Die Versorgung dislozierter 3- und 4-Fragmentfrakturen des proximalen Humerus mit einem winkelstabilen Plattenfixateur

Effect of surgical approaches on deltoid innervation and clinical outcomes in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures

Objectives

This study aims to investigate the effects of deltopectoral and anterolateral acromial approaches commonly used in open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures on the clinical outcomes, and axillary nerve damage through electrophysiological assessment.

Patients and methods

Forty-eight patients (22 males, 26 females; mean age 47.9±13.2 years; range, 22 to 73 years) diagnosed with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO)/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type 11 proximal humeral fractures who underwent osteosynthesis with anatomical locking plates in our hospital between January 2015 and June 2016 were prospectively examined. The patients were divided into two groups according to either the deltopectoral or anterolateral deltoid-split surgical approach used. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores and Constant-Murley scores (CMS) obtained at three- and 12-month follow-up visits. Needle electromyography (EMG) was performed for the electrophysiological assessment of the deltoid muscle.

Results

There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic data, follow-up times, and complications. DASH scores and CMS obtained postoperatively at three months (p=0.327 and p=0.531, respectively) and 12 months (p=0.324 and p=0.648, respectively) revealed no significant differences. In addition, the two groups did not significantly differ with respect to the presence of EMG abnormalities (p=0.792). Avascular necrosis of the humeral head was detected in only two patients from the deltopectoral group.

Conclusion

Deltopectoral and anterolateral approaches do not differ regarding the presence of postoperative EMG abnormalities and functional outcomes. Surgeons can thus adopt either approach. However, dissection without damaging the soft tissue should be performed in both approaches.

Complication rate after operative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: locking plate osteosynthesis versus proximal humeral nail

PURPOSE

There is still disagreement regarding the optimal surgical treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. The aim of this monocentric, retrospective study was to compare the complication rate of internal fixation with a locking plate versus proximal humeral nailing after a one-year follow-up.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2016, 292 patients suffered a fracture of the proximal humerus and were treated surgically at our level-I trauma center. According to the inclusion criteria, 50 patients were included in this study: 19 of these (11 three-part fractures and 8 four-part fractures) were treated with a proximal humeral nail (HN) and 31 (12 three-part fractures and 19 four-part fractures) with a locking plate (LP) osteosynthesis. Classification was performed according to the Hertel classification. At a 1-year follow-up, the complication rate of the two treatment methods was compared.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (40%) suffered at least one complication. Of these, six patients (12%) were treated with a HN and 14 (28%) with a LP (p = 0.39). The most frequent complication was screw perforation (22%), followed by non-union (16%). Humeral head necrosis (10%) occurred only in the LP cohort. One wound infection occurred in a patient treated with a HN. Four-part fractures were treated more frequently with a LP. However, the difference was non-significant in this sample (p = 0.186).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study provide some evidence that in terms of complication rate, both treatment options are comparable for internal fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. The type of fracture seems to be decisive for the choice of implant.

Anatomic locking plates for complex proximal humeral fractures: anatomic neck fractures versus surgical neck fractures

BACKGROUND

Continued debate exists on the management of displaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures. Only a few studies have compared the efficacy of proximal humeral locking plates (PHLPs) for treating anatomic neck fractures (ANFs) and surgical neck fractures (SNFs).

METHODS

The medical data of 31 consecutive patients with displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures treated with PHLPs between May 2013 and April 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. We divided the patients into the ANF and SNF groups and assessed the neck-shaft angle (NSA), sum of the screw tip-articular surface distance, and other parameters postoperatively at 3 days and at 12 months using shoulder radiographs. The Constant-Murley scores were assessed at 3 days, 12 months, and last follow-up.

RESULTS

The ANF group had a significantly lower mean age and significantly greater mean operative duration, estimated blood loss, and rate of bone grafting. Full or partial osteonecrosis of the humeral head developed in 7 patients and 1 patient in the ANF and SNF groups, respectively. Screw cutout and/or pullout complications occurred in 8 cases in the ANF group but not in the SNF group. In the ANF group, the values for NSA and the sum of the screw tip-articular surface distance changed significantly from 3 days to 12 months postoperatively. There were no significant correlations among the tested parameters.

CONCLUSION

ANFs resulted in more complications at a younger age than SNFs. ANF treatment using PHLPs is more prone to a decreased NSA and humeral head osteonecrosis and has poorer clinical outcomes than SNF treatment using PHLPs.

Osteonecrosis After Surgically Repaired Proximal Humerus Fractures Is a Predictor of Poor Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of osteonecrosis (ON) on the clinical and functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Over a 12-year period, patients were screened and identified on presentation to the emergency department or in the clinical office for inclusion in an institutional review board-approved registry. One hundred sixty-five patients with 166 proximal humerus fractures met inclusion criteria. Eight patients developed radiographic evidence of ON (4.8%).

INTERVENTION

Surgical repair of proximal humerus fractures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Patients were divided into 2 cohorts; 1 cohort being those diagnosed with ON and the other cohort being those who were not. All patients were prospectively followed and assessed for clinical and functional outcomes at the latest follow-up visit (mean = 22.9 months) using the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand survey along with ranges of motion of the injured extremity.

RESULTS

Average postoperative forward elevation for patients with ON was worse than those without ON (P = 0.002). Additionally, there was a significant difference in Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores at the latest follow-up between the 2 groups (P = 0.026). There was no difference in external rotation or mean length of follow-up between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the negative effects of ON after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Those who develop ON have poorer functional and clinical outcomes as compared with patients without ON. Consequently, the development of ON can be used as a predictor of poor outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cost-effectiveness of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Compared With Hemiarthroplasty in the Management of Complex Proximal Humerus Fractures

Objectives

To determine if open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is more cost-effective than hemiarthroplasty (HA) in the management of proximal humerus fracture.

Design

Retrospective cohort study with cost-effectiveness analysis.

Setting

Tertiary referral center in Rochester, NY.

Patients/participants

The records of 459 consecutive patients in whom a proximal humerus fracture was treated surgically at our institution between the years 2002 and 2012 were studied retrospectively. We identified 30 consecutive patients with a mean follow-up of 60.3 months (13.6–134.5 months) of which 15 patients underwent primary ORIF and another 15 underwent primary HA for the management of head-splitting fracture or fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus.

