Biomechanischer Vergleich sechs verschiedener Fixationstechniken zur Versorgung von Halsfrakturen der Metakarpale

Operative Fixation of a Humeral Shaft Periprosthetic Fracture After IlluminOss: A Case Report

CASE

An 82-year-old man sustained a periprosthetic fracture after IlluminOss photodynamic bone stabilization system (PBSS) stabilization for an impending pathologic fracture. Nonoperative management was unsuccessful, and he subsequently underwent operative fixation, which featured lag screw fixation of the spiral distal humeral shaft fracture and osteotomy followed by plate fixation of the pathologic humeral shaft fracture.

CONCLUSION

This is the first article to report this complication with IlluminOss PBSS stabilization and details regarding revision surgery.

Comparative analysis of the effects of AO mini-plate and Kirschner wire pinning in the metacarpal fractures: A retrospective study

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of AO miniplate screw internal fixation and Kirschner wire (KW) in the treatment of metacarpal fractures.We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 590 metacarpal fracture patients admitted to our hospital from March 2016 to March 2019. Among them, 290 patients were treated with KWs; 300 were treated with AO microplate internal fixation. The clinical, radiological results, time of surgery, and complications were observed and compared between the 2 groups.The imaging characteristics and preoperative fracture types of the 2 groups were similar and comparable (P > .05). The operation time, length of hospital stay, and fracture healing time of AO group were shorter than those of KW group, and the differences were statistically significant (41.22 ± 7.23 vs 25.64 ± 6.29; 7.13 ± 2.38 vs 5.26 ± 1.71; 67.43 ± 22.01 vs 52.57 ± 17.46, P < .05). In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications in AO group was lower than that in KW group (8.3% vs 15.2%, P < .05). In terms of surgical knuckle extension, flexion, and total mobility (compared with the uninjured hand), patients in the AO plate group were significantly improved compared with patients in the KW group, and the difference was statistically significant (4 vs 10 degree; 19 vs 10 degree; 14 vs 29 degree, P < .05); The average degree of finger rotation deformity in AO plate group was significantly lower than that in KW group (1 vs 6 degree, P < .05). In terms of grip strength (compared with the healthy hand), the average grip strength of AO plate group was significantly higher than that of KW group (93% vs 83%, P < .05). Patients in the OA plate group had a lower Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (P < .05).Compared with KW fixation, AO mini-plate and screw fixation for the metacarpal fracture has a better effect, which can effectively shorten the operation time and reduce the trauma to patients. It can provide patients with better stability and realize the early movement of the palm, promote fracture healing and joint function recovery; it can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, which has certain safety. In addition, it can effectively reduce the risk of poor finger rotation.

Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures

Closed reduction and internal fixation with antegrade intramedullary nails is a feasible and effective treatment for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures (FMNFs). The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with displaced FMNFs after treatment with single or dual antegrade elastic intramedullary nails (AEIMNs). Thirty-three patients were treated with a single 2.0 mm AEIMN and 34 patients were treated with two 1.5 mm AEIMNs. Clinical and radiological outcomes included grip strength, active range of motion (ROM), active flexion and extension of the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, dorsal angulation loss, and metacarpal shortening of the fifth metacarpal at 12 months after treatment. No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to grip strength, ROM or flexion of the fifth MCP joint. The average values of dorsal angulation loss, metacarpal shortening, and extension of the fifth MCP joint of the dual nails group were better than those of the single nail group (dorsal angulation loss, 2.79 ± 1.93° vs. 4.05 ± 1.59°, P = 0.009; metacarpal shortening, 1.66 ± 0.80 mm vs. 2.12 ± 0.88 mm, P = 0.028; extension of the fifth MCP joint, 7.71 ± 4.43° vs. 4.82 ± 4.09°, P = 0.012). In conclusion, dual AEIMNs fixation provided better MCP extension and radiological outcomes than single AEIMN fixation.