[Allergic rhinitis. Immunological and neurogenic mechanisms]

Exploring Advances in Natural Plant Molecules for Allergic Rhinitis Immunomodulation in Vivo and in Vitro

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent allergic disease that imposes significant economic burdens and life pressures on individuals, families, and society, particularly in the context of accelerating globalization and increasing pathogenic factors. Current clinical therapies for AR include antihistamines, glucocorticoids administered via various routes, leukotriene receptor antagonists, immunotherapy, and several decongestants. These treatments have demonstrated efficacy in alleviating clinical symptoms and pathological states. However, with the growing awareness of AR and rising expectations for improvements in quality of life, these treatments have become associated with a higher incidence of side effects and an elevated risk of drug resistance. Furthermore, the development of AR is intricately associated with dysregulation of the immune system, yet the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms remain incompletely understood. In contrast, widely available natural plant molecules offer multiple targeting pathways that uniquely modify the typical pathophysiology of AR through immunomodulatory processes. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of both in vivo and in vitro studies on natural plant molecules that modulate immunity for treating AR. Additionally, we examine their specific mechanisms of action in animal models to provide new insights for developing safe and effective targeted therapies while guiding experimental and clinical applications against AR.

Three-Year Outcomes After Posterior Nasal Neurectomy in Perennial Moderate and Severe Allergic Rhinitis Patients

BACKGROUND

Posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) has been shown to reduce the symptom burden of patients with perennial moderate and severe allergic rhinitis (AR).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of PNN for the treatment of perennial moderate and severe AR.

METHODS

A prospective 3-year single-arm study was conducted in which the reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) and total non-nasal symptom score (rTNNSS) were collected preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 213 patients with AR were recruited and received PNN, of whom 154 patients completed the 3-year follow-up. The mean rTNSS of the long-term follow-up patients improved from 7.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.507-7.974) at baseline to 2.604 (95% CI 2.221-2.986), P < .001, at 6 months and showed sustained improvement to 3.156 (95% CI 2.806-3.506), P < .001, at 3 years. The mean rTNNSS ranged from 1.301 (95% CI 1.112-1.491) at baseline to 0.564 (95% CI 0.441-0.688) (P < .001) at 6 months and showed sustained improvement to 0.641 (95% CI 0.533-0.749) (P < .001) at 3 years. The rTNSS subscores (sneezing, congestion, rhinorrhea, and itching) and rTNNSS subscores (lacrimation, eye itching, postnasal drip, and cough) remained significantly improved from the baseline at all follow-up time points (all P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Posterior nasal neurectomy significantly and sustainably alleviated nasal and non-nasal symptoms of perennial moderate and severe AR and improved patient quality of life through 3 years postprocedure.

The Role of Neuro-Immune Interactions in the Pathology and Pathogenesis of Allergic Rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a non-infectious inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa mediated by IgE and involving a variety of immune cells such as mast cells. In previous studies, AR was considered as an isolated disease of the immune system. However, recent studies have found that the nervous system is closely related to the development of AR. Bidirectional communication between the nervous and immune systems plays an important role in AR.

SUMMARY

The nervous system and immune system depend on the anatomical relationship between nerve fibers and immune cells, as well as various neurotransmitters, cytokines, inflammatory mediators, etc. to produce bidirectional connections, which affect the development of AR.

KEY MESSAGES

This article reviews the impact of neuro-immune interactions in AR on the development of AR, including neuro-immune cell units.