Intervention

HA or ORIF for the management of proximal humerus fracture.

Main outcome measurements

SF-36 scores were converted to utility weights, and a cost-effectiveness model was designed to evaluated ORIF and HA.

Results

Given the baseline assumptions, ORIF was slightly more costly but also more effective (0.75 quality-adjusted life years [QALY] vs 0.67 QALY) than HA. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $5319/QALY for ORIF compared to HA, which is less than the cost-effectiveness standard utilized based on a willingness to pay of $50,000/QALY.

Conclusions

Compared to HA, ORIF is the more cost-effective approach for the surgical management of complex proximal humerus fractures. These data are limited by patient selection which would impact the relative utility scores. These results suggest that ORIF should be considered the preferable surgical approach given payer and patient perspectives. Level of Evidence: This is a Level III retrospective, cohort therapeutic study.

Outcome Analysis of Locking Plate Fixation in Proximal Humerus Fracture

INTRODUCTION

Proximal humerus fractures account for approximately 5% of all fractures. Stable minimally displaced fractures can be treated nonoperatively but the management of displaced fractures remain controversial with various modalities of treatment available. Locking plates provide stable fixation and enable early postoperative mobilization specially in osteoporotic proximal humerus fracture.

AIM

To evaluate the functional outcome of locking plate fixation and to compare the results of two approaches used for fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary level hospital between September 2011 to December 2013. PHILOS plates were used for internal fixation of displaced proximal humerus fractures Neer's type 2 part, 3 part and 4 part fractures on 26 patients (M/F ratio 1.36:1; mean age 46 years). According to Neer classification, 5,12 and 9 patients had displaced 2, 3 and 4 part fractures respectively. Deltopectoral and deltoid splitting approaches were used for fixation on 13 patients each. Functional outcome was assessed using Constant-Murley shoulder score. Graphpad software version 6.0 was used with Chi-square test and Fisher-exact test are used to compare data. The p-value< 0.05 is considered significant.

RESULTS

Of the 26 patients, all fractures united radiologically and clinically and average constant score at final follow-up was 72.5. At the final follow-up 8 patients had good score, 10 patients had moderate score, 6 patients had excellent outcome and 2 patients had poor outcome according to Constant score. Mean time to union was 12.3 weeks (9 -15 weeks). Four complications (15.4%) were encountered, 2 cases of varus malunion, 1 case of wound infection which required wound debridement and 1 case of screw cut-out in which screw removal was done. Mean constant score in delto splitting approach was 70.9 and 74 in deltopectoral group (p-value= 0.54). No significant difference existed in constant score in 2 approaches. No significant difference existed between groups in terms of complications (P > .05) and all fractures were united.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that locking plate fixation gives good functional outcomes in treatment of proximal humerus fractures. There was no significant difference in the two approaches used for exposure. Our results are comparable to various studies conducted by other authors which states that locking plates provide better functional and radiological outcomes as compared to other fixation methods like Tension band wiring, percutaneous K-wire fixation, non-locking plates, intramedullary nails.

Histomorphometric Assessment of Cancellous and Cortical Bone Material Distribution in the Proximal Humerus of Normal and Osteoporotic Individuals: Significantly Reduced Bone Stock in the Metaphyseal and Subcapital Regions of Osteoporotic Individuals

Osteoporosis is a systemic disorder predominantly affecting postmenopausal women but also men at an advanced age. Both genders may suffer from low-energy fractures of, for example, the proximal humerus when reduction of the bone stock or/and quality has occurred.The aim of the current study was to compare the amount of bone in typical fracture zones of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic individuals.The amount of bone in the proximal humerus was determined histomorphometrically in frontal plane sections. The donor bones were allocated to normal and osteoporotic groups using the T-score from distal radius DXA measurements of the same extremities. The T-score evaluation was done according to WHO criteria. Regional thickness of the subchondral plate and the metaphyseal cortical bone were measured using interactive image analysis.At all measured locations the amount of cancellous bone was significantly lower in individuals from the osteoporotic group compared to the non-osteoporotic one. The osteoporotic group showed more significant differences between regions of the same bone than the non-osteoporotic group. In both groups the subchondral cancellous bone and the subchondral plate were least affected by bone loss. In contrast, the medial metaphyseal region in the osteoporotic group exhibited higher bone loss in comparison to the lateral side.This observation may explain prevailing fracture patterns, which frequently involve compression fractures and certainly has an influence on the stability of implants placed in this medial region. It should be considered when planning the anchoring of osteosynthesis materials in osteoporotic patients with fractures of the proximal humerus.

Complex proximal humerus fractures: Hertel's criteria reliability to predict head necrosis

BACKGROUND

The risk of post-traumatic humeral head avascular necrosis (AVN), regardless of the treatment, has a high reported incidence. In 2004, Hertel et al. stated that the most relevant predictors of ischemia after intracapsular fracture treated with osteosynthesis are the calcar length, medial hinge integrity and some specific fracture types. Based on Hertel's model, the purpose of this study is to evaluate both its reliability and weaknesses in our series of 267 fractures, assessing how the anatomical configuration of fracture, the quality of reduction and its maintenance were predictive of osteonecrosis development, and so to suggest a treatment choice algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study, level of evidence IV, was conducted to duly assess the radiographic features of 267 fractures treated from 2004 to 2010 following Hertel's criteria treated with open reduction and internal fixation by angular stability plates and screws. The average age was 65.2 years. The average follow-up was 28.3 ± 17.0 months. The percentage of AVN, the quality and maintenance of reduction obtained during surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

The AVN incidence was 3.7 %. No significant correlation with gender, age and fracture type was found. At the last follow-up X-ray, only 30 % presented all Hertel's good predictors in the AVN group, 4.7 % in the non-AVN group (p < 0.05). About quality of reduction in the AVN group, it was poor in 50 %; while in the non-AVN group, it was poor in 3.4 % (p < 0.05). Four patients with AVN were symptomatic, and three needed a second surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Hertel's criteria are important in the surgical planning, but they are not sufficient: an accurate evaluation of the calcar area fracture in three planes is required. All fractures involving calcar area should be studied with CT.

