[Treatment of ankle fractures: operative techniques : Standards, tips and pitfalls]

[Plastering-A technique fallen into obscurity]

Immobilization of fractures and dislocations is a basic technique in orthopedic trauma surgery care. The orthopedic surgeon should be familiar with the various materials, techniques and possible complications. Despite other techniques, the classical white plaster cast remains an integral part of orthopedic trauma surgery care. The application of such a cast must be learned as failure to observe the basic principles can result in harm to the patient. In many hospitals, the application of a plaster cast is delegated to the nursing staff according to the physician's instructions. As a result, many young medical colleagues lack the knowledge of how to apply a plaster cast. In addition to the treatment of fractures, immobilization after dislocation, inflammation and ligamentous injuries are some of the areas of application. In this article the application of a plaster cast is described based on a case study, from the indications to the execution and possible complications.

Intercalary fragments in posterior malleolar fractures: incidence, treatment implications, and distribution within CT-based classification systems

Introduction

Complex ankle fractures frequently include the posterior malleolus (PM). Despite advances in diagnostic and treatment strategies, PM fracture involvement still predisposes to worse outcomes. While not incorporated into the most common PM fracture classifications, the presence of an intercalary fragment (ICF) complicates treatment. This study aims to describe the incidence, morphology, and location of ICFs in PM fractures.

Materials and methods

A total of 135 patients with a mean age of 54.4 (SD ± 18.9) years and PM fractures were analyzed for the presence of an ICF. Patients with an ICF were compared to those without in terms of age, gender, and treatment received. Characteristics of the ICFs in terms of location and size were assessed. Furthermore, the presence of an ICF in relation to the PM fracture classification according to Haraguchi et al., Bartoníček/Rammelt et al., and Mason et al. was investigated.

Results

ICFs presented in 55 (41%) of the 135 patients. Patients with an ICF were younger, and the PM was more often operatively treated when compared to patients without an ICF. A posterolateral approach was used significantly more often in patients with an ICF. Almost all ICFs were found in the posterolateral (58%) and posterocentral (35%) regions. The majority of fragments were found in Bartoníček/Rammelt type 2 fractures, the most common fracture type. Bartoníček/Rammelt type 3 fractures had the highest relative frequency of ICFs.

Conclusion

ICFs are frequently found in PM fractures; however, they are not incorporated into any of the common classifications. They are generally found in younger patients and associated with more complex PM fractures. As they can complicate reduction of the main fragment and may require direct exposure to restore joint congruency, ICFs should be considered in PM fracture classifications. Due to their location, the majority of ICFs are able to be accessed using a posterolateral approach.

[Fracture of the posterior malleolus : A paradigm shift]

Ankle fractures with involvement of the posterior malleolus have a poor prognosis. The traditional concept of addressing the posterior fragment as the final step in the surgical reconstruction depending on the fragment size manifest in the lateral X‑ray, does not do justice to the anatomic and biomechanical relevance of the posterior malleolus. Intra-articular step-offs and fragment displacement ≥ 2 mm, impacted intercalary fragments, involvement of the fibular notch and instability of the syndesmosis, represent parameters relevant for the surgical reconstruction and the functional and radiomorphological outcome independent of fragment size. A valid assessment of these parameters can only be achieved via computed tomography (CT) including multiplanar 2D and 3D reconstruction. This is the foundation for the classification of posterior malleolar fractures according to Bartoníček et al., it forms the basis of the preoperative analysis of the fracture components and represents a decision-making tool for the indications for surgery. The individual fracture pattern guides the selection of the suitable approach or a combination of approaches and the surgical strategy. Making use of the posterior approaches enables the surgeon to have a direct view of the fracture components of the posterior malleolus as a precondition for an anatomic reduction. This central surgical step is frequently done as the first measure of the surgical reconstruction of the ankle joint. Furthermore, direct reduction and posterior stabilization is more accurate and stable than indirect reduction from an anterior approach with indirect fixation using lag screws. An additional temporary transfixation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis is often dispensable.