Tiefe Hirnstimulation bei der Parkinson-Krankheit

Changes in self-perception in patients treated with neurostimulating devices

BACKGROUND

In recent years, qualitative changes in self-perception have been reported in individual patients undergoing brain stimulation to treat their neurological disease. We here report a first systematic study addressing these unwanted treatment effects in a semiquantitative way.

HYPOTHESES

Hypothesis 1 (H1): Changes in self-perception can be detected and documented in patients following interventions with various neurostimulating devices using standardized assessment tools. Hypothesis 2 (H2): Central nervous-implanted neurostimulating devices (deep brain stimulation [DBS]) will have a greater impact on the patient's self-perception than "peripheral" implanted devices (implanted vagus nerve stimulation [iVNS]) and external devices (transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation [tVNS] or transcutaneous electrical trigeminal nerve stimulation [eTNS]).

METHODS

Application of a newly developed semiquantitative questionnaire (FST-questionnaire [Fragebogen zur Veränderung der Selbstwahrnehmung unter tiefer Hirnstimulation]: Questionnaire regarding changes in self-perception while treated with DBS) to systematically assess changes in self-perception in a single-center, cross-sectional pilot-study at the University Hospital Freiburg, Germany on 50 patients (44% male; age 50 years [range: 27-73 years]), undergoing neurostimulation (DBS, iVNS, tVNS, or eTNS) to treat Parkinson's disease or epilepsy.

RESULTS

Standardized assessment detected alterations in self-perception in all treatment groups (H1 approved). This included rare self-alienating changes in self-perception. Unexpectedly, peripheral neurostimulation had similar effects as central stimulation techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Properly designed questionnaires - like the FST-questionnaire as standardized assessment tool - can detect changes in self-perception in patients during neurostimulatory treatment in a wide spectrum of brain stimulation techniques. This may provide a strategy to systematically identify the subgroup of patients liable to experience such problems during treatment already prior to treatment decisions.

Underutilization of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease? A survey on possible clinical reasons

BACKGROUND

Only 10% of the up to 15% of patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) eligible for deep brain stimulation (DBS) are referred to specialized centers. This survey evaluated the reasons for the reluctance of patients and referring physicians regarding DBS.

METHODS

Two different questionnaires containing multiple choice and open verbalized questions were developed, one for neurologists and one for patients with PD. The first questionnaire was sent to 87 neurologists in private practice in the catchment area of the authors' medical center, the second to patient support groups in the same region with the help of the German Parkinson Association.

RESULTS

Of the addressed neurologists, 56.3% completed the questionnaire; 61.2% of them estimated the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage as the most severe complication at 4.3% on average; 30.6% were concerned about patients developing mood changes or depression after DBS. Only 16.3% felt unable to care for patients after DBS; 61.2% already had personal experience with patients after DBS and reported good clinical outcome in 90.0% of patients. Although 87.8% claimed to know the specific criteria for DBS, only 40.8% could actively describe them. Only 14.0% could state each of the three main criteria. Of the 46 patients, 88.1% completing the questionnaire had obtained information on DBS from regional patient organizations and 54.8% also from a physician; 44.7% assumed the risk of severe complications to be ≥5.0%. Not being satisfied with their medical treatment was reported by 22.2%, of whom more than 70% considered DBS a further treatment option.

CONCLUSIONS

The latter numbers indicate that treating neurologists tend to overestimate the reluctance of their patients to undergo DBS. Therefore, education of patients and neurologists should be improved and give more realistic figures on the actual outcomes and frequencies of possible complications.