[Is compression therapy contraindicated for lower leg erysipelas? : Results of a retrospective analysis]

Indications, contraindications, side effects, general assessment, and outlook for the future: An International Compression Club survey

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of compression therapy (CT) and the best compression modality choice are questioned in many clinical stages of chronic venous disease (CVD). This work aims to obtain information on indications, contraindications, and the best treatment option for CT in different clinical scenarios of CVD.

METHOD

An online survey was made among members of the International Compression Club, experts in CT.

RESULTS

The experts apply CT in all clinical stages of CVD, even when evidence is missing. Regarding compression materials, experts use inelastic materials in the advanced stages of CVD and compression stockings in the early or chronic stages of CVD.

CONCLUSION

The authors highlight the gap between experts' practical use of CT and evidence-based medicine results. They also suggested that, given the cost of randomized clinical trials aimed at specifying specific indications for different devices, artificial intelligence could be used for large-scale practice surveys in the future.

Compression Therapy in Dermatology

The benefit of lower limb compression therapy is not limited to chronic venous insufficiency or/and lymphoedema. Thanks to its anti-edema and anti-inflammatory effects, compression therapy is considered a beneficial adjuvant therapy to treat atypical wounds, inflammatory dermatoses, cellulitis, and traumatic wounds in the absence of contraindications. Strict contraindications are limited to severe peripheral arterial disease and decompensated heart failure. The variability of commercially available compression materials and systems, such as short-stretch bandages, multi-component systems, zinc oxide bandages, medical adaptive compression systems, ulcer compression stockings or medical compression stockings, facilitates the adaptation of compression therapy to the individual needs of each patient. Compared to venous leg ulcers, low pressures of 20mmHg are often sufficient to treat dermatological disorders, with higher patient tolerance and compliance.

[Compression therapy for inflammatory dermatoses of the legs]

In addition to venous and lymphatic diseases, there is increasing scientific evidence that inflammatory dermatoses of the legs are also indications for compression therapy. Specifically, diseases such as pyoderma gangrenosum, livedoid vasculopathy, cutaneous vasculitides, necrobiosis lipoidica, psoriasis, or erysipelas are conditions for which adjunctive compression therapy may be used when manifestations occur on the lower extremities. When inflammatory dermatoses are accompanied by edema, compression therapy is not an off-label use. Especially because of the often problematic pain symptoms, compression therapy can be performed with low resting pressures around 20 mmHg, especially in inflammatory dermatoses.In this review article, the current scientific aspects of compression therapy in inflammatory dermatoses of the legs and the corresponding limitations are presented in a differentiated manner.

Compression therapy in dermatology

Compression therapy is a conservative therapy that can be used in many patients with dermatological conditions, especially those associated with edema. In addition to its well-established use in venous and lymphatic disorders, there is increasing evidence that compression therapy supports the healing of inflammatory dermatoses. The presence of edema, regardless of its etiology, is an indication for the use of compression therapy. Nowadays, a variety of materials and treatment options are available for compression therapy, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Often, compression therapy with low resting pressures is sufficient for effective therapy and is better tolerated by patients. The main contraindications to compression therapy are advanced peripheral arterial disease and decompensated heart failure. Individual factors and economic considerations should be taken into account when deciding on compression therapy with the patient. Patient self-management should be encouraged whenever possible. This requires education and support tools.

Kompressionstherapie in der Dermatologie

Die Kompressionstherapie ist eine konservative Therapie, die bei vielen Patienten mit dermatologischen Krankheiten durchgeführt werden kann, insbesondere wenn diese mit Ödemen assoziiert sind. Neben den wissenschaftlich sehr gut belegten Indikationen bei venösen und lymphatischen Erkrankungen, gibt es auch zunehmend wissenschaftliche Hinweise, dass durch die Kompressionstherapie die Abheilung entzündlicher Dermatosen unterstützt wird. Wenn Ödeme vorliegen, handelt es sich, unabhängig von deren Genese, um einen Einsatz im Rahmen der Zulassung der Kompressionstherapie.

