[Clinical results of primary intramedullary osteosynthesis with the unreamed AO/ASIF tibial intramedullary nail of open tibial shaft fractures]

A multicentre case series of tibia fractures treated with the Expert Tibia Nail (ETN)

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to present clinical experience and outcomes of intramedullary nailing of proximal, midshaft and distal tibia fractures with the Expert Tibia Nail (ETN; Synthes GmbH, Switzerland), an implant offering a wide range of proximal and distal locking options in multiple planes to increase stability of the implant and bone construct.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

180 patients with 185 tibia fractures were enclosed between July 2004 and May 2005 from ten trauma units (Levels I, II and III) and treated with intramedullary reamed and unreamed nailing with the ETN. Patients attended examinations at 12 weeks and 1 year. The occurrence of postoperative complications was documented as well as the outcomes of fracture healing, primary and secondary malalignment, implant failure, rate of infection and the need for reoperation.

RESULTS

The 1-year follow-up rate was 81 %. At 1 year, the prevalence of delayed union was 12.2 % and higher for open fractures (18.2 %) compared to closed fractures (9.7 %). According to the fracture location, the percentage of delayed union was 5.9, 16.7 and 10.5 % in proximal third, midshaft and distal third cases, respectively. Patients with a plated fibula fracture had an eightfold higher risk of delayed union. The rate of malalignment >5° in any plane 1 year after surgery was 5.5 %. Proximal third fractures were at a higher risk of postoperative malalignment (17.6 %). The rate of secondary malalignment was 1.4 %. The risk of unplanned reoperation was 9.2 %.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary ETN fixation of tibia fractures results in low rates of delayed union, primary and secondary malalignment, implant-related complications, and secondary surgery. Fibula plating had a negative effect on the healing of the tibia.

Open fractures of the tibia treated by immediate intramedullary tibial nail insertion without reaming: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Does immediate tibial nail insertion without reaming as part of protocol-driven management provide a safe and effective treatment for open tibia fractures?

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

A consecutive series of 161 patients with Gustilo grade I-IIIb open tibia fractures.

INTERVENTION

Emergent incision and debridement of the wound with immediate tibial nail insertion without reaming, repeat incision and debridement, and soft-tissue coverage within 14 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Time to union, number of secondary procedures performed to obtain union, implant failures, and the type and incidence of complications.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-three fractures were followed to union. Follow up averaged 2.2 years (0.6-5.5 years). Seventy-six fractures united in less than 6 months, 35 took between 6 and 9 months, and 32 took longer than 9 months. Twenty-five additional procedures were needed to obtain union in 16 of the delayed unions (12 nail exchanges, 4 bone grafts, 9 dynamizations). Complications included 3 patients with cellulitis, 1 superficial infection, 4 deep infections (1 grade I, 2 grade II, 1 grade IIIb), 3 loose screws, 2 broken screws, 5 malunions greater than 5 degrees, and 30 patients with decreased ankle motion when compared with the uninjured side. Not counting the ankle loss of motion, 18 complications occurred in 143 fractures (13%). Twenty-nine patients (20%) had complaints of minor knee pain and 30 (21%) had occasional fracture site pain after activity despite clinical and radiographic evidence of union. Eleven patients (8%) considered themselves completely disabled. Five patients were not treated by the standard protocol and are not included in the previously listed statistics; 3 were grade IIIB that did not have adequate coverage by 14 days, and 2 were grade II injuries that did not have a second debridement. Four of these 5 patients developed a complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Protocol-driven management emphasizing meticulous soft-tissue management and the use of immediate tibial nailing without reaming appears to be safe and effective in the treatment of open tibia fractures. The deep infection rate for the patients who were treated by protocol was 3% and the implant failure rate was lower than has been previously reported, most likely attributable to attempts to obtain cortical contact and avoid fracture gaps. Overall satisfaction was good, but approximately 41% of the patients had complaints of knee or fracture site pain or both well after union.

Treatment of open tibial shaft fractures using tightly fitted interlocking nailing

Between 2000 and 2003 we treated 23 patients who sustained open tibial shaft fractures with tightly fitted interlocking intramedullary nailing. There were three grade I, eight grade II, nine grade IIIa, and three grade IIIb open fractures. Nail diameters were decided on using preoperative and intraoperative radiographs. Nails were introduced after gentle passage with a 7- to 8-mm hand reamer. Union was obtained in all cases. Nine (37.5%) fractures, however, required additional procedures before union. Three of them gained union through exchange nailing, bone graft, and bone transport, respectively. The remaining six underwent dynamisation. Two of them required an additional exchange nailing for non-union; thereafter one healed and the other gained union through an additional bone graft. Deep infection occurred in one case. Screw breakage occurred in one case only. Tightly fitted nailing produced a significantly lower incidence of locking screw breakage. However, even with this advantage, this technical modification has failed to show clinical advantage in terms of higher healing rate or lower rate of secondary procedures.

Intramedullary nailing in open tibia fractures: a comparison of two techniques

We analyzed 51 patients with open tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. In 29 patients the nailing was performed without reaming and in 22 after the "reamed-to-fit" technique. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of union. The nonreamed group required a greater number of secondary procedures to achieve union and had a higher but not statistically significant incidence of infection. Analysis of the operative and anesthesia cost associated with the additional procedures revealed that on average, patients receiving nonreamed nailing incurred a cost of $4,900 more per fracture than patients of the reamed-to-fit technique. The healing rates of open tibia fractures using either minimally reamed or nonreamed techniques of intramedullary nailing are comparable. No increase in the rate of infection with the reamed-to-fit technique was found. A significant increase in the number of secondary procedures required to achieve union was found with the nonreamed nailing technique.