Psychosoziale Folgen der Psoriasis—eine empirische Studie über die Krankheitslast bei 3753 Betroffenen

Effectiveness of a structured short intervention against stigmatisation in chronic visible skin diseases: Results of a controlled trial in future educators

Background

Chronic visible skin diseases are highly prevalent, and patients affected frequently report feeling stigmatised. Interventions to reduce stigmatisation are rare.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured short intervention in reducing stigmatising attitudes towards psoriasis in future educators.

Methods

The intervention consisted of four components: (1) self‐reflection, (2) education on skin diseases, (3) contact between participants and a person with psoriasis and (4) practising of knowledge via case studies. A quasi‐experimental, pre–post study design was chosen with a nonrandomized contemporaneous control group that attended regular lessons. The main outcomes were participants' desire for social distance, stereotype endorsement, illness‐related misconceptions and intended behaviour. Intervention effects were analysed using mixed repeated‐measures analysis of variance, with Bonferroni post‐hoc tests for pairwise comparisons.

Results

The sample consisted of 221 students attending vocational training as educators (n = 118 intervention group, n = 103 control group). While no effect of the intervention was found in social distance, small to large effect sizes were observed for intended behaviour (r = .14), illness‐related misconceptions (r = .28) and stereotype endorsement (r = .42). The intervention group reported significantly higher satisfaction with the seminar compared to the control group.

Conclusions

Overall, the short intervention was effective at reducing stigmatising attitudes in future educators. In perspective, revised versions could help in reducing stigmatisation in various demographics and promote patient empowerment by acknowledging and including them as experts on their own behalf.

Patient or Public Contribution

Patient advocate groups were consulted and involved in the superordinate destigmatization research programme and intervention.

Role of neuroimmune circuits and pruritus in psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease presenting with an array of clinical phenotypes, often associated with pruritus. Environmental and psychological stressors can exacerbate psoriasis symptoms and provoke flares. Recent studies suggest a dysfunctional hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in some patients with psoriasis that can result in immune dysregulation. The immune system, in turn, can communicate with the nervous system to induce, maintain or aggravate psoriasis. In the skin, peripheral sensory as well as autonomic nerves control release of inflammatory mediators from dendritic cells, mast cells, T cells or keratinocytes, thereby modulating inflammatory responses and, in case of sensory nerves, pruritus. In response to the environment or stress, cytokines, chemokines, proteases, and neuropeptides fluctuate in psoriasis and influence immune responses as well as nerve activity. Furthermore, immune cells communicate with sensory nerves which control release of cytokines, such as IL-23, that are ultimately involved in psoriasis pathogenesis. Nerves also communicate with keratinocytes to induce epidermal proliferation. Notably, in contrast to recent years the debilitating problem of pruritus in psoriasis has been increasingly appreciated. Thus, investigating neuroimmune communication in psoriasis will not only expand our knowledge about the impact of sensory nerves in inflammation and pruritus and give new insights into the impact of environmental factors activating neuroimmune circuits or of stress in psoriasis, but may also lead to novel therapies. This review summarizes the relevant literature on the role of neuroimmune circuits, stress and how the central HPA axis and its peripheral equivalent in the skin, impact psoriasis.

The German National Program on Psoriasis Health Care 2005-2015: results and experiences

In 2005, the first national psoriasis survey in Germany revealed large deficits in health care particularly in patients with moderate to severe disease. The consecutive goal was to improve health care for psoriasis countrywide. For this, a large-scale national program was initiated starting with a comprehensive analysis of structures and processes of care for psoriasis. Patient burden, economic impact and barriers to care were systematically analyzed. In order to optimize routine care, a S3 guideline, a set of outcomes measures and treatment goals, were developed. Implementation was enforced by the German Psoriasis Networks (PsoNet) connecting the most dedicated dermatologists. The annual National Conference on Health Care in Psoriasis established in 2009 consented National Health Care Goals in Psoriasis 2010-2015 and defined a set of quality indicators, which are monitored on a regular basis. Currently 28 regional networks including more than 800 dermatologists are active. Between 2005 and 2014 7 out of 8 quality indicators have markedly improved, and regional disparities were resolved. e.g., mean PASI (Psoriasis Area Severity Index) dropped from 11.4 to 8.1 and DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index) from 8.6 to 5.9. A decade of experience indicates that a coordinated nationwide psoriasis program based on goal orientation can contribute to better quality of care and optimized outcomes.

Social problem-solving, perceived stress, negative life events, depression and life satisfaction in psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic dermatosis which may cause significant impairment of the patient's quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the social problem-solving skills, perceived stress, negative life events, depression and life satisfaction in psoriasis patients.

