[Treatment of metacarpal fractures. Recommendations of the Hand Surgery Group of the German Trauma Society]

[Translated article] Closed reduction and intramedullary fixation of fifth metacarpal neck fractures: Retrograde vs. anterograde technique. Prospective study

INTRODUCTION

The fifth metacarpal fracture is a frequent pathology that can cause deformity and functional impairment for the adequate grip of the hand. Reintegration into daily or working activities is related to the treatment received and rehabilitation. In fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal, internal fixation with a Kirschner's wire is a conventional treatment method with variants that affect its outcome.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To compare the functional and clinical results of the treatment of fifth metacarpal fracture with the use of retrograde vs. antegrade Kirschner wires.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Comparative, longitudinal, prospective study at a third-level trauma centre in patients with a fifth metacarpal neck fracture, with clinical, radiographic and Quick DASH scale follow-up at the 3rd, 6th, and 8th postoperative week.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included (58 men, 2 women), age of 29.63±10.15 years, with a fifth metacarpal fracture, treated by closed reduction and stabilisation with a Kirschner wire. The antegrade approach showed a metacarpophalangeal flexion range at 8 weeks of 89.11° (p<0.001; 95% CI [-26.81; -11.42]), a DASH scale value of 18.17 (p<0.001; 95% CI [23.45; 39.12]), and an average of 27.35 days to return to work (p=0.002; 95% CI [16.22; 62.14]), compared with the retrograde approach.

CONCLUSION

Stabilisation with antegrade Kirschner wire showed superior functional results, and metacarpophalangeal range of motion, compared to those operated via retrograde approach.

Closed reduction and intramedullary fixation of fifth metacarpal neck fractures: Retrograde vs. anterograde technique. Prospective study

INTRODUCTION

The fifth metacarpal fracture is a frequent pathology that can cause deformity and functional impairment for the adequate grip of the hand. Reintegration into daily or working activities is related to the treatment received and rehabilitation. In fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal, internal fixation with a Kirschner's wire is a conventional treatment method with variants that affect its outcome.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To compare the functional and clinical results of the treatment of fifth metacarpal fracture with the use of retrograde versus antegrade Kirschner wires.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Comparative, longitudinal, prospective study at a third-level trauma center in patients with a fifth metacarpal neck fracture, with clinical, radiographic and Quick DASH scale follow-up at the 3rd, 6th, and 8th postoperative week.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included (58 men, 2 women), age of 29.63±10.15 years, with a fifth metacarpal fracture, treated by closed reduction and stabilization with a Kirschner wire. The antegrade approach showed a metacarpophalangeal flexion range at 8 weeks of 89.11° (p<0.001; 95% CI [-26.81; -11.42]), a DASH scale value of 18.17 (p<0.001; 95% CI [23.45; 39.12]), and an average of 27.35 days to return to work (p=0.002; 95% CI [16.22; 62.14]), compared with the retrograde approach.

CONCLUSION

Stabilization with antegrade Kirschner wire showed superior functional results, and metacarpophalangeal range of motion, compared to those operated via retrograde approach.

Treatment of hand and finger fractures with the Stryker Hand Plating System

Objectives: 10% of all fractures occur in the fingers and metacarpal region. Early mobilization with preservation of grip function is the goal of any therapy for these injuries. Osteosyntheses with plates are used in complex fractures that do not allow any other treatment. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the performance and safety of the Stryker Hand System. Patients and methods: Between 2010 and 2019, 190 patients underwent surgical treatment with plates for fractures of the fingers and metacarpal region. Of these, 140 operations could be analyzed according to the inclusion criteria based on clinical and radiological parameters. Results: Three-quarters of the patients were male. The mean age at the time of surgery was 39.3±16 years. Falling was the leading cause for hand fractures, and the most common were fractures of the shaft (>52%). More than 15% were complex hand injuries with more than one fractured finger. The majority of patients were healthy non-smokers without systemic diseases and relevant medical history. Conclusion: The Stryker Finger Plates are safe implants with good results that are consistent with those reported in the literature. The trend is also toward stable-angle implants for fracture treatment of the finger, in order to enable the earliest possible functional, safe mobilization. Level of Evidence: Level: IV; outcome-study, retrospective.

Fracture dislocations of the carpometacarpal joints of the fingers

OBJECTIVE

Fracture dislocations of the multiple carpometacarpal joints [CMCJ] of the fingers are uncommon injuries that can significantly compromise hand function and durability if managed sub-optimally. These injuries are at risk of being missed as they are commonly a part of major high energy trauma with associated more obvious and immediately threatening injuries getting all the attention. The clinical and radiological parameters which could help a surgeon to detect and analyse these injuries well are discussed. The management of these injuries with emphasis on the pattern of K-wire fixation is presented.

