[Fractures of the extremities with severe open soft tissue damage. Initial management and reconstructive treatment strategies]

[Acute and post-acute soft tissue reconstruction]

BACKGROUND

The precise analysis of the injured structures requiring reconstruction in complex wound defects is a prerequisite for successful restoration.

OBJECTIVE

The fundamental reconstructive strategies for soft tissue defects of the extremities including injuries to vessels, nerves and burn wounds in the context of the acute and post-acute trauma phases are presented.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The different phases of soft tissue reconstruction are described. Recommendations for action with respect to the reconstruction of the functional structures are described. Two clinical case examples illustrate the approach.

RESULTS

The acute reconstruction phase is defined as the period 0-72 h after the traumatic event and includes surgical debridement, primary reconstruction of nerves and vessels using interpositional grafts if necessary and temporary soft tissue reconstruction. Combined thermomechanical trauma requires early debridement combined with internal fixation of open fractures. In the post-acute reconstruction phase, which is generally defined as a period of up to 6 weeks after the traumatic event, definitive soft tissue reconstruction is performed. In the case of long reinnervation distances, nerve transfer or motor replacement plastic surgery is performed in the post-acute phase.

CONCLUSION

The reconstruction of soft tissue after trauma necessitates a stage-dependent approach. In the acute phase procedures aim at the immediate preservation of the limb. In the post-acute phase, definitive soft tissue reconstruction is performed to enable maximum functional preservation. Combined thermomechanical injuries require early surgical treatment in order to prevent infections.

[Modern concepts of interdisciplinary extremity reconstruction in open fractures]

The orthoplastic approach involves the collaboration of orthopedic/trauma surgeons, vascular surgeons and reconstructive microsurgeons. In cases of complex limb fractures, the aims are to optimize blood flow, restore bone stability, reconstruct soft tissue defects, and enhance function and sensitivity. The early administration of antibiotics and a timely, high-quality debridement after initial interdisciplinary assessment are carried out. This is followed by fracture stabilization and temporary wound coverage in order to plan the definitive interdisciplinary procedure. This includes definitive osteosynthesis and soft tissue reconstruction, using local tissue transfer if feasible, or free tissue transfer in cases of extensive trauma zones. The orthoplastic approach allows for faster definitive stabilization, fewer operations, shorter hospital stays, lower complication and revision rates, higher cost-effectiveness and improved long-term function.

[Open fractures]

Open fractures are associated with a higher rate of infections and delayed fracture healing; therefore, in addition to fracture fixation, infection prevention and soft tissue management are also important. Administration of antibiotics should be carried out as early as possible and over 24-72 h depending on the injury. The initial debridement and assessment of the severity of injury determine the treatment strategy. Fracture fixation follows the general traumatological principles. Simple injury patterns can be treated by primary fixation and wound closure. With substantial contamination, loss of bone or extensive soft tissue damage, temporary fixation and temporary wound closure are carried out. The definitive treatment with soft tissue coverage should be performed within 72 h in order to reduce the risk of fracture-related infections. For osseous segmental defects, different approaches are available to restore bone continuity, depending on the size and soft tissue situation.

Current concepts review: Fractures of the patella

Fractures of the patella account for about 1% of all skeletal injuries and can lead to profound impairment due to its crucial function in the extensor mechanism of the knee. Diagnosis is based on the injury mechanism, physical examination and radiological findings. While the clinical diagnosis is often distinct, there are numerous treatment options available. The type of treatment as well as the optimum timing of surgical intervention depends on the underlying fracture type, the associated soft tissue damage, patient factors (i.e. age, bone quality, activity level and compliance) and the stability of the extensor mechanism. Regardless of the treatment method an early rehabilitation is recommended in order to avoid contractures of the knee joint capsule and cartilage degeneration.

For non-displaced and dislocated non-comminuted transverse patellar fractures (2-part) modified anterior tension band wiring is the treatment of choice and can be combined – due to its biomechanical superiority – with cannulated screw fixation. In severe comminuted fractures, open reduction and fixation with small fragment screws or new angular stable plates for anatomic restoration of the retropatellar surface and extension mechanism results in best outcome. Additional circular cerclage wiring using either typical metal cerclage wires or resorbable PDS/non-resorbable FiberWires increases fixation stability and decreases risk for re-dislocation. Distal avulsion fractures should be fixed with small fragment screws and should be protected by a transtibial McLaughlin cerclage. Partial or complete patellectomy should be regarded only as a very rare salvage operation due to its severe functional impairment.

