Patellaluxation

The Impact of Anatomical Predisposition and Mechanism of Trauma on Dislocation of the Patella: A Retrospective Analysis of 104 Cases

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine whether traumatic dislocation of the patella is provoked by the presence of predisposing factors and examine the role of the mechanism of injury.

METHODS

Cases diagnosed with dislocation of the patella and covered by the workers' compensation program were identified and classified as traumatic based on insurance regulations. We examined predisposing factors (e.g., frontal axis, torsional deviation, trochlear dysplasia, patella alta) in case groups based on age at dislocation and trauma mechanism. Retrospective cohort study, level of evidence III.

RESULTS

Our sample size comprised 104 cases, consisting of 54 children and 50 adults. The most common mechanism of injury in children and adults was rotational trauma. Only 20% of the children and 21% of the adults exhibited no relevant predisposing factors. Group specifically, falls accounted for the highest number of cases exhibiting none of the defined anatomical predisposing factors. Children are more frequently affected by predisposition-related dislocations than adults.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of predispositions is high. A fall, direct impact, or rotational trauma can be viewed as an adequate mechanism of trauma. For successful treatment, it is paramount to analyze the exact mechanism of the trauma and address any underlying predispositions.

The Ali Krogius procedure for treatment of patellofemoral instability should be regarded as obsolete even in skeletally immature patients

BACKGROUND

Several interventions are established for treating patellofemoral instability in adults. Fewer exist for pediatric patients without damaging the epiphysis. The Ali Krogius (AK) method is currently still being used. Most studies are not current and report varying results in small patient population. The aim of this study is to determine the long-term results of the AK method.

METHODS

In this monocentric, retrospective study design, 33 knees in 33 patients who received the AK procedure for recurrent patellar dislocation were assessed. The average age was 20.8 years (range 6-40). The following functional scores were assessed: Kujala Score, Lysholm Score and Tegner Score. Subgroup analysis was done for patients ≤16 years of age. Available preoperative imaging was assessed for known risk factors.

RESULTS

After an average follow-up of 7.8 years (Range 59-145 months), a total of 8 (24%) knees suffered a redislocation postoperatively. Seven of the eight dislocations occurred in patients ≤ 16 years of age. One knee (3%) was revised due to persistent pain. The median score was 86 points for the Kujala score and 90 for the Lysholm score. The median in the Tegner score was level 6. Clinically, the patellar glide was lateralized in 7 knees (21%) and an apprehension sign was triggered in 8 knees (24%).

CONCLUSIONS

Including the present study, the existing literature indicates a redislocation rate between 24 and 41% following AK. It should thus be regarded as obsolete even though it protects the epiphysis. Surgical interventions such as medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with femoral drilling distal to the epiphysis should be preferred.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered: S-302/2016.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Outcomes after locked plating of displaced patella fractures: a prospective case series

PURPOSE

Tension band wiring remains a common treatment for patella fractures, but complication rates are high, with unsatisfactory results. The purpose of this observation study was to evaluate clinical results and complication rates of a novel patella locking plate fixation.

METHODS

Twenty patients (mean age, 59.2 ± 18 years) with displaced patella fractures were prospectively enrolled. Range of motion, knee scores (Tegner, Lysholm, Kujala), complications, and revision surgeries were assessed six weeks, six months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery. Results were compared to the situation before trauma in regards to the time of follow-up using a paired sample t test.

RESULTS

According to the OTA classification, the fractures were classified as follows: one A1, four C1, six C2, and nine C3. Range of motion improved from 121° after six weeks to 140°, 141°, and 143° within the follow-up period. While the Tegner, Lysholm, and Kujala scores were 4.1/97/97, respectively, before trauma, they improved from 2.6/80/89 to 3.6/94/89, 3.7/95/94, and 4.1/97/97 within the follow-up period. Three patients had a complication (15%): one fracture dislocation, one reactive bursitis, and one renewed fracture. Four patients reported discomfort or anterior knee pain especially when kneeling on the implant.

CONCLUSIONS

The patella locking plate is a safe and effective treatment for patella fractures, including comminuted fractures. Function can be restored within six months after surgery, and the complication rate is low. Nonetheless, the implant can cause discomfort or anterior knee pain especially when kneeling, which can necessitate an implant removal.

