Upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea-Can radiological position monitoring predict tongue motion one year after implantation?

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Effects on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGS) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane database, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar.

REVIEW METHODS

Five databases were reviewed to identify relevant studies that measured polysomnography parameters such as the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index, as well as quality of life and functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire scores, before and after HGS.

RESULTS

In total, 44 studies involving 8670 patients met the inclusion criteria. At 12 months after treatment, approximately 47%, 72%, and 82% of patients achieved AHI values of <5, < 10, and <15, respectively. The reported clinical success rates according to Sher criteria were 80% within 12 months and 73% between 12 and 36 months. While the favorable effects exhibited a gradual reduction up to 12 months postimplantation, they generally maintained a consistent level between the 12th and 36th months, as assessed by AHI < 5, <15, and success rate according to Sher criteria.

CONCLUSION

HGS can enhance quality of life scores and polysomnography outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea patients. Although the positive effects gradually decreased until 12 months after implantation, they generally remained consistent between 12 and 36 months.

Electric field aspects in hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea: A bilateral electrophysiological evaluation of unilateral electrode configuration changes

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is an established treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea in selected patients. A unilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation system was approved a decade ago, yet the physiological effect of unilateral hypoglossal stimulation on bilateral tongue motion remains unclear. This study examined how electrode configuration, stimulation cuff position, or body mass index influenced the contralateral genioglossus electromyography (EMG) signal. Twenty-nine patients underwent three EMG recordings in a polysomnographic setting after being implanted with a unilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulator for at least 6 months. The ratio of EMG signals between the ipsi- and contralateral sides was evaluated. No difference in EMG signals was demonstrated based on electrode configurations, stimulation-cuff position, body-mass-index, or sleep apnea severity, even in patients with right tongue protrusion only. Our findings may be explained by a significant level of cross-innervation and by a smaller and less variable circumferential electric field than expected based on prior biophysical models. A patient's individual anatomy needs to be considered during therapy titration in order to achieve an optimal response.

Model-based analysis of implanted hypoglossal nerve stimulation for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), characterized by frequent sleep disruptions from tongue muscle relaxation and airway blockage, are known to benefit from on-demand electrical stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy, which activates the protrusor muscles of the tongue during inspiration, has been established in multiple clinical studies as safe and effective, but the mechanistic understanding for why some stimulation parameters work better than others has not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

In this study, we developed a detailed biophysical model that can predict the spatial recruitment of hypoglossal nerve fascicles and axons within these fascicles during stimulation through nerve cuff electrodes. Using this model, three HNS programming scenarios were investigated including grouped cathode (---), single cathode (o-o), and guarded cathode bipolar (+-+) electrode configurations.

RESULTS

Regardless of electrode configuration, nearly all hypoglossal nerve axons circumscribed by the nerve cuff were recruited for stimulation amplitudes <3 V. Within this range, monopolar configurations required lower stimulation amplitudes than the guarded bipolar configuration to elicit action potentials within hypoglossal nerve axons. Further, the spatial distribution of the activated axons was more uniform for monopolar versus guarded bipolar configurations.

CONCLUSIONS

The computational models predicted that monopolar HNS provided the lowest threshold and the least sensitivity to rotational angle of the nerve cuff around the hypoglossal nerve; however, this setting also increased the likelihood for current leakage outside the nerve cuff, which could potentially activate axons in unintended branches of the hypoglossal nerve.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01161420.