[Human genetics in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome-its role in diagnosis and treatment]

Propensity score-matched analysis of long-term outcomes for living kidney donation in alternative complement pathway diseases: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Atypical hemolytic syndrome (aHUS) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) are complement-mediated rare diseases with excessive activation of the alternative pathway. Data to guide the evaluation of living-donor candidates for aHUS and C3G are very limited. The outcomes of living donors to recipients with aHUS and C3G (Complement disease-living donor group) were compared with a control group to improve our understanding of the clinical course and outcomes of living donation in this context.

METHODS

Complement disease-living donor group [n = 28; aHUS(53.6%), C3G(46.4%)] and propensity score-matched control-living donor group (n = 28) were retrospectively identified from 4 centers (2003-2021) and followed for major cardiac events (MACE), de novo hypertension, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), cancer, death, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria after donation.

RESULTS

None of the donors for recipients with complement-related kidney diseases experienced MACE or TMA whereas two donors in the control group developed MACE (7.1%) after 8 (IQR, 2.6-12.8) years (p = 0.15). New-onset hypertension was similar between complement disease and control donor groups (21.4% vs 25%, respectively, p = 0.75). There were no differences between study groups regarding last eGFR and proteinuria levels (p = 0.11 and p = 0.70, respectively). One related donor for a recipient with complement-related kidney disease developed gastric cancer and another related donor developed a brain tumor and died in the 4th year after donation (2, 7.1% vs none, p = 0.15). No recipient had donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies at the time of transplantation. Median follow-up period of transplant recipients was 5 years (IQR, 3-7). Eleven (39.3%) recipients [aHUS (n = 3) and C3G (n = 8)] lost their allografts during the follow-up period. Causes of allograft loss were chronic antibody-mediated rejection in 6 recipients and recurrence of C3G in 5. Last serum creatinine and last eGFR of the remaining patients on follow up were 1.03 ± 038 mg/dL and 73.2 ± 19.9 m/min/1.73 m2 for aHUS patients and 1.30 ± 0.23 mg/dL and 56.4 ± 5.5 m/min/1.73 m2 for C3G patients.

CONCLUSION

The present study highlights the importance and complexity of living related-donor kidney transplant for patients with complement-related kidney disorders and motivates the need for further research to determine the optimal risk-assessment for living donor candidates to recipients with aHUS and C3G.

Evaluation of Genetic Kidney Diseases in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Towards Precision Genomic Medicine in Donor Risk Assessment

Purpose of Review

To provide a comprehensive update on the role of genetic testing for the evaluation of kidney transplant recipient and living donor candidates.

Recent Findings

The evaluation of candidates for living donor transplantation and their potential donors occurs within an ever-changing landscape impacted by new evidence and risk assessment techniques. Criteria that were once considered contraindications to living kidney donation are now viewed as standard of care, while new tools identify novel risk markers that were unrecognized in past decades. Recent work suggests that nearly 10% of a cohort of patients with chronic/end-stage kidney disease had an identifiable genetic etiology, many whose original cause of renal disease was either unknown or misdiagnosed. Some also had an incidentally found genetic variant, unrelated to their nephropathy, but medically actionable. These patterns illustrate the substantial potential for genetic testing to better guide the selection of living donors and recipients, but guidance on the proper application and interpretation of novel technologies is in its infancy. In this review, we examine the utility of genetic testing in various kidney conditions, and discuss risks and unresolved challenges. Suggested algorithms in the context of related and unrelated donation are offered.

Summary

Genetic testing is a rapidly evolving strategy for the evaluation of candidates for living donor transplantation and their potential donors that has potential to improve risk assessment and optimize the safety of donation.