Nailing of three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head -- long-term results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Long term outcome of the treatment of displaced complex fractures of humeral head is rare in the literature especially in greater cohorts. Main purpose of our study was the assessment of long term results of intramedullary nailing of 3-4 part fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

137 patients with 137 three or four-part fractures of the humeral head treated by intramedullary nailing were reassessed after an average follow-up time of 57 (27-93) months. The whole cohort consisted of 85 three-part fractures, 38 four-part fractures and 14 fracture-dislocations. Radiographic and clinical outcome - absolute Constant score (CS(abs)) and relative Constant score (compared to the contralateral side - CS(rel)) were evaluated. The rate of complications was recorded. Analysis of the influence of quality of achieved reduction on final functional result and on the development of complications was performed.

RESULTS

125 fractures healed uneventfully. Mean long term CS(rel) was 81% of the unaffected side. Mean CS(rel) was 85% in 3-part fractures, 73% in four-part fractures, 80% in three-part fracture-dislocations and 70% in four-part fracture-dislocations. 96 (70%) patients achieved excellent or good results (CS(rel) higher than 80%), 17 (12.4%) satisfactory results and 24 (17.5%) poor results (CS(rel) less than 60%). No significant difference was observed in functional results between different age groups. No incidence of non-union was observed, 4 losses of reduction were encountered. We observed 17 cases of complete humeral head necrosis, 14 of them in the group of 4-part fractures. Reduction quality strongly influenced functional result and development of head necrosis. In the group of excellent reduction mean CS(rel) was 88% and the rate of necrosis was 2%. Moderate reduction quality deteriorated CS(rel) to 70% and head necrosis rate rose up to 28%. If reduction was poor, mean CS(rel) was 52% and the rate of complete necrosis rose to 60%.

CONCLUSION

Long term results confirmed nailing as appropriate treatment strategy for all types of humeral head fractures with limitation of excellent reduction in every age group. Moderate or even poor reduction significantly deteriorates functional results and increases rate of complete necrosis of the humeral head. If good reduction cannot be achieved, treatment strategy should be changed.

Fractures of the proximal humerus

Fractures of the proximal humerus have been diagnosed and managed since the earliest known surgical texts. For more than four millennia the preferred treatment was forceful traction, closed reduction, and immobilization with linen soaked in combinations of oil, honey, alum, wine, or cerate. The bandages were further supported by splints made of wood or coarse grass. Healing was expected in forty days. Different fracture patterns have been discussed and classified since Ancient Greece. Current classification of proximal humeral fractures mainly relies on the classifications proposed by Charles Neer and the AO/OTA classification. Since the late 1980's it has been known that intra- and inter-observer variation was high within the two systems. I conducted a series of observer studies to qualify the disagreement further and to study to what extent improvement of agreement could be obtained. No clinically significant differences in observer agreement were found at different levels of clinical experience, by reducing the number of categories, or by adding high quality radiographs, CT or 3D CT scans. A consistently low agreement on the Neer classification within and between untrained orthopaedic doctors was found. However, we also found that inter-observer agreement on treatment recommendation was higher than the agreement on the Neer classification. In a randomized trial we found that agreement could improve significantly by training of doctors, especially among specialists. However, classification of proximal humeral fractures remains a challenge for the conduct, reporting, and interpretation of clinical trials. The evidence for the benefits of surgery in complex fractures of the proximal humerus is weak. In three systematic reviews I studied the outcome after locking plate osteosynthesis or reverse arthroplasty in complex fractures patterns. No randomized trials or well-conducted comparative studies were identified. High failure rates suggest that the use of these implants for complex fractures of the humerus should not be used outside clinical protocols. I recommend the conduct of randomized trials, and a design of such study is proposed.

Reconstruction of unstable, complex proximal humeral fractures with the da Vinci cage: surgical technique and outcome at 2 to 6 years

BACKGROUND

Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures remains a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. We describe the reconstruction of such fractures with a new device designed to provide good medial cortex support and report treatment outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The da Vinci device is an open triangular prism made of titanium. It is inserted in the proximal humeral cavity to stabilize the humeral head and tuberosities. Between May 2005 and December 2010, we treated 81 patients with unstable dislocated proximal fractures using this device. We report the outcome of the 69 patients monitored for at least 2 years.

RESULTS

The results, based on the Constant-Murley and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up, were excellent in 36 of 69 patients, good in 29, fair in 2, and poor in the remaining 2. Successful fracture healing was obtained in 68 of 69 patients, whereas the cage was removed in 1 patient 80 days after surgery because of infection. Partial vascular osteonecrosis occurred in 5 patients but was clinically symptomatic in only 1 of these. Fragment reduction was maintained during follow-up in all 68 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The da Vinci cage results in good reduction and stable fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures, as well as in cases of humeral head dislocation and comminuted fractures. Unlike other devices and screwed plates, it does not invade the subacromial space and osteosynthesis is minimally invasive.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case Series, Treatment Study.

Plating of proximal humeral fractures

The optimal treatment for proximal humeral fractures is controversial. Few data exist concerning the influence of the surgical approach on the outcome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plate fixation through a deltopectoral vs an anterolateral deltoid-splitting approach. Of 86 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 70 were available for follow-up examination. Thirty-three patients were treated through a deltopectoral approach and 37 through an anterolateral deltoid-splitting approach. In all cases, open reduction and internal fixation with a PHILOS locking plate (Synthes, Umkirch, Germany) was performed. Clinical follow-up included evaluation of pain, shoulder mobility, and strength. Constant score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were assessed. A clinical neurological examination of the axillary nerve was also performed. Consolidation, reduction, and appearance of head necrosis were evaluated radiographically. After a mean follow-up of 33 months, Constant scores, DASH scores, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores showed no significant differences between the groups. Clinical neurologic examination of the axillary nerve revealed no obvious damage to the nerve in either group. Deltopectoral and anterolateral detoid-splitting approaches for plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures are safe and provide similar clinical outcomes. The results of this study suggest that the approach can be chosen according to surgeon preference.

Surgical treatment of Neer Group VI proximal humeral fractures: retrospective comparison of PHILOS® and hemiarthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Neer Group VI proximal humeral fractures often are related to persistent disability despite surgical treatment. We retrospectively compared the outcome after open reduction and internal fixation with the PHILOS(®) plate or primary hemiarthroplasty in patients with Neer Group VI fractures focusing on complications, shoulder function, health-related quality of life (SF-36), and potential risk factors for complications.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The aim of this study was to compare the PHILOS(®) plate with primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of specific Neer Group VI fractures. We asked whether (1) both procedures have comparable clinical and radiologic complication rates; (2) one procedure is superior in terms of revision rate; (3) objective and subjective shoulder function (Constant-Murley score) and health-related quality of life (SF-36) were comparable in both groups at final followup; and (4) there are clinical or radiologic predictors for complications in any group?

