1
|
Kreyenschulte T, Bohnet-Joschko S. [Patients' Use of Digital Innovations in the Care Process: A Scoping Review]. DAS GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2023; 85:48-57. [PMID: 35654402 DOI: 10.1055/a-1791-0689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital innovations in healthcare continue to be extensively researched and publicly discussed. The research perspective is often indication-specific or process-oriented and focuses on an application by health professionals in care settings. From the patient's perspective, there are additional digital innovations and opportunities for use that take place privately in addition to sectoral care services. AIM The aim of this scoping review was to map digital innovations currently available for patients and their possible applications in the care process by exploring the following question: Which digital innovations are currently available for patients in health care? MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic literature search in four databases helped identify 44 international publications as relevant for our analysis. They were categorized and analyzed according to the types of digital innovations, their use by patients, and their location within the care process. In addition, the intentions whereby digital innovations can be applied were discussed. RESULTS We found that current research was focused on patient-applied digital innovations in the therapeutic field, and a broad application spectrum of interfaces for digital care was emerging. These included apps, smart devices, teleconsultation, patient portals, games, implants, robotics, intelligent information and communication systems, and ambient assisted living environments. CONCLUSION Many digitally supported health applications are designed to be used exclusively by patients themselves, or are performed in only partial interaction with providers. In this respect, the active participation and personal responsibility of patients in the treatment process could be strengthened with the help of digital innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thea Kreyenschulte
- Lehrstuhl für Management und Innovation im Gesundheitswesen, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - Sabine Bohnet-Joschko
- Lehrstuhl für Management und Innovation im Gesundheitswesen, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sieber C, Haag C, Polhemus A, Sylvester R, Kool J, Gonzenbach R, von Wyl V. Feasibility and scalability of a fitness tracker study: Results from a longitudinal analysis of persons with multiple sclerosis. Front Digit Health 2023; 5:1006932. [PMID: 36926468 PMCID: PMC10012422 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1006932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Consumer-grade fitness trackers offer exciting opportunities to study persons with chronic diseases in greater detail and in their daily-life environment. However, attempts to bring fitness tracker measurement campaigns from tightly controlled clinical environments to home settings are often challenged by deteriorating study compliance or by organizational and resource limitations. Objectives By revisiting the study design and patient-reported experiences of a partly remote study with fitness trackers (BarKA-MS study), we aimed to qualitatively explore the relationship between overall study compliance and scalability. On that account, we aimed to derive lessons learned on strengths, weaknesses, and technical challenges for the conduct of future studies. Methods The two-phased BarKA-MS study employed Fitbit Inspire HR and electronic surveys to monitor physical activity in 45 people with multiple sclerosis in a rehabilitation setting and in their natural surroundings at home for up to 8 weeks. We examined and quantified the recruitment and compliance in terms of questionnaire completion and device wear time. Furthermore, we qualitatively evaluated experiences with devices according to participants' survey-collected reports. Finally, we reviewed the BarKA-MS study conduct characteristics for its scalability according to the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool checklist. Results Weekly electronic surveys completion reached 96%. On average, the Fitbit data revealed 99% and 97% valid wear days at the rehabilitation clinic and in the home setting, respectively. Positive experiences with the device were predominant: only 17% of the feedbacks had a negative connotation, mostly pertaining to perceived measurement inaccuracies. Twenty-five major topics and study characteristics relating to compliance were identified. They broadly fell into the three categories: "effectiveness of support measures", "recruitment and compliance barriers", and "technical challenges". The scalability assessment revealed that the highly individualized support measures, which contributed greatly to the high study compliance, may face substantial scalability challenges due to the strong human involvement and limited potential for standardization. Conclusion The personal interactions and highly individualized participant support positively influenced study compliance and retention. But the major human involvement in these support actions will pose scalability challenges due to resource limitations. Study conductors should anticipate this potential compliance-scalability trade-off already in the design phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloé Sieber
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christina Haag
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Ashley Polhemus
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Ramona Sylvester
- Research Department Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Centre, Valens, Switzerland
| | - Jan Kool
- Research Department Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Centre, Valens, Switzerland
| | - Roman Gonzenbach
- Research Department Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Centre, Valens, Switzerland
| | - Viktor von Wyl
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dillenseger A, Weidemann ML, Trentzsch K, Inojosa H, Haase R, Schriefer D, Voigt I, Scholz M, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Digital Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11111519. [PMID: 34827518 PMCID: PMC8615428 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11111519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