A Novel Approach to Posterior Lateral Nasal Neurectomy

Background Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a major health concern throughout the world. By severing the parasympathetic supply to the lateral wall of the nose, posterior lateral nasal neurectomy (PLNN), a form of highly selective vidian neurectomy, decreases nasal allergy symptoms. This study attempts to characterize the demographic and surgical characteristics of study participants in relation to PLNN, as well as to identify the risk factors associated with these characteristics. Methodology A five-year, cross-sectional study was undertaken among patients diagnosed with AR at a tertiary care center in Tamaka, Kolar. Case sheets accessible in the department of medical records were used to compile a list of 50 study patients. SPSS version 21 was used for data analysis (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results The study revealed that the average age of the sample population was 30.4 years. The majority of the study participants were less than or equal to 30 years old (54%). In our study, the majority of the participants were male (60%). This study revealed that around 46% of the surgeries were independent PLNNs and that most of them (76%) were observed to have four nerves following surgery. The average intraoperative blood loss during PLNN surgery was 43.14 mL. The mean hemoglobin levels before and after surgery were 13.11 and 12.78 g/dL, respectively. The average duration of the surgical procedure was 62 minutes. The average duration of PLNN surgery in females was 52.75 minutes, whereas the average duration in males was 68.33 minutes. According to an independent t-test (p = 0.045), this difference in mean was statistically significant. Approximately 85% of female study participants were identified with four nerves during PLNN surgery compared to 70% of male study participants. According to the chi-square test (p = 0.018), this proportional difference was statistically significant. Conclusions The majority of the participants in this study were male and younger. The typical PLNN surgical procedure lasted one hour. Males and females require different amounts of time, with females requiring less time. During PLNN surgery, most females detected four nerves, as opposed to most males.

Effect of posterior nasal neurectomy on the suppression of allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVES

Recent guidelines have revealed that allergic rhinitis (AR) impairs quality of life. Neuropeptides play a central role in AR. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) for the treatment of AR and for the suppression of neuropeptides and type 2 cytokine expression.

METHODS

In total, 77 patients undergoing PNN were recruited. Subjective symptoms, including sneezing and rhinorrhea, were elicited with a questionnaire using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Nasal lavage fluid taken from a random sample of 17 patients both preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively was screened with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

RESULTS

Postoperative rhinorrhea (6.03 ± 1.31vs 2.12 ± 1.40, P < 0.001) and sneezing (5.53 ± 1.25vs 2.04 ± 1.29, P < 0.001) were significantly improved relative to the preoperative levels; the mean SP and NPY concentrations in the nasal lavage fluid were 91.6 ± 20.9 pg/ml and 71.5 ± 10.5 pg/ml, which decreased significantly to 52.9 ± 16.7 pg/ml and 31.8 ± 8.2 pg/ml, respectively, and the mean periostin and IL-5 concentrations were 215.2 ± 87.7 pg/ml and 984.5 ± 181.8 pg/ml, which decreased significantly to 146.1 ± 70.1 pg/ml and 281.6 ± 74.0 pg/ml, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PNN was safe and well tolerated, and the symptom (sneezing and rhinorrhea) scores were significantly decreased by 1 year postoperatively.

Fibromyalgia in the Patients With Allergic Rhinitis: Its Prevalence and Impact on the Quality of Life

Background

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic diseases which affect a patient’s quality of life. Another important disease which has a negative impact on quality of life is fibromyalgia (FM). Some studies have suggested that a probable relationship exists between atopic diseases and FM.

Objectives

This study was designed to determine the prevalence of FM and its impact on quality of life among AR patients.

Methods

One hundred five consecutive adult patients with AR who were between 18 and 57 years old were prospectively recruited in this study between April 2017 and May 2018. All patients were evaluated for the presences of FM. Patients were diagnosed with FM according to the classification criteria of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology. The patients’ quality of life was evaluated by Turkish versions of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP).

Results

Thirty-four patients were diagnosed as having FM (32.4%). The percentage of FM was considerably higher than in the general population (2%–5%). Median individual domain scores except practical problems ( P = .108) and eyes symptoms ( P = .227) were significantly higher in AR with FM patients ( P < .001). All median levels of the NHP domains were significantly higher in AR with FM patients ( P < .001).

Conclusion

We would like to suggest that FM may be considered as one of the overlooked comorbid conditions in AR patients. Physicians should be aware of the occurrence of FM, especially in patients with impaired quality of life.

Evaluation of allergic rhinitis with nasal symptoms and nasal mucociliary clearance in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome

BACKROUND

The exact etiopathogenesis of fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) is still unclear but the pathogenesis of FM is associated with neurogenic inflammation. Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common inflammatory and immunological disease of the nasal mucosa. As a result, it is known that neurogenic inflammation has a role in the pathophysiology of both FM and AR.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate AR and nasal allergic inflammation using nasal mucociliary clearance time (NMC) in FM patients.

METHODS

Forty-five FM patients and fifty healthy controls were included in the study. In both groups, AR was evaluated by total nasal symptom scoring (TNSS) and NMC was measured using saccharine transit time test (STT).