METHODS

Data were gathered by means of questionnaires and clinical evaluations from 51 psoriatic patients and 51 matched healthy controls.

RESULTS

Average disease duration was 16.47 years and average Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score was 3.67. Compared with the controls, the patients displayed lower social problem-solving skills. They displayed higher negative problem orientation and impulsive-careless problem-solving style scores than the controls. Patients tended also to show more avoidant problem-solving style and lower life satisfaction than controls. There was no difference between psoriatic patients and controls in terms of depression, perceived stress and negative life events. Higher social problem-solving skills were associated with lower depression, perceived stress and fewer numbers of negative life events but higher level of life satisfaction.

LIMITATIONS

The patient group largely included mild and moderate psoriatic cases.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the study suggest that problem-solving training or therapy may be a suitable option for alleviating levels of psychological distress in patients suffering from psoriasis.

Barriers to the prescription of systemic therapies for moderate-to-severe psoriasis--a multinational cross-sectional study

Despite the availability of a plethora of approved systemic treatments, high proportions of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis do not receive systemic treatment. This study aims at identifying barriers that hinder dermatologists from prescribing systemic treatments for psoriasis. A cross-sectional online survey in six countries (Canada, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, UK) was performed among 300 dermatologists, assessing the relevance of 15 potential barriers towards prescribing acitretin, cyclosporine, methotrexate, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab. Multivariate regression analyses were used to explore provider characteristics related to these barriers. Treatment barriers are perceived differently in the countries investigated, with Spanish, Italian and Canadian dermatologists being particularly concerned about the safety of methotrexate and Canadian dermatologists about the safety of cyclosporine. In general, safety concerns were the most important barrier to the use of cyclosporine, (18 % of participants' moderate/9 % strong or very strong barrier). Costs were being perceived as a strong or very strong barrier to the use of the different biologics by 19-24 % of the participants. Overall, country and work place were the most important determinants of treatment barriers. Sex, age, training, position and experience were minor determinants of treatment barriers. Medical reasons such as safety concerns or an inappropriate risk-benefit profile are particularly relevant barriers to the prescription of conventional treatments; whereas for biological treatments, economic reasons such as costs are more prevalent. Country specific analysis showed national differences in the perception of safety. The treatment barriers identified in this exploratory study should be confirmed in further health services research.

S3 - Guidelines on the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris (English version). Update

Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and often chronic inflammatory skin disease. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1.5% to 2%. Patients afflicted with severe psoriasis vulgaris may experience a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, surveys have shown that patients still do not received optimal treatments. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologi sche Gesellschaft (DDG) and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) have initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. They were first published in 2006 and updated in 2011. The Guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate and severe plaque-type psoriasis in adults including systemic therapy, UV therapy and topical therapies. The therapeutic recommendations were developed based on the results of a systematic literature search and were finalized during a consensus meeting using structured consensus methods (nominal group process).

Efficacy of systemic therapies for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term treatment

BACKGROUND

Despite the chronicity of psoriasis, most systematic reviews focus on short-term treatment.

METHODS

The systematic search strategy and results from the German Psoriasis Guidelines were adapted. To update the data a literature search in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library was conducted. The proportion of participants achieving ≥75% decrease in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) as well as Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) reduction at different time points were assessed. Trials were summarized with respect to time periods and study designs. Suitable trials were included in a meta-analysis. Particular attention was paid to statistical approaches of handling dropouts.

RESULTS

A total of 33 articles including 27 trials totaling 6575 patients with active treatment were included in the systematic review. Seven randomized controlled trials were eligible for the meta-analysis. Over a 24 week treatment period infliximab [risk difference (RD) 78%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 72-83%] and ustekinumab 90 mg every 12 weeks (RD 77%, 95% CI 71-83%) were the most efficacious treatments. Adalimumab (RD: 60%, 95% CI 45-74%) showed results within the range of different etanercept dosages (etanercept 50 mg once weekly: RD 62%, 95% CI, 52-72%), (etanercept 25 mg twice weekly: RD 45%, 95% CI 34-56%), (etanercept 50 mg twice weekly: RD 56%, 95% CI 49-62%) and (etanercept 50 mg twice weekly until week 12, then 25 mg twice weekly: RD 50%, 95% CI 42-57%). After 24 weeks a decrease in efficacy for inflximab, adalimumab and etanercept was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

More sufficient data is required to draw reliable conclusions in extended long-term treatment and head-to-head comparisons are necessary.