For incurable diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), the prevention of progression and the preservation of quality of life play a crucial role over the entire therapy period. In MS, patients tend to become ill at a younger age and are so variable in terms of their disease course that there is no standard therapy. Therefore, it is necessary to enable a therapy that is as personalized as possible and to respond promptly to any changes, whether with noticeable symptoms or symptomless. Here, measurable parameters of biological processes can be used, which provide good information with regard to prognostic and diagnostic aspects, disease activity and response to therapy, so-called biomarkers Increasing digitalization and the availability of easy-to-use devices and technology also enable healthcare professionals to use a new class of digital biomarkers-digital health technologies-to explain, influence and/or predict health-related outcomes. The technology and devices from which these digital biomarkers stem are quite broad, and range from wearables that collect patients' activity during digitalized functional tests (e.g., the Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test, dual-tasking performance and speech) to digitalized diagnostic procedures (e.g., optical coherence tomography) and software-supported magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. These technologies offer a timesaving way to collect valuable data on a regular basis over a long period of time, not only once or twice a year during patients' routine visit at the clinic. Therefore, they lead to real-life data acquisition, closer patient monitoring and thus a patient dataset useful for precision medicine. Despite the great benefit of such increasing digitalization, for now, the path to implementing digital biomarkers is widely unknown or inconsistent. Challenges around validation, infrastructure, evidence generation, consistent data collection and analysis still persist. In this narrative review, we explore existing and future opportunities to capture clinical digital biomarkers in the care of people with MS, which may lead to a digital twin of the patient. To do this, we searched published papers for existing opportunities to capture clinical digital biomarkers for different functional systems in the context of MS, and also gathered perspectives on digital biomarkers under development or already existing as a research approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-351-458-5934; Fax: +49-351-458-5717
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Automated Analysis of the Two-Minute Walk Test in Clinical Practice Using Accelerometer Data. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11111507. [PMID: 34827506 PMCID: PMC8615930 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11111507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the core problems for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) is the impairment of their ability to walk, which can be severely restrictive in everyday life. Therefore, monitoring of ambulatory function is of great importance to be able to effectively counteract disease progression. An extensive gait analysis, such as the Dresden protocol for multidimensional walking assessment, covers several facets of walking impairment including a 2-min walk test, in which the distance taken by the patient in two minutes is measured by an odometer. Using this approach, it is questionable how precise the measuring methods are at recording the distance traveled. In this project, we investigate whether the current measurement can be replaced by a digital measurement method based on accelerometers (six Opal sensors from the Mobility Lab system) that are attached to the patient’s body. We developed two algorithms using these data and compared the validity of these approaches using the results from 2-min walk tests from 562 pwMS that were collected with a gold-standard odometer. In 48.4% of pwMS, we detected an average relative measurement error of less than 5%, while results from 25.8% of the pwMS showed a relative measurement error of up to 10%. The algorithm had difficulties correctly calculating the walking distances in another 25.8% of pwMS; these results showed a measurement error of more than 20%. A main reason for this moderate performance was the variety of pathologically altered gait patterns in pwMS that may complicate the step detection. Overall, both algorithms achieved favorable levels of agreement (r = 0.884 and r = 0.980) with the odometer. Finally, we present suggestions for improvement of the measurement system to be implemented in the future.
Collapse
|
5
|
Electronic Health Interventions in the Case of Multiple Sclerosis: From Theory to Practice. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11020180. [PMID: 33540640 PMCID: PMC7913051 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11020180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: eHealth interventions play a growing role in shaping the future healthcare system. The integration of eHealth interventions can enhance the efficiency and quality of patient management and optimize the course of treatment for chronically ill patients. In this integrative review, we discuss different types of interventions, standards and advantages of quality eHealth approaches especially for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). (2) Methods: The electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane and Web of Science were searched to identify potential articles for eHealth interventions in pwMS; based on 62 articles, we consider different ways of implementing health information technology with various designs. (3) Results: There already exist some eHealth interventions for single users with a single-use case, interventions with a social setting, as well as eHealth interventions that integrate various single and social interventions and even those that may be used additionally for complex use cases. A key determinant of consumer acceptance is a high-quality user-centric design for healthcare practitioners and pwMS. In pwMS, the different neurological disabilities should be considered, and particular attention must be paid to the course of the treatment and the safety processes of each treatment option. (4) Conclusion: Depending on the field of application and the respective users, interventions are designed for single, social, integrated or complex use. In order to be accepted by their target group, interventions must be beneficial and easy to use.
