Laterale Klavikulafraktur: Klassifikationen und Therapieoptionen

Simultaneous clavicular hook plate fixation in bilateral distal clavicle fractures (Neer type II): A case report

RATIONALE

Bilateral distal clavicle fractures (BDCF) are exceedingly rare types of fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical treatment under a single anesthesia for trauma-induced BDCF (Neer type II) through a case report.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patient brought to the emergency department due to a motor vehicle accident exhibited severe pain, tenderness, swelling, and deformity in both shoulder regions upon physical examination. No significant pain or tenderness was detected in other areas of the body. There were also no signs of additional neurological deficits or vascular pathology in the extremities.

DIAGNOSES

Radiographic examinations led to a diagnosis of BDCF (Neer type II).

INTERVENTIONS

Surgical intervention involved the simultaneous application of a neutral-angled hook plate to both clavicles via open reduction.

OUTCOMES

Postoperative radiographs taken at the 12th week demonstrated complete healing in both fractures and no functional limitations in shoulder movements.

LESSONS

BDCF can compromise the stability of the shoulder girdle, necessitating surgical intervention with anatomical reduction and rigid fixation.

Classification of Distal Clavicle Fractures and Indications for Conservative Treatment

Management of distal clavicle fractures depends on a clear understanding of the injury's proximity to the ligamentous attachments joining the clavicle and scapula. Various classification systems have been proposed to guide treatment. Despite this, controversy between operative and nonoperative management remains for certain fracture patterns. Patient-specific factors, concomitant injuries, fracture characteristics (displacement, shortening, and rotation) should all be considered when deciding on treatment. When nonoperative management is indicated, patients should be immobilized in a sling for 2 weeks, followed by gradual range of motion, and strengthening exercises.

[Combined intrapulmonary/intramediastinal K-wire position after K-wire osteosynthesis of the clavicle : A case report]

BACKGROUND

Lateral clavicle fractures can be treated both conservatively and surgically depending on the fracture classification. Different surgical techniques have been described for the operative treatment. The selection of the appropriate technique is decisive for the functional outcome and healing process without complications.

CASE

We report on a patient with a secondary dislocation of two Kirschner wires after Kirschner wire osteosynthesis. The secondary dislocation caused one of the wires to migrate into the mediastinum and pulmonary tissue, directly under the aortic arch. To prevent further migration with potential damage to surrounding structures, a uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopy was performed to retrieve the wire.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of lateral clavicle fractures should be performed with bent Kirschner wires as they can otherwise lead to severe complications including the occurrence of pseudarthrosis or secondary migration of the material. Safe and stable surgical techniques (plate osteosynthesis, hybrid treatment) should be preferred if they are available.

Radiological and Long-Term Functional Outcomes of Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To investigate radiological and long-term functional outcomes in modified Neer 2a, 2b, and 5 distal clavicle fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred fifteen patients sustaining displaced distal clavicle fractures between January 01, 2010 and December 12, 2017.

INTERVENTION

Operative versus nonoperative management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Radiographs were reviewed for fracture management and union. A customised questionnaire consisting of QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand), work, sports/performing arts, global satisfaction, and complication modules was used to determine functional outcome.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen patients were included [mean age of 49 (18-89) years]. Thirty-three (29%) underwent early fixation (<6 weeks from injury) and were younger (37 vs. 53 years, P < 0.0001). Radiographs were available for 96 patients. Nonunion rate was 55% (53/96), and majority had undergone initial nonoperative management (49 vs. 4, P < 0.00001). Eleven patients with symptomatic nonunion were deemed appropriate for delayed fixation with all cases uniting. Of the operatively managed patients, 27% (12/44) underwent metalwork removal. There were no differences in functional outcome between operative versus nonoperative and union versus nonunion patient groups at a mean follow-up of 79 months ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Functional outcome and patient satisfaction at long-term follow-up were similar regardless of operative fixation or radiological union. Nonunion in displaced distal clavicle fractures seemed to cause minimal functional deficit in most elderly sedentary individuals, or the outcome measures were not sensitive enough to capture these differences. An individualized approach should be adopted, with less active, comorbid, and elderly patients counseled regarding the minimal functional improvement of surgery and risk of reoperation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What are the long-term patient-reported and clinical outcomes after lateral clavicle fractures? A cross-sectional study of 619 patients

BACKGROUND

Lateral clavicle fractures account for 17% of all clavicle fractures and large studies comparing nonoperative and operative treatment are lacking. Therefore, patients cannot be properly informed about different treatment options and prognosis. We assessed long-term patient-reported and clinical outcomes in patients with lateral clavicle fractures.

METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed in patients treated for lateral clavicle fractures between 2007 and 2016. Primary outcome included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (DASH, EQ-5D, return to work, sports, cosmetics and satisfaction). Questionnaires were sent to 619 eligible patients, of which 353 (57%) responded after a mean follow-up of 7.4 ± 2.8 years. Secondary outcome included adverse events and secondary interventions. Outcomes after nonoperative vs. operative treatment (stratified by nondisplaced vs. displaced fractures) were compared using Student t tests and linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Nondisplaced lateral clavicle fractures were treated nonoperatively and resulted in excellent PROMs. Six patients (3%) developed a nonunion. For displaced lateral clavicle fractures, no differences were found between nonoperative and operative treatment with regard to DASH score (7.8 ± 12.5 vs 5.4 ± 8.6), EQ-5D (0.91 ± 0.13 vs 0.91 ± 0.09), pain (0.9 ± 1.7 vs. 0.8 ± 1.6), patient satisfaction (90.1 ± 25.5 vs. 86.3 ± 20.4), return to work (96.4% vs. 100%) and sports (61.4% vs. 62.3%). The absolute risk of nonunion in patients with a displaced fracture was higher after nonoperative than operative treatment (20.2% vs. 2.9%; p = 0.002), with six patients needing treatment to avoid one nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Nondisplaced lateral clavicle fractures should be treated nonoperatively and result in good functional outcomes and high union rates. For displaced fractures, neither nonoperative nor operative treatment seems superior. Patients opting for nonoperative treatment should be informed that nonunion occurs in 20% of patients, but only half of these need additional operative treatment. Patients who opt for surgery should be told that nonunion occurs in only 3%; however, most patients (56%) will require secondary intervention for elective implant removal. Regardless of the type of treatment, no differences in functional outcome and PROMs should be expected at long-term follow-up.

Osseous microarchitecture in frequent fracture zones of the distal clavicle

Background

Fracture classifications of the distal clavicle are based on ligamentous integrity. The influence of osseous microarchitecture on fracture occurrence, morphology, and the lesion's stability has not yet been investigated. We aimed to characterize osseous microarchitecture according to common fracture classification systems based on ligamentous integrity and investigated the possible effects of age, gender, and osteoporosis in distal clavicle fractures.

Methods

N = 20 human cadaveric distal clavicles were scanned using XtremeCT with an isometric voxel size of 82 μm. In the sagittal plane, each data set was evaluated in 11 sections of approximately 7 mm thickness. Three topographic regions were defined: the bone lateral to the trapezoid (LTR), intertubercular (ITR), and medial to the conoid (MCR) ligament. Cortical bone mineral density (BMD) [mgHA/cm³] and cortical porosity (1- (BV/TV) [%]) were determined and evaluated relative to age and gender.

Results

Along the mediolateral axis, there was an >20-fold increase in median cortical porosity (P ≤ .001). There were significant differences in cortical porosity between LTR and ITR (P ≤ .001) but not between ITR and MCR (P = .09). In ITR, cortical porosity was significantly greater in >60-year-old compared to younger donors (P = .01). For BMD, there was an >2-fold decrease toward the distal apex (P ≤ .001). BMD was significantly greater in ITR compared to LTR (P ≤ .001) and in MCR compared to ITR (P = .02). In ITR and MCR, clavicles of >60-year-old donors had significantly lower BMD values compared to younger donors (P < .01). Across all 3 regions, frequency distribution of low bone mass did not significantly differ between <60-year-olds and >60-year-olds (P > .6).

Conclusion

The distal clavicle features a characteristic bony microarchitecture. The present study revealed a significant difference in bone quality of lateral, intertubercular, and medial zones of the distal clavicle and could specify target areas and strategies for surgical treatment of unstable fractures. Age, gender, and osteoporosis have a limited effect on bone quality and fracture genesis. In contrast, ligamentous quality is supposed to exert a substantial influence on fracture characteristics, especially in ITR. Fracture morphology of the distal clavicle is determined by a bony-ligamentous conjunction, which remains to be characterized.