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2007, 44 consecutive patients (mean, 75.2 years) with a Neer Group VI proximal humeral fracture were included. Twenty-two patients treated with a PHILOS(®) plate were compared with 22 patients treated by primary hemiarthroplasty. Both groups were similar in all criteria. At minimum followup of 12 months (mean, 30 months; range, 12-83 months), radiographic control, Constant-Murley score, and SF-36 were performed.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with complications (63.6%) were counted in the PHILOS(®) plate group, of which 10 (45.4%) needed revision surgery, mostly as a result of avascular necrosis and screw cut-outs. In the primary hemiarthroplasty group, only one patient needed revision surgery (4.5%). Smoking and steroid therapy were substantially associated with complications in the PHILOS(®) plate group. There were no differences between the two groups regarding Constant-Murley or SF-36 scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Angular stable open reduction and internal fixation was associated with high complication and revision rates, especially in patients who smoked and those receiving steroid therapy. Primary hemiarthroplasty provides limited function, which had little influence on the quality of life in this elderly collective. There are predictive factors for complications after the treatment of Neer Group VI proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS(®) plate. Primary hemiarthroplasty remains a good option, especially when treating elderly patients.

Benefits and harms of locking plate osteosynthesis in intraarticular (OTA Type C) fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Locking plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures are widely recommended and used, even in complex intraarticular fracture patterns such as AO/OTA Type C fractures. We systematically reviewed clinical studies assessing the benefits and harms of osteosynthesis with angle stable plates in AO/OTA Type C fractures of the proximal humerus.

METHODS

We conducted an iterative search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Cinahl, and PEDro in all languages from 1999 to November 2010. Eligible studies should study the outcome for Type C fractures after primary osteosynthesis with locking plate within two weeks of injury, and a follow-up period of six months or more. Patients should be evaluated with the Constant-Murley Score (CS). Two observers extracted data independently.

RESULTS

Twelve studies and 282 Type C fractures were included. Results were categorised according to study type and synthesised qualitatively. No randomised clinical trials were identified. Two comparative, observational studies reported a mean CS of 71 (relative to contralateral shoulder) and 75 (non-adjusted Constant Score) for Type C fractures. For all studies mean non-adjusted CS ranged from 53 to 75. Mean age- and sex-adjusted CS ranged from 60 to 88. Mean CS relative to the contralateral shoulder ranged from 71 to 85. The most common complications were avascular necrosis (range, 4-33%), screw perforations (range, 5-20%), loss of fixation (range, 3-16%), impingement (range, 7-11%) and infections range 4-19%. Reoperation rate ranged from 6 to 44%.

CONCLUSIONS

Insufficient study designs and unclear reporting preclude safe treatment recommendations. Complication and reoperation rates were unexpected high. Based on the studies included we cannot routinely recommend the use of locking plates in AO/OTA Type C fractures.

Clinical outcome and complications using a polyaxial locking plate in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures. A reliable system?

INTRODUCTION

The surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures (ORIF) is a perpetual challenge to the surgeon. For this reason, the principle of polyaxiality was developed to provide an improved primary stability of the fracture through better anchorage of the screws, especially in osteoporotic bone. The aim of this study was to present clinical results with the polyaxial locking plate in the operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in order to determine whether the technique of polyaxiality leads to better functional outcome and lower complication rates in comparison to monoaxial plates in the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated surgically with the polyaxial locking Suture Plate™ (Arthrex(®)) between 03/2007 and 06/2009. Fifty-two of the patients (mean age, 69.9 ± 12.1) were included in a radiographical and clinical examination using the Constant score (CS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH).

RESULTS

The follow-up examinations were on average 13.9 ± 4.5 months (10-27 months) after surgical treatment. The mean CS of the patients was 66.0 ± 13.7 points, the age- and gender-related CS was 90.9% ± 20.0% and the mean DASH score was 23.8 ± 19.8 points for the injured side. The patients with a nearly anatomical reduction of their fracture (n = 13) reached a significantly higher CS (75.1 ± 8.5; p = 0.004) and DASH-score (13.6 ± 11.6; p = 0.043) and none of these patients had a complication. The complications were identified in 12 (23.1%) cases, 5 of which involved loss of reduction. All of these 5 cases were lacking of initial medial column support and 4 of which were type C2.3 AO-Classification.

CONCLUSION

The data show that the combination of angular stability with the possibility of variable polyaxial screw direction is a good concept for reduction and fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures, but anatomical reduction and medial support remain important preconditions for a good outcome. However, a significantly lower rate of complications or better clinical outcome than that reported in the literature could not be found.

Locked plating for proximal humeral fractures: differences between the deltopectoral and deltoid-splitting approaches

BACKGROUND

Locking proximal humerus plate (LPHP) fixation has recently become available for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. However, the preliminary results were contradictory. The technical requirements for success when using LPHP remain to be defined. Maybe the approach to the proximal humerus plays an important role, not the implants. We analyzed two surgical approaches to proximal humeral fractures.

METHODS

Between April 2004 and October 2007, 63 consecutive patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures who underwent LPHP osteosynthesis in our institute were classified to two treatment groups retrospectively: the deltopectoral incision and the deltoid-splitting incision according to surgeon's preference. The Constant and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were recorded for clinical assessment. Quality of reduction, fracture union, and radiographic complications were recorded for radiographic assessment. Electrophysiological abnormalities were also assessed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to demographic data, preoperative radiographic findings, and duration of follow-up. There were also no significant differences between the groups with regard to operative time (p = 0.918), blood loss (p = 0.407), hospital stay (p = 0.431), postoperative head-shaft angle (p = 0.769), union time (p = 0.246), final head-shaft angle (p = 0.533), Constant score (p = 0.677), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (p = 0.833), radiographic complications (p = 1.000), and presence of electrophysiological abnormalities (p = 0.296). Avascular necrosis of the humeral head was found in three patients, all of whom in the deltopectoral approach group.

