1
|
Chepelev L, Wake N, Ryan J, Althobaity W, Gupta A, Arribas E, Santiago L, Ballard DH, Wang KC, Weadock W, Ionita CN, Mitsouras D, Morris J, Matsumoto J, Christensen A, Liacouras P, Rybicki FJ, Sheikh A. Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios. 3D Print Med 2018; 4:11. [PMID: 30649688 PMCID: PMC6251945 DOI: 10.1186/s41205-018-0030-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Medical three-dimensional (3D) printing has expanded dramatically over the past three decades with growth in both facility adoption and the variety of medical applications. Consideration for each step required to create accurate 3D printed models from medical imaging data impacts patient care and management. In this paper, a writing group representing the Radiological Society of North America Special Interest Group on 3D Printing (SIG) provides recommendations that have been vetted and voted on by the SIG active membership. This body of work includes appropriate clinical use of anatomic models 3D printed for diagnostic use in the care of patients with specific medical conditions. The recommendations provide guidance for approaches and tools in medical 3D printing, from image acquisition, segmentation of the desired anatomy intended for 3D printing, creation of a 3D-printable model, and post-processing of 3D printed anatomic models for patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonid Chepelev
- Department of Radiology and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Nicole Wake
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY USA
- Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | | | - Waleed Althobaity
- Department of Radiology and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Ashish Gupta
- Department of Radiology and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Elsa Arribas
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Lumarie Santiago
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - David H Ballard
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO USA
| | - Kenneth C Wang
- Baltimore VA Medical Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - William Weadock
- Department of Radiology and Frankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Ciprian N Ionita
- Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York Buffalo, Buffalo, NY USA
| | - Dimitrios Mitsouras
- Department of Radiology and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | | | | | - Andy Christensen
- Department of Radiology and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Peter Liacouras
- 3D Medical Applications Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Frank J Rybicki
- Department of Radiology and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Adnan Sheikh
- Department of Radiology and The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Krieg AH. [Extracorporeal irradiation : Reimplantation of bone segments in the treatment of malignant bone tumours]. DER ORTHOPADE 2017; 46:681-687. [PMID: 28718006 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-017-3445-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant bone tumors themselves and the wide resection required because of them may cause huge bone defects in the bone segment involved. Autologous bone grafts are a reliable option to cover these defects in many cases but their availability is limited. Besides common alternative reconstruction methods, including the use of allografts and/or prostheses, especially extracoroporeal irradiation (ECI) and reimplantation of the bone segment involved is attracting increasingly more attention nowadays. DISCUSSION In the following, we report on indications/contraindications, details of the operative technique, as well as the recommended rehabilitation regime of ECI. Furthermore, we compare our own results with those published in the recent literature. Especially the advantages and disadvantages of this method, the risks and the complications are illustrated and critically discussed. CONCLUSION Extracorporeal irradiation of a tumor bearing bone segment is a valuable alternative reconstruction technique following tumor resections of the pelvis, femur and tibia, with encouraging results with respect to local control, complication risks and functional outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A H Krieg
- Knochen- und Weichteiltumorzentrum der Universität Basel (KWUB), Kinderorthopädie, Universitätskinderspital beider Basel (UKBB), Spitalstr. 33, 4056, Basel, Schweiz.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Customised osteotomy guides and endoprosthetic reconstruction for periacetabular tumours. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2014; 38:1435-42. [PMID: 24658873 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2314-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2014] [Accepted: 02/23/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to analyse clinical and oncological outcomes of patients after guided resection of periacetabular tumours and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the remaining defect. METHODS From 1988 to 2008, we treated 56 consecutive patients (mean age 52.5 years, 41.1 % women). Patients were followed up either until death or February 2011 (mean follow up 5.5 years, range 0.1-22.5, standard deviation ± 5.3). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate survival rates. RESULTS Disease-specific survival was 59.9 % at five years and 49.7 % at ten and 20 years, respectively. Wide resection margins were achieved in 38 patients, whereas 11 patients underwent marginal and seven intralesional resection. Survival was significantly better in patients with wide or marginal resection than in patients with intralesional resection (p = 0.022). Survival for patients with secondary tumours was significantly worse than for patients with primary tumours (p = 0.003). In 29 patients (51.8 %), at least one reoperation was necessary, resulting in a revision-free survival of 50.5 % at five years, 41.1 % at ten years and 30.6 % at 20 years. Implant survival was 77.0 % at five years, 68.6 % at ten years and 51.8 % at 20 years. A total of 35 patients (62.5 %) experienced one or more complications after surgery. Ten of 56 patients (17.9 %) experienced local recurrence after a mean of 8.9 months. The mean postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 18.1 (60.1 %). CONCLUSION The surgical approach assessed in this study simplifies the process of tumour resection and prosthesis implantation and leads to acceptable clinical and oncological outcomes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Harboe K, Gjerdet NR, Sudmann E, Indrekvam K, Søreide K. Assessment of retention force and bone apposition in two differently coated femoral stems after 6 months of loading in a goat model. J Orthop Surg Res 2014; 9:69. [PMID: 25127722 PMCID: PMC4237892 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-014-0069-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since the introduction of uncemented hip implants, there has been a search for the best surface coating to enhance bone apposition in order to improve retention. The surface coating of the different stems varies between products. The aim was to assess the retention force and bone adaption in two differently coated stems in a weight-bearing goat model. Materials and methods Hydroxyapatite (HA) and electrochemically deposited calcium phosphate (CP; Bonit®) on geometrically comparable titanium-based femoral stems were implanted into 12 (CP group) and 35 (HA group) goats. The animal model included physiological loading of the implants for 6 months. The pull-out force of the stems was measured, and bone apposition was microscopically evaluated. Results After exclusion criteria were applied, the number of available goats was 4 in the CP group and 11 in the HA group. The CP-coated stems had significantly lower retention forces compared with the HA-coated ones after 6 months (CP median 47 N, HA median 1,696 N, p = 0.003). Bone sections revealed a lower degree of bone apposition in the CP-coated stems, with more connective tissue in the bone/implant interface compared with the HA group. Conclusion In this study, HA had better bone apposition and needed greater pull-out force in loaded implants. The application of CP on the loaded titanium surface to enhance the apposition of bone is questioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Harboe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger 4068, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bading S, Mössinger E, Rosenthal H, Länger F, Bastian L. [Osteosarcoma of the pelvisTwo case reports and review of the literature]. Unfallchirurg 2004; 107:625-32. [PMID: 15060775 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-004-0753-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Primary malignant neoplasms of the bone are rare. One of the most common bone tumors is osteosarcoma, most often localized in the metaphysis of adolescent long bones. The sacrum is concerned in only about 1%. Primary bone sarcomas of the pelvis are usually recognized after they have grown to a considerable size. Osteosarcoma patients from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland are treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with complete surgical excision according to the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS). Based on a review of the literature, diagnosis, treatment, and complications of two cases of sacrum osteosarcoma are introduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bading
- Unfallchirurgische Klinik, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|