Avoiding Complications with MPFL Reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the potentially significant complications associated with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Additionally, to review the most current and relevant literature with an emphasis on avoiding these potential complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple cadaveric studies have characterized the anatomy of the MPFL and the related morphologic abnormalities that contribute to recurrent lateral patellar instability. Such abnormalities include patella alta, excessive tibial tubercle to trochlear grove (TT-TG) distance, trochlear dysplasia, and malalignment. Recent studies have evaluated the clinical outcomes associated with the treatment of concomitant pathology in combination with MPFL reconstruction, which is critical in avoiding recurrent instability and complications. Although there remains a lack of consensus regarding various critical aspects of MPFL reconstruction, certain concepts remain imperative. Our preferred methods and rationales for surgical techniques are described. These include appropriate work up, a combination of procedures to address abnormal morphology, anatomical femoral insertion, safe and secure patellar fixation, appropriate graft length fixation, and thoughtful knee flexion during fixation.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability: Two-Year Results of an Algorithm-Based Approach

Background:

Patellar instability remains a challenging problem for both the patient and surgeon. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) repair has historically had poor results, and due to this, there is currently a trend toward reconstruction.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

This study was undertaken to investigate experience with repair versus reconstruction of the MPFL using a multifactorial treatment algorithm approach. Our hypothesis was that there will be no significant difference in outcome scores between patients in the MPFL repair and reconstruction groups.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

A total of 24 patients with recurrent (≥2) lateral patellar dislocations were included. All had failed nonoperative treatment for more than 6 months, and all were observed for a minimum of 2 years. First, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to find the location of the MPFL tear. A tilt test was used to determine whether a lateral retinacular lengthening was required to allow the patella to have neutral tilt. If the MRI showed a tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance greater than 20 mm, a tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) was recommended. An MPFL reconstruction was performed if the entire ligament was inadequately visualized on MRI or if it was torn from both insertion sites. Failure was defined as recurrent lateral patellar instability after surgery. As a secondary outcome measure, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, and Tegner score were calculated.

Results:

All patients were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 51 months (range, 25-79 months). Sixteen patients initially underwent MPFL repair, 8 underwent reconstruction, and 3 also underwent TTO. MPFL reconstructions were performed in all patients who underwent TTO. One MPFL repair was to the anatomic femoral origin and 15 were to the patellar insertion corresponding to the site of tearing on MRI. A lateral retinacular lengthening was performed in 21 patients. There was 1 failure in the repair group (6%) and none in the reconstruction group. However, the patient who failed had a TT-TG distance of 26 mm but refused a TTO. She subsequently underwent revision with a TTO and MPFL reconstruction and did not have any further instability events. There were no significant differences between groups for any of the secondary outcome scores.

Conclusion:

Using an algorithm-based approach, MPFL repair or reconstruction may lead to clinically acceptable results at 2-year follow-up.

Current Concepts for Patellar Dislocation

Context:

Patellar dislocation usually occurs to the lateral side, leading to ruptures of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) in about 90% of the cases. Even though several prognostic factors are identified for patellofemoral instability after patellar dislocation so far, the appropriate therapy remains a controversial issue.

Evidence Acquisition:

Authors searched the Medline library for studies on both surgical and conservative treatment for patellar dislocation and patellofemoral instability. Additionally, the reference list of each article was searched for additional studies.

Results:

A thorough analysis of the anatomical risk factors with a particular focus on patella alta, increased Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove (TT-TG) distance, trochlear dysplasia as well as torsional abnormalities should be performed early after the first dislocation to allow adequate patient counseling. Summarizing the results of all published randomized clinical trials and comparing surgical and conservative treatment after the first-time patellar dislocation until today indicated no significant evident difference for children, adolescents, and adults. Therefore, nonoperative treatment was indicated after a first-time patellar dislocation in the vast majority of patients.

Conclusions:

Surgical treatment for patellar dislocation is indicated primarily in case of relevant concomitant injuries such as osteochondral fractures, and secondarily for recurrent dislocations.

Influence of rupture patterns of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) on the outcome after operative treatment of traumatic patellar dislocation

PURPOSE

Patellar dislocation usually occurs to the lateral side, leading to ruptures of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) in about 90 % of all cases. Reliable prognostic factors for the stability of the patellofemoral joint after MPFL surgery and satisfaction of the patient have not been established as yet.

METHODS

This multicentric study retrospectively included 40 patients with a mean age of 22.4 ± 8.1 years (range 9-48) from 5 German Trauma Departments with first-time traumatic patellar dislocation and operative treatment. Surgery was limited to soft tissue repairs, and a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all cases. Evaluation of the MRI included sulcus angle, dysplasia of the trochlea, depth and facet asymmetry of the trochlea, Insall-Salvati index, Tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove (TTTG) distance, and rupture patterns of the MPFL. Patients were interrogated after 2 years about recurrent dislocation, satisfaction, and the Kujala score.