CONCLUSION

We found no statistically significant difference in clinical, radiographic, and electrophysiological outcomes between the deltopectoral approach and deltoid-splitting approach while surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

The calcar screw in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures--a case study

BACKGROUND

With new minimally-invasive approaches for angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures, the need for the placement of oblique inferomedial screws ('calcar screw') has increasingly been discussed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of calcar screws on secondary loss of reduction and on the occurrence of complications.

METHODS

Patients with a proximal humeral fracture who underwent angular stable plate fixation between 01/2007 and 07/2009 were included. On AP views of the shoulder, the difference in height between humeral head and the proximal end of the plate were determined postoperatively and at follow-up. Additionally, the occurrence of complications was documented. Patients with calcar screws were assigned to group C+, patients without to group C-.

RESULTS

Follow-up was possible in 60 patients (C+ 6.7 ± 5.6 M/C- 5.0 ± 2.8 M). Humeral head necrosis occurred in 6 (C+, 15.4%) and 3 (C-, 14.3%) cases. Cut-out of the proximal screws was observed in 3 (C+, 7.7%) and 1 (C-, 4.8%) cases. In each group, 1 patient showed delayed union. Implant failure or lesions of the axillary nerve were not observed. In 44 patients, true AP and Neer views were available to measure the head-plate distance. There was a significant loss of reduction in group C- (2.56 ± 2.65 mm) compared to C+ (0.77 ± 1.44 mm; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The placement of calcar screws in the angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures is associated with less secondary loss of reduction by providing inferomedial support. An increased risk for complications could not be shown.

Locking plate osteosynthesis in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is considerable uncertainty about the optimal treatment of displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Within the last decade, locking plate technology has been considered a breakthrough in the treatment of these complex injuries.

METHODS

We systematically identified and reviewed clinical studies on the benefits and harms after osteosynthesis with locking plates in displaced 4-part fractures.

RESULTS

We included 14 studies with 374 four-part fractures. There were 10 case series, 3 retrospective observational comparative studies, 1 prospective observational comparative study, and no randomized trials. Small studies with a high risk of bias precluded reliable estimates of functional outcome. High rates of complications (16-64%) and reoperations (11-27%) were reported.

INTERPRETATION

The empirical foundation for the value of locking plates in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus is weak. We emphasize the need for well-conducted randomized trials and observational studies.

Medial support by fibula bone graft in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures: an in vitro study with synthetic bone

BACKGROUND

Failure to achieve stable fixation with medial support in proximal humeral fractures can result in varus malalignment and cut-through of the proximal screws. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of an intramedullary fibula bone graft on the biomechanical properties of proximal humeral fractures stabilized by angular stable plate fixation in a bone model under cyclic loading.

METHODS

Two fixation techniques were tested in 20 composite analog humeri models. In group F- (n = 10), fractures were fixed by an anatomically formed locking plate system. In group F+ (n = 10), the same fixation system was used with an additional fibular graft model with a length of 6 cm inserted in an intramedullary manner. Active abduction was simulated for 400 cycles by use of a recently established testing setup. Fragment gap distance was measured, and thereby, intercyclic motion, fragment migration, and residual plastic deformation were determined.

RESULTS

The addition of a fibular graft to the fixation plate led to 5 times lower intercyclic motion, 2 times lower fragment migration, and 2 times less residual plastic deformation. Neither screw pullout, cut-through, nor implant failure was observed.

CONCLUSION

Medial support with an intramedullary fibular graft in an angular stable fixation of the proximal humerus in vitro increases overall stiffness of the bone-implant construct and reduces migration of the humeral head fragment. This technique might provide a useful tool in the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures, especially when there is medial comminution.

Clinical longer-term results after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures with a locking compression plate (PHILOS)

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the subjective and objective longer-term outcomes after fracture fixation with the Proximal Humerus InterLocking OSteosynthesis (PHILOS) plate.

DESIGN

Minimum 4-year follow-up of a primary prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single university trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-four consecutively collected patients fulfilled the study criteria. Seven patients (11%) were lost to follow-up, resulting in 57 patients (65 ± 14 years).

INTERVENTION

Open reduction and internal fixation with the PHILOS® plate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Standardized follow-up including functional outcome instruments (eg, Constant Murley score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), rate of complications, and secondary surgeries at 6, 12, and no less than 48 months (uni- and multivariate analysis; P < 0.05).

RESULTS

At the 4- to 6-year follow-up (median 5 years postinjury), patients on average achieved an 87% range of motion of the injured compared with the uninjured shoulder (eg, 133° ± 40° versus 152° ± 26° abduction). Objective and subjective outcome improved significantly during the overall follow-up, most of all in reoperated and younger patients (65 years and younger) and within the first postinjury year. We observed an overall reoperation rate of 29% and 10 patients (17.5%) demonstrated an insufficient result resulting from pain (greater than 3 visual analog scale) or restricted abduction (less than 90°) at longer-term follow-up. First, the need for revision surgery and, second, increasing age were found to be the most predictive factors for unsatisfactory results.

CONCLUSIONS

Fracture fixation with the PHILOS showed good to excellent longer-term results in three fourths of patients with outcome partially still improving after the first postoperative year.

The hybrid technique: potential reduction in complications related to pins mobilization in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fracture fixation has a high incidence of complications especially when pins are used in elderly patients. In 2005, we introduced a new technique that augmented osteosutures by using 2.5-mm fully threaded pins and an external fixator (hybrid technique). The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of the hybrid technique (HT) with traditional pins fixation.

METHODS

A prospective nonrandomized study was organized on 2 consecutive series of patients: 51 patients treated with percutaneous fixation using 2.5-mm terminally threaded pins and 55 patients treated with the Hybrid technique. In both groups, an open reduction and osteosutures augmented with percutaneous fixation was used when closed reduction was insufficient to provide anatomical reduction. The patients were assessed at 6- and 12-month follows-ups using DASH score, Constant score, and Modified Constant score (MCS).

RESULTS

Sixteen patients treated with traditional pins experienced complications compared to 6 patients in the HT group (P = .006). The revision rate was 19% for the traditional pins group and 4% for the HT group (P = .04). Pins migration affected 8 patients in the traditional pins group and 1 case in the hybrid group (P = .01). The MCS at the 12-month follow-up was 89 ± 9 in the HT group and 77 ± 14 in the traditional pins group (P = .03). The MCS was negatively affected by complications and malreduction (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that the HT is a valuable option for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. It has benefits compared to the traditional technique.