RESULTS

TNSS was positive in 9 patients (20%) in the FM group and no positivity in the control group. In FM group, the mean value of TNSS was higher than that of the control group (p= 0.0001). The average value of STT of FM patients was statistically significantly longer when compared to the control group (p= 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results we obtained suggest that there is a high possibility of coexistence of FM and AR. As a result, the coexistence of AR and FM cannot be denied but we believe that comprehensive clinical studies should be conducted on this subject.

Strontium chloride hexahydrate as a candidate molecule for long-term treatment of allergic rhinitis

Background & objectives:

Neurogenic inflammation plays a role in the pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis (AR). Strontium salts are highly effective in reducing the sensory irritation. This study was aimed to investigate the efficacy of strontium chloride (SC) on AR symptoms based on the duration of SC use before the symptoms begin.

Methods:

Wistar albino rats (n=18) were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1, received 1μg mometasone furoate (MF); Group 2, three per cent SC; and Group 3 received five per cent SC (2 μl/site). Drugs were administered to the each nasal cavity for three weeks every morning. On the days 7, 14 and 21, histamine dihydrochloride (HD) 5 μmol (2 μl/site) was administered and the frequencies of nasal rubbing and sneezing were counted for 15 min.

Results:

After 7, 14 and 21 day medication period, the groups were compared in terms of the frequency of sneezing and nasal rubbing following HD. There was a significant difference among the groups in terms of the frequency of sneezing on the day 7 (P< 0.05). Intragroup comparisons for the nasal rubbing showed significance (P< 0.05). In Group 3, there was a decrease in the number of nasal rubbings on the day 14 and 21; however, the difference was not significant.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Our results showed that three and five per cent SC were less effective than MF for sneezing during the first week, but the efficiency was equal to that of MF after the first 14 days. Long-term use of SC was as effective as MF on nasal rubbing. SC can be as effective as MF on both sneezing and nasal rubbing on regular use over three weeks.

[Local allergic rhinitis to Alternaria alternata : Evidence for local IgE production exclusively in the nasal mucosa]

In a subgroup of patients with symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR), no systemic sensitization can be detected in skin tests or serum. These patients are considered to be afflicted with so-called "local allergic rhinitis" (LAR) with IgE-production exclusively at the site of the nasal mucosa. Patients without any positive allergy test results but seasonal (intermittent) or perennial (persistent) allergic symptoms were often misdiagnosed as having "non-allergic rhinitis" (NAR) in the past.However, there is evidence for a specific IgE-production in the nasal mucosa in these patients without systemic sensitization. The diagnosis of LAR is confirmed by clinical symptoms, the detection of specific IgE production in the nasal mucosa and/or nasal provocation tests.We report on two cases of LAR to Alternaria alternata with symptoms of persistent allergic rhinitis that have been diagnosed by positive allergenspecific nasal challenge tests and specific IgE determinations in nasal secretions.According to an actual literature research, this is the second report published on LAR caused by Alternaria alternata.

[Local (exclusive) IgE production in the nasal mucosa. Evidence for local allergic rhinitis]

BACKGROUND

IgE production at the site of the nasal mucosa without systemic allergic sensitization in skin tests or in serum represents so-called "local allergic rhinitis (LAR)" as a subgroup of patients with symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR). Formerly, in case of negative allergological test results, seasonal (intermittent) or perennial (persistent) allergic symptoms have been diagnosed as "non-allergic rhinitis" (NAR). However, there is evidence for specific Th2 cytokine, tryptase, and ECP (eosinophil catonic protein) production in the nasal secretion after allergen exposure in these patients without systemic sensitization.

DIAGNOSIS

Taking this into account, we recommend performing an allergen-specific nasal challenge and measuring the (local) nasal IgE-levels in addition to standard allergy tests in clinical routine in this subgroup of patients. These tests should be perfomed while or shortly after allergen exposure. In addition, an update of the allergy testing should be performed after a time interval since it has been demonstrated that patients formerly diagnosed with NAR may develop LAR or AR, or patients with LAR may develop AR in the future.

TREATMENT

The pharmacological therapeutic options in LAR are in line with the treatment of AR. If and to what extent this subgroup of AR patients benefit from allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is currently being evaluated in clinical trials.