All-suture technique for fixation of unstable displaced distal clavicle fracture

Background

Displaced Neer type II and V clavicle fractures are usually treated surgically in active patients. However, distal fragment fixation remains a challenge, and no consensus has been established regarding the optimal surgical treatment. Osteosuture techniques have been popularized over the last decade, and multiple different techniques have been described. The aim of this study was to describe an all-suture technique in patients with displaced type II and V clavicle fractures and report its outcome in a prospective case series.

Methods

Between 2017 and 2020, 15 patients with displaced acute distal clavicle fractures were treated with an all-suture open technique performed by one shoulder specialized surgeon, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Osteosuture repair consisted in a coracoclavicular cerclage with 4 no6 Ethibonds and a figure-of-0 and figure-of-8 fracture cerclage with 2 no2 SutureTapes. Single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) and adjusted Constant score were recorded at 6 months and 1 year. The radiologic union was assessed on plain radiographs.

Results

At 12 months, all patients reported excellent clinical results, with a mean SANE of 98.2 [± 5.2, range 80 to 100] and a mean adjusted Constant score of 99.0 [± 1.9, range 94 to 100]. One patient developed shoulder stiffness that resolved before the final follow-up. Fractures consolidated in 93% of the cases, with union happening between 3 and 6 months [range 3 to 12 months]. One patient developed an asymptomatic malunion.

Conclusion

Excellent clinical and radiological outcomes can be achieved with this minimally invasive all-suture fixation technique for displaced distal clavicle fractures, which allows for an anatomic reduction and stable fixation. This pilot study showed low complications and a high level of union after a follow-up of 1 year. Among the numerous advantages are a smaller exposure than for plate fixation, avoidance of hardware-related complications such as screw failure, coracoid fracture from drilling, or rotator cuff damage caused by hook-plates. Furthermore, it avoids a reoperation to remove symptomatic hardware.

Hook plate fixation with versus without coracoclavicular reconstruction for distal clavicular fractures

PURPOSE

Hook plate fixation is one of the most frequently used methods for unstable distal clavicular fractures, but it is still unknown if there is a need for coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of hook plate fixation with versus without CC reconstruction for distal clavicular fractures.

METHODS

Eighty-one patients who underwent hook plate fixation (HP group, n = 45) or hook plate fixation plus suture anchor reconstruction (HPA group, n = 36) for Neer type II or V clavicular fractures were enrolled. Demographics, fracture characteristics, and surgical data were recorded. Union time, coracoclavicular distance (CCD), post-operative complications, Constant score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score were compared between HPA and HP groups.

RESULTS

Constant score in the HPA group was higher than that in the HP group (91.8 ± 3.6 vs 88.8 ± 6.0, P = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences in union time, DASH score, CCD, and post-operative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Hook plate fixation combined with CC reconstruction costed more (3023.7 ± 202.6 vs 2416.2 ± 167.6 EUR, P < 0.001) and prolonged operative duration (78.2 ± 9.2 vs 73.7 ± 8.3 min, P = 0.023) compared with hook plate fixation alone.

CONCLUSION

Hook plate fixation with or without suture anchor reconstruction achieved satisfactory outcomes for Neer type II or V clavicular fractures. However, hook plate fixation plus CC reconstruction showed better functional outcomes compared with hook plate fixation alone.

Concomitant glenohumeral injuries in patients with distal clavicle fractures undergoing arthroscopic-assisted surgery: a systematic review

Background

To determine the incidence of concomitant intra-articular glenohumeral injuries in patients undergoing surgical management from distal clavicle fractures (DCF) with shoulder arthroscopy and their impact on outcome.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Virtual Health Library databases were accessed in October 2021. All the clinical studies evaluating the surgical management of DCF and using concomitant intra-operatory shoulder arthroscopy were included. Studies that did not specify the concomitant injury type were not eligible. Data from the incidence of intra-articular glenohumeral injuries, injury type, length of the follow-up, and clinical outcomes were retrieved. The quantitative content assessment was performed using the STROBE statement checklist. Evaluation of the publication bias of the included studies was performed using the risk of bias assessment tool for systematic reviews.

