Primärversorgung von akutem Schwindel

Stellungnahme der Wissenschaftlichen Fachgesellschaft und des Berufsverbandes zur Notfallversorgung in der Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde

Clinics and practices in the field of ear, nose and throat medicine (ENT) are experiencing a significant increase in the number of emergency patients, which has multiple reasons. There is broad consent that a reform of emergency structures is necessary.The government commission for modern and needs-based hospital care has made recommendations with statements on the reform of emergency and acute care in the areas of "emergency services and financing" and "integrated emergency centers and integrated control centers". For this purpose a reliable foundation will be created with participation of specialist societies and professional associations, also linked to the hope of initiating the urgently needed relief of medical staff in clinics and practices.The present manuscript describes the health policy history and current problems in emergency care, focusing on proposed solutions with reference to the special features of ENT medicine. This position paper is linked to an appeal to self-administration and politicians to quickly implement a sustainable concept for emergency care, as financing and staff availability are becoming increasingly critical and the unregulated wave of emergency patients must be given a helping hand.

Clinical use of the manchester triage system in patients with dizziness - An observational study in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION

Dizziness is a common symptom with diverse causes, including ear-nose-throat, internal, neurological, or psychiatric origins. While for most parts treatable in nonemergency settings, it can also signal time-critical conditions, like an unnoticed stroke, requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment to prevent lasting harm or death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the Manchester Triage System in classifying patients presenting with dizziness based on final diagnoses and patient outcomes, as no specific flow chart exists for this symptom in the MTS.

METHODS

Monocentric, retrospective observational study. To test the validity of the MTS in the triage of dizziness patients, the treatment level was used as a surrogate parameter. We grouped the patients into outpatient, normal ward and intermediate care/intensive care unit (IMC/ICU) patients. Furthermore, we analyzed the dizziness patients in subgroups based on the origin of their dizziness to identify potential improvements for the MTS. Patients with dizziness and stroke, who represent the most vulnerable group of dizziness patients, were also evaluated separately.

RESULTS

During the observation period, 2958 patients presented at the ED with the symptom dizziness and 52 017 without, who formed the reference group. When examining the relationship between triage level and subsequent treatment level, a larger deviation is observed compared to the reference group. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) regarding hospital admission in general showed an area under the curve (AUC) in the subgroup with dizziness due to a central nervous system causes (n=838) of 0.69 (95% CI 0.65 - 0.72) and in the subgroup of dizziness by other organic cause (n=901), an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI 0.60 - 0.68). The reference group had an AUC 0.75 (95% CI 0.75 - 0.76) here. In relation to admission to IMC/ICU, the results were similar. The sensitivity of the MTS in terms of an adequate initial assessment of dizziness patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) was 0.39, the specificity was 0.91 (reference group sensitivity 0.72, specificity 0.82).

CONCLUSION

In terms of construct validity, the present study revealed that the use of MTS as a priority triage assessment tool was found to be less accurate in emergency patients with dizziness, particularly those diagnosed with stroke/TIA, when compared to other emergency patients.

[Dizziness and vertigo in a tertiary ENT emergency department]

BACKGROUND

Although vestibular symptoms are amongst the most frequent reasons for seeking emergency medical help, many patients remain undiagnosed.

OBJECTIVE

In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the spectrum of vertigo and dizziness in a tertiary ear, nose, and throat (ENT) emergency department (ED). Furthermore, we investigated the attendant symptoms, clinical signs, and the diagnostic tests performed.

METHODS

We screened all ED reports from 01/2013 to 12/2013 for adult patients with vestibular symptoms referred to the ENT department.

RESULTS

In total, we found 2596 cases with reported vestibular symptoms in the ED as a main or accompanying complaint. Of these, 286 were referred to the ENT specialist directly (n = 98) or via other major medical specialties (n = 188). Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) was the most frequent diagnosis in our study (n = 46, 16.1%), followed by vestibular neuritis (n = 44, 15.4%), otitis media (n = 20, 7%), and 9 patients (3.1%) had an ischemic stroke or a transient ischemic attack. In 70 (24.5%) cases, dizziness was not further specified.

CONCLUSION

BPPV is the most frequent diagnosis seen in the ED; however, physicians need to document nystagmus more precisely and perform diagnostic tests systematically, in order to make an accurate diagnosis. To avoid misdiagnoses, ED physicians and ENT specialists should be able to recognize central signs in patients with an acute vestibular syndrome. Every fourth patient does not receive a definitive diagnosis. Diagnostic ED workup for patients with dizziness needs further improvement.