[Percutaneous laser-induced thermotherapy of lung metastases: experience gained during 4 years]

Computed tomography guided electromagnetic navigation system in percutaneous laser ablation for treating primary lung cancer: a case report

Background

The majority of patients of lung cancer have already lost the chance of surgery at the time of diagnosis. Percutaneous local thermal ablation is a precise minimally invasive technique and a viable alternative to surgical treatment. Compared with radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation, percutaneous laser ablation for the treatment of lung tumors is less commonly used and reported, especially for primary lung cancer.

Case presentation

A 63-year-old male patient with mixed pulmonary nodules selected computed tomography-guided electromagnetic navigation system for percutaneous biopsy and laser ablation therapy. The puncture point was determined through Computed tomography scanning, along with the placement of the electromagnetic navigation system locators. After rapid on-site evaluation and pathological examination of the puncture tissue specimen, the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma was confirmed. A 980-nanometer wavelength semiconductor laser fiber was inserted into the appropriate position guided by the electromagnetic navigation system. Subsequently, a power of 7 watt was applied to ablate the tumor for 30 seconds, then pause for 60 seconds before repeating the procedure. Positron emission tomography-Computed tomography examination was performed 1 month after operation, suggesting complete response of the tumor.

Conclusion

Here, we present a case of percutaneous laser ablation treatment for primary lung cancer guided by computed tomography-electromagnetic navigation system. As a more precise, shorter duration, impedance-independent, safe and effective minimally invasive thermal ablation method, it is expected to gain wider application and become a novel alternative for surgical treatment.

Long-Term Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Laser Ablation for Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study

Objective

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser ablation (PLA) for the treatment of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).

Methods

From June 2012 to May 2015, 105 patients with solitary, pathologically confirmed PTMC lesions were treated with ultrasound-guided PLA. Nodule location, nodule volume, thyroid function, and clinical symptoms were evaluated before ablation. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was performed 1 h after treatment to evaluate whether the ablation was complete. Ultrasound examination was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation and every 6 months thereafter to determine the size of the ablation area and search for recurrence in the thyroid parenchyma and lymph node metastasis. Thyroid function was examined before and 1 month after ablation. Fine needle aspiration biopsy was performed for any suspicious metastatic lymph nodes and recurrent lesions in the thyroid.

Results

All 105 lesions were completely inactivated after one ablation, making the success rate for single ablation 100%. The average ablation time was 2.78 ± 1.05 min, and the average ablation energy was 505 ± 185 J. All patients could tolerate and complete the ablation. No serious complications occurred during the treatment; only minor side effects such as pain and local discomfort were reported. The volume reduction rates were −781.14 ± 653.29% at 1 h posttreatment and −268.65 ± 179.57%, −98.39 ± 76.58%, 36.78 ± 30.32%, 75.55 ± 21.81%, 96.79 ± 10.57%, and 100% at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after ablation, respectively. This rate remained 100% at the later follow-up times. Overall, 28 (26.67%), 74 (70.48%), 96 (91.43%), and 103 (100%) were completely absorbed by 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after PLA. One patient developed another lesion 12 months after ablation, and two patients had central cervical lymph node metastasis 24 months after ablation.

Conclusion

PLA is a safe and effective alternative clinical treatment for low-risk PTMC.

Quo Vadis Oncological Hyperthermia (2020)?

Heating as a medical intervention in cancer treatment is an ancient approach, but effective deep heating techniques are lacking in modern practice. The use of electromagnetic interactions has enabled the development of more reliable local-regional hyperthermia (LRHT) techniques whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) techniques. Contrary to the relatively simple physical-physiological concepts behind hyperthermia, its development was not steady, and it has gone through periods of failures and renewals with mixed views on the benefits of heating seen in the medical community over the decades. In this review we study in detail the various techniques currently available and describe challenges and trends of oncological hyperthermia from a new perspective. Our aim is to describe what we believe to be a new and effective approach to oncologic hyperthermia, and a change in the paradigm of dosing. Physiological limits restrict the application of WBH which has moved toward the mild temperature range, targeting immune support. LRHT does not have a temperature limit in the tumor (which can be burned out in extreme conditions) but a trend has started toward milder temperatures with immune-oriented goals, developing toward immune modulation, and especially toward tumor-specific immune reactions by which LRHT seeks to target the malignancy systemically. The emerging research of bystander and abscopal effects, in both laboratory investigations and clinical applications, has been intensified. Our present review summarizes the methods and results, and discusses the trends of hyperthermia in oncology.

Current status of oncothermia therapy for lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors, and it has the highest death rate. Oncothermia is a feasible and successful treatment for lung cancer. Results show a remarkable survival benefit for patients, with a good quality of life. The treatment has no, or in some cases mild, side-effects and could decrease the adverse effects of the complementary treatment. Applying oncothermia together with other treatment methods could increase the effects and result in better performance. A comparison of studies demonstrates a good correspondence in the data, which strengthens the reliability of the studies, and clearly shows the feasibility of the application of oncothermia to treating all kinds of pulmonary malignancies including non-small-cell and small-cell primary tumors, and all of the metastatic diseases of the pulmonary system.