Thrombotische Mikroangiopathie

Die thrombotische Mikroangiopathie (TMA) zeichnet sich durch eine endothelschadenassoziierte Bildung von Plättchenthromben in arteriellen und venösen Mikrogefäßen aus. Die damit einhergehende Ischämie führt zu schwerwiegenden Organdysfunktionen und kann akut lebensbedrohlich sein. Ätiologisch verbirgt sich hinter der TMA ein sehr heterogenes Erkrankungsspektrum. Neben der thrombotisch-thrombozytopenischen Purpura, die durch eine stark reduzierte ADAMTS13(„a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13“)-Aktivität gekennzeichnet ist, dem infektassoziierten klassischen hämolytisch-urämischen Syndrom (HUS) sowie dem komplementvermittelten atypischen HUS (aHUS) können weitere sehr seltene Erkrankungen oder sekundäre Formen vorliegen. Die differenzialdiagnostische Einteilung ist aufgrund unterschiedlicher therapeutischer Ansätze erforderlich. Der Einsatz neuer spezifischer medikamentöser Behandlungsmethoden hat die Prognose der TMA deutlich verbessert.

[The experience of using the Russian biosimilar of the original drug eculizumab for the treatment of patients with atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome]

Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a chronic systemic disease of a genetic nature, which is based on uncontrolled activation of the alternative complement pathway, leading to generalized thrombosis in the vessels of the microvasculature (complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy). To date, therapy with eculizumab is the most effective and pathogenetically substantiated method of treating patients with ASH. Using the example of three clinical cases of patients with a verified diagnosis of aHUS, the high efficiency and safety of the worlds first bioanalogue of eculizumab in the treatment of adult patients with aHUS (complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy) was demonstrated.

Relative incidence of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and haemolytic uraemic syndrome in clinically suspected cases of thrombotic microangiopathy

Background

Data are lacking on the relative incidence of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) caused by Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and atypical HUS (aHUS) in patients presenting with thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs).

Methods

This was a prospective, cross-sectional, multicentre and non-interventional epidemiological study. Patients fulfilling criteria for TMAs (platelet consumption, microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and organ dysfunction) were included in the study. The primary objective was to assess the relative incidence of TTP, STEC-HUS, aHUS and ‘other’ physician-defined diagnoses. The secondary objective was to develop an algorithm to predict a severe deficiency in ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) activity (≤10%) using routine laboratory parameters. A post hoc classification using the recent Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes diagnostic criteria was then undertaken to further classify patient groups.

Results

aHUS was diagnosed with a relative incidence of 61%, whereas TTP, STEC-HUS and ‘other’ were diagnosed in 13, 6 and 20% of patients, respectively. In the post hoc analysis, 27% of patients with a TMA were classified as ‘primary aHUS’ and 53% as ‘secondary aHUS’. Multivariate analysis revealed that severe deficiency in ADAMTS13 activity (≤10%) was unlikely to underlie TMA if platelet and serum creatinine were above threshold values of 30 × 10⁹/L and 1.8 mg/dL, respectively (negative predictive value of 92.3 and 98.1, respectively, if one or both values were above the threshold).

Conclusions

In this study, aHUS was the most common single diagnosis among patients presenting with a TMA. In the absence of an ADAMTS13 activity result, platelet count and serum creatinine may aid in the differential diagnosis.

The genetics of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a disorder characterized by thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia due to endothelial injury. aHUS is felt to be caused by defective complement regulation due to underlying genetic mutations in complement regulators or activators, most often of the alternative pathway. Mutations causing aHUS can be subdivided into two groups, loss of function mutations (affecting factor H, factor H-related proteins, membrane co-factor protein, and factor I), and gain of function mutations (affecting factor B and C3). As more information becomes available on the relationship between specific mutations and clinical outcome, complete genetic workup of aHUS patients becomes more and more important. In this review, we will discuss the genetic background of aHUS, the role of complement for aHUS pathogenesis, and the different groups of specific mutations known to be involved in the pathogenesis of aHUS.

The genetics of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a disorder characterized by thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia due to endothelial injury. aHUS is felt to be caused by defective complement regulation due to underlying genetic mutations in complement regulators or activators, most often of the alternative pathway. Mutations causing aHUS can be subdivided into two groups, loss of function mutations (affecting factor H, factor H-related proteins, membrane co-factor protein, and factor I), and gain of function mutations (affecting factor B and C3). As more information becomes available on the relationship between specific mutations and clinical outcome, complete genetic workup of aHUS patients becomes more and more important. In this review, we will discuss the genetic background of aHUS, the role of complement for aHUS pathogenesis, and the different groups of specific mutations known to be involved in the pathogenesis of aHUS.