Collapse
|
6
|
Inojosa H, Proschmann U, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Should We Use Clinical Tools to Identify Disease Progression? Front Neurol 2021; 11:628542. [PMID: 33551982 PMCID: PMC7859270 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.628542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The presence of disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) is an important hallmark for MS patients in the course of their disease. The transition from relapsing remitting (RRMS) to secondary progressive forms of the disease (SPMS) represents a significant change in their quality of life and perception of the disease. It could also be a therapeutic key for opportunities, where approaches different from those in the initial phases of the disease can be adopted. The characterization of structural biomarkers (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging or neurofilament light chain) has been proposed to differentiate between both phenotypes. However, there is no definite threshold between them. Whether the risk of clinical progression can be predicted by structural markers at early disease phases is still a focus of clinical research. However, several theories and pathological evidence suggest that both disease phenotypes are part of a continuum with common pathophysiological mechanisms. In this case, the clinical evaluation of the patients would play a preponderant role above destruction biomarkers for the early identification of disability progression and SPMS. For this purpose, the use of clinical tools beyond the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) should be considered. Besides established functional tests such as the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), patient's neurological history or digital resources may help neurologists in the decision-taking. In this article, we discuss arguments for the use of clinical markers in the detection of secondary progressive MS and the characterization of progressive disease activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hernan Inojosa
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Undine Proschmann
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Katja Akgün
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Trentzsch K, Weidemann ML, Torp C, Inojosa H, Scholz M, Haase R, Schriefer D, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. The Dresden Protocol for Multidimensional Walking Assessment (DMWA) in Clinical Practice. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:582046. [PMID: 33192268 PMCID: PMC7649388 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.582046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Walking impairments represent one of the most debilitating symptom areas for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). It is important to detect even slightest walking impairments in order to start and optimize necessary interventions in time to counteract further progression of the disability. For this reason, a regular monitoring through gait analysis is highly necessary. At advanced stages of MS with significant walking impairment, this assessment is also necessary to optimize symptomatic treatment, choose the most suitable walking aid and plan individualized rehabilitation. In clinical practice, walking impairment is only assessed at higher levels of the disease using e.g., the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). In contrast to the EDSS, standardized functional tests such as walking speed, walking endurance and balance as well as walking quality and gait-related patient-reported outcomes allow a more holistic and sensitive assessment of walking impairment. In recent years, the MS Center Dresden has established a standardized monitoring procedure for the routine multidimensional assessment of gait and balance disorders. In the following protocol, we present the techniques and procedures for the analysis of gait and balance of people with MS at the MS Center Dresden. Patients are assessed with a multidimensional gait analysis at least once a year. This enables long-term monitoring of walking impairment, which allows early active intervention regarding further progression of disease and improves the current standard clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Trentzsch
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Dresden, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marie Luise Weidemann
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Dresden, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Charlotte Torp
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Dresden, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hernan Inojosa
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Dresden, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Maria Scholz
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Dresden, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Rocco Haase
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Dresden, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dirk Schriefer
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Dresden, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Katja Akgün
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Dresden, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Department of Neurology, MS Center Dresden, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Voigt I, Benedict M, Susky M, Scheplitz T, Frankowitz S, Kern R, Müller O, Schlieter H, Ziemssen T. A Digital Patient Portal for Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol 2020; 11:400. [PMID: 32670174 PMCID: PMC7326091 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Multiple Sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that requires a complex, differential, and lifelong treatment strategy, which involves high monitoring efforts and the accumulation of numerous medical data. A fast and broad availability of care, as well as patient-relevant data and a stronger integration of patients and participating care providers into the complex treatment process is desirable. The aim of the ERDF-funded project "Integrated Care Portal Multiple Sclerosis" (IBMS) was to develop a pathway-based care model and a corresponding patient portal for MS patients and health care professionals (HCPs) as a digital tool to deliver the care model. Methods: The patient portal was created according to a patient-centered design approach which involves both the patients' and the professionals' view. Buurmann's five iterative phases were integrated into a design science research process. A problem analysis focusing on functions and user interfaces was conducted through surveys and workshops with MS patients and HCPs. Based on this, the patient portal was refined and a prototype of the portal was implemented using an agile software development strategy. Results: HCPs and patients already use digital hardware and are open to new technologies. Nevertheless, they desire improved (digital) communication and coordination between care providers. Both groups require a number of functions for the patient portal, which were implemented in the prototype. Usability tests with patients and HCPs are planned to consider whether the portal is deemed as usable, acceptable as well as functional to prepare for any needed ameliorations. Discussion: After testing the patient portal for usability, acceptability, and functionality, it will most likely be a useful and high-quality electronic health (eHealth) tool for patient management from day care to telerehabilitation. It implements clinical pathways in a manner which is comprehensible for patients. Future developments of the patient portal modules could include additional diseases, the integration of quality management and privacy management tools, and the use of artificial intelligence to personalize treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Voigt
- Department of Neurology, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Benedict
- Chair of Wirtschaftsinformatik, Especially Systems Development, Faculty of Business and Economics, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marcel Susky
- Chair of Wirtschaftsinformatik, Especially Systems Development, Faculty of Business and Economics, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tim Scheplitz
- Chair of Wirtschaftsinformatik, Especially Systems Development, Faculty of Business and Economics, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Hannes Schlieter
- Chair of Wirtschaftsinformatik, Especially Systems Development, Faculty of Business and Economics, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Department of Neurology, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|