[Intraoperative 3D imaging in spinal surgery]

[Innovative 3D imaging]

Intraoperative 2D fluoroscopy is often performed for repositioning and implant control. However, this does not always provide the details needed to reliably detect joint steps or incorrect repositioning. Over the last few years, intraoperative 3D imaging has been established and further developed. Multiple studies demonstrate an advantage and better intraoperative control through 3D imaging. Examples are the upper ankle, the proximal tibia and the distal radius; the rates of intraoperative revisions with digital volume tomography (DVT) are between 20-30%. Technical advancements, such as metal artifact reductions, automated plane setting, automated screw detection, and robotic DVT devices, facilitate intraoperative operation, shorten surgical time, and provide improved image quality. By processing the data sets in the form of an immersive, computer-simulated image in terms of "augmented reality" (AR), increased precision can be achieved intraoperatively while reducing radiation exposure. The implementation of these systems is associated with costs, which are offset by cost savings from avoided revisions. Adequate counter-financing is still lacking at the present time. Intraoperative 3D imaging represents an important tool for intraoperative control. The current data situation makes it necessary to address the routine use of 3D procedures, especially in the joint area. The indications are becoming increasingly broader. Technical innovations such as robotics and AR have significantly improved 3D devices in recent years and offer high potential for integration into the OR.

[Hybrid operating room : Application in trauma surgery and orthopaedics]

BACKGROUND

For some years now, more and more hospitals in Germany have acquired so-called hybrid operating rooms. In these operating rooms it is possible to produce three-dimensional imaging during the operation. Originally developed for cardiovascular surgery, these rooms are increasingly being used for interdisciplinary purposes. Previous experiences in the use for trauma surgery and orthopedics has shown that three-dimensional imaging can have a positive effect on the success of surgery.

OBJECTIVE

Can minimally invasive operations on the spine benefit intraoperatively from three-dimensional imaging with respect to operating times and results?

METHODS

Minimally invasive operations on the spine performed at the UKSH Campus Kiel between 2015 and 2018 in the hybrid operating room were considered. These were compared to minimally invasive spinal surgery performed in conventional operating rooms.

RESULTS

As is usual with the establishment of a new procedure, there are initially longer operating times. With regular use and appropriate training and experience of the personnel, the processes can be optimized.

CONCLUSION

Due to the accuracy of the three-dimensional imaging, errors can be detected and eliminated at an early stage during the operation. Revisions are less frequent. In contrast, there is increased radiation exposure and sometimes longer operation and anesthesia times.