[Beyond antibiotic therapy - Future antiinfective strategies - Update 2017]

Personalized bacteriophage therapy outcomes for 100 consecutive cases: a multicentre, multinational, retrospective observational study

In contrast to the many reports of successful real-world cases of personalized bacteriophage therapy (BT), randomized controlled trials of non-personalized bacteriophage products have not produced the expected results. Here we present the outcomes of a retrospective observational analysis of the first 100 consecutive cases of personalized BT of difficult-to-treat infections facilitated by a Belgian consortium in 35 hospitals, 29 cities and 12 countries during the period from 1 January 2008 to 30 April 2022. We assessed how often personalized BT produced a positive clinical outcome (general efficacy) and performed a regression analysis to identify functional relationships. The most common indications were lower respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue, and bone infections, and involved combinations of 26 bacteriophages and 6 defined bacteriophage cocktails, individually selected and sometimes pre-adapted to target the causative bacterial pathogens. Clinical improvement and eradication of the targeted bacteria were reported for 77.2% and 61.3% of infections, respectively. In our dataset of 100 cases, eradication was 70% less probable when no concomitant antibiotics were used (odds ratio = 0.3; 95% confidence interval = 0.127-0.749). In vivo selection of bacteriophage resistance and in vitro bacteriophage-antibiotic synergy were documented in 43.8% (7/16 patients) and 90% (9/10) of evaluated patients, respectively. We observed a combination of antibiotic re-sensitization and reduced virulence in bacteriophage-resistant bacterial isolates that emerged during BT. Bacteriophage immune neutralization was observed in 38.5% (5/13) of screened patients. Fifteen adverse events were reported, including seven non-serious adverse drug reactions suspected to be linked to BT. While our analysis is limited by the uncontrolled nature of these data, it indicates that BT can be effective in combination with antibiotics and can inform the design of future controlled clinical trials. BT100 study, ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05498363 .

Alginate microbeads and hydrogels delivering meropenem and bacteriophages to treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa fracture-related infections

Bacteriophage (phage) therapy has shown promise in treating fracture-related infection (FRI); however, questions remain regarding phage efficacy against biofilms, phage-antibiotic interaction, administration routes and dosing, and the development of phage resistance. The goal of this study was to develop a dual antibiotic-phage delivery system containing hydrogel and alginate microbeads loaded with a phage cocktail plus meropenem and evaluate efficacy against muti-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Two phages (FJK.R9-30 and MK.R3-15) displayed enhanced antibiotic activity against P. aeruginosa biofilms when tested in combination with meropenem. The antimicrobial activity of both antibiotic and phage was retained for eight days at 37 °C in dual phage and antibiotic loaded hydrogel with microbeads (PA-HM). In a mouse FRI model, phages were recovered from all tissues within all treatment groups receiving dual PA-HM. Moreover, animals that received the dual PA-HM either with or without systemic antibiotics had less incidence of phage resistance and less serum neutralization compared to phages in saline. The dual PA-HM could reduce bacterial load in soft tissue when combined with systemic antibiotics, although the infection was not eradicated. The use of alginate microbeads and injectable hydrogel for controlled release of phages and antibiotics, leads to the reduced development of phage resistance and lower exposure to the adaptive immune system, which highlights the translational potential of the dual PA-HM. However, further optimization of phage therapy and its delivery system is necessary to achieve higher bacterial killing activity in vivo in the future.

Short-Term Outcomes of Phage-Antibiotic Combination Treatment in Adult Patients with Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection

Implant-associated infections are the most costly problem in modern orthopedics due to the continued increase in the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains that requires the development of new effective antimicrobials. A non-randomized, prospective, open-label, with historical control study on the use of combined phage/antibiotic therapy of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was carried out. Forty-five adult patients with deep PJI of the hip joint were involved in the study, with a 12-month follow-up after one-stage revision surgery. Patients from a prospective study group (SG, n = 23) were treated with specific phage preparation and etiotropic antibiotics, whereas patients from a retrospective comparator group (CG, n = 22) received antibiotics only. The rate of PJI relapses in the SG was eight times less than that in the CG: one case (4.5%) versus eight cases (36.4%), p = 0.021. The response rate to treatment was 95.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7511-0.9976) in the SG and only 63.6% (95% CI = 0.4083-0.8198) in the CG. The odds ratio for PJI relapse in patients of the SG was 0.083 (95% CI = 0.009-0.742), which was almost 12 times lower than that in the CG. The obtained results support the efficacy of the combined phage-antibiotic treatment of PJI.

