(Teil‑)Arthrodesen am Handgelenk

[Osteoarthritis of the wrist]

The term osteoarthritis (OA) of the wrist can be used as an umbrella term for various, often independent areas of OA, as the wrist is made up of several joints. Radiocarpal OA often occurs after untreated ligament injuries, incorrectly healed bone fractures in the carpus or after radius fractures involving the joint. A typical sequence of propagation is known for radiocarpal OA following scapholunate (SL) insufficiency or scaphoid pseudarthrosis. Other causes include inflammation, crystal deposits or bone necrosis. Ulnocarpal arthrosis occurs posttraumatically or primarily when there are differences in levels between the ulna and radius. When treating wrist arthrosis, after conservative measures have been exhausted a surgical procedure should be chosen that enables the best possible load-bearing and residual mobility, considering the surgical risks and individual requirements. During salvage operations, the defective cartilage areas are either fused directly or eliminated using appropriate diverting partial fusions and resection arthroplasty. An accurate analysis of the affected zones is crucial for selecting an appropriate intervention.

A Systematic Review of Radiolunate and Radioscapholunate Arthrodesis

Purpose

The aims of this systematic review were to examine the use of radiolunate (RL) or radioscapholunate (RSL) arthrodesis as surgical management for patients with advanced radiocarpal arthritis that failed conservative management and to assess postoperative outcomes.

Methods

We reviewed articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception through December 2019. We identified complete manuscripts written in English reporting on RL or RSL arthrodesis for treatment of wrist pathology that included the primary outcomes (pain or grip strength) and at least 2 secondary outcomes (range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, or nonunion). Data pooling was used to calculate weighted averages.

Results

We identified 2,252 articles and selected 13 for inclusion. Across all studies, RSL arthrodesis was performed for 180 patients (49% female; 45 years old) and RL for 94 (87% female; 50 years old). Both procedures exhibited improvements in pain score and grip strength. Both cohorts demonstrated postoperative changes in flexion-extension arc, flexion, extension, ulnar deviation, supination, and pronation after data pooling. The nonunion rate for RSL was 15% versus 2% for RL, whereas the rate of progression to total wrist arthrodesis for RSL and RL was 4% and 0%, respectively.

Conclusions

Both RL and RSL arthrodesis can be successfully used to manage debilitating radiocarpal arthritis by affording patients with pain reduction. Each has its own benefits, in which RSL arthrodesis provides a total arc of motion within the functional demands of most activities of daily living, and RL arthrodesis has low rates of nonunion and progression to total wrist arthrodesis. Further research is needed to compare the 2 surgeries directly and prospectively in comparable patient groups.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

[Joint arthrodesis in functionally favorable position : Considerations on measurement of disability in private accident insurance]

If an accident results in a functional disorder that persists and permanently restricts physical and/or mental capacity, this is referred to as a disability. In private accident insurance it is the task of the medical expert to assess this disability by examining the medical findings and produce an assessment taking account of the literature and comparing against generally acknowledged guidance values. The priority dismemberment disability rating schedule initially provides loss values. For the "next lowest" disability levels for arthrodesis of extremity joints, the assessment recommendations are based on a functionally favorable position although this functionally favorable position is not more precisely defined.In this article the authors have defined these functionally favorable positions based on the information available in the literature. In particular, the operatively favorable settings for arthrodesis of the affected joint that are stated in the literature on trauma and orthopedic surgery were consulted. Of course, the functional perspective has been especially emphasized.A difficulty in achieving this was that the literature on arthrodesis is now almost only of historical value due to modern endoprosthetics. The knowledge gained was checked against medical experience and is expounded here.

