Cranialization of the frontal sinus: indications, technique and results

[Diagnosis and Treatment in frontobasal fractures]

Traumatic brain injury can result in frontobasal fractures (FBF). The goals of treatment for FBF are to eliminate primary morbidity and/or prevent secondary morbidity. Of particular importance in this regard is the proximity of important sensory organs for hearing, vision, smell, and taste, as well as their supplying nervous structures. Medical history, clinical findings, or CT scan are necessary and should lead to an individual evaluation. Depending on the severity of the fractures, the following disciplines may be involved in the treatment of FBF: neurosurgery, plastic surgery, oral and maxillofacial surgery, and/or otorhinolaryngology. Particularly less invasive endoscopic endonasal therapy is a specialty of otorhinolaryngologic surgeons and has not been widely established in other disciplines. The present work provides an overview of the current state of the art in terms of the following aspects, taking into account the current literature: anatomic principles, classification of fractures, diagnostics (in particular clinical examination, imaging, and laboratory chemistry tests), clinical symptoms, and treatment.

Endoscopic management of frontal sinus diseases after frontal craniotomy: a case series and review of the literature

PURPOSE

To evaluate frontal sinus complications developed after previous external craniotomies requiring frontal sinus reconstruction and their treatment with an endoscopic approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 22 patients who referred to Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital and Bellaria Hospital (Bologna, Italy) between 2005 and 2017. All patients presented with frontal sinus disease after frontal craniotomy with sinus reconstruction performed to treat various pathological conditions. We reported our experience in the endoscopic management of such complications and we reviewed the current literature concerning the endoscopic treatment of these conditions.

RESULTS

In total, 14 frontal mucoceles, 4 cases of chronic frontal sinusitis, 2 mucopyoceles and 2 fungus ball of the frontal sinus were identified. Endoscopic surgical treatment included 7 DRAF IIa, 1 DRAF IIb, 11 DRAF III and 3 DRAF IIc (modified DRAF III) approaches. The success rate of the surgical procedure was 86% (19/22 patients). Recurrence of the initial pathology occurred in three patients (14%) requiring a conversion of previous frontal sinusotomy into a DRAF III sinusotomy.

CONCLUSION

Frontal sinusopathy can be a long-term complication following craniotomies and may lead to potentially severe pathological conditions, such as mucoceles and frontal sinus inflammation. Its management is still debated and requires recovery of the patency of nasal-frontal route. Our study confirms that the endoscopic endonasal approach may offer a valid solution with low morbidity avoiding re-opening of the craniotomic access. For selected cases, endoscopic approach could also be performed simultaneously to craniotomy as a combined surgery to reduce the risk of short- and long-term complications. Long-term follow-up is mandatory in patients with a history of opened and reconstructed frontal sinus and should include imaging and endoscopic outpatient evaluation.

Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery

Endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery is the standard procedure for surgery of most paranasal sinus diseases. Appropriate frame conditions provided, the respective procedures are safe and successful. These prerequisites encompass appropriate technical equipment, anatomical oriented surgical technique, proper patient selection, and individually adapted extent of surgery. The range of endonasal sinus operations has dramatically increased during the last 20 years and reaches from partial uncinectomy to pansinus surgery with extended surgery of the frontal (Draf type III), maxillary (grade 3-4, medial maxillectomy, prelacrimal approach) and sphenoid sinus. In addition there are operations outside and beyond the paranasal sinuses. The development of surgical technique is still constantly evolving. This article gives a comprehensive review on the most recent state of the art in endoscopic sinus surgery according to the literature with the following aspects: principles and fundamentals, surgical techniques, indications, outcome, postoperative care, nasal packing and stents, technical equipment.

Cranialization of the frontal sinus for secondary mucocele prevention following open surgery for benign frontal lesions

Objective

To compare frontal sinus cranialization to obliteration for future prevention of secondary mucocele formation following open surgery for benign lesions of the frontal sinus.

Study Design

Retrospective case series.

Setting

Tertiary academic medical center.

Patients

Sixty-nine patients operated for benign frontal sinus pathology between 1994 and 2011.

Interventions

Open excision of benign frontal sinus pathology followed by either frontal obliteration (n = 41, 59%) or frontal cranialization (n = 28, 41%).

Main Outcome Measures

The prevalence of post-surgical complications and secondary mucocele formation were compiled.

Results

Pathologies included osteoma (n = 34, 49%), mucocele (n = 27, 39%), fibrous dysplasia (n = 6, 9%), and encephalocele (n = 2, 3%). Complications included skin infections (n = 6), postoperative cutaneous fistula (n = 1), telecanthus (n = 4), diplopia (n = 3), nasal deformity (n = 2) and epiphora (n = 1). None of the patients suffered from postoperative CSF leak, meningitis or pneumocephalus. Six patients, all of whom had previously undergone frontal sinus obliteration, required revision surgery due to secondary mucocele formation. Statistical analysis using non-inferiority test reveal that cranialization of the frontal sinus is non-inferior to obliteration for preventing secondary mucocele formation (P<0.0001).

Conclusion

Cranialization of the frontal sinus appears to be a good option for prevention of secondary mucocele development after open excision of benign frontal sinus lesions.

Ossification of the frontal sinus in juvenile minipigs following water jet application

BACKGROUND

Obliteration of the frontal sinus is a generally accepted management for patients with severe craniofacial trauma in whom the sinus cannot be repaired or adequately drained. Effective obliteration requires complete removal of mucosa, sufficient filling of the sinus cavity as well as effective occlusion of the nasofrontal duct. The use of various filling materials for sinus obliteration has been described and include autologous fat, bone, muscle and lyophilized cartilage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In order to appreciate the advantages of the water-jet scalpel an animal study in 10 juvenile (4 months old) and 10 adult (18 months) minipigs was performed. In 5 juvenile and 5 adult animals the frontal sinus mucosa was removed using the water jet, while in the others bone curettes were used. No occlusion of the frontonasal duct was carried out and no filling material was implanted. All animals were followed-up for 40 days. After sacrifice, radiological, histological and computerized histomorphometrical examinations were carried out.

RESULTS

Removal of the mucosa from the sinus was simplified when using the water jet. Previous studies have shown that the selected tissue structures were less traumatized when compared with conventional surgical techniques. In young animals (only) and exclusively following the use of a water-jet scalpel osseous occlusion of the frontal sinus was found at follow-up. Histomorphometric findings revealed a significant increase of bone formation in the frontal sinus area of these animals.

CONCLUSION

Based on these experimental results in a small series of juvenile minipigs the water-jet technique is a faster and less traumatic technique (less blood loss) for osteoplastic surgery of the frontal sinus. Further long-term studies are needed to evaluate the possibilities for applying this technique in post-traumatic craniofacial surgery in man.