Da Vinci System: clinical experience with complex proximal humerus fractures

The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of displaced proximal humerus fractures with the "Da Vinci System". It is a triangle-shaped cage whose opposite faces are pierced, and it represents the evolution of a triangle-shaped bone block technique performed in a previous series of 33 patients. The new device is an interesting innovation to treat the difficult problem of fracture fragments reconstruction and stability, metaphyseal bone loss and proximal humerus revascularization. According to the technique, authors position the correct size titanium cage into the metaepiphysis, so that the fragments are reduced upon the cage, and they are stabilized with a minimal osteosynthesis by Kirschner wires, titanium screws or transosseous sutures. If the fracture line involves the proximal portion of the diaphysis, it is possible to use a short low profile plate. Between May 2005 and November 2009, we treated 71 patients (34 men and 37 women), even though we included in our study only 59 patients, who had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The first patient has been treated in May 2005 and the last one in September 2008. The mean age was 60.8 years (minimum 27, maximum 78). There were 8 displaced 3-part fractures, 20 displaced 4-part fractures, 10 4-part fracture-dislocations, 5 head splitting, 12 unclassified multifragmentary fractures, 1 2-part fracture with multifragmentary calcar and 3 malunions of 4-part fracture. The functional results were evaluated by the Constant score. With a mean follow-up of 24 months (minimum 12, maximum 36 months), the mean Constant score was 80.25. The results were excellent or good in 48 cases, bad in 2 cases and satisfactory in 9; the mean active anterior elevation (AAE) was 160 degrees . All fractures but one healed; in one case, we had a deep infection after 80 days since the operation, treated with a preformed cement spacer.

Results of 131 consecutive operated patients with a displaced proximal humerus fracture: an analysis with more than two years follow-up

Objective

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of the open reduction and fixation of a dislocated proximal humerus fracture with a locking plate, also evaluating the incidence of complications and functional recovery of the shoulder. A retrospective study focusing on patients who had suffered a fracture of the proximal humerus and were treated by means of an open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate, using either the Philos or the LPHP plate. We have also included a comparison of these two plates.

Method

Ninety-two patients were found to be eligible and were included in our study. These patients had all been treated for a proximal humerus fracture between 2002 and 2008. We included those patients who could be classified as a class 2, 3, or 4 according to the Neer classification. Demographic data, surgical technique, and peri/post-operative complications were collected from medical records. Patients were followed-up and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was filled in by phone. The mean age of our patient population was 66.2 (15–97), with a male: female ratio of 1:5 (15:77). (The median follow-up was 2.4 years (0.2–5.8). Fourteen of our patients died during follow-up, while 25 patients were otherwise lost to follow-up. For this study, out of the original 131 patients, this finally resulted in 92 patients whom we followed-up post-operatively.

Results

Ninety-two patients (70%, 92/131) were interviewed. The mean Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was 19.76 (11–54). The overall complication rate was 39.1% (36/92). The most frequently occurring complications in our patient population were hemorrhage 3.3%; dislocation of the caput humeri and/or tuberculum majus 2.2%; persistent pain 3.3%; Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head 0%; Loss of reduction and screw cutout 6.5%; Plate breakout 6.5%; Subacromial Impingement 11.9%; Frozen shoulder 3.3%; rotator cuff rupture 1.1%, and infection 1.1%. Of the entire group of patients originally included in this study, 29% was re-operated due to one of the above-mentioned complications.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the locking plate provides satisfactory functional outcomes after a mid-term follow-up in patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures. The incidence of complications and subsequent re-operation is relatively high, however, comparable to or slightly better when compared to data found in literature. Subacromial Impingement seems to occur more frequently when a Philos plate is implemented. We therefore suggest that randomized clinical trials determining the possible superiority of one specific type of plate in patients with a displaced proximal humerus fracture are to be performed in future.

The results of ORIF of displaced unstable proximal humeral fractures using a locking plate

BACKGROUND/HYPOTHESIS

Surgical management of displaced unstable proximal humerus fracture remains a challenge due to poor proximal bone quality and significant deforming forces. We hypothesized that the technique of application and mechanical properties of the proximal humeral locking plate would allow successful treatment of unstable and displaced proximal humeral fractures even in the face of osteoporotic bone.

METHOD

We evaluated prospectively the results of open reduction internal fixation of 22 displaced unstable proximal humerus fractures in 22 patients utilizing a proximal humeral locking plate.

RESULTS

Results according to the ASES scoring system at a minimum of 2 years were excellent in 13, good in 4, fair in 1, and poor in 3. One patient was lost to follow-up. All fractures healed. Anatomic alignment was obtained in 72%. Two patients developed avascular necrosis of the humeral head. There were no cases of hardware failure, infection, or loss of reduction. Three separate reduction maneuvers were employed in this series depending on fracture type.

CONCLUSION

The locking plate is an excellent device in the management of displaced unstable proximal humeral fractures and is expanding the indications for ORIF in these fractures.

Minimal invasive fixation of proximal humeral fractures with an intramedullary nail: good results in elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

To report on the results of a minimally invasive technique for the fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures with a locked intramedullary nail.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients treated with a T2 intramedullary nail between 2004 and 2007 were evaluated. Thirty-three patients were included [mean age 78, m:f ratio (1:4)]. Fracture characteristics were classified according to AO and Neer (eighteen 2-part, eleven 3-part, five 4-part fractures).

RESULTS

Functional outcome (Constant Score) was excellent in nine, satisfactory in eight and poor in three patients. Subjective outcome was satisfactory to good for patients with 2-part and 3-part fractures but poor for 4-part fractures. Major complications comprised four fixation failures, two cases of impingement and one deep infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive fixation of displaced 2-part and 3-part humeral fractures in an elderly population shows satisfactory to excellent results in 80% of patients.

Intramedullary nailing of combined/extended fractures of the humeral head and shaft

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of intramedullary nailing in the management of both "combined" and "extended" fractures of the humeral head and shaft.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series study.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

Twenty-one consecutive patients who underwent intramedullary nail insertion for "extended" or "combined," closed, nonpathologic fractures of the humeral head and shaft between October 1999 and December 2006 were included in the study. Two patients were lost to follow up and one died before fracture healing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Evaluation of outcomes was assessed with the use of the Constant score.

