Der Einfluss einer Schallleitungsstörung auf die DPOAE-Schwelle

Pulsed DPOAEs in serial measurements : Combined analysis paradigm of simultaneously occurring changes in hearing thresholds and DPOAEs

BACKGROUND

To date, there is no consensus on how to standardize the assessment of ototoxicity in serial measurements. For the diagnosis of damage to the cochlear amplifier, measurement methods are required that have the highest possible test-retest reliability and validity for detecting persistent damage. Estimated distortion-product thresholds (LEDPT) based on short-pulse distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level maps use individually optimal DPOAE stimulus levels and allow reliable quantitative estimation of cochlea-related hearing loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hearing thresholds were estimated objectively using LEDPT and subjectively using modified Békésy tracking audiometry (LTA). Recordings were performed seven times within three months at 14 frequencies (f2 = 1-14 kHz) in 20 ears (PTA4 (0.5-4 kHz) < 20 dB HL). Reconstruction of the DPOAE growth behavior as a function of the stimulus levels L1, L2 was performed on the basis of 21 DPOAE amplitudes. A numerical fit of a nonlinear mathematical function to the three-dimensional DPOAE growth function yielded LEDPT for each stimulus frequency. For the combined analysis, probability distributions of hearing thresholds (LTA, LEDPT), DPOAE levels (LDP), and combinations thereof were determined.

RESULTS

LTA and LEDPT each exhibited a test-retest reliability with a median of absolute differences (AD) of 3.2 dB and 3.3 dB, respectively. Combining LEDPT, LDP, and LTA into a single parameter yielded a significantly smaller median AD of 2.0 dB.

CONCLUSION

It is expected that an analysis paradigm based on a combination of LEDPT, suprathreshold LDP, and fine-structure-reduced LTA would achieve higher test performance (sensitivity and specificity), allowing reliable detection of pathological or regenerative changes in the outer hair cells.

[Pulsed DPOAEs in serial measurements : Combined analysis paradigm of simultaneously occurring changes in hearing thresholds and DPOAEs. German version]

BACKGROUND

To date, there is no consensus on how to standardize the assessment of ototoxicity in serial measurements. For the diagnosis of damage to the cochlear amplifier, measurement methods are required that have the highest possible test-retest reliability and validity for detecting persistent damage. Estimated distortion-product thresholds (LEDPT) based on short-pulse distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level maps use individually optimal DPOAE stimulus levels and allow reliable quantitative estimation of cochlea-related hearing loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hearing thresholds were estimated objectively using LEDPT and subjectively using modified Békésy tracking audiometry (LTA). Recordings were performed seven times within three months at 14 frequencies (f2 = 1-14 kHz) in 20 ears (PTA4 (0.5-4 kHz) < 20 dB HL). Reconstruction of the DPOAE growth behavior as a function of the stimulus levels L1, L2 was performed on the basis of 21 DPOAE amplitudes. A numerical fit of a nonlinear mathematical function to the three-dimensional DPOAE growth function yielded LEDPT for each stimulus frequency. For the combined analysis, probability distributions of hearing thresholds (LTA, LEDPT), DPOAE levels (LDP), and combinations thereof were determined.

RESULTS

LTA and LEDPT each exhibited a test-retest reliability with a median of absolute differences (AD) of 3.2 dB and 3.3 dB, respectively. Combining LEDPT, LDP, and LTA into a single parameter yielded a significantly smaller median AD of 2.0 dB.

CONCLUSION

It is expected that an analysis paradigm based on a combination of LEDPT, suprathreshold LDP, and fine-structure-reduced LTA would achieve higher test performance (sensitivity and specificity), allowing reliable detection of pathological or regenerative changes in the outer hair cells.

