[Diagnostics and treatment strategies for soft tissue sarcomas]

[Significance of sonographically guided percutaneous needle biopsy in the diagnostics of soft tissue tumors]

BACKGROUND

The role of percutaneous needle biopsy in the diagnostics of soft tissue tumors is controversially discussed. The specificity of this method has been examined in this study based on the collective of patients treated in our university hospital. Secondly, the influence of the specialization of the treating surgeon has been evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 96 patients who underwent percutaneous needle biopsy and, if necessary, surgical resection. The specificity, logistic requirements and possible complications of percutaneous biopsy were evaluated. Special attention was paid to the influence of specialization of the treating surgical team on the specificity of the method.

RESULTS

The results of the biopsy were able to define the entity of the lesion correctly in 69.7 %, the dignity in 75.0 % and the grading in 72.0 % of the cases. In the group treated by a specialized team, the specificity of the method was 84.6 % concerning the entity of the lesion, 84.6 % concerning the dignity and 80 % concerning the grading. With regard to the entity the specificity was significantly increased (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The findings show that percutaneous needle biopsy represents a logistically simple and efficient diagnostic method for soft tissue tumors which is rarely associated with complications. Subsequent treatment should be performed in a specialized centre.

[Surgical margins in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities]

Negative surgical margins (R0 resection) play a key role in the prevention of local recurrences of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities in the multimodal therapy concept. The prognostic relevance for long-term survival is still under dispute. Despite the fact that numerous recommendations and guidelines have existed for over 100 years, strong evidence-based data from prospective randomized studies are still not available today. These studies should include parameters like tumor localization, subtype and biological aggressiveness. Recommendations as to surgical therapy diverge considerably. They range from amputation and compartment resection to centimetre and millimetre surgical margins. The present article analyses currently available data and definitions and discusses the impact on functional restriction, lymph drainage, local recurrence and the perioperative irradiation field. In the absence of surgical standards, it is doubtful whether existing studies and multicenter trials currently underway are valid. Close co-operation between surgeon and pathologist is imperative to further substantiate the significance of histological examinations and resection margins.