Proof-of-Concept Standardized Approach Using a Single-Disk Method Analogous to Antibiotic Disk Diffusion Assays for Routine Phage Susceptibility Testing in Diagnostic Laboratories

Application of bacteriophages is increasingly being implemented in clinical therapies. Prior susceptibility testing should be regarded as mandatory, but standards are lacking. The objective of this research was to develop a highly standardized methodology to facilitate phage susceptibility testing (PST) in clinical microbiology routine laboratories. Therefore, EUCAST methods established for single disk-based antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) were adapted. In a first step, basic parameters were evaluated using well-studied Escherichia phage T4-Escherichia coli combinations. In addition, test results were compared to those from conventional spot test and efficiency of plating (EOP) approaches. In a second step, the applicability of the methodology and the most promising test parameters were demonstrated for five other frequently isolated clinical bacterial species and their corresponding phages. At present, the method predominantly leads to qualitative rather than quantitative results. This disk-based approach provides a standardized, easy-to-handle, reproducible and reliable PST protocol by relying on well-established routine procedures in diagnostic laboratories. IMPORTANCE Application of bacteriophages in clinical therapies is attractive due to increasing rates of isolation of multidrug-resistant bacteria worldwide. As the phage effect is highly specific, prior susceptibility testing of target bacteria is mandatory. Of note, established standards are lacking. In this research, we adapted the single-disk method for antibiotic susceptibility testing to phage susceptibility testing (PST) in order to provide a standardized, easy-to-handle, reproducible, and reliable PST protocol for application in diagnostic routine laboratories.

Bacteriophage Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of Fracture-Related Infection Caused by Staphylococcus aureus: a Preclinical Study

Although several studies have shown promising clinical outcomes of phage therapy in patients with orthopedic device-related infections, questions remain regarding the optimal application protocol, systemic effects, and the impact of the immune response. This study provides a proof-of-concept of phage therapy in a clinically relevant rabbit model of fracture-related infection (FRI) caused by Staphylococcus aureus. In a prevention setting, phage in saline (without any biomaterial-based carrier) was highly effective in the prevention of FRI, compared to systemic antibiotic prophylaxis alone. In the subsequent study involving treatment of established infection, daily administration of phage in saline through a subcutaneous access tube was compared to a single intraoperative application of a phage-loaded hydrogel and a control group receiving antibiotics only. In this setting, although a possible trend of bacterial load reduction on the implant was observed with the phage-loaded hydrogel, no superior effect of phage therapy was found compared to antibiotic treatment alone. The application of phage in saline through a subcutaneous access tube was, however, complicated by superinfection and the development of neutralizing antibodies. The latter was not found in the animals that received the phage-loaded hydrogel, which may indicate that encapsulation of phages into a carrier such as a hydrogel limits their exposure to the adaptive immune system. These studies show phage therapy can be useful in targeting orthopedic device-related infection, however, further research and improvements of these application methods are required for this complex clinical setting. IMPORTANCE Because of the growing spread of antimicrobial resistance, the use of alternative prevention and treatment strategies is gaining interest. Although the therapeutic potential of bacteriophages has been demonstrated in a number of case reports and series over the past decade, many unanswered questions remain regarding the optimal application protocol. Furthermore, a major concern during phage therapy is the induction of phage neutralizing antibodies. This study aimed at providing a proof-of-concept of phage therapy in a clinically relevant rabbit model of fracture-related infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Phage therapy was applied as prophylaxis in a first phase, and as treatment of an established infection in a second phase. The development of phage neutralizing antibodies was evaluated in the treatment study. This study demonstrates that phage therapy can be useful in targeting orthopedic device-related infection, especially as prophylaxis; however, further research and improvements of these application methods are required.

A systematic review of phage therapy applied to bone and joint infections: an analysis of success rates, treatment modalities and safety

Bone and joint infections are difficult to treat, and increasing antibiotic resistance has only made them more challenging. This has led to renewed interest in phage therapy (PT). The aim of this systematic review was to determine success rate, current treatment modalities and safety of PT in bone and joint infections.A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases as well as the journal PHAGE for literature published between January 2000 and April 2021 was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify all human studies assessing bacteriophages as therapy for bone and joint infections. All study designs and patient populations were eligible. The review's primary outcome was success rate.Twenty records describing a total of 51 patients and 52 treatment episodes were included. No randomized controlled studies were identified. The overall success rate was 71% (n = 37/52). Topical administration alone was the most frequent administration route (85%, n = 44/52). Antibiotics were administered concomitantly with PT in the majority of treatments (79%, n = 41/52), and surgery was performed for 87% (n = 45/52) of treatment episodes. Four minor adverse events related to PT were reported, representing 8% (n = 4/52) of treatment episodes.PT for bone and joint infections has not been evaluated in any randomized controlled clinical study, and current administration modalities are highly variable between case reports and case series. While publications included here show potential benefit and few adverse effects, clinical trials are warranted to assess the efficacy of PT for bone and joint infections and determine optimal treatment modalities. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1148-1156. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210073.