Derivation of input-output functions from distortion-product otoacoustic emission level maps

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) emerge from the cochlea when elicited with two tones of frequencies f₁ and f₂. DPOAEs mainly consist of two components, a nonlinear-distortion and a coherent-reflection component. Input-output (I/O) functions of DPOAE pressure at the cubic difference frequency, f_DP=2f₁-f₂, enable the computation of estimated distortion-product thresholds (EDPTs), offering a noninvasive approach to estimate auditory thresholds. However, wave interference between the DPOAE components and suboptimal stimulus-level pairs reduces the accuracy of EDPTs. Here, the amplitude P of the nonlinear-distortion component is extracted from short-pulse DPOAE time signals. DPOAE level maps representing the growth behavior of P in L₁,L₂ space are recorded for 21 stimulus-level pairs and 14 frequencies with f₂=1 to 14 kHz (f₂/f₁=1.2) from 20 ears. Reproducing DPOAE growth behavior using a least-squares fit approach enables the derivation of ridge-based I/O functions from model level maps. Objective evaluation criteria assess the fit results and provide EDPTs, which correlate significantly with auditory thresholds (p < 0.001). In conclusion, I/O functions derived from model level maps provide EDPTs with high precision but without the need of predefined optimal stimulus-level pairs.

Subclinical conductive hearing loss significantly reduces otoacoustic emission amplitude: Implications for test performance

OBJECTIVES

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are a time-efficient, non-invasive means of assessing the integrity of active inner ear mechanics. Unfortunately, the presence of even relatively minor conductive hearing loss (CHL) has been suggested to reduce the clinical utility of DPOAEs significantly. The primary aims of this study were to systematically evaluate the impact of CHL on DPOAE amplitude and to determine if ear-specific primary tone level manipulations can be used to mitigate CHL impact and recover DPOAE measurability.

METHODS

For 30 young adults (57 ears) with normal hearing, DPOAEs were obtained for f₂ = 1-6 kHz. Observed DPOAE amplitudes were used to generate ear- and frequency-specific models with the primary tone levels, L₁ and L_2, as inputs and predicted DPOAE amplitude, L_DP, as output. These models were then used to simulate the effect of CHL (0-15 dB), as well as L₁ manipulations (0-15 dB), on DPOAE measurability.

RESULTS

Mean L_DP for every CHL condition was significantly different from that for all other conditions (p = <.001), with a mean L_DP attenuation of 8.7 dB for every 5 dB increase in CHL. Mean DPOAE measurability in response to a standard clinical stimulation paradigm of L₁/L₂ = 65/55 (dB SPL) was determined to be 99%, 84%, 37%, and 9% in the presence of 0, 5, 10, and 15 dB CHL, respectively. In the presence of 10 dB CHL, altering L₁ resulted in an approximately 25% increase in DPOAE responses.

CONCLUSION

Subclinical CHL loss is sufficient to significantly impair DPOAE measurability in a meaningful proportion of otherwise healthy ears. However, through strategic alteration of primary tone levels, the clinician can mitigate CHL impact and at least partially recover DPOAE measurability.

Contrasting Effects of Pressure Compensation on TEOAE and DPOAE in Children With Negative Middle Ear Pressure

In children with normal cochlear acuity, middle ear fluid often abolishes otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), and negative middle ear pressure (NMEP) reduces them. No convincing evidence of beneficial pressure compensation on distortion product OAE (DPOAE) has yet been presented. Two studies aimed to document effects of NMEP on transient OAE (TEOAE) and DPOAE. In Study 1, TEOAE and DPOAE pass/fail responses were analyzed before and after pressure compensation in 50 consecutive qualifying referrals having NMEP from -100 to -299 daPa. Study 2 concentrated on DPOAE, recording both amplitude (distortion product amplitude) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) before and after pressure compensation. Of the 20 participants, 5 had both ears qualifying. An effect of compensation on meeting a pass criterion was present in TEOAE for both left and right ear data in Study 1 but not demonstrable in DPOAE. In Study 2, the distortion product amplitude compensation effect was marginal overall, and depended on recording frequency band. SNR values improved moderately after pressure compensation in the two (overlapping) sets of single-ear data. In the five cases with both ears qualifying, a stronger compensation effect size, over 3 dB, was seen. The absolute dependence of SNR on frequency was also strongly replicated, but in no analysis, the frequency × compensation interaction was significant. Independent of particular frequency range, the data support a limited SNR improvement in 2 to 3 dB for compensation in DPOAE, with slightly larger effects in ears giving SNRs between 0 dB and +6 dB, where pass/fail cutoffs would generally be located.

