[PET-CT in head and neck cancer]

Commissioning of the first hospital-based PET radiopharmaceutical cyclotron in Greece: personnel dose assessment

The role of18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is well established in diagnosis and management of cancer patients. Installations of on-site self-shielded mini cyclotrons are increasing. The Dose on Demand Biomarker Generator BG-75 was installed at Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Greece, in May 2021 and is the first hospital-based PET radiopharmaceutical cyclotron in the country. Personnel expected external exposure was established during commissioning; internal exposure is not expected. Personnel dose was estimated with two methods: survey meter measurements in various locations combined with the time spent in each location, and direct measurement using electronic personal dosemeters. Gamma and neutron radiation readings outside the cyclotron vault were at background levels. Inside the cyclotron vault, the highest recorded radiation readings by the target were 18μSv h-1for both gammas and neutrons with cyclotron in operational mode; at one meter, the values were 5μSv h-1and 4μSv h-1, respectively. The annual expected whole body dose per cyclotron operator is 0.6 mSv, and the respective extremity dose 16 mSv. The annual expected whole body and extremity dose for the radiochemist is 0.3 mSv and 25 mSv, respectively. The respective annual dose estimates for the medical physicists are < 1 mSv. The expected personnel doses are well below the regulatory limits and local as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) levels. With experience and a robust ALARA program, personnel exposure could be further reduced.

Real-Life Performance of F-18-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis of Unknown Primary Tumor

Background: Neoplasms in the head and neck region possess higher glycolytic activity than normal tissue, showing increased glucose metabolism. F-18-Flourodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can identify an unknown primary tumor (CUP). Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the real-life performance of F-18-FDG-PET/CT in detecting primary sites in patients with cervical lymph node metastasis of CUP. Methods: A retrospective data analysis of 31 patients who received FDG-PET/CT between June 2009 and March 2015 in a CUP context with histologically confirmed cervical lymph node metastasis was included. Results: In 48% of the patients (15/31), PET/CT showed suspicious tracer accumulation. In 52% of the patients (16/31), there was no suspicious radiotracer uptake, which was confirmed by the lack of identification of any primary tumor in 10 cases until the end of follow-up. FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 91%, PPV of 92%, and NPV of 63% in detecting the primary tumor. Additionally, PET/CT showed suspicious tracer accumulation according to further metastasis in 32% of the patients (10/31). Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT imaging is a useful technique for primary tumor detection in patients in a cervical CUP context. Furthermore, it provides information on the ulterior metastasis of the disease.

Correlation between 18F-FDG PET/CT intra-tumor metabolic heterogeneity parameters and KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The study aimed to evaluate the relationship between intra-tumor metabolic heterogeneity parameters of ¹⁸F-FDG and KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and which threshold heterogeneity parameters could better reflect the heterogeneity characteristics of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Medical data of 101 CRC patients who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and KRAS mutation analysis were selected. On PET scans, ¹⁸F-FDG traditional indices maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and heterogeneity parameters coefficient of variation with a threshold of 2.5 (CV_2.5), CV_40%, heterogeneity index-1 (HI-1), and HI-2 of the primary lesions were obtained. We inferred correlations between these ¹⁸F-FDG parameters and KRAS mutation status.

RESULTS

41 patients (40.6%) had KRAS gene mutation. Assessment of FDG parameters showed that SUVmax (19.00 vs. 13.16, p < 0.001), MTV (11.64 vs. 8.83, p = 0.001), and TLG (102.85 vs. 69.76, p < 0.001), CV_2.5 (0.55 vs. 0.46, p = 0.006), and HI-2 (14.03 vs. 7.59, p < 0.001) of KRAS mutation were higher compared to wild-type (WT) KRAS. CV_40% (0.22 vs. 0.24, p = 0.001) was lower in the KRAS mutation group, while HI-1 had no significant difference between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that MTV (OR = 4.97, 1.04-23.83, p = 0.045) was the only significant predictor in KRAS mutation, using a cut-off of 7.62 (AUC = 0.695), and MTV showed a sensitivity of 90.2% and specificity of 45.0%. However, the PET parameters were not independent predictors in KRAS mutation.

CONCLUSION

KRAS gene mutant CRC patients had more ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (SUVmax, MTV, TLG) and heterogeneity (CV_2.5, HI-2) than WT KRAS. MTV was the only independent predictor of KRAS gene mutation in colorectal cancer patients.