Can nuclear aquatic environmental DNA be a genetic marker for the accurate estimation of species abundance?

Environmental DNA methods for biosecurity and invasion biology in terrestrial ecosystems: Progress, pitfalls, and prospects

Analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) enables indirect detection of species without the need to directly observe and sample them. For biosecurity and invasion biology, eDNA-based methods are useful to address biological invasions at all phases, from detecting arrivals to confirming eradication of past invasions. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and found that in biosecurity and invasion biology, eDNA has primarily been used to detect new incursions and monitor spread in marine and freshwater ecosystems, with much slower uptake in terrestrial ecosystems, reflecting a broader trend common to the usage of eDNA tools. In terrestrial ecosystems, eDNA research has mostly focussed on the use of eDNA metabarcoding to characterise biodiversity, rather than targeting biosecurity threats or non-native populations. We discuss how eDNA-based methods are being applied to terrestrial ecosystems for biosecurity and managing non-native populations at each phase of the invasion continuum: transport, introduction, establishment, and spread; across different management options: containment, control, and eradication; and for detecting the impact of non-native organisms. Finally, we address some of the current technical issues and caveats of eDNA-based methods, particularly for terrestrial ecosystems, and how these might be solved. As eDNA-based methods improve, they will play an increasingly important role in the early detection and adaptive management of biological invasions, and the implementation of effective biosecurity controls.

Validating post-enrichment steps in environmental RNA analysis for improving its availability from water samples

Environmental RNA (eRNA) analysis is expected to inclusively provide the physiological information of a population and community without individual sampling, having the potential for the improved monitoring of biodiversity and ecosystem function. Protocol development for maximizing eRNA availability is crucial to interpret its detection and quantification results with high accuracy and reliability, but the methodological validation and improvement of eRNA collection and processing methods are scarce. In this study, the technical steps after eRNA extraction, including genomic DNA (gDNA) removal and reverse transcription, were focused on and their performances were compared by zebrafish (Danio rerio) aquarium experiments. Additionally, this study also focused on the eRNA quantification variabilities between replicates and compared them between the PCR and sample levels. Results showed that (i) there was a trade-off between gDNA removal approaches and eRNA yields and an excess gDNA removal could lead to the false-negative eRNA detection, (ii) the use of the gene-specific primers for reverse transcription could increase the eRNA yields for multiple mitochondrial and nuclear genes compared with the random hexamer primers, and (iii) the coefficient of variation (CV) values of eRNA quantifications between PCR replicates were substantially lower for those between samples. Including the study, further knowledge for the sensitive and precise detection of macro-organismal eRNA should be needed for increasing the reliability and robustness of eRNA-based biomonitoring.