[Reliability of the FFP classification in pelvic fractures]

Is the conservative treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures still up to date? Retrospective clinical observational study in 46 patients

BACKGROUND

According to current forecasts, our society will grow older and older, so that the proportion of 6% of the German population from 2017 who were 80 years or older will increase further. The frequency of falls in this patient population lead to a further increase of sacral insufficiency fractures.

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study is to evaluate the multimodal interdisciplinary conservative therapy regime for sacral insufficiency fractures in geriatric patients, especially on the basis of mobility and the need for assistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of patients, who were treated as inpatients at the Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien in Erlangen with ICD-10 for sacral fractures S32.1 as the main diagnosis, was retrospectively examined. Only newly diagnosed sacral insufficiency fractures were taken into account. Patients were divided into groups based on the factors hospital stay, fracture location on the sacrum, and location of concomitant pelvic ring injury. The Barthel Index, the Tinetti's Mobility Test and the Timed Up&Go Test were recorded.

RESULTS

46 patients met the inclusion criteria. Using the conservative therapy, improvements were achieved in all patients in terms of need for care, mobility without aids and risk of falling, also patients with an anterior and posterior pelvic ring fracture. Regard a score improvement in the Barthel Index and Tinetti Mobility Test, patients with bilateral sacral insufficiency fracture (n=17, 37.0%) did not differ significantly from patients with unilateral sacral insufficiency fracture (n=22, 47.8%).

CONCLUSION

In geriatric patients, decisions about therapy should always be made on an individual and interdisciplinary basis. The conservative therapy regimen continues to play an important role in this. The collected tests-consisting of Barthel Index, Tinetti Mobility Test and Timed Up&Go Test-are well suited for further reproducible, objective studies with a larger patient collective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

[Sacral fractures in geriatric patients]

Sacral fractures in geriatric patients are increasing and form a distinct entity. Clinical findings can be unspecific, which is why they are easily overlooked. It is mandatory to analyze the whole pelvic ring for evaluation of pelvic stability and for making treatment decisions. The primary diagnostics are made using plain X‑radiography; however, for assessment of the posterior pelvic ring an examination using sectional imaging is regularly necessary. The fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) classification is suitable as a guideline for the surgical treatment to be used. Stable fractures without relevant displacement after initial mobilization should be treated conservatively. Instability, failure of mobilization and persistent pain are, however, common reasons for surgical treatment. Fracture displacement determines if minimally invasive procedures for posterior and anterior pelvic ring stabilization are possible. Otherwise, complex open procedures such as spinopelvic fixation may be necessary.

The FFP-classification: From eminence to evidence

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are a clinical entity with a rapidly growing incidence among elderly women. The characteristics of these fractures are different from those appearing after high-energy trauma. In 2013, the comprehensive FFP-classification provided a new framework for analysis of these fractures. It is based on the estimation of loss of stability in the pelvic ring. It is connected with recommendations for surgical treatment, justified by the fact that higher instabilities will need surgical stabilization. Since ist appearance, we can observe an increasing clinical-scientific interest in FFP. Multiple publications use the FFP-classification studying the characteristics of fractures, choice of treatment and outcome. Other studies focus on minimal-invasive techniques for stabilization. The actual knowledge describes higher mortality rates as the reference population, lower mortality rates after operative treatment but for the price of surgery-related complications. Mobility, independency and quality of life are worse than before the fracture, independent of the FFP-classification and the type of treatment. The classification triggered a rapid increase of expertise. This publication gives a detailed overview on the evolution from eminence to evidence.