RESULTS

Trochlea facet asymmetry was significantly lower in patients with redislocation (23.5 ± 18.8) than in patients without redislocation (43.1 ± 16.5, p = 0.03). Patients with a patellar-based rupture were significantly younger (19.5 ± 7.2 years) than patients without patellar-based rupture (25.4 ± 8.1 years, p < 0.02). Patients with femoral-based ruptures were significantly older (25.7 ± 9.2 years) than patients without femoral-based rupture (19.7 ± 6.1 years, p < 0.02), and had a significantly higher TTTG distance (10.2 ± 6.9 vs. 4.5 ± 5.5, p < 0.02). Patients with incomplete ruptures of the MPFL had a significantly lower Insall-Salvati index (1.2 ± 0.2 vs. 1.4 ± 0.2, p = 0.05). The Kujala score in patients with redislocations was significantly lower (81.0 ± 10.5 points) than in patients without redislocation (91.9 ± 9.2 points, p < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Younger patients more often sustain patellar-based ruptures following first-time traumatic patella dislocation, while older patients more often sustain femoral-based ruptures of the MPFL. Incomplete MPFL ruptures are correlated with lower Insall-Salvati indices. Low trochlear facet asymmetry is correlated with higher rates of redislocation. These results may be of relevance for the operative and postoperative treatment in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, Level IV.

Operative vs conservative treatment of traumatic patellar dislocation: results of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Patellar dislocation is a common knee injury with mainly lateral dislocations, leading to ruptures of the medial patellofemoral ligament in most of the cases. Even though several prognostic factors for patellofemoral instability have been identified so far, the appropriate therapy for patients with patellar dislocation remains a controversial issue. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome after conservative or operative treatment in patients after first-time patellar dislocation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled clinical trial was designed multicentric including patients from six German orthopaedic and trauma departments. Twenty patients with a mean age of 24.6 years with first-time traumatic patella dislocation were included and randomized into either a conservative arm or an operative arm. Plain X-ray images of the knee joint (a.p. and lateral view and tangential view of both patellae) were performed in all cases prior to therapy to exclude osteochondral fragments requiring refixation. An MRI was recommended, but not compulsory. Patients were consulted after 6, 12, and 24 months with a questionnaire including the criteria of the Kujala score, recurrent dislocation, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

The mean Kujala score of the conservative vs operative treatment group was 78.6 vs 80.3 after 6 months (p = 0.842), 79.9 vs 88.9 after 12 months (p = 0.165), and 81.3 vs 87.5 after 24 months (p = 0.339). Redislocation rate after 24 months was 37.5 % in the conservative group and 16.7 % in the operative group (p = 0.347). Due to the small number of patients that could be included, no significant difference between the groups could be detected. We see a tendency towards better results after operative treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our multicentric prospective randomized controlled trial revealed no significant difference between conservative and operative treatment for patients after first-time traumatic patellar dislocation. However, a tendency towards a better Kujala score and lower redislocation rates for patients with operative treatment was observed. The small number of patients is a limiting factor of the study, leading to results without statistical significance. A meta-analysis including other study's level I data is desirable for the future.

[Musculoskeletal modeling of the patellofemoral joint. Dynamic analysis of patellar tracking]

Numerical simulations contribute to the understanding of patellofemoral diseases. Whereas cadaveric studies are limited with respect to reproducibility of results, the impact of different operative approaches can be systematically evaluated based on mathematical models. The objective of this study was to introduce a musculoskeletal model which is capable of describing the dynamic interactions within the patellofemoral joint. It contains major bony and soft tissue structures of the right leg including the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). Two operative approaches were considered based on the model to illustrate the effect on patellofemoral biomechanics during active knee flexion: On the one hand the effect of femoral insertion during MPFL reconstruction on medial soft tissue tension, and on the other hand the difference in patella kinematics before and after total knee arthroplasty. Finally, the potential of musculoskeletal models is discussed.

[Evidence-based treatment protocol to manage patellar dislocation]

Patellar dislocation is a common knee injury with mainly lateral dislocations, leading to ruptures of the medial patellofemoral ligament in most of the cases. Reliable data and prognostic factors for stability of the patellofemoral joint and satisfaction of the patient after either conservative or operative treatment have not been established yet. Until now, there are no randomized controlled trials for recurrent patellar dislocation at all. As a synopsis of the randomized controlled trials about first-time patellar dislocation, no significant difference between operative and conservative management is evident. This applies to both children and adolescents as well as to adults. There is a clear tendency towards first-line conservative therapy after traumatic patellar dislocation. Operative treatment is only required in case of accompanying injuries like osteochondral fractures or in case of recurrent dislocations. Further prospective randomized controlled trials with standardized operative and conservative treatment and patient cohorts of sufficient size are necessary in the future.