Results

Data from five retrospective and five prospective cohort studies were analyzed. Eight of the included studies were conducted on patient cohorts with Neer type II injuries. Data pooling revealed a mean of 17.70% of concomitant glenohumeral injuries, whereas 84.21% of them required additional surgical management (Table 1). Rotator cuff injuries, labral tears, and biceps pulley lesions were the most common concomitant injuries.

Conclusion

Preoperative MRI or diagnostic arthroscopy to evaluate glenohumeral associated injuries to DCF should be recommended.

Operative management of an extra-lateral distal clavicle fracture pattern: a study of 48 patients and a proposed update to the modified Neer classification

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of operative management for the treatment of patients with an extra-lateral distal clavicle fracture pattern. This fracture pattern is not currently included in the modified Neer classification.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of an acute extra-lateral distal clavicle fracture pattern between August 2005 and March 2019. The postoperative clinical outcomes were time to union; active shoulder range of motion; scar size; patient sensation of a "normal" shoulder; and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, all patients achieved union at an average of 7.9 weeks (range, 4-20 weeks). All patients regained full active shoulder range of motion at an average of 10.1 weeks (range, 5-44 weeks) and had a scar size of 3-4 cm; 93.8% of patients reported that their shoulder felt normal again after union. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 1.7 (range, 0-28) at 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The patients had very good clinical outcomes following operative management of an extra-lateral distal clavicle fracture pattern. We recommend that this fracture pattern be added to the current modified Neer classification as a type IIC fracture.

Current Concepts for Classification and Treatment of Distal Clavicle Fractures

Distal clavicle fractures are less common than mid-shaft fractures in adults and there is no consensus on the best classification system or the ideal treatment approach considering that high nonunion rates have been reported. Although there are numerous treatment options for distal clavicle fractures, a gold standard treatment has not yet been established. Each surgical technique has its pros and cons. In this review article, we provide an overview of classification systems and treatment methods for distal clavicle fractures.

[Fracture diagnosis: upper extremities : Shoulder and shoulder girdle]

BACKGROUND

The shoulder girdle is a chain of bones and joints which connect the upper extremity to the axial skeleton. The shoulder as a biomechanical unit has a remarkable range of motion and is therefore frequently prone to injuries of the three major joints (sternoclavicular joint, acromioclavicular joint, glenohumeral joint) and the bony elements (clavicle, scapula, humerus). Projection radiography is still the first imaging modality for injuries of the shoulder and usually sufficient for initial diagnosis and injury classification. Computed tomography (including 3D reconstructions) and magnetic resonance imaging provide additional useful information for the detection of accompanying soft-tissue injury, for surgical planning and in cases of complex anatomy (e.g., scapular fractures).

PURPOSE

We aim to describe the fundamentals of injuries of the shoulder girdle and the proximal humerus with special emphasis on radiological diagnostics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A selective PubMed literature search was performed using the following terms: "sternoclavicular joint dislocation", "clavicle fracture", "acromioclavicular joint injury", "scapular fracture", "shoulder dislocation", "proximal humerus fracture", and "shoulder girdle injuries".

RESULTS

The article describes the basics of the anatomy, the trauma mechanism and the epidemiology of the most common injuries of the shoulder girdle and the proximal humerus. Special emphasis is given to radiological diagnostics, including basic projection radiography and advanced cross-sectional imaging.

Klavikularekonstruktion bei Pseudarthrose nach lateraler Klavikulafraktur

Laterale Klavikulafrakturen machen einen Anteil von bis zu 28 % aller Klavikulafrakturen aus und neigen zur Entstehung von Pseudarthrosen. In diesem Beitrag wird ein spezielles Operationsverfahren beschrieben. Hierbei erfolgte die Therapie durch eine Resektion des lateralen Fragments und Rekonstruktion der lateralen Klavikula mit Beckenkammspan sowie Hakenplattenfixierung, was nachfolgend zur Ausbildung eines Neo-Akromioklavikulargelenks (ACG) führte. Die 43-jährige Patientin klagte über bewegungsabhängige und Dauerschmerzen aufgrund einer lateralen Klavikulafraktur vor einem Jahr. Die klinische Untersuchung zeigte einen Druckschmerz im Bereich des ACG und einen positiven Cross-body-Test. In der bildgebenden Diagnostik (MRT und Röntgen) zeigt sich die Pseudarthrose im Bereich der lateralen Klavikula (Neer I, Jäger/Breitner I). Ziel dieser Arbeit war die Demonstration der Rekonstruktion des ACG mit Hakenplattenfixierung und Beckenkammspan. Im Follow-up zeigte sich eine gute Rekonstruktion der lateralen Klavikula unter Ausbildung eines Neo-ACG mit freier Beweglichkeit des Schultergelenks ohne Schmerzen.

