Therapie bei Knochenmarködemsyndrom im Kniegelenk mit Denosumab: Ein Fallbericht

Influence of Vitamin D and C on Bone Marrow Edema Syndrome-A Scoping Review of the Literature

Bone marrow edema syndrome (BMES) is a rare disease with a largely unknown etiology. The aim of this scoping review is to systematically evaluate and combine the available evidence about vitamin D and C and BMES. The analysis of the manuscripts was based on country of origin, number of patients, gender, study type, epidemiology, localization, bone mineral density measurements, vitamin status and therapy. Sixty studies were included. The overall number of patients was 823 with a male-to-female ratio of 1.55:1 and a mean age of 40.9 years. Studies were very heterogeneous and of diverging scientific scope with a weak level of evidence. The hip was the most affected joint, followed by the foot and ankle and the knee; 18.3% of patients suffered from multifocal BMES. Sixteen studies reported on vitamin D levels, resulting in a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (47%) and insufficiency (17.9%) among BMES patients. Three BME manuscripts were associated with vitamin C deficiency. Current therapeutic interventions include conservative measures (mainly unloading), various osteoactive drugs and iloprost. In summary, data about BMES in association with vitamin status is limited. A causal relationship between vitamin D or vitamin C status, osteopenia, and BMES cannot be determined from the existing literature.

High-energy focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy for bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip: A retrospective study

The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of high-energy focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (HF-ESWT) on painful bone marrow edema syndrome (BMES) of the hip and shorten the natural course of disease.Thirty-four consecutive patients with BMES of the hip were treated with HF-ESWT in our department between August 2017and July 2018. The progression and treatment results of BMES were evaluated by imaging examination and clinical outcomes. The clinical outcomes include hip pain and function which were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Harris hip score (HHS), respectively, and the VAS and HHS of all patients were calculated and evaluated before treatment (s0), at 1 month (s1), 3 months (s2), 6 months (s3)post-treatment. Imaging examination including Pelvic radiographs and frog views and double hip magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were also obtained and scheduled before treatment, at 1, 3, 6, and the final follow-up post-treatment to exclude avascular necrosis and other pathology.All patients successfully completed the treatment and follow-up. Compared with pretherapy, the pain was alleviated to varying degrees and the HHS was significantly improved, and the VAS was significantly reduced at S1-2 (1- and 3-months post-treatment) after therapeutic intervention (P < .05). The mean improvements were strongly statistically significant between S0 and S1 and between S1 andS2 (P < .0001) and less significant between S2 and S3 (P < .01). The mean improvement between 6 months (S3) and final follow-up (more than 12 months) was not statistically significant. The MRI findings demonstrated that the diffuse BMES in the femoral head and neck disappeared completely.HF-ESWT is a safe, effective, reliable, and noninvasive treatment in patients with painful BMES of the hip, and it can accelerate the recovery of BMES of the hip, shorten the treatment time and course of disease, improve hip joint function and the quality of life of patients.

[Idiopathic bone marrow oedema: Outcome of 3 cases treated with denosumab]

Idiopathic bone marrow oedema is considered an unclarified pathophysiological entity of multifactorial origin affecting middle-aged persons; it is characterised by pain and functional limitation of the lower extremities. Characteristic findings on magnetic resonance imaging are hypointense T1 and hyperintense T2 images in the affected joints. We present 3clinical cases of BMO in men (age: 45-64 years), involving 2knees and one hip. Onset occurred with intense pain (VAS ≥ 5), with no clear cause and functional limitation with characteristic images on magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment consisted of vitamin D 20,000 IU/week orally and a single subcutaneous dose of denosumab 60mg (off label use). The patients avoided weight bearing on affected joints and conducted self-assisted exercises to maintain range of movement. Outcome was favourable with clinical and bone oedema resolution, with no notable complications. This report demonstrates that denosumab is a treatment option for the clinical/radiological resolution of bone marrow oedema and seems to shorten the clinical course of the process.

Denosumab is effective in the treatment of bone marrow oedema syndrome

Bone marrow oedema (BMO) syndrome describes a painful condition with increase of interstitial fluid within bone and is often lately diagnosed due to unspecific symptoms. The underlying causes are diverse while it is widely assumed that in cases of BMO local bone resorption is increased. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption and is commonly administered in the treatment of osteoporosis. Besides one previous case report, its clinical effectiveness in the treatment of bone marrow oedema has not been elucidated. We treated 14 patients with primary (idiopathic) bone marrow oedema of the lower extremity with single dose denosumab application. Mean time between onset of pain and therapy was 155days. MRI scans were performed for initial diagnosis, and 6-12 weeks after denosumab injection. Vitamin D and calcium homeostasis were strived to be balanced before initiation of therapy. Furthermore bone status was analysed using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and extended bone turnover serum markers. After 6-12 weeks, BMO dissolved partly or completely in 93%, while a complete recovery was observed in 50% of the individuals. Visual analogue scale (VAS) evaluation revealed a significant decrease in pain level. Furthermore, bone turnover decreased significantly after treatment. No adverse reactions were reported. In conclusion, our retrospective analysis shows that denosumab is highly effective in the treatment of bone marrow oedema and therefore represents an alternative treatment option.