Magnetresonanztomographie bei häufigen Verletzungen des Handgelenks

[Rare case of palmar disc dislocation after wrist distorsion]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was the elaboration of clinical symptoms and image findings in injuries of the wrist and ulnar-sided pain with accompanying damage to the articular disc and the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This article reports about a 26-year-old male patient who presented to the department of surgery of this hospital after repeated falls onto the right wrist. Following the latest fall there was persistent wrist pain and limited movement, especially in supination. The physical examination showed pressure pain above the ulnocarpal complex; however, under forced pronation and supination no pain in the ulnocarpal complex could be triggered.

RESULTS

Due to the symptoms damage to the TFCC was suspected and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination of the wrist was carried out. A TFCC damage reaching as far as the dorsal radioulnar ligament involving the dorsal suspension was demarcated with dislocation and displacement of the disc. For further differentiation of the damaged structures arthrography was performed and contrast medium containing gadolinium was injected into the joint gap. The imaging showed avulsion of the dorsal triangular disc from the dorsal suspension with volar dislocation. Treatment was continued with an arthrotomy by the formation of an ulnar pedicled capsular flap, the luxated TFCC was repositioned, central frayed and torn parts were resected and smoothed. Finally, the TFCC was refixed with two 3/0 PDS U‑sutures.

CONCLUSION

Ulnar-sided wrist pain can be caused by a variety of clinical pathologies, so that often no diagnosis can be made based on clinical symptoms alone and an imaging method is required; however, for a clear assessment of the ligament or joint injuries an MRI is necessary. Particularly for the evaluation of the TFCC injuries MRI is a sensitive diagnostic method. In the decision making, especially when atypical injury patterns are present, an arthrography should be performed in addition to MRI to obtain the best possible information on the anatomical circumstances.

KEY POINTS

In cases of injuries of the wrist and ulnar-sided pain collateral damage to the articular disc and the TFCC should always be considered and excluded when appropriate. A dislocation of the disc at the wrist is a rare consequence of trauma but should be considered in the differential diagnosis. In cases of unclear MRI results and complex injuries of the wrist or unclear symptoms, MR arthrography can be helpful.

High-resolution flat panel CT versus 3-T MR arthrography of the wrist: initial results in vivo

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of direct C-arm flat panel computed tomography arthrography (FPCT-A) with direct magnetic resonance arthrography (MR-A) of the wrist in patients with clinically suspected pathologies.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients underwent tri-compartmental wrist arthrography. FPCT-A was acquired using a high-resolution acquisition mode, followed by a 3-T MR exam using a dedicated wrist coil. Image quality and artifacts of FPCT-A and MR-A were evaluated with regard to the depictability of anatomical structures. The time stamps for the different image acquisitions were recorded for workflow assessment.

RESULTS

Image quality was rated significantly superior for all structures for FPCT-A (p < 0.001) as compared to MR-A including intrinsic ligaments, TFCC, cartilage, subchondral bone, and trabeculae. The differences in image quality were highest for cartilage (2.0) and lowest for TFCC (0.9). The artifacts were rated lower in MR-A than in FPCT-A (p < 0.001). The procedure was more time-efficient in FPCT-A than in MR-A.

CONCLUSIONS

FPCT-A of the wrist provides superior image quality and optimized workflow as compared to MR-A. Therefore, FPCT-A should be considered in patients scheduled for dedicated imaging of the intrinsic structures of the wrist.

KEY POINTS

• FPCT arthrography allows high-resolution imaging of the intrinsic wrist structures. • The image quality is superior as compared to MR arthrography. • The procedure is more time-efficient than MR arthrography.

[Distal radius fractures : Current treatment concepts and controversies]

Distal radius fractures represent the most frequent bone fractures in humans. Although the treatment was dominated for decades by conservative measures or closed surgical procedures, such as percutaneous wire osteosynthesis, a paradigm shift was instigated by the introduction and rapid dissemination of volar locking plate osteosynthesis (VLP). The novel procedure was soon proclaimed to be the gold standard and applied for practically all forms of fractures of the distal radius. In addition to clinical mishaps, e.g. failure to address dorsal edge fragments or the occurrence of extensor and flexor tendon irritation, the publication of various prospective randomized studies and meta-analyses led to a certain degree of disillusionment. In comparison to percutaneous wire osteosynthesis, no differences in the clinical result could be established for VLP 1 year postoperatively. It was therefore obvious that not all problems of the distal radius could be solved using the innovative instrument of volar locking plates. This article gives an overview on the current insights and reflects the current expert opinion on the present concepts for the treatment of distal radius fractures. This is illustrated by comprehensive case presentations.

Ultra-high resolution C-Arm CT arthrography of the wrist: Radiation dose and image quality compared to conventional multidetector computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

Objective of this phantom and cadaveric study was to compare the effective radiation dose (ED) and image quality (IQ) between C-arm computed tomography (CACT) using an ultra-high resolution 1×1 binning with a standard 16-slice CT (MDCT) arthrography of the wrist.

METHODS

ED was determined with thermoluminescence dosimetry using an anthropomorphic phantom and different patient positions. Imaging was conducted in 10 human cadaveric wrists after tri-compartmental injection of diluted iodinated contrast material and a wire phantom. IQ of MDCT was compared with CACT reconstructed with a soft (CACT1) and sharp (CACT2) kernel. High and low contrast resolution was determined. Three radiologists assessed IQ of wrist structures and occurrence of image artifacts using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

ED of MDCT was comparable to standard CACT (4.3μSv/3.7μSv). High contrast resolution was best for CACT2, decreased to CACT1 and MDCT. Low contrast resolution increased between CACT2 and MDCT (P<0.001). IQ was best for CACT2 (1.3±0.5), decreased to CACT1 (1.9±0.6) and MDCT (3.5±0.6). Non-compromising artifacts were only reported for CACT.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this phantom and cadaveric study indicate that ultra-high resolution C-Arm CT arthrography of the wrist bears the potential to outperform MDCT arthrography in terms of image quality and workflow at the cost of mildly increasing image artifacts while radiation dose to the patient is comparably low for both, MDCT and C-Arm CT.

Statistical analysis on the concordance of the radiological evaluation of fractures of the distal radius subjected to traction

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the current classifications for fractures of the distal extremity of the radius, since the classifications made using traditional radiographs in anteroposterior and lateral views have been questioned regarding their reproducibility. In the literature, it has been suggested that other options are needed, such as use of preoperative radiographs on fractures of the distal radius subjected to traction, with stratification by the evaluators. The aim was to demonstrate which classification systems present better statistical reliability.

RESULTS

In the Universal classification, the results from the third-year resident group (R3) and from the group of more experienced evaluators (Staff) presented excellent correlation, with a statistically significant p-value (p < 0.05). Neither of the groups presented a statistically significant result through the Frykman classification. In the AO classification, there were high correlations in the R3 and Staff groups (respectively 0.950 and 0.800), with p-values lower than 0.05 (respectively <0.001 and 0.003).

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that radiographs performed under traction showed good concordance in the Staff group and in the R3 group, and that this is a good tactic for radiographic evaluations of fractures of the distal extremity of the radius.