Clavicle fractures in adults; current concepts

BACKGROUND

For decades, clavicle fractures have been treated conservatively. In the last 20 years, however, non-union rates after conservative treatment appear higher than previously reported and more evidence regarding operative treatment has become available. This has led to a paradigm shift towards an increase in operative treatment. The aim of this review is to present the current concepts and available evidence regarding clavicle fracture treatment.

METHODS

Conservative and operative treatment options together with their indications for medial, shaft and lateral clavicle fractures are discussed. For all three anatomical locations, a treatment algorithm is proposed.

CONCLUSION

In general, non-displaced fractures are treated conservatively. Operative treatment has to be discussed with patients with displaced clavicle fractures, especially in the young and active patient.

Which lateral clavicle fractures can be treated by an arthroscopic-assisted endobutton procedure? An analysis of risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Arthroscopy-assisted treatment of lateral clavicle fractures with coracoclavicular stabilization and an endobutton device have gained popularity over recent years. There is little evidence to support which types of lateral clavicle fractures are suitable for this treatment. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical und radiological outcomes of this treatment and to identify which fracture types are suitable. The secondary outcome was to evaluate potential risk factors for complications MATERIAL/METHODS: A retrospective single center review of 20 unstable lateral clavicle fractures treated with an arthroscopy-assisted CC stabilization technique and Endobutton device between September 2012 and August 2016. The functional outcome was evaluated using Constant and DASH Scores, VAS and SSV.

RESULTS

Between September 2012 and August 2016, 20 patients were treated using this method (average age 45 years; male: female ratio 14:6). The DASH Score was on average 2.0 (0-9.82) and the Constant Score on average 81.8 points (range 68-93) with an average difference between the affected and the unaffected side of 4.1 points (range 0-15). Six patients had nonunion fractures of which two needed revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that arthroscopy-assisted CC stabilization using an endobutton technique delivers good functional results. Highly lateral unstable clavicle fractures seem to be especially suitable for this surgical technique. There was a high number of delayed unions. Analysis of risk factors showed that early mechanical stress, a lateral clavicular fragment larger than 3 cm and a time delay to surgery could be risk factors for nonunions.

[Effectiveness of anatomical locking plate internal fixation combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for Neer type b distal clavicle fractures]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of anatomical locking plate internal fixation combined with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in treatment of the Neer type Ⅱb distal clavicle fractures by comparing with the simple anatomical locking plate internal fixation.

Methods

The clinical data of 40 patients with Neer type Ⅱb distal clavicle fractures who met the criteria between February 2013 and January 2017 were analyzed. Eighteen cases were treated with anatomical locking plate internal fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction by using a suture anchor (reconstruction group), and 22 cases were treated only with anatomical locking plate internal fixation (non-reconstruction group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injured side, causes of injury, associated injuries, time from injury to operation between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, medical expense, postoperative coracoclavicular distance, Constant-Murley scores of injured side, and complications were recorded and compared between 2 groups.

Results

All patients were followed up 12-27 months (mean, 16.3 months). One patient in reconstruction group had superficial wound infection. One patient in non-reconstruction group had pullout of screws from the distal fragment and reduction loss at 1 month postoperatively. The operation time and medical expense in reconstruction group significantly increased when compared with those in non-reconstruction group ( P<0.05). All fractures in 2 groups achieved bony union at last follow-up. The rate of coracoclavicular distance increase of injured side in non-reconstruction group was significantly higher than that in reconstruction group ( t=2.371, P=0.023). The Constant-Murley scores at 1 month, 3 months after operation, and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative values in 2 groups ( P<0.05), but no significant difference was observed between 2 groups ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

Both anatomical locking plate internal fixation with and without coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction can achieve good effectiveness for the Neer type Ⅱb distal clavicle fractures. Therefore, the coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction does not need, except for comminuted fractures with the length of lateral fragment less than 1 cm or the patients with poor compliance.