[Indications, procedure and outcome of prehospital emergency resuscitative thoracotomy-a systematic literature search]

[Prehospital perimortem cesarean section during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for traumatic cardiac arrest : Case report and lessons learned]

The following case report discusses the resuscitation of a pregnant woman in traumatic cardiac arrest after a fall from a height with consecutive resuscitative hysterotomy for maternal and fetal salvage. The report illustrates all lessons learned from critical appraisal amid new guideline recommendations and gives an overview of the published literature on the matter. Despite extensive resuscitation efforts, ultimately both the mother and the newborn were pronounced life extinct at the scene. Prehospital treatment of (traumatic) cardiac arrest in a pregnant patient as well as performing a perimortem cesarean section remain infrequent but challenging scenarios.

Präklinische Notfallthorakotomie in der Berliner Notfallrettung – Darstellung der Umsetzung im Land Berlin und Diskussion erster Erkenntnisse

Im Jahr 2015 fand das Thema „traumatisch bedingter Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand“ erstmalig Einzug in die aktualisierten Reanimationsleitlinien des European Resuscitation Council. Neben dem speziell anzuwendenden Maßnahmenbündel mit Atemwegsmanagement, Therapie der Hypovolämie, externer Blutungskontrolle und beidseitiger Thoraxentlastung sollte auch eine Notfallthorakotomie bei geeigneten Patienten erwogen werden. Um dieses Vorgehen systematisch in der Berliner Notfallrettung zu etablieren und standardisieren, hat die Ärztliche Leitung Rettungsdienst der Berliner Feuerwehr verschiedene Maßnahmen unternommen, um die optimale Ausnutzung der Schlüsselfaktoren Expertise, „elapsed time“, Equipment und „environment“ sicherzustellen. Dabei konnten im Laufe der ersten 2,5 Jahre auch bereits wichtige Erfahrungen aus der neuen Versorgungsstruktur dieser schwerstverletzten Patienten gewonnen werden.

[Safety aspects of prehospital thoracic emergency procedures: Results of a survey among German emergency physicians]

BACKGROUND

The safe indication and performance of thoracic emergency procedures are crucial and potentially lifesaving in prehospital emergency care. This study aims to investigate issues of patient safety and quality assurance of prehospital invasive thoracic interventions. The survey does not represent the actual medical care situation but explores reasons for security concerns among emergency physicians.

METHODS

Using a pre-validated questionnaire, prehospital emergency physicians of three prehospital rescue associations (Zweckverband) in Southwest Saxony, Greifswald, and Vechta, Germany, were queried via the online survey service limesurvey. The survey was conducted between January and March 2022.

RESULTS

104 emergency physicians participated (response rate 42.4%) 71 of which fully completed the survey (68%). 79% of the participants stated that they felt safe in performing pleural punction. Common reasons for postponing prehospital thoracic interventions included fear of complications or individual patient characteristics. 90% said that they were familiar with the on-board equipment options, and 60% reported that resources were sufficient to perform double-sided procedures. While in all three regions there is sufficient on-board equipment to perform procedures on two sides, one out of two participants said that lack of equipment deters them from performing prehospital invasive thoracic procedures. Emergency physicians who graduated from trauma courses and/or participate in air rescue are more likely to perform invasive thoracic procedures. More than half of the participants wanted more training in chest tube placement or pleural punction.

CONCLUSION

Safety in prehospital invasive thoracic procedures needs improvement in structural, procedural, as well as human factors aspects. Safe handling of these rare but vital techniques requires more training. A lack of knowledge of equipment is a significant safety gap. Prehospital ultrasound constitutes a structural element of prehospital diagnostics.

Survival after traumatic cardiac arrest is possible—a comparison of German patient-registries

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to trauma is rare, and survival in this group is infrequent. Over the last decades, several new procedures have been implemented to increase survival, and a “Special circumstances chapter” was included in the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines in 2015. This article analysed outcomes after traumatic cardiac arrest in Germany using data from the German Resuscitation Registry (GRR) and the TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU) of the German Trauma Society. 

Methods

In this study, data from patients with OHCA between 01.01.2014 and 31.12.2019 secondary to major trauma and where cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was started were eligible for inclusion. Endpoints were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), hospital admission with ROSC and survival to hospital discharge.

Results

1.049 patients were eligible for inclusion. ROSC was achieved in 28.7% of the patients, 240 patients (22.9%) were admitted to hospital with ROSC and 147 (14.0%) with ongoing CPR. 643 (67.8%) patients were declared dead on scene. Of all patients resuscitated after traumatic OHCA, 27.3% (259) died in hospital. The overall mortality was 95.0% and 5.0% survived to hospital discharge (47). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis; age, sex, injury severity score (ISS), head injury, found in cardiac arrest, shock on admission, blood transfusion, CPR in emergency room (ER), emergency surgery and initial electrocardiogram (ECG), were independent predictors of mortality.

Conclusion

Traumatic cardiac arrest was an infrequent event with low overall survival. The mortality has remained unchanged over the last decades in Germany. Additional efforts are necessary to identify reversible cardiac arrest causes and provide targeted trauma resuscitation on scene.

