Defektdeckung an den Fingern und am Daumen

Clinical effects of resurfacing fingertip amputations in long fingers using homodigital dorsal neurofascial broaden pedicle island flaps

The use of homodigital dorsal neurofascial broaden pedicle island flaps (HDNBPIF) to treat fingertip amputations is an ongoing research topic. Here, we evaluated the clinical effects of resurfacing fingertip amputations in long fingers using HDNBPIF. Seventeen patients with 18 long fingers were treated with HDNBPIF from December 2018 to May 2021. Total active motion (TAM) scores, Semmes Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test, static 2PD test, visual analogue scale (VAS), Vancouver scar scales (VSS), and quick DASH scores were evaluated at 12-25 months postoperation. The aesthetic satisfaction of the patients was estimated subjectively using a 5-point Likert scale. The mean defect size was 1.11 × 1.13 cm and mean flap size was 1.32 × 1.32 cm. All flaps survived and the mean TAM of injured fingers was 255.6° (Contralateral side: 268.4°, p < 0.05). Mean SWM score in the flap was 3.90 g, and 3.22 g in the donor zone. Mean static 2PD discrimination in the flap was 5.61 mm and 4.33 mm in the donor zone. Mean quick Dash scores were 5.81 whereas Mean VAS score in the flap was 0.7 and 0.2 in the donor site. Vancouver scar scales at the donor and recipient sites ranged from 0 to 2. At the end of the follow-up, all patients reported good aesthetic appearance and curative effects. These results show that HDNBPIF is a promising strategy that achieves good curative effects and recovery of fingertip functions.Type of Study and Level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Effect of Health Care and Rehabilitation Nursing and Analysis of Neurovascular Preservation of Patients Undergoing Reconstruction of Severed Finger under X-ray Image Examination

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to provide a guideline for continuous rehabilitation nursing for patients with severe finger replantation, and establish a satellite contact point for patients with severe finger replantation after discharge, so as to ensure scientific and effective rehabilitation training after discharge and explore the role of continuous rehabilitation nursing measurement in severe finger rehabilitation and neurovascular preservation.

METHODS

A total of 380 patients accepting neurovascular preservation finger replantation in the hand surgery department were divided into an observation group and a control group according to the number of hospitalizations. All patients underwent reconstructive surgery of severed finger. X-ray filming was used to monitor the postoperative nursing effect of neurovascular preservation of severed finger. The discharged patient information questionnaire was filled 3 days before the discharge. Then, a patient information database was established, and rehabilitation training was performed. Finally, sexual rehabilitation nursing follow-up intervention, telephone follow-up, and cross-referring intervention were carried out. Postoperative x-ray images were taken regularly to observe the recovery of reconstructed finger.

RESULTS

There was no difference in daily life ability scores and hand function scores between the 2 groups at discharge (P > 0.05). The daily life ability scores and hand function scores of the observation group were better than those of the control group at 1 and 6 months after discharge (P < 0.05), the difference is statistically significant. As the discharge time prolonged, the daily life ability score and hand function score of the 2 groups of patients gradually increased. X-ray images showed that the replanted finger body was well developed, phalanx was in good antithesis, and there was no epiphysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous rehabilitation nursing measures should be taken after the replantation of the severed finger after neurovascular preservation, which provides standardized rehabilitation training standards for patients with replantation of severed finger after discharge, improves patient training compliance, promotes hand function recovery as soon as possible, and enables patients to return to society as soon as possible, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

[Homodigital neurovascular island flap according to Venkataswami]

OBJECTIVE

Reliable wound coverage of the fingertip and palmar aspect of the middle finger with a sensate flap in order to restore early function.

INDICATIONS

Palmar, oblique pulp defects or amputations at the distal finger phalange with uncovered bone, tendons, and/or neurovascular structures.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Peripheral perfusion deficiency, size of defect exceeding flap capacity, obliteration of the flap artery, i.e. contralateral finger artery.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Harvesting of adipocutane, midlateral triangle based on proper digital vessel flap; distal flap transposition and primary closure of the harvesting defect, flap dimension 4-5 mm larger than defect.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Finger splint for 2 weeks, followed by exercises with flap conditioning.

RESULTS

Very reliable defect coverage with 9% minor and temporary complications, all of which healed without consequences.

Long-term outcome of fingertip reconstruction with the homodigital neurovascular island flap

INTRODUCTION

Fingertip injuries are frequent and several surgical strategies exist to reconstruct the amputated part and restore function and appearance. Yet, long-term results are rarely published. The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term clinical outcome of neurovascular island flaps for traumatic fingertip amputation of Allen type III/IV injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed a cohort of patients with traumatic fingertip amputation that underwent reconstruction with a neurovascular island flap from January 2003 to December 2014. No mandatory splinting was applied after surgery. 28 participants (29 fingers) were available for follow-up at mean 8 years after reconstruction. Activities of daily living were measured with the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire. Grip strength and finger motion were assessed using a Jamar dynamometer and a goniometer. Two-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments were used to evaluate sensory recovery.

RESULTS

No intraoperative complications occurred and all flaps survived. Mean flap size was 4.7 ± 0.6 cm². Active motion of the fingers was over 95% of the contralateral side at follow-up. Three patients showed mild extension lag of the proximal interphalangeal joint. The grip strength of the affected hand and of each of the affected fingers was over 70% of the contralateral side. In comparison to the contralateral side we did not detect any significant difference for the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, but two-point discrimination (5.1 ± 1.7 mm) was significantly impaired. According to the Lim classification 1 of 14 nails with hook nail deformity showed grade 3 breaking of the nail. The DASH score was 16.0. All patients returned to their original occupation and patient satisfaction with the procedure was high.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk for disabling flexion contracture seems to be small even without mandatory splinting. Neurovascular island flaps for fingertip amputation of Allen type III/IV injuries are a reliable tool in fingertip reconstruction in the long term.