[How to become a trauma surgeon: analysis of the current situation and concepts for career development in the new common field of orthopaedics and trauma surgery--part II]

[Residency program under scrutiny (part 2)-How do residents prepare for emergency operations?]

BACKGROUND

Postgraduate medical education in trauma and orthopedic surgery residents largely relates to learning and teaching surgery. During this crucial stage of surgical development some of the didactic challenges are caused by heterogeneous and contradictory expectations of trainees and trainers alike. So how do residents prepare for emergency surgery? To date there is neither an expert consensus nor scientific investigations in the clinical context on this topic.

METHODS

Between February and April 2015 questionnaires were issued to all physicians active in the field of trauma and orthopedic surgery within the Trauma Network East Bavaria (27 clinics, 255 physicians). The participants were asked to rate the importance of certain elements functioning in the preparation of two emergency operations using a Likert scale. The intensity with which residents generally realize these elements of preparation was also documented. The aim was to objectify if and to what extent the presumed normal practices diverge from clinical reality.

RESULTS

A total of 150 questionnaires were analyzed (return rate 59%). Discussion with the consultant (85.3%, n = 128), examination of the patient (80.0%, n = 120), surgical approach (76.0%, n = 114) and study of patient files (68.0%, n = 102) were considered to be the most important elements; however, many of the participants admitted that these elements of preparation are not sufficiently performed.

CONCLUSION

The personal preparation of residents for an emergency operation should be classified as extremely important; however, the requirements and reality do not seem to hold true in the clinical environment. This seems to be most likely due to structural and organizational issues.

Trauma care in German-speaking countries: have changes in the curricula led to changes in practice after 10 years?

PURPOSE

Traditionally, in the German-speaking countries, trauma patients are treated by general surgeons specialized in trauma surgery known as the Unfallchirurg. Over the last decade, a trend towards a lower influence of surgeons and a higher influence of subspecialties in the emergency department has been noted. With additional transformations in the health care system towards highly specialized medicine and the arising of new (sub-) specialties, diversification in the management of the trauma patient appears to occur. The new curricula for surgical disciplines providing trauma care will widen this issue even further, moreover, triggered by the Anglo-American medical model. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the current situation in German-speaking countries concerning the management of trauma patients. The interfaces between emergency physicians, orthopaedic and general surgeons have been investigated concerning the management of the trauma patients. Additionally, different future scenarios have been evaluated.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was submitted to members of the German Society of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery [Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DGOU)], including both general and orthopaedic surgeons, emergency physicians and also some members from Austria, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Questions dealt with demographic data, the current situation in the clinic of the responders in terms of management of mono- and polytrauma patients as well as fracture care. In addition, various future scenarios were evaluated.

RESULTS

293 members of the DGOU answered the questionnaire. The majority of the responders (45%) were orthopaedic surgeons and 34% were general trauma surgeons. Sixty-two per cent of hospitals run their emergency departments with emergency physicians. Treatment of both mono- and polytrauma patients in the emergency department is equally distributed between general and orthopaedic surgeons. Fracture care, however, is predominantly (65%) being performed by general trauma surgeons in both mono- and polytrauma patients. The majority of the respondents (80%) do not want to change the current situation and predict that in the future fracture care will still be performed by general surgeons' specialized in trauma surgery. Approximately two-thirds of the responders do not believe that emergency physicians will play a bigger role in the management of trauma patients in the future.

CONCLUSION

Despite the growing importance of emergency physicians, separated in the emergency room between surgical and internal medicine fields, in the acute care of surgical patients in the emergency departments, their role in the management of the polytraumatized patients remains limited. More than 13 years after the new curricula for orthopaedic and general surgery have been implemented in Germany, fracture care is still predominantly provided by general surgeons specialized in trauma surgery. In conclusion, it seems that the general surgeon specialized in trauma surgery still plays and wants to play the key role in the management of the polytrauma patient and fracture care in German-speaking countries.

[How many generalists and how many specialists does orthopedics and traumatology need?]

The training in orthopedic and trauma surgery has changed significantly with the introduction of the new residency program. The contents taught have already been reduced in breadth and the current developments in the outpatient and particularly in the clinical landscape also contribute to increasing specialization. This trend favors structures in which comprehensive medical care for the population in Germany in orthopedic and trauma surgery appears to be endangered and in which the future efforts for e.g. polytraumatised patients need to be questioned. The Young Forum of the German Society for Orthopedics and Traumatology actively accompanies a discussion about the necessity and value of generalists to ensure the level of care in Germany in addition to the specialists.

[The young resident between work and family. Status quo and approaches to a solution in orthopedics and traumatology]

The compatibility between the family and the medical profession requires a new challenge of leadership in hospitals, politics and medical societies. The generation change in the medical profession needs the implementation of modern framework conditions in the departments of orthopedics and traumatology. Topics such as work organisation, family support and programs to assist the return to work need to be discussed and should be used as a competitive advantage. Employees of generation y need a gender-independent role model in the field of modern management methods in employee leadership.

[PHTLS team course: a pilot project. Structured student education in prehospital care of severely injured patients]

BACKGROUND

The training of medical school students at the University of Heidelberg seems to be improvable regarding prehospital trauma treatment compared to an established anaesthesiology-based training for medical emergencies. This study addresses the current situation and possibilities for advancing this training.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A baseline was set by interviews of the medical school students. Based on this the hypothesis was postulated that there is a deficit in the education of the medical school students concerning the training in prehospital trauma treatment. This was proved by questionnaires given to the students in the 7th and 8th semesters at the University of Heidelberg Medical School. The results were evaluated and a possible approach for improvement was developed.

RESULTS

A total of 111 questionnaires could be evaluated. It could be shown that the existing education was not effectual and that there is a need for a praxis-orientated 1-day course in prehospital trauma treatment.

CONCLUSION

Especially the treatment of multiply injured patients is a challenge for young medical professionals. However, there is a high motivation to learn and train in emergency medicine. The students long for a practical trauma course compared to the advanced medical CPR course provided by the Department of Anaesthesiology of the University of Heidelberg. Those algorithm-based trauma courses do exist with PHTLS® and ATLS®. Based on these courses we developed the PHTLS® TEAM course.