[Intramedullary nailing of proximal tibial fractures. Complications and risk factors]

Prevalence of Rotational Malalignment After Infrapatellar Versus Suprapatellar Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures

Background

Up to 30% of patients with a tibial shaft fracture sustain iatrogenic rotational malalignment (RM) after infrapatellar (IP) nailing. Although IP nailing remains the management of choice for most patients, suprapatellar (SP) nailing has been gaining popularity. It is currently unknown whether SP nailing can provide superior outcomes with regard to tibial RM. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in the prevalence of RM following IP versus SP nailing.

Methods

This retrospective study included 253 patients with a unilateral, closed tibial shaft fracture treated with either an IP or SP approach between January 2009 and April 2023 in a Level-I trauma center. All patients underwent a postoperative, protocolized, bilateral computed tomography (CT) scan for RM assessment.

Results

RM was observed in 30% and 33% of patients treated with IP and SP nailing, respectively. These results indicate no significant difference (p = 0.639) in the prevalence of RM between approaches. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the distribution (p = 0.553) and direction of RM (p = 0.771) between the 2 approaches. With the IP and SP approaches, nailing of left-sided tibial shaft fractures resulted in predominantly internal RM (85% and 73%, respectively), while nailing of right-sided tibial shaft fractures resulted in predominantly external RM (90% and 80%, respectively). The intraobserver reliability for the CT measurements was 0.95.

Conclusions

The prevalence of RM was not influenced by the entry point of tibial nailing (i.e., IP versus SP). Hence, the choice of surgical approach should rely on factors other than the risk of RM.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Suprapatellar intramedullary nail combined with screw fixation has comparable surgical outcomes to minimally invasive locking plate fixation in ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures

PURPOSE

To compare union rate, union time, alignment, and complication rate in ipsilateral tibia plateau and shaft fractures treated via suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation and minimally invasive locking plate fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 48 patients who underwent minimally invasive plate fixation (n = 35) or suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation (n = 13), for the treatment of ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures with at least 1-year follow-up. Union rate, union time, radiologic alignment, and complication rate such as malalignment, nonunion, and fracture-related infection (FRI) were investigated.

RESULTS

Demographic data were not different between the two groups. Coronal plane alignment was 0.17 ± 4.23 in the plate group and -0.48 ± 4.17 in the intramedullary nail group (p = 0.637). Sagittal plane alignment was -0.13 ± 5.20 in the plate group and -1.50 ± 4.01 in the suprapatellar intramedullary nail group (p = 0.313). Coronal and sagittal malalignment recorded equal results: (p > 0.99), FRI (p = 0.602), nonunion and union times recorded (p = 0.656) and (p = 0.683, 0.829), respectively, and showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Suprapatellar intramedullary nailing with screw fixation had similar surgical outcomes with minimally invasive locking plate fixation in ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures in terms of union rate, union time, alignment, and complication rate. Thus, frequent use of intramedullary nailing combined with screw fixation is anticipated in patients with ipsilateral tibial plateau and shaft fractures when the soft tissue condition is not desirable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Comparison of suprapatellar intramedullary nailing versus minimal invasive locked plating for proximal tibia fractures

PURPOSE

To compare the radiological alignment, union time, union rate, and complication rate between suprapatellar intramedullary nails and minimally invasive locking plate fixation in the treatment of proximal tibial fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 103 patients who underwent plate fixation (n = 50) or suprapatellar intramedullary nailing (n = 53) for proximal tibial fractures involving the meta-diaphyseal junction between November 2015 and October 2020 at our institution. The union rate, union time, radiologic alignments, and complications, such as malalignment, nonunion, and deep infection, were investigated.

RESULTS

The demographic data did not differ between the plate and suprapatellar intramedullary nail groups. The alignment of the coronal plane was 0.24 ± 3.19 in the plate group and - 0.49 ± 2.22 in the intramedullary nail group (p = 0.196). Sagittal plane alignment was - 0.29 ± 4.97 in the plate group and 0.24 ± 4.12 in the intramedullary nail group (p = 0.571), and coronal malalignment (p = 0.196), sagittal malalignment (p = 0.57), deep infection (p = 0.264), nonunion (p = 0.695), union time (p = 0.329), and final union rate (p = 0.699) were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the minimally invasive locking compression plate group, the suprapatellar intramedullary nail group yielded comparable results in terms of radiological alignment and complications. Considering that proximal tibial fractures are associated with high-energy trauma and severe soft tissue damage, we believe that a suprapatellar intramedullary nail may be a good alternative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Avoiding deformity in proximal tibial nailing: risk factors, deformity rules, tips, and tricks

Malalignment is one of the most common problems linked to nailing of proximal tibial fractures. This review will cover technical aspects of intramedullary nailing and will help explain the various risk factors. Deformity rules aid in identifying the likely deformity and help to develop management strategies. Various tools and techniques are discussed which can help optimize the outcome.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level V.

