1
|
Antabak A, Boršćak N, Čagalj M, Ivelj R, Bumči I, Papeš D, Ćavar S, Bogović M, Bulić K, Luetić T. TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC FEMORAL FRACTURES IN THE CITY OF ZAGREB. Acta Clin Croat 2020; 59:686-695. [PMID: 34285439 PMCID: PMC8253082 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2020.59.04.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Femur fractures in children can be treated with a number of operative and conservative methods. Numerous factors determine which method is optimal for a specific fracture. The aim of this research was to analyze distribution of femur fractures in children living in the urban communities of Zagreb and Zagreb County by localization, type and frequency of treatment methods used according to age and fracture mechanism. The research included 103 children aged up to 18 years, treated for femur fractures at the Zagreb University Hospital Centre and Zagreb Children’s Hospital. Data were collected from these institutions and a retrospective study covered the 2010-2015 period. The cause of fracture and diagnosis were coded with the help of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. Operative treatment was applied in 55% of cases, which is contrary to previous researches. The highest incidence of femur fractures was recorded in the 0- to 4-year age groups, accounting for 49.1% of all fractures. These fractures mostly occurred due to falls and were more often treated with non-operative methods. All other age groups were mostly treated with operative methods. Coxofemoral immobilization and traction were used as non-operative methods, whereas flexible intramedullary nailing was the most frequently used operative method. The treatment depended on age, complexity of the fracture, fracture type, fragment displacement, and associated injuries. The cause was also an important factor on choosing the treatment method. Non-operative treatment was mostly used for fractures caused by falls (64.71% of cases due to falls) and operative treatment was mostly used for fractures caused by traffic accidents (79.4% of cases due to traffic accidents). It is a wide-known opinion that the best treatment for femur fractures in children is non-operative treatment. However, recent studies have shown that the use of operative methods in femur fracture treatment is growing. Our cohort of children treated during a five-year period (2010-2015) also underwent operative treatment more often than non-operative one. Two non-operative and eight operative methods were used. With such a large number of methods, it is clear that there is no unique method for all fractures. However, it is clear that the trend of using operative treatment is connected to the perennial trend of considerable sociodemographic and socioeconomic changes in urban settings such as Zagreb. Lifestyle changes directly affect the prevalence of femur fractures among children, as well as approach to treatment choice. General opinion is that most of fractures that occur at an early age can be treated with non-operative methods. Our research on femur fractures in children confirmed this rule. The youngest age group that had the highest incidence of fractures (49.1% of all fractures) was treated with non-operative methods in 75% of cases. Operative methods prevailed in other age groups. Similar results have been published by other authors. In conclusion, nearly half of all femur fractures (49.1%) occurred at a young age (0-4 years). Diaphysis fractures were most common. Most of the fractures that occurred during the 2010-2015 period were treated with operative methods, mostly in children aged 5-9 years. Out of eight different operative methods, elastic stable intramedullary osteosynthesis was most frequently used (60%). Coxofemoral immobilization and traction were used as non-operative methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nikolina Boršćak
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marija Čagalj
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Renato Ivelj
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Igor Bumči
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Dino Papeš
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Stanko Ćavar
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marko Bogović
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Krešimir Bulić
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Tomislav Luetić
- 1Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Zagreb, Croatia; 2University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; 3Zagreb Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rauer T, Pape HC, Gamble JG, Vitale N, Halvachizadeh S, Allemann F. Transitional fracture of the distal radius: a rare injury in adolescent athletes. Case series and literature review. Eur J Med Res 2020; 25:21. [PMID: 32517738 PMCID: PMC7285726 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-020-00419-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transitional fractures are fractures in adolescents where partial closure of the epiphyseal growth plate has occurred. These fractures are most commonly reported in the distal tibia. With respect to the distal radius, only a few case reports describing transitional fractures exist. Furthermore, relatively little is known about epiphyseal closure of the distal radius. A case series of four transitional fractures of the distal radius is presented by comparing non-operative and operative treatment options. At present, this is the largest case series in the literature dealing with this rare injury. CASE PRESENTATION We present three cases of four transitional fractures of the distal radius including 1-year follow-up. Patient age ranged from 16 to 18 years including a gender ratio of two males to one female. Clinical and radiographic assessments took place 6 and 12 weeks and 1 year after trauma/surgery. Three transitional fractures were treated with open reduction and internal volar plate fixation followed by functional rehabilitation. One transitional fracture was treated non-operatively. All cases showed an excellent functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS The primary treatment goal in transitional fractures is anatomic reduction of the articular surface. Non-operative treatment of transitional fractures of the distal radius is the most commonly reported treatment option. Additionally, different fixation options have been described, including the use of Kirschner wires (K-wires) and lag screws. The presented cases demonstrate that volar plate fixation followed by functional rehabilitation is a valuable treatment option in significantly displaced transitional fractures of the distal radius. Furthermore, we discuss the pathogenesis as well as the different treatment options by critical reviewing the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Rauer
- Division of Trauma Surgery, UniversityHospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Hans-Christoph Pape
- Division of Trauma Surgery, UniversityHospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolo' Vitale
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Sascha Halvachizadeh
- Division of Trauma Surgery, UniversityHospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Florin Allemann
- Division of Trauma Surgery, UniversityHospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
One-stage Surgical Treatment of Simultaneous Osteotomy and Asymmetric Lengthening on Short Femur with Severe Deformity of Genu Valgus. Sci Rep 2019; 9:8602. [PMID: 31197215 PMCID: PMC6565623 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45157-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to discuss the effects of one stage surgical treatment by simultaneous osteotomy and asymmetric lengthening by Ilizarov external fixator on short femur with severe deformity of genu valgus. A total of 12 cases with unilateral deformities treated by simultaneous osteotomy and Ilizarov asymmetric lengthening on short femur with severe deformity of genu valgus were retrospectively analyzed from January 2006 to April 2015. The affected limbs were 2.5–11 cm (5.2 cm on average) short, the femorotibial angle was 135°–158° (146.3° on average), and the ankle interval was 15–43 cm (24.7 cm on average). The Paley method was used to determine the osteotomy plane (distal femur) of genu valgus. According to this standard, the bone union results were as follows: 11 had excellent and 1 had good, where 7 patients had excellent and 5 had good functional outcomes. One stage surgical treatment by simultaneous osteotomy and asymmetric lengthening on short femur with severe deformity of genu valgus was considered to be an effective and reliable method with better osteotomy union, less trauma and fewer complications.
Collapse
|