[Treatment of bone and periprosthetic infections with bacteriophages : A systematic review]

Hintergrund

Die Behandlung von Knochen- und Protheseninfektionen bleibt trotz moderner Behandlungskonzepte mit interdisziplinärem Therapieansatz schwierig und weitere Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung des Behandlungsergebnisses sind wünschenswert. Präklinischen Studien liefern ein vielversprechendes Bild der Wirksamkeit von Bakteriophagen zur Behandlung von Knochen- und Protheseninfektionen.

Ziel der Arbeit

Die vorliegende Arbeit gibt eine systematische Übersicht über die klinische Anwendung von Bakteriophagen zur Behandlung von Knochen- und Protheseninfektionen.

Material und Methoden

Eine systematische Suche wurde in PubMed zur Identifikation von primären klinischen Daten zur Anwendung der Phagentherapie bei Patienten mit Knochen- und Protheseninfektion durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Elf Studien wurden eingeschlossen, bestehend aus 8 Fallberichten und 3 Fallserien. Indikationen der Phagentherapie waren periprothetische Infektionen (n = 12, 52,2 %), frakturassoziierte Infektionen (n = 9, 39,1 %), Osteomyelitis (n = 1, 4,4 %) und eine Iliosakralgelenkinfektion nach Zementaugmentation einer Metastase (n = 1, 4,4 %). Die Interventionen waren heterogen, Phagen wurden intravenös verabreicht, intraoperativ ins Gelenk injiziert, intraoperativ lokal angewendet oder über Drainagen appliziert. In Kombination mit Antibiotikatherapie konnte eine vollständige Infekteradikation bei 18 Patienten (78,3 %) erreicht werden. Bei 91,3 % der Patienten wurden keine Nebenwirkungen berichtet.

Schlussfolgerung

Bakteriophagen sind eine vielversprechende Behandlungsmethode von Knochen- und Protheseninfektionen in Kombination mit einer Antibiotikatherapie. Zukünftige klinische Studien mit höherem Evidenzgrad werden benötigt, um eine erfolgreiche Translation der Bakteriophagentherapie in die klinische Praxis weiter zu etablieren.

Future directions of postoperative spinal implant infections

This article outlines some promising future concepts against postoperative spinal implant infections on the basis of today available literature. The ever-adapting bacteria causing this common complication compel a corresponding continuous research about best effective treatment. The aim is to give a perspective on several future attack-points: surgical infection prevention strategies such as technical optimization of implants and surgical technique; faster diagnostic tools to detect infection, especially in the context of late infections with low-virulent germs and with regard to decision-making in the course of the surgical workflow; and combined surgical and medical treatment options against implant infections. The surgical treatment section will also state open issues concerning implant removal, and the medical treatment section will give an outlook to promising medical alternatives in a post-antibiotic era. To keep up in this field will be important to retain spine surgery in the future as the state-of-the-art treatment option for mandatory spinal interventions in the presence of tumor or trauma and even more so as an attractive option for patients with degenerative spinal disorder for improvement of their life quality.

Phages Needed against Resistant Bacteria

Phages have been known for more than 100 years. They have been applied to numerous infectious diseases and have proved to be effective in many cases. However, they have been neglected due to the era of antibiotics. With the increase of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms, we need additional therapies. Whether or not phages can fulfill this expectation needs to be verified and tested according to the state-of-the-art of international regulations. These regulations fail, however, with respect to GMP production of phages. Phages are biologicals, not chemical compounds, which cannot be produced under GMP regulations. This needs to be urgently changed to allow progress to determine how phages can enter routine clinical settings.

Bacteriophages as Adjuvant to Antibiotics for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

We documented the adjunctive bacteriophage therapy to treat a chronic relapsing periprosthetic joint infection of the knee and chronic osteomyelitis of the femur caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa The combined antibiotic-phage treatment eradicated the infection, and no side effects to phages were observed.

Bacteriophage Application for Difficult-to-treat Musculoskeletal Infections: Development of a Standardized Multidisciplinary Treatment Protocol

Bacteriophage therapy has recently attracted increased interest, particularly in difficult-to-treat infections. Although it is not a novel concept, standardized treatment guidelines are currently lacking. We present the first steps towards the establishment of a "multidisciplinary phage task force" (MPTF) and a standardized treatment pathway, based on our experience of four patients with severe musculoskeletal infections. After review of their medical history and current clinical status, a multidisciplinary team found four patients with musculoskeletal infections eligible for bacteriophage therapy within the scope of Article 37 of the Declaration of Helsinki. Treatment protocols were set up in collaboration with phage scientists and specialists. Based on the isolated pathogens, phage cocktails were selected and applied intraoperatively. A draining system allowed postoperative administration for a maximum of 10 days, 3 times per day. All patients received concomitant antibiotics and their clinical status was followed daily during phage therapy. No severe side-effects related to the phage application protocol were noted. After a single course of phage therapy with concomitant antibiotics, no recurrence of infection with the causative strains occurred, with follow-up periods ranging from 8 to 16 months. This study presents the successful outcome of bacteriophage therapy using a standardized treatment pathway for patients with severe musculoskeletal infection. A multidisciplinary team approach in the form of an MPTF is paramount in this process.