Forward and reverse transfer functions of the middle ear based on pressure and velocity DPOAEs with implications for differential hearing diagnosis

Recently it was shown that distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) can be measured as vibration of the human tympanic membrane in vivo, and proposed to use these vibration DPOAEs to support a differential diagnosis of middle-ear and cochlear pathologies. Here, we investigate how the reverse transfer function (r-TF), defined as the ratio of DPOAE-velocity of the umbo to DPOAE-pressure in the ear canal, can be used to diagnose the state of the middle ear. Anaesthetized guinea pigs served as the experimental animal. Sound was delivered free-field and the vibration of the umbo measured with a laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV). Sound pressure was measured 2-3 mm from the tympanic membrane with a probe-tube microphone. The forward transfer function (f-TF) of umbo velocity relative to ear-canal pressure was obtained by stimulating with multi-tone pressure. The r-TF was assembled from DPOAE components generated in response to acoustic stimulation with two stimulus tones of frequencies f(1) and f(2); f(2)/f(1) was constant at 1.2. The r-TF was plotted as function of DPOAE frequencies; they ranged from 1.7 kHz to 23 kHz. The r-TF showed a characteristic shape with an anti-resonance around 8 kHz as its most salient feature. The data were interpreted with the aid of a middle-ear transmission-line model taken from the literature for the cat and adapted to the guinea pig. Parameters were estimated with a three-step fitting algorithm. Importantly, the r-TF is governed by only half of the 15 independent, free parameters of the model. The parameters estimated from the r-TF were used to estimate the other half of the parameters from the f-TF. The use of r-TF data - in addition to f-TF data - allowed robust estimates of the middle-ear parameters to be obtained. The results highlight the potential of using vibration DPOAEs for ascertaining the functionality of the middle ear and, therefore, for supporting a differential diagnosis of middle-ear and cochlear pathologies.

Quantitative estimation of minor conductive hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig

Subclinical conductive hearing losses (CHLs) can affect otoacoustic emissions and therefore limit their potential in the assessment of the cochlear function. Theoretical considerations to estimate a minor CHL from DPOAE measurements [Kummer et al. (2006). HNO 54, 457-467] are evaluated experimentally. They are based on the fact, that the level difference of the stimulus tones L(1) and L(2) for optimal excitation of the inner ear is given by L(1)=aL(2)+b. A CHL is presumed to attenuate both L(1) and L(2) to the same extent such that excitation of the inner ear is no longer optimal. From the change of L(1) that is necessary to restore optimal excitation of the inner ear and thus to produce maximal DPOAE levels, the CHL can be estimated. In 10 guinea pig ears an experimental CHL was produced, quantified by determination of compound action potential (CAP) thresholds at 8 kHz (CHL(CAP)) and estimated from DPOAE measurements at 8 kHz (CHL(DPOAE)). CHLs up to 12 dB could be assessed. CHL(DPOAE) correlated well with CHL(CAP) (R=0.741, p=0.0142). Mean difference between CHL(DPOAE) and CHL(CAP) was 4.2±2.6 dB. Estimation of minor CHL from DPOAE measurements might help to increase the diagnostic value of DPOAEs.

Accuracy of velocity distortion product otoacoustic emissions for estimating mechanically based hearing loss

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) measured as vibration of the human eardrum have been successfully used to estimate hearing threshold. The estimates have proved more accurate than similar methods using sound-pressure DPOAEs. Nevertheless, the estimation accuracy of the new technique might have been influenced by endogenous noise, such as heart beat, breathing and swallowing. Here, we investigate in an animal model to what extent the accuracy of the threshold estimation technique using velocity-DPOAEs might be improved by reducing noise sources. Velocity-DPOAE I/O functions were measured in normal and hearing-impaired anaesthetized guinea pigs. Hearing loss was either conductive or induced by furosemide injection. The estimated distortion product threshold (EDPT) obtained by extrapolation of the I/O function to the abscissa was found to linearly correlate with the compound action potential threshold at the f(2) frequency, provided that furosemide data were excluded. The standard deviation of the linear regression fit was 6 dB as opposed to 8 dB in humans, suggesting that this accuracy should be achievable in humans with appropriate improvement of signal-to-noise ratio. For the furosemide animals, the CAP threshold relative to the regression line provided an estimate of the functional loss of the inner hair cell system. For mechanical losses in the middle ear and/or cochlear amplifier, DPOAEs measured as velocity of the umbo promise an accuracy of hearing threshold estimation comparable to classical audiometry.