[Revision surgery after failed (partial-) arthrodesis of the wrist]

(Partial) arthrodeses of the wrist have been proven cornerstones to treat many lesions for decades, especially in the case of revision surgery. Four-corner, scapho-trapezo-trapezoidal (STT), radio-scapho-lunate (RSL) and total wrist fusions are very common techniques in hand surgery. However, even these proven surgical procedures have significant non-fusion rates. Prior to revising a failed arthrodesis, it is essential to analyse the latter failure precisely. A technically adequate revision is only feasible when based on a correct and meticulous analysis. The understanding of the biological processes and technical aspects of the implants are the basis for solving this issue.

[Revision surgery after total wrist arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

Wrist arthroplasty is still an exceptional indication in the field of hand surgery. In recent years, it has become increasingly accepted as an alternative to wrist arthrodesis as the ultima ratio for panarthrosis or similar destruction of the wrist. In particular, the patient's desire for functional integrity also plays an important role.

COMPLICATIONS

While there were often complications with earlier prosthesis designs of the older generations and only a short survival rate could be achieved, this has improved, if the indication of the so-called fourth generation prostheses is done properly. Survival rates of over 10 years are no longer uncommon, even without revision operations. Currently, the indication for hemiarthroplasty has been increasing, particularly in the case of post-traumatic destruction. Those who are seriously interested in endoprosthesis should also be able to treat the associated complications. The present article is intended to provide an overview of common or potential complications in the context of wrist arthroplasty and to demonstrate possible solutions by presenting case studies. The basics of primary implantation are, therefore, not discussed. Reference is made to further literature.

[Total wrist arthroplasty-a review]

BACKGROUND

Total wrist arthroplasty is still a rare procedure. This issue is being discussed controversially, particular in German-speaking countries. Lately, its acceptance has risen, especially as an alternative to wrist fusion regarding treatment of panarthritis or similar pathologies. Previous arthroplasty designs had short survival spans and devastating complications.

THE CURRENT SITUATION

Currently, these problems have been reduced by the development of fourth generation arthroplasty systems. Nowadays, survival spans of 10 years and more can be seen on a regular basis. The development of hemi-arthroplasty may be of interest, especially for traumatic destruction of the distal radius. This review outlines the current state of wrist arthroplasty and is based on the author's 15 years of experience.

Treatment of scaphoid waist nonunion by one, two headless compression screws or plate with or without additional extracorporeal shockwave therapy

INTRODUCTION

Scaphoid nonunion remains challenging for hand surgeons. Several treatment options are available such as: non-vascularized or vascularized bone grafting, with or without additional stabilization. In the last few decades, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has become an established procedure for treating delayed and nonunions. Purpose of this retrospective follow-up study was (a) to investigate union rate and clinical outcome of the different implants [either one/two headless compression screws (HCS) or a plate] and (b) union rate and clinical outcome using only surgery, or a combination of surgery and ESWT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 42 patients with scaphoid nonunions of the waist with a mean follow-up of 52 months. All patients received a non-vascularized bone graft from the iliac crest and stabilization was achieved by using one, two HCS or a plate. ESWT was performed with 3000 impulses, energy flux density per pulse 0.41 mJ/mm² within 2 weeks after surgery. Clinical assessment included range of motion (ROM), pain according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), grip strength, Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and modified Green O'Brien (Mayo) Wrist Score. In addition, each patient had a CT scan of the wrist.

RESULTS

A total of 33/42 (79%) patients showed union at the follow-up investigation. Patients treated with additional ESWT showed bony healing in 21/26 (81%) and without ESWT in 12/16 (75%). Patients that were stabilized using one HCS showed bony healing in 6/10 (60%), with two HCS 10/12 (83%) and by plate 17/20 (85%). The ESWT group had a significantly lower pain score according to the VAS and better modified Green O'Brien (Mayo) Score. No differences could be found in respect of ROM, grip strength, functional outcome score depending of which stabilization method was used.

CONCLUSIONS

Stabilization of scaphoid waist nonunions with two HCS or plate showed higher union rates than a stabilization using only one HCS. In addition, ESWT combined with a nonvascularized bone graft from the iliac crest seems a suitable option for treating scaphoid nonunions.