Antimicrobial Effect Of Visible Blue Light Used In A Minimally Invasive Intramedullary Fracture Stabilization System

Introduction: Since 2009, the IlluminOss^® System is being used as an intramedullary fracture treatment. The system is characterized by the use of blue light to polymerize liquid monomer after its infusion in a polyethylene terephthalate balloon. Very few infections of the material have been observed, which might be explained by the possible antimicrobial side-effect of the blue light used in this intramedullary fracture stabilization system. This study aimed to assess this antimicrobial (side-)effect on S. aureus.

Methods: A suspension of 1.5 x 10³ CFU/ml of 8325-4 S. aureus was placed into five, custom made, black delrin cylinders. The implant was placed into the cylinders and the light source was activated for 200, 400, 600, 800, or 1,000 seconds. 100 µL of the light exposed suspension was grafted on blood agar and placed in a 35 degrees Celsius incubator for 24 hours. Colonies on each agar plate were counted and compared to the control plates (no blue light exposure).

Results: The control plates showed a mean of 85 ± 15 colonies per plate. A statistically significant decrease was observed after 600 seconds of exposure time; mean colony count of 63 ± 4 (p <0.05). The absolute reduction was 24 ± 14 after 600 seconds exposure time. At 800 and 1,000 seconds, no statistically significant reduction was found compared with the control plates (means 72 ± 10 and 83 ± 14 colonies, respectively).

Conclusions: In this study only a temporary reduction of S. aureus was observed.

If future research regarding the antimicrobial characteristics of blue light used in the IlluminOss^® System is desired, it should focus on the need for oxygen and its availability and the dose and manner of applying the light.

Clinical application of bacteriophages in Europe

Bacteriophages could help address the antibiotic resistance crisis that impacts health systems all over the world. In 2011, the European Commission formally confirmed that phage products used as therapeutics are medicinal products and thus manufacturers need to navigate the extremely arduous and enormously expensive medicine development and marketing pathway. However, up until now, not one therapeutic phage product has made it to the European market, and yet clinicians are under increasing pressure to use phages in the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. While a handful of small European enterprises are struggling to squeeze therapeutic phage products through the conventional and centralised European medicinal products funnel, some clinicians and academics are exploring (European) national solutions to accelerate the availability of phages for the treatment of an increasing number of desperate patients. This mini-review summarises the actual status and perspectives of clinical phage application in Europe.

A Wake-Up Call: We Need Phage Therapy Now

The rise of multidrug-resistant bacteria has resulted in an increased interest in phage therapy, which historically preceded antibiotic treatment against bacterial infections. To date, there have been no reports of serious adverse events caused by phages. They have been successfully used to cure human diseases in Eastern Europe for many decades. More recently, clinical trials and case reports for a variety of indications have shown promising results. However, major hurdles to the introduction of phage therapy in the Western world are the regulatory and legal frameworks. Present regulations may take a decade or longer to be fulfilled. It is of urgent need to speed up the availability of phage therapy.

Isolation and identification of Salmonella pullorum bacteriophage YSP2 and its use as a therapy for chicken diarrhea

Salmonella pullorum is the major pathogen that is harmful to the poultry industry in developing countries, and the treatment of chicken diarrhea caused by S. pullorum has become increasingly difficult. In this study, a virulent bacteriophage YSP2, which was able to specifically infect Salmonella, was isolated and characterized. Phage YSP2 was classified in the Siphoviridae family and had a short latent period of 10 min. No bacterial virulence- or lysogenesis-related ORF is present in the YSP2 genome, making it eligible for use in phage therapy. Experiments in vivo investigated the potential use of phages as a therapy against diarrhea in chickens caused by S. pullorum in a chicken diarrhea model, demonstrating that a single oral administration of YSP2 (1 × 10¹⁰ PFU/mL, 80 μL/chicken) 2 h after S. pullorum oral administration at a double median lethal dose was sufficient to protect chickens against diarrhea. Gross inspection showed that YSP2 can effectively reduce organ damage and significantly relieve hemorrhage in the intestine and liver tissue. Moreover, YSP2 can maintain a high curative effect when diluted to 10⁸ PFU/mL. In light of its therapeutic effect on chicken diarrhea, YSP2 may serve as an alternative treatment strategy for infections caused by S. pullorum.