Neuronavigierte repetitive transkranielle Magnetstimulation (rTMS)

Evidence and evidence gaps in tinnitus therapy

A nearly endless number of procedures has been tried and in particular sold for the treatment of tinnitus, unfortunately they have not been evaluated appropriately in an evidence-based way. A causal therapy, omitting the tinnitus still does not exist, actually it cannot exist because of the various mechanisms of its origin. However or perhaps because of that, medical interventions appear and reappear like fashion trends that can never be proven by stable and reliable treatment success. This contribution will discuss and acknowledge all current therapeutic procedures and the existing or non-existing evidence will be assessed. Beside external evidence, the term of evidence also encompasses the internal evidence, i.e. the experience of the treating physician and the patient's needs shall be included. While there is no evidence for nearly all direct procedures that intend modulating or stimulating either the cochlea or specific cervical regions such as the auditory cortex, there are therapeutic procedures that are acknowledged in clinical practice and have achieved at least a certain degree of evidence and generate measurable effect sizes. Those are in particular habituation therapy and psychotherapeutic measures, especially if they are combined with concrete measures for improved audio perception (hearing aids, CI, hearing therapies).

Why do some promising brain-stimulation devices fail the next steps of clinical development?

Interest in techniques of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been growing exponentially in the last decade. Recent studies have shown that some of these techniques induce significant neurophysiological and clinical effects. Although recent results are promising, there are several techniques that have been abandoned despite positive initial results. In this study, we performed a systematic review to identify NIBS methods with promising preliminary clinical results that were not fully developed and adopted into clinical practice, and discuss its clinical, research and device characteristics. We identified five devices (transmeatal cochlear laser stimulation, transcranial micropolarization, transcranial electrostimulation, cranial electric stimulation and stimulation with weak electromagnetic fields) and compared them with two established NIBS devices (transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation) and with well-known drugs used in neuropsychiatry (pramipexole and escitalopram) in order to understand the reasons why they failed to reach clinical practice and further steps of research development. Finally, we also discuss novel NIBS devices that have recently showed promising results: brain ultrasound and transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation. Our results show that some of the reasons for the failure of NIBS devices with promising clinical findings are the difficulty to disseminate results, lack of controlled studies, duration of research development, mixed results and lack of standardization.

Surgical treatment by electrical stimulation of the auditory cortex for intractable tinnitus

Tinnitus is a public health issue in France. Around 1% of the population is affected and 30,000 people are handicapped in their daily life. The treatments available for disabling tinnitus have until now been disappointing. We are reporting on the surgical treatment by electrical stimulation of the auditory cortex of a female patient affected by disabling tinnitus that resisted classical treatments. The tinnitus appeared suddenly 10 years ago after a left ear tympanoplasty. The acouphenometry measures revealed a bilateral tinnitus, predominant on the right side, constant, with high frequency (6000 Hz). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was performed at first with several supraliminal and infraliminal protocols. This showed promising results. Anatomic and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the auditory cortex before and after repetitive TMS (rTMS) demonstrated a modification of the cortical activity and where the ideal location for a cortical electrode might be, to straddle primary and secondary auditory cortex. After these investigations, two quadra polar electrodes (Resume, Medtronic Ltd, Hertfordshire, UK), connected to a stimulating device implanted under the skin (Synergy, Medtronic Ltd), were extradurally implanted. The surgical procedure was similar to the one performed for analgesic cortical stimulation. No surgical complications were reported. The activation of the stimulator provided a reduction of 65% of the tinnitus impact, with a persistent effect on the right side. The feasibility of the cortical stimulation in symptomatic treatment of tinnitus was proven by this preparatory work. The middle- and long-term therapeutic effects remain to be evaluated.