From Bad to Disaster: Iatrogenic Fracture Followed by Knee Perforation With Bone Fragments During Femoral Nailing

Intramedullary nailing is the preferred treatment method in tibial, femoral shaft, and sub- or intertrochanteric fractures. Despite good results, a number of complications have been well-characterized. Joint perforation by bone fragment during nail insertion is one such complication.

We report an eventful case of a 63-year-old female patient who presented with an intertrochanteric fracture. Osteosynthesis with a short proximal femoral nail was complicated by a well-known and recognized on-time complication - an iatrogenic fracture of the femoral shaft. However, it was further complicated by knee arthrodesis by a bone fragment when a long nail was inserted. The bone fragment not only “closed” the knee joint, but fractured the medial tibial condyle and protruded into the medial soft tissues of the joint. This misfortune was not recognized intraoperatively and led to revision surgery in the short term and joint post-traumatic arthrosis with resultant total knee replacement in the long term.

Tibial alignment following intramedullary nailing via three approaches

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of malalignment in patients undergoing IMN for tibial shaft fractures treated with the extra-articular lateral parapatellar, suprapatellar, and infrapatellar approaches.

METHODS

A retrospective review of an institutional trauma database was completed at a single level 1 trauma academic medical centre. Quality of reduction was assessed using the following three parameters: (1) < 10°of angulation in orthogonal radiographic views (2) < 5 mm of displacement between the major fracture fragments (3) < 5 mm of gap between the major fracture fragments. A good reduction was one that met all 3 criteria, an acceptable reduction met 2 criteria, and a bad reduction met one or none of the criteria. All patients treated consecutively for tibial shaft fractures between June 1, 2019 and June 1, 2020 were identified. The final cohort included 57 tibia fractures in 56 patients. Of the 57 tibia fractures, 8 (14%) were proximal third, 32 (56%) were middle third, and 17 (30%) were distal third fractures.

RESULTS

We found no significant difference in angulation, displacement, or gapping with respect to surgical approach utilized or location of fracture (proximal or distal tibia fractures) on one-way ANOVA. Quality of reduction was rated as "good" in 48 (84%) of the cases (19 supra, 13 infra, and 16 lateral). Nine reductions (16%) met only two of the three reduction quality criteria and were considered acceptable reductions. These included 2 suprapatellar (1 > 5 mm displacement, 1 > 5 mm gapping), 4 infrapatellar (4 > 5 mm displacement), and 3 lateral extra-articular parapatellar (2 > 5 mm displacement and 1 > 5 mm gapping). No reductions were determined to be bad according the Baumgaertner et al. criteria. There was no significant difference in the rate of combined fibula fractures or the rate of fibular fixation between the three cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, no significant difference was found in fracture reduction angulation, displacement, and gapping in patients treated with an IMN with respect to approach for diaphyseal or metadiaphyseal tibial shaft fractures.

Comparison of Infrapatellar and Suprapatellar Approaches for Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Tibia Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To assess clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes after intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation of tibia fractures with an infrapatellar approach compared to a suprapatellar approach.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred four patients with 208 tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing between 2008 and 2018.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of tibia fractures was conducted. The clinical and functional outcomes of tibia fractures treated with IMN were compared between groups treated with an infrapatellar approach versus a suprapatellar approach. Multivariate models were created to control for confounding demographic, comorbidity, and injury-related confounders.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Outcome measures included nonunion, malunion, and infection. Subjective functional patient outcomes were assessed using pain interference and physical function Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements Systems scores.