RESULTS

There were no neurovascular problems or infections. Eighteen fractures united from 4 to 7 months postoperatively. One case of avascular necrosis of the humeral head, one case of acromion impingement, and one case of unacceptable loss of reduction occurred. Shoulder range of motion was not regained fully in any case and mild shoulder discomfort remained in eight patients. The mean Constant score for all 18 patients was 74.4 (range, 20-95) for the affected side and 89.17 points for the uninjured side. The percentage created from the mean affected/unaffected side scores was 83.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary nailing for proximal humeral fractures associated with shaft extension or segmental involvement appears to offer a reliable treatment option.

The role of locking technology in the upper extremity

The technique of locked plating has been a major advance in Orthopaedic fracture surgery and has had an equal impact on the management of upper extremity fractures. The recognition of the role of vascularity and soft tissues in fracture healing was central to the research and development of newer plate designs that left minimal footprints on the surface of the bone. Subsequently, innovative locking technology has improved our ability to manage cases with extensive communition, inadequate bone stock, and peri-articular fractures. This paper will review the role of locking technology in the management of fractures of the upper extremity.

Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review

HYPOTHESIS

Locking plates with special configuration for the anatomic region of the proximal humerus have been introduced recently to address the difficulties of stabilizing proximal humeral fractures. The purpose of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy and early to medium term functional results of locking plates for stabilization of proximal humeral fractures.

METHODS

Using the PubMed database, a systematic review of the English and German literature was carried out in order to assess the efficacy and complications related to the use of these plates and the patients' functional outcome, using the key words "locking plates proximal humeral fractures," "angular stability plates proximal humeral fractures," "PHILOS plate," and "LPHP plate." Our criteria for eligibility were clinical studies with more than ten cases followed-up, adult patients, and adequate data provided at least in terms of implant related complications. Articles written in English and German language were included. Exclusion criteria were: studies dealing exclusively with 2-part fractures (since this category has a more favorable outcome); experimental studies; case reports; and, literature other than English or German. Each one of the articles was evaluated for quality of the study using the Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES).

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 791 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients in these studies continued to improve up to one year, achieving a mean Constant score of 74.3. The incidence of the reported complications was: avascular necrosis 7.9%, screw cut-out 11.6% and re-operation rate 13.7%.

DISCUSSION

The high incidence of cut-out may be secondary to the rigidity of the implant in combination with medial inadequate support, in cases compromised by severe underlying osteoporotic bone. Definition of indications for the use of locking plates and attention on technical aspects of applying them would help optimization of the results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review.

Early results in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate

OBJECTIVES

We report early results using a second generation locking plate, non-contact bridging plate (NCB PH((R)), Zimmer Inc. Warsaw, IN, USA), for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The NCB PH combines conventional plating technique with polyaxial screw placement and angular stability.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

SETTING

A single level-1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

A total of 50 patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated from May 2004 to December 2005.

INTERVENTION

Surgery was performed in open technique in all cases.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Implant-related complications, clinical parameters (duration of surgery, range of motion, Constant-Murley Score, subjective patient satisfaction, complications) and radiographic evaluation [union, implant loosening, implant-related complications and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head] at 6, 12 and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

All fractures available to follow-up (48 of 50) went to union within the follow-up period of 6 months. One patient was lost to follow-up, one patient died of a cause unrelated to the trauma, four patients developed AVN with cutout, one patient had implant loosening, three patients experienced cutout and one patient had an axillary nerve lesion (onset unknown). The average age- and gender-related Constant Score (n = 35) was 76.

CONCLUSIONS

The NCB PH combines conventional plating technique with polyaxial screw placement and angular stability. Although the complication rate was 19%, with a reoperation rate of 12%, the early results show that the NCB PH is a safe implant for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Bone quality measured by the radiogrammetric parameter "cortical index" and reoperations after locking plate osteosynthesis in patients sustaining proximal humerus fractures

AIM

To analyse the radiogrammetric parameter "cortical index" (CI) and its predictive value for proximal humerus fractures. Furthermore, to investigate the reoperations and the cause of reoperations after locking plate osteosynthesis of displaced proximal humerus fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

113 consecutive patients (73 women and 40 men) with a median age of 66 years (range 18-100 years) were included in this study. The median follow-up time in our database was 4.7 years (range 45-72 months). For a comparative matched-group analysis of the CI, patients with a fall on the shoulder without fracture were selected. Demographic data and all reoperations were recorded after median 58 months postoperatively. The CI was measured at the proximal humeral diaphysis.

RESULTS

The CI showed to be significant lower in the fracture group (mean 0.28) when compared to the matched group (mean 0.47, p < 0.01). 39% patients underwent a reoperation within 40 months postoperatively. 24% were reoperated within the first 12 months postoperatively, and 15% were reoperated after 12 months or later. The reoperation was independent of bone quality (p = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk for reoperation is independent of the CI even though the CI may be a predictor for proximal humerus fracture. Younger patients should be aware that surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures might be a two-stage surgery. Regular follow-up visits for older patients during the first postoperative year must be assured.

Additive fiber-cerclages in proximal humeral fractures stabilized by locking plates: no effect on fracture stabilization and rotator cuff function in human shoulder specimens

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The effect of additive fiber-cerclages in proximal humeral fractures stabilized by locking plates on fracture stabilization and rotator cuff function is unclear. Here it was assessed in a human cadaver study.

METHODS

24 paired human shoulder specimens were harvested from median 77-year-old (range 66-85) female donors. An unstable 3-part fracture model with an intact rotator cuff was developed. 1 specimen of each pair received an additive fiber-cerclage of the rotator cuff after plate fixation, and the other one received a plate fixation without an additive fiber-cerclage. Force-controlled hydraulic cylinders were used to simulate physiological rotator cuff tension, while a robot-assisted shoulder simulator performed 4 relevant cases of load: (1) axial loading at 0 degrees, (2) glenohumeral abduction at 60 degrees, (3) internal rotation at 0 degrees abduction, and (4) external rotation at 0 degrees abduction, and imitated hanging arm weight during loading without affecting joint kinematics. A 3-dimensional real-time interfragmentary motion analysis was done in fracture gaps between the greater tuberosity and the head, as well as subcapital. The capacity of the rotator cuff to strain was analyzed with an optical system.

