[Current treatment strategies for lower leg fractures in adults]

Clinical analysis of accelerated rehabilitation surgery for Gustilo type IIIA/B open tibio fibular fracture

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of accelerated rehabilitation surgery for the treatment of Gustilo type IIIA/B open tibiofibular fracture with emergency stage I debridement, internal fracture fixation, bone grafting, coverage of the wound surface with a muscle flap combined with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD), and internal and lateral leg reduction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 15 patients with Gustilo type IIIA/B open tibiofibular fracture who were admitted to the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University from January 2015 to December 2018. There were 12 males and 3 females. The patients ranged in age from 20 to 62 years, with an average of 39.5 years. After admission, the patients underwent stage I emergency debridement (including exploration and repair of nerves and tendons), open reduction and internal fixation of the tibia and fibula, iliac bone grafting, muscle flap and VSD coverage of the bone defect, complete tensioning of the calf inside and outside, tibia-sparing incision before healing, and stage II free skin grafting. Patients were followed up periodically to observe muscle flap survival, fracture healing time, length of hospitalization, wound healing time, delayed union, bone nonunion, osteomyelitis and other complications. At the last follow-up, the Johner-Wruhs criteria were used to evaluate the rate of good functional recovery from tibial shaft fracture, fracture healing quality was evaluated by the Merchant score, and limb function was evaluated by the LEFS.

RESULTS

All 15 cases were followed up for 12-32 months, with an average of 22.8 months. All the fractures healed; the range of healing time was 14-30 weeks (mean 18.5 weeks). The length of hospitalization was 25.1 ± 7.6 days, and wound healing took 12.2 ± 2.0 days. None of the patients had complications such as osteomyelitis infection. When the Johner-Wruhs evaluation criteria for functional recovery from tibial shaft fracture were applied at the last follow-up, the outcomes were as follows: excellent in 13 cases, good in 1 case and fair in 1 case, for an excellent and good rate of 93.3%. When fracture healing was evaluated according to the Merchant scoring standard, the outcomes were as follows: excellent in 12 cases, good in 1 case, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case, for an excellent and good rate of 86.7%. The mean LEFS score of the affected limb at the last follow-up was 70 (59-80).

CONCLUSION

For Gustilo type IIIA/B open tibiofibular fractures, emergency stage I debridement, internal fixation of the fracture, bone grafting, coverage of the wound with a muscle flap, complete tensioning of the calf inside and outside, and application of VSD can improve the repair of leg soft-tissue defects, shorten hospitalization time, promote fracture healing, and effectively reduce infection and complications related to bone exposure. More importantly, this treatment protocol provides effective wound repair, guarantees the recovery of limb function, significantly speeds up recovery, and improve patients' quality of life.

Retrospective clinical outcomes in the definitive treatment of high-energy tibial diaphyseal fractures using hexapod external fixator versus monolateral external fixator

BACKGROUND

External fixation, which can preserve the biomechanical microenvironment of fracture healing, plays an important role in managing the high-energy fractures with poor surrounding soft tissues. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences of clinical outcomes, if any, between hexapod external fixator and monolateral external fixator in the definitive treatment of high-energy tibial diaphyseal fractures.

METHODS

A total of 53 patients with high-energy tibial diaphyseal fractures and definitively treated by the hexapod external fixator (HEF) or monolateral external fixator (MEF) were retrospectively collected and analyzed, from March 2015 to June 2019. There were 31 patients in the HEF treatment, and the other 22 patients were managed by the MEF. The demographic data, surgical duration, external fixation time, final radiological results, complications, and clinical outcomes were documented and analyzed. Difficulties that occurred during the treatment were classified according to Paley. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov criteria (ASAMI) at the last clinical visit.

RESULTS

The mean surgical duration in the HEF group (62.4 ± 8.3 min) was shorter than that in the MEF group (91.4 ± 6.9 min) (P < 0.05). All patients acquired complete bone union finally. Patients in the HEF group (24.2 ± 3.1 weeks) underwent a shorter average external fixation time than that in the MEF group (26.3 ± 3.8 weeks) (P < 0.05). Satisfactory alignment was achieved in all patients without the need for remanipulation. The residual sagittal plane deformities in the HEF group were all less than that in the MEF group (P < 0.05). The complication rate was 35.5% in the HEF group, while 45.5% in the MEF group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in ASAMI scores (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is no statistically significant difference in finally clinical outcomes between hexapod external fixator and monolateral external fixator in the definitive treatment of high-energy tibial diaphyseal fractures. The hexapod external fixation treatment is a superior effective method, including advantages of stable fixation, less surgical duration, postoperatively satisfactory fracture reduction, and fewer complications.

Experiences in the Use of Motorized Intramedullary Nails after Complex Injuries to the Extremities

The treatment of complex injuries of the extremities after comminuted fractures or non-unions is a challenging area in the field of trauma surgery. Internal, motorized implants nowadays enable a patient-oriented and progressive treatment of these cases. The present article aims to present modern treatment strategies of complex injuries of the extremities, support the use of novel, motorized intramedullary nails and provide experiences for the handling with lengthening nails or transport nails. For this purpose, the preoperative planning including selection of patients, presentation of internal lengthening and transport systems and the most important factors during preparation of the surgery are described. Moreover, critical steps during the implantation of motorized nails and also during potential follow-up interventions are highlighted and the postoperative protocol including precise recommendations for the transport und consolidation phase are provided. Finally, the experiences are illustrated by presentation of the four different cases. The use of internal, motorized implants represents the latest step in the treatment of complex injuries of the extremities. These implants improve the quality of life and the authors recommend its use. However, these implants require a high expertise and adaption of established treatment protocols in these challenging trauma cases. Follow-up analyses with a considerably large number of cases are necessary and the research on implants to solve persisting problems in the area of complex injuries of the extremities has to be pursued intensively.