[Dermatologic-psychosomatic rehabilitation]

Dermatologic-psychosomatic rehabilitation is indicated when a patient has both cutaneous and psychological disease, as well as when psychosocial factors have a negative influence on the course of disease or coping mechanisms. The goals of multimodal dermatologic and psychotherapeutic treatment are increased empowerment and self-action, as well as acceptance of disability. Requirements for admission are given with regard to ICF. The course of rehabilitation is explained and the most important therapeutic tools are presented.

Quality of life in patients with psoriasis and psoriasis arthritis with a special focus on stigmatization experience

Negative impact of psoriasis and psoriasis arthritis on quality of life is a central consequence of these diseases. Feelings of stigmatization might, for example, already emerge with only small patches of skin being affected. Empirical data indicate that treating dermatologists should address possible negative effects elicited by problematic encounters with the public and in sexual relationships even if the severity of the disease is low, because lesions on invisible parts of the body can already cause serious adverse impairment. Such psychosocial consequences can be reduced by attending a self-help organization and by taking part in an interdisciplinary patient education program led by dermatologists.

Evidence-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris

Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and often chronic inflammatory skin disease. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1 to 2%. Patients afflicted with severe psoriasis vulgaris may experience a significant reduction in quality of life. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, patient surveys have revealed lack of satisfaction with the efficacy of available treatments and a high rate of non-compliance. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG) and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. These resulting Guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate, and severe plaquetype psoriasis in adults. The Guidelines include evidence-based evaluation of the efficacy of all currently available therapeutic options in Germany. In addition, they offer detailed information on how best to administer the various treatments and give information on contraindications, adverse drug reactions, and drug interactions as well as estimates of practicability and cost. The Guidelines were developed following the recommendations of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft wissenschaftlicher medizinischer Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). The therapeutic recommendations were developed by an expert group and finalized during interdisciplinary consensus conferences.

German evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris (short version)

Psoriasis vulgaris is a common and chronic inflammatory skin disease which has the potential to significantly reduce the quality of life in severely affected patients. The incidence of psoriasis in Western industrialized countries ranges from 1.5 to 2%. Despite the large variety of treatment options available, patient surveys have revealed insufficient satisfaction with the efficacy of available treatments and a high rate of medication non-compliance. To optimize the treatment of psoriasis in Germany, the Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft and the Berufsverband Deutscher Dermatologen (BVDD) have initiated a project to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of psoriasis. The guidelines focus on induction therapy in cases of mild, moderate, and severe plaque-type psoriasis in adults. The short version of the guidelines reported here consist of a series of therapeutic recommendations that are based on a systematic literature search and subsequent discussion with experts in the field; they have been approved by a team of dermatology experts. In addition to the therapeutic recommendations provided in this short version, the full version of the guidelines includes information on contraindications, adverse events, drug interactions, practicality, and costs as well as detailed information on how best to apply the treatments described (for full version, please see Nast et al., JDDG, Suppl 2:S1-S126, 2006; or http://www.psoriasis-leitlinie.de ).

Psoriasisschulung für erwachsene Patienten nach den Regeln der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Prävention

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a substantial impairment of quality of life. Interdisciplinary outpatient educational programs are an innovative supplementary therapy form for the management of this disorder.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The Task Force on Dermatological Prevention developed a concept for outpatient instruction of psoriasis patients. Five 2-hour classes by dermatologists, psychotherapists/psychologists and dieticians focus on central topics relevant for the patients and the management of the disease.

RESULTS

The results presented are based on own experiences with this educational program. The interdisciplinary program is accepted very well and seen as helpful by the concerned. A structure analysis of the effects in a greater number of cases is a current goal. In some areas, health insurance companies are paying for the classes.

CONCLUSION

The educational program for the management of psoriasis vulgaris according to the rules of the Task Force on Dermatological Prevention is a supplement of the treatment of patients with this chronic skin disease. Broader implementation in Germany is desirable.

[The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in dermatological rehabilitation: conception, application, perspective]

Medical rehabilitation represents the interdisciplinary management of a person's functional health. This term implies concepts of functioning, disability and health and represents the core notion of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Four components -- anatomic structure, body functions, activities and participation, environmental factors and personal factors -- make the ICF applicable from a biological, individual and social perspective. At present the ICF is used as a system of classification, a research tool and as a theoretical basis in rehabilitation medicine. Its clinical application will depend on the improvement of its practicability and compatibility with currently used tools in dermatologic rehabilitation. ICF offers the opportunity to define, weight and classify diseases of the skin and their psychosocial consequences.