RESULTS

Interfragmentary motion was similar between the groups with and without fiber-cerclages, in both fracture gaps and in any of the cases of load. Cerclages did not impair the capacity of the rotator cuff to strain. INTERPRETATION; Provided that unstable 3-part fractures are reduced and stabilized anatomically by a locking plate, additive fiber-cerclages do not reduce interfragmentary motion. Additive fiber-cerclages may be necessary in locking plate osteosyntheses of multiple-fractured greater tuberosities or lesser tuberosity fractures that cannot be fixed sufficiently by the plate.

Does fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis solve the problems of a fractured proximal humerus? A prospective series of 87 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is considerable controversy about the treatment of complex, displaced proximal humeral fractures. Various types of head-preserving osteosynthesis have been suggested. This prospective case series was designed to evaluate the perioperative and early postoperative complications associated with fixed-angle implants and to record outcome after bone healing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fractures of the proximal humerus were stabilized surgically in 87 patients (mean age 64 (16-93) years) by application of a fixed-angle plate (65 PHILOS, 22 T-LCP). There were 34 2-segment fractures, 42 3-segment fractures, and 11 4-segment fractures, including 7 dislocation fractures. Follow-up assessment after a minimum of 12 months was based on the Constant, UCLA, and DASH scores and on radiographs.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications included soft tissue problems (n = 9), humeral head necrosis (n = 9), screw perforation (n = 11), secondary displacements (n = 14), and delayed fracture healing (n = 4). Treatment outcomes recorded on the various scores were very good in 60-82% of the cases.

INTERPRETATION

Screw perforation of fixed-angle implants has replaced the complications of secondary displacement and implant loosening after using conventional plates. Even with the use of fixed-angle implants, fractures of the proximal humerus are associated with a high complication rate and sometimes poor outcome.

Humeral head necrosis rate at mid-term follow-up after open reduction and angular stable plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures

INTRODUCTION

Short-term follow-up of angular stable fixation for proximal humeral fractures has been well documented in the literature. Longer follow-up series are difficult to find. However, especially regarding the risk of avascular humeral head necrosis longer follow-up series are high of clinical relevance.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with a mean age of 66 years and treated with open reduction and angular stable internal fixation for proximal humeral fractures were followed up for a mean of 45 months. The clinical and radiographic follow-up (Constant Score (CS), age and gender related Constant Score (agCS), Constant Score in comparison to the contralateral side (%CS) and shoulder anterior-posterior and lateral view and axial view X-rays) was performed postoperatively.

RESULTS

Clinical results after 45 months showed a mean CS of 66.2+/-15.4 points with a mean agCS of 90.0+/-23.1%. Evaluation of the %CS showed 77.7+/-17.8%. %CS results showed no significant differences after 45 months in comparison to those obtained after 12 months. However, incidence of avascular necrosis of the humeral head doubled over the follow-up period from 4 cases at 12 months follow-up to 9 cases at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Results of open reduction and internal fixation with angular stable implants for proximal humeral fractures are reliable, however long-term complications such as avascular necrosis of the humeral head need to be evaluated further on since its incidence increases over the time.

Outcome analysis following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus

Background

Concerning surgical management experience with locking plates for proximal humeral fractures has been described with promising results. Though, distinct hardware related complaints after fracture union are reported. Information concerning the outcome after removal of hardware from the proximal humerus is lacking and most studies on hardware removal are focused on the lower extremity. Therefore the aim of this study was to analyze the functional short-term outcome following removal of locking plate fixation of the proximal humerus.

Methods

Patients undergoing removal of a locking plate of the proximal humerus were prospectively followed. Patients were subdivided into the following groups: Group HI: symptoms of hardware related subacromial impingement, Group RD: persisting rotation deficit, Group RQ: patients with request for a hardware removal. The clinical (Constant-Murley score) and radiologic (AP and axial view) follow-up took place three and six months after the operation. To evaluate subjective results, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), was completed.

Results

59 patients were included. The mean length of time with the hardware in place was 15.2 ± 3.81 months. The mean of the adjusted overall Constant score before hardware removal was 66.2 ± 25.2% and increased significantly to 73.1 ± 22.5% after 3 months; and to 84.3 ± 20.6% after 6 months (p < 0.001). The mean of preoperative pain on the VAS-scale before hardware removal was 5.2 ± 2.9, after 6 months pain in all groups decreased significantly (p < 0.001). The SF-36 physical component score revealed a significant overall improvement in both genders (p < 0.001) at six months.

Conclusion

A significant improvement of clinical outcome following removal was found. However, a general recommendation for hardware removal is not justified, as the risk of an anew surgical and anesthetic procedure with all possible complications has to be carefully taken into account. However, for patients with distinct symptoms it might be justified.

Locked intramedullary nailing for treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures

Controversy surrounds the optimal technique for fixation of displaced fractures, although locked intramedullary nailing is emerging as a preferred technique in managing displaced proximal humerus fractures in appropriately selected patients. This technique provides stable fracture fixation allowing early postoperative mobilization critical in ensuring a pain-free shoulder with a functional range of motion. Additional advantages include the ability to insert by way of a minimally invasive approach with limited soft tissue dissection, achieve accurate anatomic reduction, provide a secure construct even in the situation of osteopenic bone or comminution, and manage fractures of the proximal humerus extending into the shaft.

Locked plating in orthopaedic trauma: a clinical update

Locked plating for fracture fixation has enjoyed widespread popularity despite a paucity of published data on outcomes. Anatomically precontoured locked plates that allow fixation in various anatomic regions are widely available. New technologies incorporate subchondral support locking pegs, polyaxial bushings, and locking washers to improve intraoperative versatility. However, limited data are available on the efficacy of these new implants. The clinical performance of locked plates generally has been good. However, several unique complications have been noted, such as difficulty with implant removal, malalignment, fracture distraction, and loss of diaphyseal fixation, especially with percutaneous techniques and unicortical screws. The expense of locked plate constructs is a concern. This technology typically costs three times more than similar unlocked constructs. Locked constructs should be reserved for problematic fractures that have demonstrated poor outcomes with unlocked constructs.