METHOD

A review of multiple CMCJ dislocations at our institution found 39 hands in 38 patients (one case with bilateral injury) over a seven-year period (January 2010 to January 2017). The pattern of injury noted in these cases was assessed and categorized. Our preferred management plan for these injuries is discussed.

RESULTS

The patterns of dislocations noted in a total of 39 cases were-dorsal (25), dorsal radial (6), volar (1), volar radial (5) and divergent (2). The dorsal dislocations were the commonest (25/39) and additional 6/39 were radial-dorsal, only six displaced in a volar direction. Divergent dislocation was seen in only two cases.

CONCLUSION

The pattern of dislocations noted in 39 cases in our institute (Ganga Hospital- A tertiary level trauma center) is presented to provide an overview of the spectrum of the injuries which a surgeon could face. Early surgery is recommended and should be aimed to restore perfect anatomical alignment of the skeleton. Surgeon should have a low threshold for open reduction in case of gross swelling or inability to get an anatomical closed reduction. The method of K-wire fixation presented herein has resulted in good outcome in our practice; wherein we fix the dislocated CMCJ by inserting K-wires from the radial and ulnar borders of the hand and avoiding wires in the central part of the hand. This prevents extensor tendons tethering by the K-wires. The fixation achieved by multiple K-wires passed in this manner provides enough stability to allow for early active mobilisation of the fingers. The need for careful assessment to detect associated nerve injury and compartment syndrome; and post-operative strict hand elevation and prevention of stiffness of the MCP joints has been emphasized.The CMCJ dislocations have innumerable patterns possible; however, the management principles remain the same. In spite of the gross distortion of the anatomy seen in these injuries, anatomical reduction and adequate stabilization to allow early mobilization generally results in satisfactory outcomes.

[Fractures of the thumb ray]

Fractures of the first thumb ray are common and need accurate differential treatment to restore gripping hand functions. Displaced fractures of the distal and proximal phalanx of the thumb are often treated with screws or Kirschner wires. Stable fractures can also be treated non-operatively. Fractures of the base of the first metacarpal should be differentiated into extra-articular Winterstein fractures and intra-articular Bennett or Rolando fractures. Traction forces by the abductor pollicis longus tendon regularly lead to displacement of the shaft of the first metacarpal; therefore, these fractures usually require reduction and fixation. Good functional results can be achieved by operative treatment. Fractures of the trapezium are rare. If they are displaced, operative treatment is recommended to prevent osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint.

Management algorithm for index through small finger carpometacarpal fracture dislocations

PURPOSE

Injuries to the carpometacarpal (CMC) joints are rare. The most common CMC fracture dislocations occur in the ring and small finger CMC joints. The aim of this study was to review the structured diagnostic procedure and different treatment options.

METHODS

We review the importance of early and correct diagnosis in CMC fracture dislocation, because it is needed to ensure pain-free hand function. Moreover, we contrast different therapeutic options, including non-operative and surgical therapy for CMC fracture dislocation.

RESULTS

If a clinical suspicion for a CMC dislocation based on patient examination or radiographic findings exists, then a thin slice CT should be considered. Non-operative treatment is rarely indicated. Surgical treatment may include closed or open reduction efforts. In the case of most fracture dislocations, open reduction is recommended. Fracture fixation may be accomplished with K-wires, mini plates or screws.

CONCLUSION

CMC fracture dislocations of the fourth and fifth CMC joints are uncommon and often overlooked. Primary goal of treatment is to restore normal function to the hand. Therefore, operative therapy might be the method of choice.

[Osteosynthesis of metacarpal fractures with 2.0 mm LCP system and functional postoperative treatment]

BACKGROUND

Locking head systems are an additional option in the surgical treatment of metacarpal fractures. In this clinic 2.0 mm locking compression plates (LCP) are used, which provide the possibility of functional postoperative treatment even for complex and osteoporotic metacarpal fractures. For simple fractures and good bone quality the LCP system is used as a compression or neutralization plate. Depending on the type and localization of the fracture, different osteosynthesis techniques are used in order to achieve a functional postoperative treatment in as many patients as possible.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between July 2009 and December 2010 a total of 49 patients were enrolled in a prospective trial. All patients underwent surgical treatment with a 2.0 mm LCP system. Postoperative functionality of the hand was restored without immobilization. Clinical and radiological examinations were performed after 6 and 12 weeks and after 6 and 12 months with documentation of the range of motion (ROM), grip strength, fingertip to palm distance and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score.