Complete major amputation of the upper extremity: Early results and initial treatment algorithm

BACKGROUND

Traumatic major amputations of the upper extremity are devastating injuries. These injuries have a profound impact on patient's quality of life and pose a burden on social economy. The aims of the current study were to report about the initial management of isolated traumatic major upper limb amputation from the time of admission to definitive soft tissue closure and to establish a distinct initial management algorithm.

METHODS

We recorded data concerning the initial management of the patient and the amputated body part in the emergency department (ED) (time from admission to the operation, Injury Severity Score [ISS], cold ischemia time from injury to ED, and total cold ischemia time). The duration, amount of surgical procedures, the time to definitive soft tissue coverage, and the choice of flap were part of the documentation. All intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

All patients were successfully replanted (time from injury to ED, 59 ± 4 minutes; ISS16; time from admission to operating room 57 ± 10 minutes; total cold ischemia time 203 ± 20 minutes; total number of procedures 7.3 ± 2.5); definitive soft tissue coverage could be achieved 23 ± 14 days after injury. Two thromboembolic complications occurred, which could be treated by embolectomy during revision surgery, and we saw one early infection, which could be successfully managed by serial debridements in our series.

CONCLUSION

The management of complete major amputations of the upper extremity should be reserved for large trauma centers with enough resources concerning technical, structural, and personnel infrastructure to meet the demands of surgical reconstruction as well as the postoperative care. Following a distinct treatment algorithm is mandatory to increase the rate of successful major replantations, thus laying the foundation for promising secondary functional reconstructive efforts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level V.

Impact of high prevalence of pseudomonas and polymicrobial gram-negative infections in major sub-/total traumatic amputations on empiric antimicrobial therapy: a retrospective study

Introduction

Emergency treatment of major sub-/total traumatic amputations continue to represent a clinical challenge due to high infection rates and serious handicaps. Effective treatment is based on two columns: surgery and antimicrobial therapy. Detailed identification of pathogen spectrum and epidemiology associated with these injuries is of tremendous importance as it guides the initial empiric antibiotic regimen and prevents adverse septic effents.

Methods

In this retrospective study 51 patients with major traumatic amputations (n = 16) and subtotal amputations (n = 35) treated from 2001 to 2010 in our trauma center were investigated. All patients received emergency surgery, debridement with microbiological testing within 6 h after admission and empircic antimicrobial therapy. Additionally to baseline patient characteristics, the incidence of positive standardized microbiologic testing combined with clinical signs of infection, pathogen spectrum, administered antimicrobial agents and clinical complications were analyzed.

Results

70.6% of the patients (n = 36) acquired wound infection. In 39% wounds were contaminated on day 1, whereas the mean length of duration until first pathogen detection was 9.1 ± 13.4 days after injury. In 37% polymicrobial colonization and 28% Pseudomonas were responsible for wound infections during hospitalization. In 45% the empirc antimicrobial therapy focussed on Gram positive strains did not cover the detected bacteria, according antimicrobial resistogram. It was significantly more often found in infections associated with Pseudomonas (p 0.02) or polymicrobial wound infections.

Conclusions

This epidemiologic study reveals a pathogen shift from Gram-positive to Gram-negative strains with high incidence of Pseudomonas and polymicrobial infections in sub-/total major traumatic amputations. Therefore, empiric antimicrobial treatment historically focussing on Gram-positive strains must be adjusted. We recommend the use of Piperacillin/Tazobactam for these injuries. As soon as possible antimicrobial treatment should be changed from empiric to goal directed therapy according to the microbiological tests and resistogram results.

[Prevention of infection in the current treatment of open fractures: an evidence-based systematic analysis]

BACKGROUND

Treatment of open fractures remains an interdisciplinary challenge. Even success and evidence of infection prevention especially of new treatment options is not clear.

METHOD

A systematic search in available electronic databases over the years 1974 until 2011 was conducted. Only clinical analyses with more than 5 adult patients in the German, English or French languages were included. All studies were rated according to Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) criteria.

RESULTS

Over 855 articles were found due to the search and after applying the exclusion and inclusion criteria 49 studies were finally assessed to contribute to the evidence-based recommendations. Grade A recommendation: early application of antibiotics against gram-positive organisms for all open fracture types, additional coverage of gram-negative organisms for type III open fractures. Early surgical debridement should be performed. Grade B recommendation: type III open fractures should be treated with antibiotics for a minimum of 72 h but not longer than 24 h after wound closure. Vacuum treatment is justified and beneficial if wound closure is not achieved. Grade C recommendation: additional local antibiotic treatment in combination with systematic antibiotics may be of benefit. Definitive wound closure should be achieved within 1 week.

DISCUSSION

This evidence-based analysis shows that there is good evidence for the treatment of open fractures with antibiotics and surgical debridement. Vacuum treatment can be recommended if wound closure is not possible.