1
|
Guttenberg P, Heigl F, Hettich R, Brand G, Taenzel S, Zenk S, Felberbaum R, Zahn E, Puhl AG. Therapeutische Apherese als erfolgreiches Behandlungskonzept einer Alloimmunisierung in der Schwangerschaft am Beispiel von maternalen Anti-Kell- und Anti-Duffy-Antikörpern. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1277-4079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
2
|
Borisow N, Hellwig K, Paul F. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and pregnancy: relapse-preventive measures and personalized treatment strategies. EPMA J 2018; 9:249-256. [PMID: 30174761 PMCID: PMC6107451 DOI: 10.1007/s13167-018-0143-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are autoimmune inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system that predominately affect women. Some of these patients are of childbearing age at NMOSD onset. This study reviews, on the one hand, the role NMOSD play in fertility, pregnancy complications and pregnancy outcome, and on the other, the effect of pregnancy on NMOSD disease course and treatment options available during pregnancy. Animal studies show lower fertility rates in NMOSD; however, investigations into fertility in NMOSD patients are lacking. Pregnancies in NMOSD patients are associated with increased disease activity and more severe disability postpartum. Some studies found higher risks of pregnancy complications, e.g., miscarriages and preeclampsia. Acute relapses during pregnancy can be treated with methylprednisolone and/or plasma exchange/immunoadsorption. A decision to either stop or continue immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine or rituximab during pregnancy should be evaluated carefully and factor in the patient's history of disease activity. To this end, involving neuroimmunological specialist centers in the treatment and care of pregnant NMOSD patients is recommended, particularly in specific situations like pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadja Borisow
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hellwig
- Clinic for Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Friedemann Paul
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD), including pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, mucous membrane pemphigoid, and pemphigoid gestationis, pose significant therapeutic challenges, especially in pregnant and post-partum breastfeeding patients or those planning to conceive. Data on the safety and efficacy of therapeutic interventions during the perinatal period are lacking because randomized controlled trials are typically not performed in this setting. However, many of the treatments for AIBD are also used in other diseases, so data can be extrapolated from studies or case reports in these other patient populations. It appears that many of the treatments for AIBD can adversely affect the fetus or neonate, and alterations in immune status caused by pregnancy-associated hormonal changes can negatively impact disease control. This article summarizes and weighs the risks and benefits of the various agents used to treat AIBD during pregnancy. We also present the available information on lactation as well as effects on male fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn J Kushner
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 2 East Gates, Room 2075, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Josef Symon S Concha
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 2 East Gates, Room 2075, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Victoria P Werth
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 2 East Gates, Room 2075, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoffmann F, Kraft A, Heigl F, Mauch E, Koehler J, Harms L, Kümpfel T, Köhler W, Ehrlich S, Bayas A, Weinmann-Menke J, Beuker C, Henn KH, Ayzenberg I, Ellrichmann G, Hellwig K, Klingel R, Fassbender CM, Fritz H, Slowinski T, Weihprecht H, Brand M, Stiegler T, Galle J, Schimrigk S. Tryptophan immunoadsorption during pregnancy and breastfeeding in patients with acute relapse of multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2018; 11:1756286418774973. [PMID: 29872456 PMCID: PMC5974561 DOI: 10.1177/1756286418774973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to every fourth woman with multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) suffers a clinically relevant relapse during pregnancy. High doses of steroids bear some serious risks, especially within the first trimester of pregnancy. Immunoadsorption (IA) is an effective and more selective treatment option in disabling MS relapse than plasma exchange. Data on the use of IA during pregnancy and breastfeeding are scarce. METHODS In this retrospective multicenter study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of IA treatment in acute relapses during pregnancy or breastfeeding. The primary outcome parameter - change of acute relapse-related disability after IA - was assessed using Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and visual acuity (VA) measurements for patients with optic neuritis (ON). RESULTS A total of 24 patients were analyzed, 23 with relapsing-remitting MS, and 1 with NMOSD. Twenty patients were treated with IA during pregnancy. Four patients received IA postnatally during the breastfeeding period. Treatment was started at a mean 22.5 [standard deviation (SD) 13.9] days after onset of relapse. Patients were treated with a series of 5.8 (mean, SD 0.7) IA treatments within 7-10 days. Sixteen patients received IA because of steroid-refractory relapse, eight were treated without preceding steroid pulse therapy. EDSS improved clinically relevant from 3.5 [median, interquartile range (IQR) 2] before IA to 2.5 (median, IQR 1.1) after IA, p < 0.001. In patients with ON, VA improved in four out of five patients. Altogether, in 83% of patients, a rapid and marked improvement of relapse-related symptoms was observed after IA with either a decrease of ⩾1 EDSS grade or improvement in VA ⩾20%. No clinically relevant side effect was reported in 138 IA treatments. CONCLUSIONS Tryptophan-IA was found to be effective and well tolerated in MS/NMOSD relapses, both as an escalation option after insufficient response to steroid pulse therapy and as first-line relapse treatment during pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Hoffmann
