1
|
Gothe H, Schall I, Saverno K, Mitrovic M, Luzak A, Brixner D, Siebert U. The Impact of Generic Substitution on Health and Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2015; 13 Suppl 1:S21-S33. [PMID: 26091709 PMCID: PMC4519629 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-014-0147-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Generic drugs are considered therapeutically equivalent to their original counterparts and lower in acquisition costs. However, the overall impact of generic substitution (GS) on global clinical and economic outcomes has not been conclusively evaluated. OBJECTIVE To test whether (1) generics and original products yield the same health outcomes, and (2) generic therapies save economic resources versus original therapies. METHODS We performed a systematic literature review in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify original studies that examine clinical or economic outcomes of GS. After standardized data extraction, reported outcomes were categorized as supporting or rejecting the hypotheses. Each reported outcome was assessed and accounted for supporting and opposing GS. One publication could provide multiple outcome comparisons. RESULTS We included 40 studies across ten therapeutic areas. Fourteen studies examined patients on de novo therapy; 24 studies investigated maintenance drug therapy, and two studies considered both settings. Overall, 119 outcome comparisons were examined. Of 97 clinical outcome comparisons, 67% reported no significant difference between generic drugs and their off-patent counterparts. Of 22 economic comparisons, 64% suggested that GS increased costs. Consequently, hypothesis (1) was supported but hypothesis (2) was not. We found no major differences among studies that investigated clinical outcomes with de novo or maintenance therapy. CONCLUSION The review suggests that clinical effects are similar after GS. However, economic savings are not guaranteed. More systematic research comparing clinical and economic outcomes with or without GS is needed to inform policy on the use of generic substitution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. Gothe
- />Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, 6060 Hall i.T., Austria
- />Division of Public Health, Decision Modelling, Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, ONCOTYROL, Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine Innsbruck, Karl Kapferer Strasse 5, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- />Dresden Medical School “Carl Gustav Carus”, Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - I. Schall
- />Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, 6060 Hall i.T., Austria
| | - K. Saverno
- />Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, 6060 Hall i.T., Austria
- />Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, 30 S 2000 E, Rm 4410, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA
| | - M. Mitrovic
- />Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, 6060 Hall i.T., Austria
| | - A. Luzak
- />Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, 6060 Hall i.T., Austria
| | - D. Brixner
- />Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, 6060 Hall i.T., Austria
- />Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, 30 S 2000 E, Rm 4410, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USA
| | - U. Siebert
- />Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center 1, 6060 Hall i.T., Austria
- />Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 USA
- />Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac St., 10th FL, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lessing C, Ashton T, Davis P. The impact on health outcomes and healthcare utilisation of switching to generic medicines consequent to reference pricing: the case of lamotrigine in New Zealand. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2014; 12:537-546. [PMID: 25005492 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-014-0110-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many countries have implemented generic reference pricing and substitution as methods of containing pharmaceutical expenditure. However, resistance to switching between medicines is apparent, especially in the case of anti-epileptic medicines. OBJECTIVES This study sought to exploit a nation-wide policy intervention on generic reference pricing in New Zealand to evaluate the health outcomes of patients switching from originator to generic lamotrigine, an anti-epileptic medicine. METHODS A retrospective study using the national health collections and prescription records was conducted comparing patients who switched from originator brand to generic lamotrigine with patients who remained on the originator brand. Primary outcome measures included switch behaviour, changes in utilisation of healthcare services at emergency departments, hospitalisations and use of specialist services, and mortality. RESULTS Approximately one-quarter of all patients using the originator brand of lamotrigine switched to generic lamotrigine, half of whom made the switch within 60 days of the policy implementation. Multiple switches (three or more) between generic and brand products were evident for around 10% of switchers. Switch-back rates of 3% were apparent within 30 days post-switch. No difference in heath outcome measures was associated with switching from originator lamotrigine to a generic equivalent and hence no increased costs could be found for switchers. CONCLUSIONS Switching from brand to generic lamotrigine is largely devoid of adverse health outcomes; however, creating an incentive to ensure a greater proportion of patients switch to generic lamotrigine is required to achieve maximal financial savings from a policy of generic reference pricing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charon Lessing
- Health Systems Section, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|