RESULTS

There were 101 patients treated with infrapatellar nailing (49%) and 107 patients treated with suprapatellar nailing (51%). On multivariate analysis, suprapatellar nailing was independently associated with decreased risk of malunion (adjusted odds ratio, 0.165; 95% confidence interval, 0.054-0.501; P = 0.001) and decreased risk of postoperative knee pain (adjusted odds ratio, 0.272; 95% confidence interval, 0.083-0.891; P = 0.032). There was no difference in the rate of nonunion (P = 0.44), infection (P = 0.45), or Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements Systems pain interference or physical function scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Suprapatellar IMN fixation of tibial shaft fractures is independently associated with lower risk of malunion and postoperative knee pain compared to the infrapatellar approach. However, there are no functional differences between approaches.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison between infrapatellar and suprapatellar approaches for intramedullary nailing for the fractures of the tibial shaft

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the outcomes at the clinical and functional levels of suprapatellar (SP) and infrapatellar (IP) approaches for intramedullary nailing in treating tibial shaft fracture.

METHODS

Patients who underwent tibial shaft fracture intramedullary nailing by the SP approach or IP approach in a trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. The demographics, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operation time, blood loss, irrigation volume, postoperative X-ray alignment, and complications of patients were compared between the two groups under different approaches. Lysholm knee score, visual analog score (VAS), and incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP) were assessed 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The study finally included well-documented 81 patients (38 SP versus 43 IP). The SP group exhibited significantly shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy time than that of the IP group (81.7 ± 14.5 s vs. 122.0 ± 24.3 s, P < 0.001). Both aspects recorded a precise reduction of the fracture: angulation (2.1 ± 1.2° vs 3.1 ± 1.5°, P < 0.05) and translation (0.6 ± 0.8 mm vs 1.4 ± 1.5 mm, P < 0.05) in the coronal plane in the SP group. However, the sagittal plane recorded no such change (P > 0.05). The Lysholm knee score was higher in the SP group than that of the IP group (87 ± 8 vs. 80 ± 15, P < 0.05). The SP group displayed an evidently lower average VAS score than that of the IP approach group (0.3 ± 0.8 vs 1.3 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). Six cases (16%) in the SP group and 16 cases (37%) in the IP group experienced AKP 1-year post-operation (P < 0.05). As far as complications are concerned, neither group showed any significant difference (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the IP approach, the application of intramedullary nailing through the SP approach in treating tibial shaft fractures can effectively shorten the intraoperative fluoroscopy time, correct coronal plane angulation and translation deformity, reduce the incidence of AKP and improve postoperative function.

[Application of lithotomy position in closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation for tibial shaft fracture]

Objective

To explore the application value of lithotomy position in the treatment of tibial shaft fracture with closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation.

Methods

The clinical data of 78 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation between January 2015 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 33 patients were treated with lithotomy position (trial group) and 45 patients were treated with traditional supine position (control group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in general data such as gender, age, the cause of injury, the interval between injury and admission, the interval between injury and operation, and fracture type and site ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, the number of patients with open reduction, postoperative incision infection, and fracture healing were recorded. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Harris score were used to evaluate the effectiveness.

Results

Both groups of operations were successfully completed. The trial group was superior to the control group in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and the number of patients with open reduction ( P<0.05). Incision infection occurred in 1 case (3.03%) of the trial group and 3 cases (6.67%) of the control group after operation. The difference in the incidence of infection was significant ( χ ²=0.139, P=0.045). The incisions of other patients healed by first intention. X-ray film reexamination showed that the fractures of the two groups healed. The fracture healing time of the trial group was (5.30±1.33) months, while that of the control group was (5.98±1.80) months, with no significant difference ( t=-1.815, P=0.073). There was no significant difference in VAS score, Harris scores of knee joint and ankle joint between the two groups before operation and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). At 3 days after operation, the VAS score was lower in the trial group than in the control group, and the Harris scores of knee joint and ankle joint were higher in the trial group than in the control group, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

Application of lithotomy position in closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation for tibial shaft fracture is favorable for fracture reduction, with less bleeding, shorter operation time, and fewer fluoroscopy.

A Comparison of the Open Semi-extended Parapatellar Versus Standard Entry Tibial Nailing Techniques and Knee Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine if an open, semi-extended, parapatellar tibial nailing technique (SEK) imparts any undue knee symptoms/pain compared with the traditional infrapatellar tibial nailing technique (FK).

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

Forty-seven patients with OTA/AO 42A-C tibial shaft fractures were included in the study.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to treatment with either a SEK or an FK technique.

MAIN OUTCOME

The main outcome was a symptoms subset of the International Knee Documentation Committee (SS-IKDC) pertaining to knee symptoms/pain.