- Department of Neurology, Martha-Maria Hospital, Halle/Saale, Academic, Hospital of University, Halle-Wittenberg, Röntgenstraße 1, D-06120 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Andrea Kraft
- Department of Neurology Martha-Maria Hospital, Halle/Saale, Academic Hospital of University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Franz Heigl
- Medical Care Center Kempten-Allgäu, Kempten, Germany
| | - Erich Mauch
- Clinic for Neurology Dietenbronn, Academic Hospital of University of Ulm, Schwendi, Germany
| | - Jürgen Koehler
- Marianne-Strauss-Hospital, Multiple Sclerosis Center Kempfenhausen, Berg, Germany
| | - Lutz Harms
- Departments of Neurology Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Tania Kümpfel
- Institute of Clinical Neuroimmunology, University Hospital and Biomedical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Köhler
- Clinic for Neurology and Neurological Intensive Care Medicine, Hubertusburg Hospital, Wermsdorf, Germany
| | - Sven Ehrlich
- Clinic for Neurology and Neurological Intensive Care Medicine, Hubertusburg Hospital, Wermsdorf, Germany
| | - Antonios Bayas
- Department of Neurology, General Hospital Augsburg, Germany
| | - Julia Weinmann-Menke
- Department of Nephrology, Medical Center of the Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Ilya Ayzenberg
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Gisa Ellrichmann
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hellwig
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | | | | | - Harald Fritz
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Martha-Maria Hospital, Halle/Saale, Germany
| | - Torsten Slowinski
- Department of Nephrology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Marcus Brand
- Department of Nephrology, University of Münster, Germany
| | - Thomas Stiegler
- Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Sana Clinic, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Jan Galle
- Department of Nephrology, General Hospital Lüdenscheid, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Germany
| | - Sebastian Schimrigk
- Department of Neurology, General Hospital Lüdenscheid, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Borisow N, Hellwig K, Paul F. [Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and pregnancy]. DER NERVENARZT 2018; 89:666-673. [PMID: 29383411 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-018-0486-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are autoimmune inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system that mainly affect women. In some of these patients NMOSD occurs during fertile age. For this reason, treating physicians may be confronted with questions concerning family planning, pregnancy and birth. OBJECTIVE This study provides an overview on the influence of NMOSD on fertility, pregnancy complications and pregnancy outcome. The effect of pregnancy on NMOSD course and therapy options during pregnancy are discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS A search of the current literature was carried out using the PubMed database. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Animal studies have shown lower fertility rates in NMOSD; however, studies investigating fertility in NMOSD patients are lacking. Pregnancy in NMOSD patients are associated with an increase in postpartum disease activity and a higher grade of disability after pregnancy. Some studies showed higher risks of pregnancy complications e. g. spontaneous abortions and preeclampsia. With a few limitations, acute relapses during pregnancy can be treated with methylprednisolone and/or plasma exchange/immunoadsorption. Stopping or continuing immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine or rituximab during pregnancy should be critically weighed considering previous and current disease activity. Therefore, a joint supervision by a specialized center is recommended, particularly in specific situations such as pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Borisow
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - K Hellwig
- Klinik für Neurologie, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - F Paul
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Stoppe M, Busch M, Krizek L, Then Bergh F. Outcome of MS relapses in the era of disease-modifying therapy. BMC Neurol 2017; 17:151. [PMID: 28784102 PMCID: PMC5547454 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-017-0927-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In multiple sclerosis (MS), neurological disability results from incomplete remission of relapses and from relapse-independent progression. Intravenous high dose methylprednisolone (IVMP) is the established standard treatment to accelerate clinical relapse remission, although some patients do not respond. Most studies of relapse treatment have been performed when few patients received disease-modifying treatment and may no longer apply today. Methods We prospectively assessed, over one year, the course of patients who presented with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or MS relapse, documenting demographic, clinical, treatment and outcome data. A standardized follow-up examination was performed 10–14 days after end of relapse treatment. Results We documented 119 relapses in 108 patients (31 CIS, 77 MS). 114 relapses were treated with IVMP resulting in full remission (29.2%), partial remission (38.7%), no change (18.2%) or worsening (4.4%). In 27 relapses (22.7%), escalating relapse treatment was indicated, and performed in 24, using double-dose IVMP (n = 18), plasmapheresis (n = 2) or immunoadsorption (n = 4). Conclusions Standardised follow-up visits and outcome documentation in treated relapses led to escalating relapse treatment in every fifth relapse. We recommend incorporating scheduled follow-up visits into routine relapse management. Our data facilitate the design of prospective trials addressing methods and timelines of relapse treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muriel Stoppe
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Translational Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maria Busch
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Luise Krizek
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Florian Then Bergh
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. .,Translational Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|