[Efficacy of x-ray assessment in emergency surgical departments: an evaluation in a level I trauma center]

[Injuries in children and adolescents in emergency services]

BACKGROUND

A differentiated knowledge of trauma in children and adolescents is essential for the treatment of injured minors. The aim of this study was to present the focus of treatment in trauma emergency services.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Over a period of 2 years all acutely injured children and adolescents (n = 4784) in the emergency service were analyzed prospectively. The data were analyzed according to sex, age, date of examination, indications for x-ray imaging, diagnosis and therapy.

RESULTS

Seasonal differences in the treatment spectrum were detected. In total 34.4 % of the patients presented with bruises/contusions, 23 % wounds, 19.9 % fractures, 14.9 % sprains/strains/ligament ruptures, 4.1 % craniocerebral trauma, 1.5 % dislocations, 1.1 % muscle/tendon injuries and 0.9 % burns. Of the patients 60 % underwent an x-ray examination and 8.3 % were hospitalized. Different injuries were found in the different age groups. Most fractures (25.7 %) were found at the distal forearm and most osteosyntheses (22.5 %) were also carried out at this anatomical location.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the frequency and age dynamics is essential for competent treatment of injuries in children and adolescents. Analysis of the reality of the treatment in emergency services allows a much better evaluation of the requirements with respect to this clientele. The collected data can serve as a basis for the development of major capability foci, training concepts, treatment algorithms as well as prevention measures.

[Treatment duration of trauma and orthopedic patients in an emergency department]

INTRODUCTION

The majority of emergency patients are admitted to hospital via the emergency department. Overcrowding in emergency departments results in dissatisfied patients, increased complication rates, and negative medicoeconomic consequences. To overcome these problems, sufficient personnel strength should be available depending on treatment duration and the patients' characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, trauma and orthopedic patients were classified into six categories: ABT (history, findings, and therapy), RABT (X-ray and ABT), WABT (wound care and ABT), WRABT (wound care and RABT), STAT (hospital admission), and SR (trauma life support). Furthermore, the duration of medical treatment was correlated with the physicians' educational level (specialist or physician in training after or during the common trunk period). Not included were waiting periods and nursing care measures. After analyzing the frequency of each category, the mean duration of treatment for an"average patient" was determined.

RESULTS

The duration of treatment of 900 patients was recorded. The average times were 9.5 min (ABT), 13.8 min (RABT), 17.3 min (WABT), 24.5 min (WRABT), 38.4 min (STAT), and 84.2 min (SR). The frequencies for the different categories were: ABT 18.8%; RABT 50.2%; WABT 14.5%; WRABT 4.4%; STAT 10.6%, and SR 1.4%. Thus, an average duration of medical treatment of 17.6 min was calculated. Especially in the RABT category, significant differences between specialists and physicians in training were evident. In children and adolescents, the duration of treatment was 12.5 min.

CONCLUSION

The duration of treatment of an average trauma and orthopedic patient depends on the level of care of the hospital and the qualification of the physician in charge. In order to avoid negative consequences of overcrowding in emergency departments, adequate personnel strength is essential. Personnel strength should be calculated based on the average duration of medical treatment of about 18 min.