Für die Kompressionstherapie stehen heute verschiedene Materialien und Versorgungsoptionen mit systemspezifischen Vor‐ und Nachteilen zur Verfügung. Oft ist eine Kompressionstherapie mit niedrigen Ruhedruckwerten für einen Therapieerfolg ausreichend und wird von den Patienten besser toleriert. Als wichtigste Kontraindikationen der Kompressionstherapie sind die fortgeschrittene periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit und die dekompensierte Herzinsuffizienz zu beachten.

Bei der gemeinsam mit dem Patienten getroffenen Entscheidung für eine Kompressionstherapie, sollten individuelle Faktoren und wirtschaftliche Aspekte berücksichtigt werden. Wann immer möglich, ist ein Selbstmanagement des Patienten zu unterstützen. Hierfür sind Edukation und Hilfsmittel erforderlich.

Multicomponent compression system use in patients with chronic venous insufficiency: a real-life prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Compression therapy is the cornerstone of therapeutic management of patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a multicomponent compression system in an unselected population of patients with CVI problems under real-life conditions.

METHOD

A prospective, multicentre, observational study with a multicomponent two-bandage compression system (UrgoK2, Laboratoires Urgo, France) was conducted in 103 centres in Germany. Main outcomes included wound healing rate, wound healing progression, assessment of oedema and ankle mobility, local tolerability and acceptance of the compression therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 702 patients with venous leg ulcers (VLU) and/or with lower limb oedema due to CVI were treated with the evaluated system for a mean (±standard deviation) duration of 27±17 days. By the last visit, 30.9% of wounds had healed and 61.8% had improved. Limb oedema was resolved in 66.7% of patients and an improvement of ankle mobility was reported in 44.2% of patients. The skin condition under the compression therapy was also considered as improved in 73.9% of patients and a substantial reduction of pain was achieved, both in number of patients reporting pain and in pain intensity. Compression therapy with the evaluated system was 'very well' or 'well' tolerated and 'very well' or 'well' accepted by >95% of patients. These positive outcomes were in line with the general opinion of physicians on the evaluated compression bandages, which were judged 'very useful' or 'useful' for >96.6% of patients. Similar results were reported regardless of the treated condition, VLU and/or limb oedema.

CONCLUSION

Real-life data documented in this large observational study of non-selected patients receiving compression therapy in daily practice confirm the benefits and safety profile of the evaluated compression system. This study also confirms the high-level of performance and acceptability of the system, regardless of the characteristics of the wounds or patients at initiation of the treatment. The data support the use of this multicomponent compression system as one first-line intervention in patients with symptoms caused by CVI.

[Diagnosis and therapy of erysipelas: A position paper of the Society Initiative Chronische Wunde (ICW) e. V.]

Erysipelas is a bacterial soft tissue infection caused by β-haemolytic streptococci that spreads proximally along the lymphatic system of the skin. The entry sites of the pathogens can be minor injuries or chronic wounds. The diagnosis of erysipelas is made clinically by the spreading eythema and overheating of the skin, the reduced general condition with fever and chills as well as by means of serological inflammation parameters and must be distinguished from numerous differential diagnoses.Systemic therapy is carried out with penicillin usually. In local therapy, the value of measures such as compression therapy or cooling is currently still controversial. Long-term therapy of the lymphoedema and the consistent avoidance and treatment of entry sites are essential, especially for the prevention of recurrence.

[Conservative treatment of varicose veins]

The treatment of varicose veins is supposed to eliminate congestive symptoms and edema, heal skin complications and prevent complications. Surgical procedures, endovenous thermal procedures, endovenous chemical procedures and conservative measures are used for treatment. Often the invasive and conservative procedures are combined. A precise examination of the varicose veins is required for therapy planning; duplex sonography is the gold standard. Conservative therapy focuses on compression therapy with compression bandages and with compression stockings. Medical adaptive compression systems are also used in the decongestion phase. Extract from red vine leafs, extract from horse chestnut seed and oxerutin are available for oral drug therapy. Conservative therapy is especially indicated when treatment of symptomatic varicose veins is not possible or when symptomatic venous disease persists even after invasive therapy.