[Specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Current methods and innovative developments]

Acupuncture as an add-on therapy to sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy for patients with allergic rhinitis

This study retrospectively analyzed the effectiveness of acupuncture as add-on therapy (AAOT) to sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy (SASIT) for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). A total of 120 eligible cases of adult patients with AR were included in this retrospective study. Of these, 60 patients received AAOT plus SASIT and were assigned to a treatment group, while the other 60 subjects underwent SASIT only, and were assigned to a control group. Primary outcome was AR symptoms. The secondary outcome was quality of life, as evaluated by the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ). In addition, adverse events were also recorded during the study period. All outcomes were assessed before and after 8 weeks treatment. After 8 weeks treatment, patients in the treatment group had much better effectiveness in symptoms relief (P <.05), and quality of life improvement (activity domain, P = .04; practical domain, P = .03), compared with patients in the control group. In addition, although patients in the treatment group reported more mild pain at local area after the treatment than that in the control group (P <.01), no patients stopped the treatment. The results of this study showed that AAOT plus SASIT achieved more benefits in patients with AR than SASIT alone.

Sublingual immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization position paper 2013 update

We have prepared this document, "Sublingual Immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization Position Paper 2013 Update", according to the evidence-based criteria, revising and updating chapters of the originally published paper, "Sublingual Immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization Position Paper 2009", available at http://www.waojournal.org. Namely, these comprise: "Mechanisms of sublingual immunotherapy;" "Clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy" - reporting all the data of all controlled trials published after 2009; "Safety of sublingual immunotherapy" - with the recently published Grading System for adverse reactions; "Impact of sublingual immunotherapy on the natural history of respiratory allergy" - with the relevant evidences published since 2009; "Efficacy of SLIT in children" - with detailed analysis of all the studies; "Definition of SLIT patient selection" - reporting the criteria for eligibility to sublingual immunotherapy; "The future of immunotherapy in the community care setting"; "Methodology of clinical trials according to the current scientific and regulatory standards"; and "Guideline development: from evidence-based medicine to patients' views" - including the evolution of the methods to make clinical recommendations.Additionally, we have added new chapters to cover a few emerging crucial topics: "Practical aspects of schedules and dosages and counseling for adherence" - which is crucial in clinical practice for all treatments; "Perspectives and new approaches" - including recombinant allergens, adjuvants, modified allergens, and the concept of validity of the single products. Furthermore, "Raising public awareness about sublingual immunotherapy", as a need for our patients, and strategies to increase awareness of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) among patients, the medical community, all healthcare stakeholders, and public opinion, are also reported in detail.

[Allergen-specific immunotherapy in pet allergy - an update]

Animal dander is a common cause of allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma in patients. In this regard, cats and dogs represent major causes of allergy to animal dander. In first line, the therapeutic options include the elimination of the pet from the patient's home as a (secondary) preventive step. However, avoidance of temporary contacts or indirect exposure to cat dander is often difficult, since cat-allergens are widely distributed even in non-cat-keeping households. In general, conventional pharmacologic therapy does not thoroughly prevent allergic symptoms. Therefore, allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) represents an important therapeutic option. This article highlights the current standards and further developments of SIT for cat-allergic patients.

[Cluster immunotherapy of persistent allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Safety aspects of induction therapy with mite depot allergen preparations]

BACKGROUND

Apart from allergen avoidance and pharmacotreatment, specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the most important therapeutic option offered to allergic patients. Clinical efficacy of SIT depends on the specific allergen extract used, the quality and total cumulative amount of allergen applied and the treatment schedule of the therapy. In cluster SIT, 2-3 injections per treatment day are applied resulting in an accelerated achievement of the maintenance dose.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study 79 mite-sensitized adult allergic patients aged 18 to 59 years (mean 27.4+/-7.2 years) were investigated in terms of side-effects of cluster SIT during induction treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 129 local hypersensitivity reactions (>grade 1) occurred or 10.2% of all injections (69% grade 1, 20% grade 2, 11% grade 3 and no grade 4 reactions). The total number of systemic reactions was 40 or 3.2% of all injections with 92% grade 1 and 8% grade 2 reactions. Grade 3 or 4 reactions did not occur.

CONCLUSION

Cluster SIT with depot allergens represents an interesting alternative option to conventional dosage schedules of SIT.

Safety of a depigmented, polymerized vaccine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma

BACKGROUND

Clinical efficacy of specific immunotherapy (SIT) with depigmented, polymerized allergen extracts is well documented in placebo-controlled trials, and safety data are encouraging although further data are required.

METHODS

We enrolled 768 patients (51% men; mean age, 31 years) in this prospective multicenter study on safety and clinical effects of Depigoid (Laboratorios LETI, S.L., Madrid, Spain). Immunotherapy consisted of four injections of increasing doses of Depigoid at weekly intervals followed by monthly maintenance injections. All adverse events were documented. Moreover, nose, eye, and lung symptoms were assessed at baseline after 3 and 6 months. Results were compared with the scores of the preceding season.

RESULTS

Rates for local and systemic reactions that might possibly be related to the study medication were 2.36 and 4.56/1000 injections, respectively. With 5923 injections given, 14 local reactions were reported (5 patients), and 27 systemic reactions were reported, including 20 of grade 1 (6 patients) and 7 of grade 2 (4 patients). The best safety profile was seen for patients vaccinated against house-dust mites. Reductions in nose, eye, and lung symptoms as well as in concomitant medication compared with either the preceding season (pollen-sensitized patients) or the baseline (house-dust mite-sensitized patients) were observed at the end of study.

CONCLUSION

In this large multicenter study on 768 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma under daily practice conditions SIT with Depigoid was well tolerated with low rates of local and systemic reactions. Furthermore, SIT resulted in considerable reductions in symptoms and concomitant medication.