RESULTS

Final follow-up was collected at 1 year for 24 SEK and 23 FK patients. No significant differences were found between the groups in regards to demographics, injury, or surgery-related variables. The 2 techniques did have equivalent symptoms scores [mean for the difference (SEK - FK): 0.29, 90% confidence interval: -4.16 to 4.75] but did not have equivalent pain scores [mean for the difference (SEK - FK): 0.2, 90% confidence interval: -3.18 to 3.59]. When comparing demographic and injury-related variables to the SS-IKDC, only Kellgren-Lawrence classification was statistically significant (P = 0.026), where increasing presence of osteoarthritis was associated with lower scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this single-center randomized controlled trial show that SEK and FK techniques for tibial nailing are equivalent in regards to knee symptoms (defined as ±5 points on the SS-IKDC) but not specifically pain that showed trends toward decreasing knee pain with the open SEK technique. This randomized controlled trial demonstrates that the use of the open semi-extended, parapatellar technique for tibial nailing should not be associated with any higher likelihood of knee pain/symptoms than the traditional flexed knee, infrapatellar technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was performed to determine the efficacy of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing (IMN).

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, CNKI and Wanfang. Cochrane collaboration's tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to evaluate literature qualities. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Eight studies were eligible, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six retrospective cohort trials. There were no significant differences between suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches in operation time, coronal plane alignment, and incidence of postoperative deep infection, nonunion and secondary operation. However, suprapatellar nailing achieved a significant shorter fluoroscopy time, less VAS pain score, better sagittal plane alignment and lower incidence of angular malalignment. Though pooled results indicated no significant difference in terms of final follow-up knee functional score, the RCT subgroup analysis showed that a higher knee functional score existed in suprapatellar group.

CONCLUSIONS

For tibia IMN, suprapatellar approach might be superior to infrapatellar approach with shorter fluoroscopy time, less knee pain, better knee function recovery, and more accurate fracture reduction. Meanwhile, no increased risk of postoperative complications was identified. More RCTs are required for further research.

Decreased QOL and muscle strength are persistent 1 year after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture: a prospective 1-year follow-up cohort study

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the development in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and muscle strength in the period from surgery to 12 months postoperatively after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The design was a prospective, follow-up cohort study. QOL was measured with the questionnaire Eq5D-5L and compared to norm data from a reference population. Recordings of pain and contralateral muscle strength (isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) for knee flexion and extension were collected at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Ipsilateral MVCs were recorded at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were included. The mean age at the time of fracture was 43.1 years (18-79 years). Twelve months postoperatively, the mean Eq5D-5L index was 0.792 (95 % CI 0.747-0.837). Throughout the 12 months postoperatively, patients reported worse QOL compared to the reference population. Six and 12 months after surgery patients demonstrated decreased muscle strength in the injured leg compared to the non-injured leg for knee extension and flexion (P < 0.001). Twelve months postoperatively, increasing relative difference in muscle strength during knee extension show a fair correlation to worse QOL (R = 0.541, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Throughout the 12 months postoperatively, patients reported worse QOL compared to the reference population. Muscle strength in the non-injured leg improved over time and was higher after 6 and 12 months compared with the injured leg.

Locked META intramedullary nailing fixation for tibial fractures via a suprapatellar approach

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary nailing is an effective approach for treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures. However, infrapatellar intramedullary nailing can easily cause angulation and rotation displacement at the fracture ends and increase risk of postoperative infection. Intramedullary nailing via the suprapatellar approach was proved with good reduction and fixation. We used locked intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial fractures via a suprapatellar approach in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

23 patients undergoing tibial fractures fixation by locked META intramedullary nailing via a suprapatellar approach were enrolled between June 2012 and October 2013. There were 18 males and 5 females. The average age was 35.5 years (range 18-60 years). The intraoperative data including operative time and blood loss and postoperative data consisting of hospital stays, fluoroscopy time, fracture healing time and complications were all recorded.

RESULTS

The average operative time, blood loss, fluoroscopy time and hospital stay were 78.2 ± 9.1 min, 90.4 ± 23.4 mL, 38.5 ± 6.5 s and 11 ± 3.4 days respectively. The mean followup period in all the patients was 15.5 months. Callus appeared in the patients at average 8 weeks after surgery. The mean knee and ankle range of motion were significantly improved at the last followup (P < 0.05). The average Hospital for Special Surgery and Olerud-Molander scores was 92 ± 4.3 points and 93.6 ± 3.9 points, respectively. No complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Locked META intramedullary nail fixation via a suprapatellar approach is safe and effective for patients suffering from tibial fractures and earlier functional recovery.

Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Tibial Nail Insertion: A Prospective Randomized Control Pilot Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this OTA-approved pilot study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of the knee joint after infrapatellar (IP) versus suprapatellar (SP) tibial nail insertion.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, skeletally mature patients with OTA 42 tibial shaft fractures were randomized into either an IP or SP nail insertion group after informed consent was obtained. The SP also underwent prenail and postnail insertion patella-femoral (PF) joint arthroscopy. Patients underwent follow-up (6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months) with standard radiographs, as well as visual analog score and pain diagram documentation. At the 6-month and 12-month visits, knee function questionnaires (Lysholm knee scale and SF-36) were completed. Magnetic resonance imaging/image (MRI) of the affected knee was obtained at 12 months. Ten patients in each group were required for a power analysis for the anticipated larger randomized control trial, but enrollment in each arm was not limited because of known problems with patient follow-up over a 12-month period.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients/fractures were enrolled in this study. Of those, only 25 patients/fractures (14 IP, 11 SP) fully complied with and completed 12 months of follow-up. Six of 11 SP presented with articular changes (chondromalacia) in the PF joint during the preinsertion arthroscopy. Three patients displayed a change in the articular cartilage based on postnail insertion arthroscopy. At 12 months, all fractures in both groups had proceeded to union. There were no differences between the affected and unaffected knee with respect to range of motion. Functional visual analog score and Lysholm knee scores showed no significant differences between groups (P > 0.05). The SF-36v2 comparison also revealed no significant differences in the overall score, all 4 mental components, and 3/4 physical components (P > 0.05). The bodily pain component score was superior in the SP group (45 vs. 36, P = 0.035). All 11 SP patients obtained MRIs at 1 year. Five of these patients had evidence of chondromalacia on MRI. These findings did not correlate with either the prenail or postnail insertion arthroscopy. Importantly, no patient in the SP group with postnail insertion arthroscopic changes had PF joint pain at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there seemed to be no significant differences in pain, disability, or knee range of motion between these 2 tibial intramedullary nail insertion techniques after 12 months of follow-up. Based on this pilot study data, larger prospective trial with long-term follow-up is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Suprapatellar nailing of tibial fractures-Indications and technique

Intramedullary nailing is the standard procedure for surgical treatment of closed and Gustilo-Anderson Grade I-II° open fractures of the tibial shaft. The use of intramedullary nailing for the treatment of proximal metaphyseal tibia fractures is frequently followed by postoperative malalignment, whereas plate osteosynthesis is associated with higher rates of postoperative infection. Intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures is generally performed through an infrapatellar approach. The injured extremity must be positioned at a minimum of 90° of flexion in the knee joint to achieve optimal exposure of the correct entry point. The tension of the quadriceps tendon causes a typical apex anterior angulation of the proximal fragment. The suprapatellar approach improves reduction of the fracture and reduces the occurrence of malalignment during intramedullary nailing of extra-articular proximal tibial fractures. The knee is positioned in 20° of flexion to neutralise traction forces secondary to the quadriceps muscle, thus preventing an apex anterior angulation of the proximal fragment. An additional advantage of the technique is that it allows the surgeon to avoid or minimise further soft tissue damage because of the distance between the optimal incision point and the usual area of soft tissue damage.

Intramedullary Nailing and Adjunct Permanent Plate Fixation in Complex Tibia Fractures

The use of adjunct plate fixation is known to be a useful reduction aid during intramedullary nailing of the proximal tibia. We have expanded the indications beyond aiding the reduction and now use these plates as an adjunct to intramedullary nailing during the healing period. Specific indications include diaphyseal tibial fractures with severe bone loss/comminution and segmental tibial fractures with or without intraarticular extension. We believe the adjunctive permanent plate fixation technique may offer a treatment solution in these selected situations with the added benefit of immediate weight bearing.

Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach: radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic results associated with the use of a percutaneous suprapatellar (SP) portal and accompanying instrumentation for tibial intramedullary nail (IMN) insertion using a semiextended approach.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, nonconsecutive study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 2007 to January 2011, 56 fractures (55 patients) underwent intramedullary nailing of a tibia fracture with a semiextended approach through a SP portal. Radiographic and clinical follow-up examinations were performed at a minimum of 1 year after the index procedure. Measurements included bone healing, tibial alignment, knee range of motion, pain drawings, pain scoring (visual analogue scale), functional outcome (Lysholm and SF-36 scoring), evaluation of prenail and postnail insertion arthroscopic images of the patella-femoral (PF) joint (subgroup of study patients), and 1-year follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (STIR and T2 gradient echo) of the knee to evaluate the PF joint cartilage. MRI scans were reviewed by an independent bone radiologist, whereas arthroscopic images were evaluated by an independent sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (37 fractures) were available for follow-up at a minimum of 1 year (range: 12-49 months) after the index procedure. All but 2 fractures healed after the index procedure (94.6%). There was 1 radiographic malunion (2.7%). The mean Lysholm knee score was 82.14. Mean SF-36 physical and mental scores were 40.8 and 46.0, respectively. Mean arc of knee motion was 124.4 degrees for the affected extremity compared with 127.2 degrees for the contralateral knee. One patient (2.7%) complained of mild pain at the scar, but no patient complained of anterior knee pain either at the PF joint or at the anterior proximal tibia. In 13 of 15 patients undergoing an arthroscopic assessment of the PF joint, prenail and postnail insertion, no cartilage changes, or pressure points were seen either at the patella or at the trochlea groove. Two patients had grade II chondromalacia of the trochlea immediately after the procedure, but these did not correspond with either MRI scans or clinical findings at 1 year. When the remainder of the 1-year MRI scans were reviewed, 1 knee (2.7%) in a patient that did not have an arthroscopic examination was found to have grade II chondromalacia in the PF joint, but this did not correlate with the clinical examination, which was normal.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first paper to critically document clinical and radiographic results using the percutaneous SP portal with the semiextended approach for IMN of the tibia. Our 1 year results indicate that the procedure resulted in excellent tibial alignment, union, and knee range of motion, with rare sequelae in the PF joint based on immediate arthroscopy and 1-year MRI scans and clinical examinations. Even more interesting was the absence of anterior tibial pain often found when a tibial nail is inserted in a standard fashion.

Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach: radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic results associated with the use of a percutaneous suprapatellar (SP) portal and accompanying instrumentation for tibial intramedullary nail (IMN) insertion using a semiextended approach.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, nonconsecutive study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 2007 to January 2011, 56 fractures (55 patients) underwent intramedullary nailing of a tibia fracture with a semiextended approach through a SP portal. Radiographic and clinical follow-up examinations were performed at a minimum of 1 year after the index procedure. Measurements included bone healing, tibial alignment, knee range of motion, pain drawings, pain scoring (visual analogue scale), functional outcome (Lysholm and SF-36 scoring), evaluation of prenail and postnail insertion arthroscopic images of the patella-femoral (PF) joint (subgroup of study patients), and 1-year follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (STIR and T2 gradient echo) of the knee to evaluate the PF joint cartilage. MRI scans were reviewed by an independent bone radiologist, whereas arthroscopic images were evaluated by an independent sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (37 fractures) were available for follow-up at a minimum of 1 year (range: 12-49 months) after the index procedure. All but 2 fractures healed after the index procedure (94.6%). There was 1 radiographic malunion (2.7%). The mean Lysholm knee score was 82.14. Mean SF-36 physical and mental scores were 40.8 and 46.0, respectively. Mean arc of knee motion was 124.4 degrees for the affected extremity compared with 127.2 degrees for the contralateral knee. One patient (2.7%) complained of mild pain at the scar, but no patient complained of anterior knee pain either at the PF joint or at the anterior proximal tibia. In 13 of 15 patients undergoing an arthroscopic assessment of the PF joint, prenail and postnail insertion, no cartilage changes, or pressure points were seen either at the patella or at the trochlea groove. Two patients had grade II chondromalacia of the trochlea immediately after the procedure, but these did not correspond with either MRI scans or clinical findings at 1 year. When the remainder of the 1-year MRI scans were reviewed, 1 knee (2.7%) in a patient that did not have an arthroscopic examination was found to have grade II chondromalacia in the PF joint, but this did not correlate with the clinical examination, which was normal.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first paper to critically document clinical and radiographic results using the percutaneous SP portal with the semiextended approach for IMN of the tibia. Our 1 year results indicate that the procedure resulted in excellent tibial alignment, union, and knee range of motion, with rare sequelae in the PF joint based on immediate arthroscopy and 1-year MRI scans and clinical examinations. Even more interesting was the absence of anterior tibial pain often found when a tibial nail is inserted in a standard fashion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.