1
|
Schut C, Dalgard FJ, Bewley A, Evers AWM, Gieler U, Lien L, Sampogna F, Ständer S, Tomas-Aragones L, Vulink N, Finlay AY, Legat FJ, Titeca G, Jemec GB, Misery L, Szabó C, Grivcheva-Panovska V, Spillekom-van Koulil S, Balieva F, Szepietowski JC, Reich A, Roque Ferreira B, Lvov A, Romanov D, Marron SE, Gracia-Cazaña T, Svensson Å, Altunay IK, Thompson A, Zeidler C, Kupfer J. Body dysmorphia in common skin diseases: Results of an observational, cross-sectional multi-centre study among dermatological out-patients in 17 European countries. Br J Dermatol 2022; 187:115-125. [PMID: 35041211 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.21021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a common psychiatric disorder associated with high costs for healthcare systems as patients may repeatedly ask for different, often not effective interventions. BDD symptoms are more prevalent in patients with dermatological conditions than the general population, but there are no large sample studies comparing the prevalence of BDD symptoms between patients with dermatological conditions and healthy skin controls. OBJECTIVES To compare the prevalence of BDD symptoms between patients with different dermatological conditions and healthy skin controls and to describe sociodemographic, physical and psychological factors associated with BDD symptoms to identify patients who may have a particularly high chance of having this condition. METHODS This observational cross-sectional, comparative multi-centre study included 8295 participants: 5487 consecutive patients with different skin diseases (56% female) recruited among dermatological out-patients at 22 clinics in 17 European countries and 2808 healthy skin controls (66% female). All patients were examined by a dermatologist. BDD symptoms were assessed by the Dysmorphic Concern Questionnaire (DCQ). Sociodemographic data, information on psychological factors and physical conditions were collected. Each patient was given a dermatological diagnosis according to ICD-10 by a dermatologist. RESULTS The participation rate of invited dermatological patients was 82.4% on average across all centres. BDD symptoms were five times more prevalent in patients with dermatological conditions than in healthy skin controls (10.5% vs. 2.1%). Patients with hyperhidrosis, alopecia and vitiligo had a more than eleven-fold increased chance (adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) > 11) of having BDD symptoms compared to healthy skin controls, and patients with atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, acne, hidradenitis suppurativa, prurigo and bullous diseases had a more than six-fold increased chance (adjusted OR > 6) of having BDD symptoms. Using a logistic regression model, BDD symptoms were significantly related to lower age, female sex, higher psychological stress and feelings of stigmatisation. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals that clinical BDD symptoms are significantly associated with common dermatological diseases. As such symptoms are associated with higher levels of psychological distress and multiple unhelpful consultations, general practitioners and dermatologists should consider BDD and refer patients when identified to an appropriate service for BDD screening and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Schut
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University, Gießen, Germany
| | - Florence J Dalgard
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.,Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden
| | - Anthony Bewley
- Barts Health NHS Trust & Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Andrea W M Evers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Department, Leiden University, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lars Lien
- Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway
| | | | - Sonja Ständer
- Department of Dermatology and Centre for Chronic Pruritus, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Lucia Tomas-Aragones
- Department of Psychology, University of Zaragoza, Spain.,Aragon Psychodermatology Research Group Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Nienke Vulink
- Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew Y Finlay
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Franz J Legat
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Gregor B Jemec
- Department of Dermatology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Laurent Misery
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France
| | - Csanád Szabó
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Hungary
| | - Vesna Grivcheva-Panovska
- University St. Cyril and Methodius, School of Medicine, PHI University Clinic of Dermatology Skopje, N. Macedonia
| | - Saskia Spillekom-van Koulil
- Radbout Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Flora Balieva
- Department of Dermatology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jacek C Szepietowski
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland
| | - Adam Reich
- Department of Dermatology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Poland
| | - Bárbara Roque Ferreira
- Centre for Philosophy of Science of the University of Lisbon, Portugal.,Department of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier de Mouscron, Belgium.,University of Brest, Lien, France
| | - Andrey Lvov
- Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs, Moscow, Russia.,Medical Research and Educational Centre, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitry Romanov
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychosomatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.,Department of Boundary Mental Conditions and Psychosomatic Disorders, Mental Health Research Centre, Moscow, Russia.,Moscow Scientific and Practical Centre of Dermatology, Venereology and Cosmetology of Moscow City Health Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - S E Marron
- Aragon Psychodermatology Research Group Zaragoza, Spain.,Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Å Svensson
- Department of Dermatology, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ilknur K Altunay
- University of Health Sciences, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Dermatology and Venereology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Andrew Thompson
- South Wales Clinical Psychology Training Programme, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board & School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Claudia Zeidler
- Department of Dermatology and Centre for Chronic Pruritus, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Joerg Kupfer
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University, Gießen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Six-Position, Frontal View Photography in Blepharoplasty: A Simple Method. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42:1312-1319. [PMID: 29484453 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-018-1104-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2017] [Accepted: 02/10/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Photography plays a pivotal role in patient education, photo-documentation, preoperative planning and postsurgical evaluation in plastic surgeries. It has long been serving as a bridge that facilitated communication not only between patients and doctors, but also among plastic surgeons from different countries. Although several basic principles and photographic methods have been proposed, there is no internationally accepted photography that could provide both static and dynamic information in blepharoplasty. In this article, we introduced a novel six-position, frontal view photography for thorough assessment in blepharoplasty. METHODS From October 2013 to January 2017, 1068 patients who underwent blepharoplasty were enrolled in our clinical research. All patients received six-position, frontal view photography. Pictures were taken of the patients looking up, looking down, squeezing, smiling, looking ahead and with closed eyes. Conventionally, frontal view photography only contained the last two positions. Then, both novel six-position photographs and conventional two-position photographs were used to appraise postsurgical outcomes. RESULTS Compared to conventional two-position, frontal view photography, six-position, frontal view photography can provide more detailed, thorough information about the eyes. It is of clinical significance in indicating underlying adhesion of skin/muscle/fat according to individual's features and assessing preoperative and postoperative dynamic changes and aesthetic outcomes. CONCLUSION Six-position, frontal view photography is technically uncomplicated while exhibiting static, dynamic and detailed information of the eyes. This innovative method is favorable in eye assessment, especially for revision blepharoplasty. We suggest using six-position, frontal view photography to obtain comprehensive photographs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
|