticaria, which is much rarer, is usually caused by autoreactivity, chronic infection, or intolerance to food additives. If the condition persists after the underlying cause has been treated or eliminated, non-sedating antihistamines are the agents of first choice for symptomatic treatment.

DISCUSSION

Unlike acute urticaria, which is self-limited and should be treated symptomatically, chronic urticaria should be treated by the identification and elimination of underlying causes, which is usually curative.

How to assess disease activity in patients with chronic urticaria?

BACKGROUND

The current EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF guidelines recommend assessing disease activity in chronic urticaria (CU) by using an established and well-defined symptom score, i.e. the urticaria activity score (UAS), which combines daily wheal numbers and pruritus intensity. However, this UAS has never been formally tested for its suitability in assessing CU activity.

AIM

To determine the UAS correlation with quality of life (QoL) in CU patients and to compare the UAS to other symptom scores.

METHODS

Chronic urticaria symptoms (wheals, erythema, angioedema, pruritus) were assessed on seven consecutive days in 111 CU patients for their numbers, duration, size, and/or intensity. Quality of life was assessed by using the Dermatology Life Quality Index. Both, urticaria activity and QoL were determined before and after a 3-week period, in which the patients followed a pseudoallergen-low diet.

RESULTS

Urticaria activity score values correlated positively, albeit weakly, with QoL impairment in CU patients (r(2) = 0.31, P < 0.05). Also, changes in QoL following a pseudoallergen-low diet were reflected by the changes observed in the UAS (r(2) = 0.30, P < 0.05). No significant differences were found comparing the QoL correlation of the UAS and other symptom scores combining up to four CU symptom qualities. Quality of life correlation with UAS values increased with the number of days the UAS was assessed and plateaued starting from the fourth consecutive day.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings back the current guideline recommendations to use the UAS for monitoring disease activity in CU patients. Urticaria activity score mean values of at least four consecutive days should be used.

Urtikaria

A number of recent epidemiologic and experimental studies have enhanced our knowledge of the etiology and pathogenesis of urticaria. In addition, new instruments for diagnosing urticaria variants and for assessing the quality of life in urticaria patients have been developed. Finally, several clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of novel treatment approaches for urticaria, while other therapeutic concepts are under development. Here, we provide a brief review of selected findings from these recent reports and a discussion of their relevance for clinical practice.