RESULTS

After 6 months a good functional result was achieved in all patients with no cases of malrotation. Radiographs showed a completely consolidated bone healing.

CONCLUSION

After osteosynthesis with 2.0 mm LCPs all types of metacarpal fractures can be treated without immobilization.

[Soft tissue protective and minimally invasive osteosynthesis for metacarpal fractures II-V]

OBJECTIVES

Soft tissue protection, closed reduction or short open reconstruction of length, rotation and articulation of metacarpals. Aftercare: early active exercises protected by additive orthesis.

INDICATIONS

Closed or grade 1 open fractures with significant dislocation, deviation of rotation or loss of length. Fractures of the metacarpal, metaphyseal and extensive oblique or spiral fractures. Intra-articular fractures of the distal metacarpal that can be reduced without a step in articular surface. Proximal partial articular fractures that can be reduced without a step in articular surface in the mini-open technique.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Grade 2 and 3 open fractures, extensive bending fractures in the middle third and absence of the palmar bony restraint. Multifragmentary proximal and distal metaphyseal fractures that cannot be reduced by closed methods. Intra-articular fractures that cannot be reduced without a step in articular surface.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Intramedullary antegrade or percutaneous K-wires or mini-open repair screw/K-wire osteosynthesis.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Two or three finger forearm cast for about 3-4 days, subsequent metacarpal orthesis, an integrated hard cast Longuette (Combicast) SoftCast™ is preferred beginning with active and passive exercises of the fingers.

RESULTS

In this retrospective study we analyzed metacarpal (MC) fractures that were treated with minimally invasive osteosynthesis during the period 2009-2010 and 65 patients (mean age 34.8 years, female/male 13/52) with 75 metacarpal fractures were enrolled. Fractures affected MC-2 (n=9), MC-3 (n=5), MC-4 (n=15) and MC-5 (n=46). Removal of implant was performed after 6-12 weeks in 44 patients. All fractures except one showed bony healing in x-ray. At 2-months follow-up 61 patients could be evaluated and at 27-months (15-37) follow-up 34 patients could be evaluated according to the DASH score. Median DASH score results were 16 points (SD 49, n = 61) after 2 months and median DASH score results were 5 points (SD 23, n = 34) after 27 months (15-37). Range of motion was limited in 6 patients after 8 weeks (range 6-12 weeks) with a deficit in flexion of finger to distal palmar crease of 1.0 cm (range 0.5-1.5 cm), 2 patients showed a deficit in finger extension of 10° in the metacarpophalangeal joint. One patient showed restricted finger extension of 15° in the proximal phalangeal joint after tendon rupture and tendon reconstruction. Complications were observed, such as circumscribed redness in two patients at the entry point of k-wires which was managed by early removal of the implant. Perforation of the k-wire occurred in one patient with subcapital and diaphyseal fracture and was managed by plate osteosynthesis. One diaphyseal transverse refracture healed after plate osteosynthesis, three circumscribed cases of paresthesia occurred, one at the entry point of the K-wires and two at the level of fracture.

[Treatment strategy for carpometacarpal fracture dislocation]

Carpometacarpal (CMC) fracture dislocations of the 2nd through 5th ray are rare injuries whose extent is regularly underestimated in the initial radiographic evaluation of the hand. Obtaining a computed tomography scan is imperative due to the radiographic underrepresentation of the full bone and joint injury. Restoration of bone and joint anatomy of the affected region is of paramount import to prevent joint deterioration and loss of hand durability and dexterity. Early surgical intervention can lead to good functional results. Different operative treatment strategies exist with a common approach being Kirschner wire, screw or plate fixation after closed or open fracture reduction and joint relocation.

[Treatment of carpal fractures. Recommendations of the Hand Surgery Group of the German Trauma Society]

The primary goal in the treatment of carpal fractures is the preservation of a painless wrist function. Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fractures and when such a fracture is clinically suspected CT or MRI scans are usually advisable. Only stable and non-displaced scaphoid fractures can be treated conservatively, all other fractures require internal fixation with restoration of normal anatomy. Second most common are fractures of the triquetrum which can occur as chip avulsions of the dorsal rim and are usually treated symptomatically. Fractures of the body of the triquetrum should be treated according to the degree of instability and displacement. This is virtually true for all carpal bones. Perilunate fracture dislocations of the carpus deserve special attention. In these severe injuries a fracture line can run through all carpal bones but the scaphoid is mostly affected. Accurate reduction and internal fixation by screws and K-wires are indicated not only in these cases, but also in carpometacarpal fracture dislocations.