Correction outcomes of the postoperative malalignment salvaged by the temporary application of the hexapod external fixator in tibial diaphyseal fractures treated by monolateral external fixation

BACKGROUND

Postoperative malalignment in fractures treated by monolateral external fixation is not uncommon in clinical practice. Accurate reduction without excessive tissue disruption caused by surgical intervention and sequentially manage the fractures using monolateral external fixation for definitive treatment is still a challenge for surgeons. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the temporary application of the hexapod external fixator (HEF) for the postoperative malalignment correction in tibial diaphyseal fractures treated by monolateral external fixation.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis of 23 trauma patients with tibial diaphyseal fracture treated by the monolateral external fixation at our institution from January 2016 to May 2019. There were 21 males and 2 females with a mean age of 38 years (range 18-60 years). The hexapod external fixator was temporarily applied due to postoperative malalignment within two weeks and who unwilling to undergo a secondary surgical intervention. For patients with postoperative malalignment requiring correction, the HEF components were installed on the original existing half pins of the monolateral external fixator after removing the connecting rod. The standard anteroposterior and lateral X-rays of the injured limb combined with the temporary HEF were conducted to measure the hexapod external fixator parameters. Any residual deformities were corrected by gradual struts adjustment with the aid of computer-based software. When satisfactory alignment was achieved, the HEF was removed, and the monolateral external fixator was sequentially used as the definitive structure.

RESULTS

All patients acquired functional reduction, which was evaluated by radiographs. The mean correction time was 4 days (range 2 to 8 days). The mean coronal plane translation (1.3±1.0 mm), coronal plane angulation (0.9±0.7°), sagittal plane translation (1.4±1.1 mm), and sagittal plane angulation (0.7±0.7°) after correction were all less than those (7.0±4.9 mm, 4.7±2.3°, 5.6±3.6 mm, 3.2±2.5°) before correction.

CONCLUSIONS

The temporary application of the hexapod external fixator is an alternative and feasible method for the postoperative malalignment correction in tibial diaphyseal fractures treated by monolateral external fixation.

Management of high-energy tibial shaft fractures using the hexapod circular external fixator

Background

The hexapod external fixator (HEF) is increasingly used for high-energy tibial shaft fracture care as more general orthopedic surgeons are gaining expertise of this versatile device. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the HEF for definitive management in patients with high-energy tibial shaft fractures.

Methods

The study was conducted on 34 patients with tibial shaft fractures who were admitted or referred to our institution and consented to HEF treatment from Jan 2016 to June 2019, including 27 males and 7 females with a mean age of 39 years (range 18 to 65 years). Patients' clinical and radiological data, and the final clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up were collected and retrospectively analyzed. All complications were documented according to Paley’s classification. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov criteria (ASAMI) at the last clinical visit.

Results

All patients remained in the HEF for a mean of 26 weeks (range 15 to 52 weeks) and acquired complete bone union. The satisfactory alignment was achieved in all patients, and all the patients were able to perform daily activities with no difficulty at the last clinical visit. Complications included pin tract infection (44%), delayed union (6%), nonunion (3%), and joint stiffness (3%). The ASAMI bony result was excellent in 31 patients and good in 3. The ASAMI functional result was excellent in 27 patients, good in 6, and fair in 1.

Conclusions

Definitive management using the hexapod external fixator is an alternative and effective method for high-energy tibial shaft fractures, including technical advantages of early trauma-control, the versatility of achieving excellent alignment, and the continuity of device until bone union.

Application of elliptic registration and three-dimensional reconstruction in the postoperative measurement of Taylor spatial frame parameters

BACKGROUND

The Taylor spatial frame offered the ability of simultaneous correction of the multidirectional deformities without the need to change the frame, and it was widely used for limb lengthening, deformity correction, and fracture reduction in recent years. There are still some inherent limitations that can affect the accuracy of correction, especially for the measurement of the mounting and rotational parameters. The purpose of our study was to propose some more precise postoperative measurement of Taylor spatial frame (TSF) parameters by application of elliptic registration and three-dimensional reconstruction.

METHODS

This retrospectively study included 28 trauma patients who suffered tibial fracture treated by the TSF at our institution from January 2016 to January 2018, including 25 males and 3 females with a mean age of 43 years (range 14-70 years). We conducted standard full-length anteroposterior and lateral X-rays of the injured extremity and the computed tomographic scans of the bilateral extremities after the operation. Elliptic registration and 3D reconstruction were used to calculate the parameters by two types of software Mimics and CorelDRAW. Correction of the deformity was conducted by adjusting the struts of the TSF according to the electronic prescription. The standard anteroposterior and lateral X-rays after correction were taken to evaluate the effectiveness.

RESULTS

All patients acquired functional reduction, which was evaluated by digital radiography. The mean coronal plane translation(1.9±2.2 mm), coronal plane angulation(1.2±1.0°), sagittal plane translation(2.7±2.1 mm), and sagittal plane angulation(1.2±1.0°) after correction were all less than those(5.5±4.6 mm, 4.9±3.9°, 4.7±4.0 mm, 2.7±2.3°) before correction.

CONCLUSIONS

The TSF system can correct the 6-axis deformities simultaneously with the accurate parameters. Elliptic registration and three-dimensional reconstruction are alternative methods to precisely measure the parameters needed by the TSF system, especially for the mounting and rotational parameters of unusually complex cases.