Trial registration

DRKS, DRKS-ID DRKS00027944. Retrospectively registered 03/02/2022.

Cardiac arrest in special circumstances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation prioritize treatments like chest compression and defibrillation, known to be highly effective for cardiac arrest from cardiac origin. This review highlights the need to modify this approach in special circumstances.

RECENT FINDINGS

Potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest are clustered into four Hs and four Ts (Hypoxia, Hypovolaemia, Hyperkalaemia/other electrolyte disorders, Hypothermia, Thrombosis, Tamponade, Tension pneumothorax, Toxic agents). Point-of-care ultrasound has its role in identification of the cause and targeting treatment. Time-critical interventions may even prevent cardiac arrest if applied early. The extracorporeal CPR (eCPR) or mechanical CPR should be considered for bridging the period needed to reverse the precipitating cause(s). There is low quality of evidence available to guide the treatment in the majority of situations. Some topics (pulmonary embolism, eCPR, drowning, pregnancy and opioid toxicity) were included in recent ILCOR reviews and evidence updates but majority of recommendations is based on individual systematic reviews, scoping reviews, evidence updates and expert consensus.

SUMMARY

Cardiac arrests from reversible causes happen with lower incidence. Return of spontaneous circulation and neurologically intact survival can hardly be achieved without a modified approach focusing on immediate treatment of the underlying cause(s) of cardiac arrest.

Applicability of Anatomic and Physiologic Scoring Systems for the Prediction of Outcome in Polytraumatized Patients with Blunt Aortic Injuries

Background: Most patients with blunt aortic injuries, who arrive alive in a clinic, suffer from traumatic pseudoaneurysms. Due to modern treatments, the perioperative mortality has significantly decreased. Therefore, it is unclear how exact the prediction of commonly used scoring systems of the outcome is. Methods: We analyzed data on 65 polytraumatized patients with blunt aortic injuries. The following scores were calculated: injury severity score (ISS), new injury severity score (NISS), trauma and injury severity score (TRISS), revised trauma score coded (RTSc) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II). Subsequently, their predictive value was evaluated using Spearman´s and Kendall´s correlation analysis, logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Results: A proportion of 83% of the patients suffered from a thoracic aortic rupture or rupture with concomitant aortic wall dissection (54/65). The overall mortality was 24.6% (16/65). The sensitivity and specificity were calculated as the area under the receiver operating curves (AUC): NISS 0.812, ISS 0.791, APACHE II 0.884, RTSc 0.679 and TRISS 0.761. Logistic regression showed a slightly higher specificity to anatomical scoring systems (ISS 0.959, NISS 0.980, TRISS 0.957, APACHE II 0.938). The sensitivity was highest in the APACHE II with 0.545. Sensitivity and specificity for the RTSc were not significant. Conclusion: The predictive abilities of all scoring systems were very limited. All scoring systems, except the RTSc, had a high specificity but a low sensitivity. In our study population, the RTSc was not applicable. The APACHE II was the most sensitive score for mortality. Anatomical scoring systems showed a positive correlation with the amount of transfused blood products.

[Emergency thoracotomy in a severely injured patient after hemorrhagic shock in traumatic pelvic bleeding : Case report]

A case of in-hospital thoracotomy with subsequent open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation of a polytraumatized patient is reported. Emergency thoracotomies are rare interventions in challenging situations. Up to now there are only few standards or uniform education and training concepts. The indications are often a borderline decision. The aim of thoracotomy and open resuscitation in combination with a reduction in circulation, for example by cross-clamping the aorta, is to save time to address reversible causes of the hemorrhage, redirect the blood volume into the vital cerebral and coronary circulation and minimize bleeding from subdiaphragmatic bleeding sources. Ultimately, in case of doubt, the thoracotomy can be performed for the patient's benefit with the appropriate indications.

[Cardiac arrest under special circumstances]

These guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Cardiac Arrest under Special Circumstances are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the modifications required for basic and advanced life support for the prevention and treatment of cardiac arrest under special circumstances; in particular, specific causes (hypoxia, trauma, anaphylaxis, sepsis, hypo-/hyperkalaemia and other electrolyte disorders, hypothermia, avalanche, hyperthermia and malignant hyperthermia, pulmonary embolism, coronary thrombosis, cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax, toxic agents), specific settings (operating room, cardiac surgery, cardiac catheterization laboratory, dialysis unit, dental clinics, transportation [in-flight, cruise ships], sport, drowning, mass casualty incidents), and specific patient groups (asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neurological disease, morbid obesity, pregnancy).

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances

These European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Cardiac Arrest in Special Circumstances guidelines are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the modifications required to basic and advanced life support for the prevention and treatment of cardiac arrest in special circumstances; specifically special causes (hypoxia, trauma, anaphylaxis, sepsis, hypo/hyperkalaemia and other electrolyte disorders, hypothermia, avalanche, hyperthermia and malignant hyperthermia, pulmonary embolism, coronary thrombosis, cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax, toxic agents), special settings (operating room, cardiac surgery, catheter laboratory, dialysis unit, dental clinics, transportation (in-flight, cruise ships), sport, drowning, mass casualty incidents), and special patient groups (asthma and COPD, neurological disease, obesity, pregnancy).