[Coupling of active middle ear implants-biomechanical aspects]

Influence of the Coupling on the Hearing Outcome After Implantation of an Active Middle Ear Implant: Comparison of the Transmission Behavior in Temporal Bone Experiments With Clinical Data

OBJECTIVES

The active middle ear implant, Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB), can be implanted with a variety of couplers. Hearing outcome after implantation has been investigated in both temporal bone (TB) experiments and patient studies, but the relationship between experimental and clinical data is still weak in the literature. Therefore, experimental data from TB experiments should be compared with patient data in a retrospective study, in which the floating mass transducer is used with couplers of the third generation. Actuator coupling structures included the long (LP coupler) and short (SP coupler) incus process, the stapes head (Clip coupler), and the round window membrane (RW soft coupler).

METHODS

In the TB experiments, the sound transmission after vibroplasty on the above-mentioned actuator coupling structures was determined in 32 specimens by means of laser Doppler vibrometry on the stapes footplate. Data of 69 patients were analyzed. The main target audiometric parameters were the postoperative aided word recognition score (WRS) in the free field at 65 dB SPL (WRS 65 dB in %), the preoperative and postoperative pure-tone average (PTA4, including the frequencies 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) of the bone conduction hearing threshold (PTA4BC), the aided postoperative air conduction hearing threshold in the free field (PTA4FF) and the direct threshold (Vibrogram) at least 6 months postoperatively. The coupling efficiency of the actuator (Vibrogram-PTA4BC) as well as the effective hearing gain (PTA4FF-PTA4BC) was compared between the couplers.

RESULTS

The analysis in the main speech range (0.5-4 kHz) indicated that in the TB experiments, the LP coupler tends to have the best coupling quality at low frequencies (500-1000 Hz). This was up to 15 dB above the worst actuator (RW soft coupler). However, the results missed the significance level ( p > 0.05). In the high frequencies (2000-4000 Hz), the Clip coupler showed the best coupling quality. This was 15 dB above the worst actuator (SP coupler). However, the results missed the significance level ( p > 0.05), too. The postoperative WRS at 65 dB SPL and the postoperative PTA4FF were independent of the actuator coupling structure. The PTA4BC was stable at 6 months postoperatively. For the PTA4 of the coupling efficiency, there were no significant differences between the actuator coupling structures (LP 8.9 dB ± 12.9; SP 9.5 ± 6.5 dB; Clip 5.2 ± 10.5 dB; RW 12.7 ± 11.0 dB). However, the tendential inferiority of the RW soft coupler with regard to transmission in the low-frequency range and the tendential superiority of the Clip coupler in the high-frequency range that have already been displayed experimentally could be confirmed in the clinical results. However, the clinical results missed the significance level, too ( p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In vivo, there are no significant differences in the postoperative outcome stratified according to coupling the target structure. The differences known from the experimental setting were repressed by individual biasing factors. However, to ensure sufficient postoperative speech intelligibility, the frequency-specific transmission behavior of the couplers should be taken into account when setting the indication for VSB implantation.

Results and Quality of Life after Implantation of Active Middle Ear Implants

The provision of implantable hearing aids represents an area with high development and innovation potential. On the one hand, this review article provides an overview of current indication criteria for the treatment with active middle ear implants. On the other hand, outcome parameters as well as functional results after implantation of active middle ear implants are demonstrated and discussed. The focus is mainly placed on audiological results as well as the subjective health status. "Patient Reported Outcome Measures" (PROMs) have become an integral part of the evaluation of hearing implant treatment. Due to low evidence level criteria, the study situation regarding audiological as well as subjective outcome parameters is not satisfactory. The lack of an international consensus on accepted outcome parameters makes a meta-analytical analysis of results immensely difficult. In the studies published to date, patients with sensorineural hearing loss and patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss offered better speech recognition after implantation of an active middle ear implant compared to conventional hearing aids. Current analyses show a significant improvement in general as well as hearing-specific quality of life after implantation of an active middle ear implant. To date, no validated, hearing-specific quality-of-life measurement instruments exist for assessing the success of fitting in children. Especially in children with complex malformations of the outer ear and the middle ear, excellent audiological results were shown. However, these results need to be substantiated by quality-of-life measurements in future.

Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics

Objective

To analyze intensity-latency functions of intraoperative auditory evoked brainstem responses (ABRs) to stimulation by the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) active middle ear implant with respect to coupling efficiency, VSB evoked ABR thresholds, and coupling modality [oval window (OW) placement vs. Incus placement and vs. round window (RW) placement].

Study Design

Exploratory study.

Setting

Bi-centric study at tertiary referral centers.

Patients

Twenty-four patients (10 female, 14 male, mean age: 58 years) who received a VSB.

Outcome Measures

Wave-V intensity-latency functions of intraoperative VSB evoked ABRs using a modified audio processor programmed to preoperative bone conduction thresholds for stimulation. Threshold level correction to coupling efficiency and ABR thresholds. Individual plots and exponential function fits.

Results

After ABR threshold level correction, the latency functions could be aligned. A large variance of latencies was observed at individual threshold level. Wave-V latency was longest in the Incus placement subgroup (9.73 ms, SD: 1.04) as compared to OW placement subgroup (9.47 ms, SD: 1.05), with the shortest latency in the RW placement subgroup (8.99 ms, SD: 0.68). For increasing stimulation levels, the variance decreased with intensity-latency function slopes converging toward a steady-state (saturation) latency caused by saturation of audio processor (stimulation) gain. Latency saturation was reached at a stimulation level of 50 dB nHL for the OW placement subgroup, 35 dB nHL for the Incus placement subgroup, and 30 dB nHL for the RW placement subgroup. The latency and saturation results indicated decreased dynamic range for RW placement, i.e., reverse stimulation.

Conclusions

VSB evoked ABR wave-V intensity-latency function slopes were similar to acoustic stimulation at high stimulation levels with a shift toward longer latencies caused by audio processor signal delay. Saturation of latencies occurred for higher stimulation levels due to saturation of audio processor gain. Thus, the analysis of VSB evoked intensity-latency functions appears to allow for the objective assessment of a patient's individual dynamic range. This can further improve diagnostics as well as intraoperative and postoperative quality control.